Don’t Take Flight 93 to Mecca 11-15-07
Nov 15, 2007 Flight 93
Support Tom Tancredo’s call to scrap the crescent memorial
The Park Service has a history of keeping the Secretary of the Interior in the dark about the decisions it makes in his name. It is likely that Secretary Dirk Kempthorne has never been told about the many warnings of Islamic symbolism in the planned Flight 93 Memorial. Please help bring Dirk into the loop by pasting the following letter (or one of your own) into an email for him. Text below the dotted line:
—————————————————
Dear Secretary Kempthorne:
Please heed Congressman Tom Tancredo’s call to completely scrap the present design for the Flight 93 Memorial. The original Crescent of Embrace design would have planted a bare naked crescent and star flag on the crash site:
The memorial plaza that sits roughly in the position of the star on an Islamic flag marks the crash site. (Click pics for larger images.)
All the redesign did was add some trees to the west of the original crescent:
Aside from the re-coloring of the site-plan image, the only actual change in the design is the additional arc of trees to the rear of a person facing into the original crescent.
The Park Service promised Congressman Tancredo in 2005 that Islamic iconography would be removed from the memorial. Instead, this iconography has only been very slightly disguised. Every particle of the original Crescent of Embrace design remains completely intact in the redesign.
The giant crescent points to Mecca
In September 2005, a half dozen different bloggers verified that a person facing directly into the original Crescent of Embrace would be facing almost exactly at Mecca. That makes the crescent a mihrab, the central feature around which every mosque is built.
Face into the crescent to face Mecca:
Left: mihrab from the Great Mosque in Cordoba Spain. Right: Crescent of Embrace also faces Mecca. The green circle is from the Mecca-direction calculator at Islam.com. When it is placed over the original Crescent of Embrace site plan, the Mecca-direction line (the “qibla”) almost exactly bisects the crescent.
You can plant as many trees around a mosque as you want and it will still be a mosque. But this isn’t just the world’s largest mosque. The planned memorial is also full of terrorist memorializing features.
Please hear my voice along with those of Congressman Tancredo and Tom Burnett Sr., who is refusing to allow Tom Jr.’s name to be used in the crescent design. The memorial to Flight 93 should not be a terrorist memorial mosque.
Sincerely
———————–
Secretary Kempthorne’s phone number is 202-208-7351.
Snail-mail: Hon. Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of Interior
Office of the Secretary
Rm. 6156, ms7229-MIB
1849 C St, NW
Washington, DC 20240-0001
In Saudi, Get Raped, Get Punished
Nov 15, 2007 General
As if we needed another indication of what a backwards country Saudi Arabia is, the courts there have ordered a woman who was gang raped to receive 200 lashes because she rode in a care with people to whom she was not related. A 19 year old woman was raped by six men who have all been sent to prison. She was originally ordered to get 90 lashes for her part in the crime but the court must have figured that being gang raped was not bad enough so they increased it to 200 lashes.
What kind of backward country do these people live in? How can anyone punish a rape victim regardless of who she was riding in a car with? This woman was a victim of the oppressive attitudes that Muslim men (if you can really call these sand fleas men) have for women. I think it was great that they jailed the rapists but the fact that they are punishing the woman shows they have no regard for the law and they have no regard for women.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is the very same law (Sharia) that the Muzzies want to bring to this country. They have stated that their goal is to make America a Muslim society and that Sharia Law will trump our Constitution. This is the kind of thing they want to bring here and impose on us and as long as liberals appease these bastards they have a shot of succeeding. Thank God there are many of us who have the means to fight against the takeover.
The Muslims in that part of the world live in the stone ages. They follow the rules of a child molesting sun worshiper and they treat human life as unimportant with women ranking below most domesticated animals.
All I can say is if my wife or daughter were gang raped (or raped at all) the rapists had better hope the police got to them before I did or there would not be enough of them left to make a DNA analysis. If I lived in a country where a judge imposed lashes on my wife or daughter after being raped I am afraid there would be one less judge in this world and any person who tried to administer those lashes would have a whip strategically placed in his rectal cavity.
