Hillary: Begging Pathetic, Crying is Not?

Hillary Clinton said that it was pathetic that President bush was in Saudi Arabia begging them to increase production in order to lower the price of oil. She stated that we need an energy independence policy right now with what she calls “green workers” to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil.

First things first. The world depends on fossil fuels. They are here for a reason and that reason is for us to refine them and use them. The fact that we have to get a lot of it from the Middle East is the fault of the Congress. If they would allow us to build more refineries and to drill on our own property for oil then perhaps we could reduce what we import.

It is also important to remember that many companies are working on other fuels but that it will take years of research before we have alternate sources. Ethanol is wasteful and uses more energy to produce than it provides. We have a long way to go but for the time being we must depend on oil. Nuclear energy is also an option but while Hillary was chiding the president for trying to get the price lowered she was bashing plans to store nuclear waste in Nevada. Nuclear power would go a long way to reducing our dependence.

I guess Hillary is having fun taking a shot at the president and saying he was begging. Let me ask you Hillary, what would you do, cry?

Source:
Breitbart

Big Dog

Clinton: Obama is Establishment Man

This is rich. Hillary Clinton was hoping for the endorsement of the largest union in Nevada but it went to Obama so Bill Clinton says it shows Obama is an establishment man. This is just too funny to be true. If Hillary had picked up the endorsement Bill would have been saying that the workers recognized her commitment to the working class folks who make America what it is. Hillary has other endorsements and some of them are from unions so does this also make her an “establishment” woman?

Clinton also had a few other interesting comments while speaking about his contractual spouse.

Bill Clinton said he talked with many of the 60,000-member Culinary Union’s rank-and-file who intend to ignore the endorsement and vote for his wife.

“In this case the establishment organization is with him and the insurgents are with her.” USA Today

It is interesting that Bill would make a big deal out of the fact that a few people he talked to in the Culinary Union are voting for Hillary. This happens all the time. If a candidate gets an endorsement from a union some members vote for another person. Bill acts like this is a big deal, as if any union that endorses Hillary has 100% of its members vote for her. I also doubt his claim that he spoke with “many” of the members given that there are 60,000 of them. It is also interesting that the insurgents are voting for Hillary. I believe we can make that claim world wide. The terrorists would certainly side with a candidate with a familial history of selling out our country. It is also interesting that he took a swipe at the union leadership in this fashion. The leadership of a union never bothered him when he was getting their endorsements.

I wonder if any of the MSM will ask Bill if Hillary is an establishment candidate because of any of the endorsements she holds or any she might receive. This could be a double edged sword. If Hillary gets the nomination this union is certain to endorse her because she is a Democrat. Then she will be the establishment candidate and we have Bill’s words to verify that claim.

The Clintons are sellers of snake oil and they will say or do anything to get back in the White House. Bill Clinton feels he owes Hillary the dedication after he embarrassed their family and since they had a lifelong pledge to help each other become president. Hillary, for her part, believes she is entitled to the presidency and that Obama should wait his turn as if people in America get turns at the office. All this talk of Hillary being the candidate of the people is pure BS. She is on a power trip and a quest to make this country a bastion of socialism.

Hillary Clinton has a dismal record. She has done very little as a Senator and she did very little as the US First Lady and the First lady of Arkansas. All this blather about helping kids or some other program is a smoke screen. She has no record that is worthy of the presidency and she acknowledges this by refusing to release her records from the time she was in the White House. Bill’s claim that she is able to work with republicans is hollow when one considers that she could not do that with health care. She even had Democrats who did not support her plan.

Yes, Hillary has been in the Senate, her gift for enduring an adulterer rapist husband. Let’s face it, she would not have been in the public’s eye if it were not for the fact that she slept with the president and she would not have won the Senate seat in New York if her husband had not had sex with an intern. Her stints as First Lady (of Arkansas and the US) were the result of her marriage so any accomplishments she has, and there are very few, are the result of her marriage of convenience.

Hillary will lose Nevada. She is Satan.

Big Dog

Others with similar posts:
Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Right Truth, Leaning Straight Up, Adeline and Hazel, third world county, Allie is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, CORSARI D’ITALIA, Right Voices, The Yankee Sailor, and CatSynth.com, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Caption This Photo

The Congress is back in session ready to cause havoc so let’s have a little fun with them. Caption this photo. Put your captions in the comment section. Try not to be vulgar, or at least be clever with it.

Reid and Pelosi

Here is one to start us off:

Ooh, Harry is that a Slim Jim in your pocket or are you happy to see me?

or
I’ve got your pork right here.

Daily Kos Kids are Wrong Again

I wrote recently about the suggestion at the Daily Kos for voters in Michigan to vote for Romney to keep him in the race and make the republicans fight it out. I indicated at the time that Michigan had a screwed up system where they allow people to vote for whomever they want. John Bambenek filed a complaint with the Michigan Attorney General and the Kos kids are having a field day with it. I really don’t care who the people in Michigan vote for and if they need a loser like Kos to tell them how to vote then they are worse off than can be imagined. A recent post, however, has a blatant error in it. Kagro X goes on and on about Bambenek’s complaint and he writes this:

Special Note #1 for the media: This case should tell you in no uncertain terms that when wingnuts cry to you about voter fraud — and let’s be honest, they’re constantly crying about it — they have not a clue in the world what they’re talking about, and they should be given no more attention than if they’d told you they’ve got video of Elvis descending from a UFO to cast a stretchy, sequined ballot.

