Cross Edwards Off the List
Feb 4, 2007 Political
John Edwards should, in no way shape or form, be president of this country. First of all he has this BS theme about two Americas where all the rich people are in one America and the rest of us are in the other America. Only problem with all that is while Edwards is telling people how we need to redistribute income and how we need to even out those Americas and while he is trying to make people believe he is from the poor America, he is living the life of luxury. He is flaunting that very rich America that he chastises on the campaign trail. Edwards just had built a 26 thousand square foot house on a hundred or so acres. His house is the largest in his county and probably cost more than most of us will make in a lifetime. He is an ambulance chasing charlatan.
Now the pretty boy wants to raise taxes. He is not in office and he already wants to raise taxes and he is not bashful about telling people that he thinks the government is entitled to their money. He wants to put in place universal health care that is expected to cost 90 to 120 billion dollars a year. He said there has to be a revenue source and the only way to get one is raise taxes. He also wants to put a Communist arm of the government in place to monitor money to ensure that people do not get to keep what they earn.
“We should have brokerage houses report the capital gains that people are incurring because we’re losing billions and billions of dollars in tax revenue,” Edwards said. al-Reuters
John Edwards is not content with the fact that people who make a capital gain are doing so on money that they have already paid taxes on. They have the chance to put money away and the government wants to take a portion of what they earn in investment. What exactly did the lazy, worthless slugs in government do to deserve the money that you earned with your capital? The government just wants to swoop in and make off with your money that you earned. Well screw you John Edwards and screw you government. We all can not be like you rich jerks in Congress who invest in non taxable funds. We have to invest in items that you can extort our money from and we are tired of it.
It is not my job to pay increased taxes so someone else can have insurance. Tell those lazy slugs to go get a fricking job and pay for their own damned insurance. I know if my taxes go up to pay for someone else I might just have to cancel my insurance and live off the gubmint like a good slave. The government’s answer to everything is to raise taxes. John Edwards is no different except you can bet his investments are on tax free items. That is part of the two Americas.
Screw him and screw the whole idea of higher taxes. They are going to keep it up until we have an armed revolution. It will happen if they do not change their ways.
Tags: Political
Democratic Candidates Pick Theme Songs
Feb 3, 2007 Political
The Democrats who hope to be the next President selected their theme songs at the winter meeting of the DNC. Here are the songs they selected:
_John Edwards: “This Is Our Country” by John Mellencamp.
Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut: “Get Ready (Cause Here I Come)” by the Temptations and “Reach Out,” also by the Temptations.
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York: “Right Here, Right Now,” by Jesus Jones and “Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet” by Bachman-Turner Overdrive.
Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio: “America the Beautiful”
Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois decided against using any music in keeping with the somber tone he sought to convey.
Wesley Clark, who hasn’t indicated whether he will run, entered to Johnny Cash’s “I Won’t Back Down.”
Here are my picks for their songs:
John Edwards, “I Feel Pretty” from West Side Story.
Christopher Dodd, “Running on Empty” by Jackson Browne.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, “The Bitch is Back” by Elton John and “Killer Queen” by Queen.
Dennis Kucinich, “For What its Worth” by Buffalo Springfield.
Barack Obama, “Back in Black” by AC/DC.
Wesley Clark, “One Tin Soldier” by Coven.
Now that more appropriately sums up the themes of the would be leaders.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway ♦ Perri Nelson’s Website ♦ Is It Just Me? ♦ Right Truth ♦ Shadowscope ♦ Stuck On Stupid ♦ The Amboy Times ♦ Pursuing Holiness ♦ The HILL Chronicles ♦ Right Celebrity ♦ third world county ♦ Woman Honor Thyself ♦ stikNstein… has no mercy ♦ The Uncooperative Blogger ® ♦ Pirate’s Cove ♦ The Right Nation ♦ Renaissance Blogger ♦ The Pink Flamingo ♦ Dumb Ox Daily News ♦ Right Voices ♦ Right Pundits ♦ A Blog For All ♦ The Random Yak ♦ 123 Beta ♦ Maggie’s Notebook ♦ Adam’s Blog ♦ basil’s blog ♦ Cao’s Blog ♦ Phastidio.net ♦ The Bullwinkle Blog ♦ Conservative Cat ♦ Conservative Thoughts ♦ Faultline USA ♦ Blue Star Chronicles ♦ Gone Hollywood
Thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Could Europe Survive without Our Goods?
Feb 2, 2007 Uncategorized
French President Jacques Chirac is indicating that Europe might try to blackmail use extortion to get the United States to sign the Kyoto climate protocol. Chirac indicated that The European Union might impose a carbon tax on countries that have not signed on in an effort to coerce them into signing.