This is why these people use the desert like a cat box and make few contributions to the world. Hell, they would not know what to do with all that oil if a westerner hadn’t shown them. They are too obsessed with their prehistoric culture of violence and death. They are stuck in the world developed for them by Mohammad the idiot child molesting false prophet and they continue to lead lives that are not worth much to the world as a whole.
I can only hope they kill each other off at a rate higher than their birth rate so we can be rid of them once and for all.
Source:
Breitbart
Tags: child molesting, gang raped, muslim men, muslim society, rape victim, sand fleas, Sharia Law, sun worshiper
City of Cambridge, mASSachusetts
Nov 15, 2007 Political
A Boy Scout troop in Cambridge was forced to stop collecting items for our troops at polling places because some asshat complained that it sent a pro war message. The Boy Scouts were collecting items to send to our warriors in harm’s way as a way to help boost their morale and to support them. As is typical in liberal mASSachusetts, some asshat complained and that was the end of the mission, at least at the polling places. The scouts are continuing their efforts despite the liberal idiot who complained.
The head of elections declined to be interviewed but released a statement saying the troop had not gotten permission. Their scout leader said that is untrue and that he received permission not once, but twice. Unfortunately, some idiot liberal retard in mASSachusetts complained and ended what was a good thing. I imagine if a group from NOW was taking donations to support inner city abortions the asshat would have donated and anyone who complained would have been ignored.
This is typical of the liberals who claim to support the troops. They say that and then they do things that are the opposite of support. They continually do things that undermine our efforts and they support our enemies. The idiot who complained should be taken to the airport and put on a plane to Iraq so they can be close to those who they really support.
This is why liberals are a subhuman form of life that should be eradicated before it festers and infects every fabric of our society.
If you would like to donate to the troops by way of this troop, their address is:
Boy Scouts of America
Troop 45
P.O. Box 38-1241
Cambridge MA 02238
Let’s show these Cambridge asshats what support for the troops really looks like!
Source:
Breitbart
Tags: asshat, boy scouts of america, cambridge ma, polling places, scout leader, support the troops, war message, warriors
So Much for Democratic Fiscal Responsibility
Nov 15, 2007 Political
Citizens Against Government Waste is putting the finishing touches on its pork report for the year and what they will report is not pretty. There were 8000 earmarks totaling 20 billion dollars. That is 20 billion dollars in taxpayer money that was flushed down the drain by the Democratic Congress, the ones who promised to put an end to waste and be a more efficient government. The truth is they could not keep their money grubbing hands out of our pockets and they could not exercise any control. For those who say the government should tax the hell out of us to provide unconstitutional social programs, here is 20 billion dollars that could have provided services without raising taxes.
Of course, I do not believe in universal health care or other government run and government provided services but if I did I would be asking how we can afford this kind of waste and not the items that Democrats think are important. The Republican led Congress (and President Bush for that matter) was no better but they lost last year so this is on the new majority. The Democrats campaigned on their ability to fix these kinds of things and now it is glaringly obvious that they are unable. They lack control and they lack responsibility.
Democrats like to say we need to end the war because that is why they were elected. They campaigned on ending the war along with the promise to be responsible with our money so that means if ending the war was a mandate, so was being fiscally responsible. They have failed miserably on both counts.
I do not think the election was a mandate on the war but this is what they think. So they are not free to cherry pick what they were elected to do. They promised to be responsible with our money and they have not been. This is another reason we need the line item veto and it is a very good example of why we should never trust Democrats.
There should be no doubt that they are truly the tax and spend party.
Source:
The Politico
Others with similar items:
Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary’s Thoughts, The Random Yak, Right Truth, The Populist, The Pet Haven Blog, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, Wake Up America, Conservative Cat, Nuke’s, Faultline USA, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, CORSARI D’ITALIA, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Congress, Democrats, government waste, line item veto, mandate, pork report, President, tax and spend, taxpayer money, universal health care, war
Catholic Bishops Set Political Agenda
Nov 14, 2007 General
The US Conference of Catholic Bishops developed guidelines for voting in the next elections stating that open discussion was needed and that decisions have an impact on the whole. This is certainly very true. If Catholics (or members of any other religion) ignore a candidate’s pro abortion stance in favor of other attributes then they should not be surprised when the candidate, if elected, pushes for abortion rights and will not listen to those asking for it to be abolished. They should not be surprised when the candidate, if elected, nominates judges who are pro abortion and these adherents to religion should not cry because their acts allowed it to happen. Does this mean people from a religion should march in lock step and vote in one particular way? Certainly not, but it does mean that the choices we make have repercussions and as a group, the people should be willing to accept those if they vote for a certain person. The Catholic Bishops did not mention any candidate by name and did not endorse anyone. They merely decided upon a platform. This is no different than any other group (like the teacher’s union or the young college Democrats) deciding upon a platform. They do not force their members to vote a certain way but they put out a platform they believe is best for them.
There are those who would look at the Catholic Bishops and what they are doing and condemn them. The uniformed or under educated would say that the country was set up based on separation of church and state for a reason and that the Catholic Bishops are violating that. The problem with this line of thinking is that it is wrong on many levels.
First of all, there is no such thing as separation of church and state. I defy anyone to find those words in the Constitution. The Constitution states that the government may not establish a religion and they may not prohibit the free exercise of religion. It does not say that the two should be separated, only that government may not establish a national religion. That is why the display of the Koran, the Ten Commandments, a Crucifix, or the Star of David in federal buildings does not violate the Constitution. Government is not establishing any religion but it is allowing the free expression (or exercise) thereof. Those are the people’s buildings, after all. If the government allowed only the display of one religion’s items, then there would be a problem.
The words separation of church and state were taken from a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists when they expressed concerns that in their state religion was seen as a privilege or favor granted by the state. Jefferson did not address the state issue but addressed establishment on the national level when he wrote; ‘I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.’ He meant that the words of the Constitution provided a wall that protects religion from government. His words have been misused to push the secularist agenda as advanced by the Communist organization, the ACLU.
The second issue is that the Catholic Bishops violated no rules even if we accept that there is such a thing as separation of church and state. The First Amendment is designed to keep government out of religion not the other way around. Religious groups are free to discuss politics, support positions or candidates and they are free to push for those items that they believe to be in the best interest of their beliefs. The church is not restricted by the Constitution, the government is. The church has freedom under the First Amendment while the government does not. Therefore, the various religions around the country are FREE to decide how what agenda they want to push. Their members do not have to follow those guidelines and are free to vote as they wish, just as with the teacher’s unions or young Democrats mentioned above. Even if the Church told its members that they had to vote a certain way it would not violate the Constitution. Once again, it prohibits the government from establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The Church is not the government and is free to tell its members how they should vote and what they may be involved in and still remain a member of the church.
This is no different than the right to free speech. The government is not allowed to restrict your free speech but others may. Your work can tell you what you are and are not allowed to discuss and it can fire you for using profanity or discussing what you have been told not to. You can be told not to say certain things in a church, a school, a store or anywhere else because it is not the government keeping you from speaking. In the case of the church, it is they and not the government that is making the decisions so nothing is violated.
People belong to various religions for a number of reasons. Those religions are free to tell their people the best way to vote. Jews overwhelmingly support Democrats (even though the Democrats screw them and ignore Israel) and there is nothing wrong with it. If all the Muslims decided they wanted to vote for Hillary then that would be their right and it does not violate the Constitution.
I know this was lengthy but it is important to combat ignorance if we want to have a better society.
Source:
My Way News
Tags: abortion rights, abortion stance, conference of catholic bishops, free exercise, pro abortion, religion, repercussions, separation of church and state