This country better not bow down to him or any other jackass. Whether we sign or not is our business and not his. It is not in our best interest to sign a protocol that has provided little if any relief and that costs a fortune. We should not sign on to this and we should tell Chirac to stuff it.
I wonder if Europe could survive without our money and goods. If they impose the tariff we should stop providing any European nation with money, we should stop providing them with military goods, and we should stop sending anything that we are not required to by some treaty. It might hurt our economy a bit for a while but it will not be long before they realize that they can not live without our goods and especially without the money we send all over.
It is also important for them to keep in mind that they also send goods here and we could just as easily stop importing things like French wine. If they want to play hardball they better be sure they are big league caliber or we can make life miserable for them.
Source:
New York Times
Tags: Commentary
Muslims Decry Nazi State in Britain
Feb 2, 2007 Uncategorized
A Muslim leader in Britain has warned that the country is moving toward a police state comparable to Nazi Germany after nine Muslims were rounded up for plotting to kidnap and kill a British Muslim soldier. The leader asked that Muslims exercise restraint and allow dialogue to bring people together.
I am amazed that the Muslims are not out rioting threatening to cut off heads. Any group of people who react violently to cartoons would certainly riot to protest the arrest of KILLERS. What this Muslim jackass needs to explain is why he did not condemn the actions of the criminals. Why is it he is crying because people were arrested for plotting to commit a murder? This is typical for the Muslim world. They decry the rules of society and ignore the antisocial behavior of the Zealots who follow their religion.
Also, how bad can it be to live under a Nazi state? The Muslims already deny the Holocaust and act like rule under Hitler was wonderful. Perhaps if they showed as much attention to the actual atrocities committed instead of those perceived by their deluded leaders they might be taken seriously. Instead, they continue to defend twisted ideals and murderous thugs.
The police arrested criminals suspected of plotting to kill a soldier. That should be the end of that. You can bet if the police failed to arrest a group of people (non Muslim) threatening to kill a Muslim cleric they would be demanding answers. Muslims will never be taken seriously as players on the world stage so long as they espouse thousand year old stupidity.
Send them all back to the Middle East and make them stay there.
Source:
Breitbart
Tags: Commentary, Terrorism
John Kerry Now Insults Scientists
Feb 2, 2007 Uncategorized
The United nations report on Global Warming is out and it has the Democrats salivating like Pavlov’s dog in a bell factory. The report indicates that man is most likely the cause of increased global temperatures and this is proof positive, to them, that something needs to be done (something that will have a huge price tag and increase taxes). John Kerry made a statement about this:
“Although President Bush just noticed that the earth is heating up, the American public, every reputable scientist and other world leaders have long recognized that global warming is real and it’s serious. The time to act is now,” said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who with GOP Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine crafted one of a half-dozen competing bills to address global warming. AP (via Comcast)
To John Kerry the only reputable scientists are those who endorse global warming. There are as many scientists who disagree with the theory as who espouse it and yet John Kerry said that every reputable scientist have long recognized. What he basically said is, if you are a scientist who does not agree with this then you are not reputable. You would think that after ruining his chances to run for the White house by opening his big mouth, he would take a bit more time to think before he speaks.
While many Democrats view the UN report as a smoking gun that gives irrefutable evidence to support their beliefs, I do not. I can find as many scientists who disagree and they are no less reputable than those who agree. The left will counter that the only scientists who disagree are paid by the oil companies. This would be incorrect but we could just as easily say that the only scientists who agree are paid big research dollars to say global warming is a problem.
I do not believe global warming is a problem and I do not think we should devote billions of dollars to it. The UN report will support the idea so that they can compel wealthy countries like the US to pay billions and billions of dollars to fix it (as if we actually could). They will use this to try to force us to sign onto Kyoto, an item that would be a disaster to us and would provide minimal if any results.
If these pompous Liberals who are on the global warming bandwagon really want to decrease fossil fuel use why do they not allow us to build nuclear reactors all over the country to supply our energy needs. The French have a lot of reactors and have done very well with them. We could do the same here. Hell, nuclear reactors in California would solve their electrical problems nearly overnight and would decrease the amount of fossil fuels consumed there. We, of course, will not completely eliminate fossil fuels for quite some time. God put them here for us to use and we are using them.
It is just unfortunate that the global warming zealots can not just worry about the pollution they produce. They have to impose their beliefs on all of us and when they do it always costs money. I will, of course, not get rid of my SUV no matter what they do.
Tags: Commentary