Do not forget this. There’s nothing the Republicans whine about more annoyingly or more frequently these days than “voter fraud.” And here they are, once again, demonstrating embarrassingly for all to see, that all they can really hope for is for the media not to ask any questions when they slap that oh-so-scary-sounding label on… well, whatever the hell they happen to have at hand.

Do not believe Republican crocodile tears about voter fraud. They don’t know what it is. Daily Kos

I think Kagro took too many hits from the ceremonial bong to write such BS. It is almost always the Democrats who cry about voter fraud. The only time the say that all went well is when they win. In Florida in 2000 it was all the Democrats who cried about purged voter rolls, intimidation and disenfranchisement (a word most of them did not know until then) and it was they, along with Michael Moore who vowed not to let the same fraud happen in 2004. Moore provided video cameras and a hot line so people could video tape incidents of fraud and telephone in their concerns. Moore did not want the republicans to engage in the perceived fraud of 2000.

It was the Democrats who committed voter fraud that allowed JFK to win in 1960, screwed Ellen Sauerbrey out of the Governor’s seat in Maryland and it was Democratic voter fraud that discovered and counted ballots in Washington state to give a Democrat the win. These are the same Democrats who cried about Diebold machines and how evil Republicans were tapping into them and making votes change. It was Democrats who stated that they voted for one guy and the screen registered for another. It was Democrats who were too stupid to use a butterfly ballot and then claimed that they had been cheated.

It is always a Democrat who cries about voter fraud unless the Democrats win. Has anyone paid attention? In 2000 we had all the so called fraud in Florida and then in 2004 there was all the so called fraud in Ohio. Fraud claims that turned out to be unsubstantiated but were filed by DEMOCRATS. In 2006 the Democrats won and regained control of both chambers of the Congress. None of them said there was any voter fraud (or complained about Diebold machines) because they got the outcome they wanted. You can bet that if they had not won they would be crying like Kos in a room full of real men that they had been the victims of fraud.

This is the problem with Democrats. They assume that if they fail to win there had to be fraud because everyone, according to them, loves their message. The only explanation they have for loss is voter fraud because to believe anything else would shoot down their perceived importance and worth. The fact is, when voters reject the Democrats fraud is not involved.

I am not saying that fraud does not exist and I am sure that it happens in both parties. What I am saying is that the idea that Republicans always cry about fraud is contrary to the facts. Democrats try to project their inadequacies on the Republican Party as if saying it enough will make it true. Kagro and Kos and all the rest can complain about Bambenek and his complaint and they can present their case but to spout off blatant lies is beyond the pale especially in the face of contrary evidence.

Leave it to moonbats to distort the truth. No wonder they love Bill Clinton.

UPDATE: If you go to Kos and read the comments you will see a number of libtards crying about stolen elections. I rest my case.

Big Dog

Erica Jong is Tired of Pink Men

Feminist Erica Jong has written a piece at the Huffington Post where she tells everyone how tired she is of pink men. The post is nothing more than a series of disjointed phrases that all revolve around Jong’s fatigue related to white guys (she call us pink but we know what she means. Here is part of it:

I am so tired of pink men bombing brown children and rationalizing it as fighting terrorism. I am so tired of pink men telling women (of all colors) what to do with their wombs–which connect with their brains–in case you forgot. I am so tired of pink men telling us we should stay in Iraq for generations. I am so tired of pink men buying bombs and cheating schools. I am so tired of pink men having wives who stand behind them and nod sagely on television. I am so tired of pink men expecting that someone–a brown, black, yellow or white woman–will trail behind them changing light bulbs, taking out garbage, washing laundry, keeping food in the house, taking care of kids of all ages, of parents of all ages. Huffington Post

First things first. Not all of the world’s woes are the fault of the pink guys. There are a lot of brown ones in the Muslim world causing all kinds of problems. There are a bunch of yellow ones in Communist China who are causing problems. The fact is, problems are not related to any one color and if a white guy had said he was tired of black men “this and that” we would have Jackson and Sharpton parading around like George Michael in a gay pride parade.

It is also not factual that men, pink or otherwise, are the reason for all problems. Plenty of women cause problems in this world. Of course the Muslim women do not cause much of it (except when they send their children out with bombs on them) because their men will not let them. Seems a good feminist like Jong would want to take up that cause, but what they hey, she is free. The fact is that all abortions are the result of a woman’s actions. This means, Erica, that the 100 million or so children who have been murdered were murdered by the very mothers you hold in such high regard.

If you want to really get down to it Erica, it was a woman who caused our removal from the Garden of Eden and gave us sin. So the reality is that there are problems that involve all sexes and all colors of people. Now Little Erica might be tired of pink men exclusively but that is because she is a bitter, aging, hippie, feminist who never had love made to her by a real man. When your favorite lover is Mr. “D” cell then you have problems. Couple her penis envy with the years of drug induced euphoria and you have a vicious, man hating, bitch who couldn’t pour water out of a bucket if the directions were written on the bottom.

Though I have to admit, she does seem confused. She says she is tired of pink men but she has been married four times. Three of them were pink and one is half pink but it is safe to say she just gets tired of men. However, she seems to be such a lousy feminist that she keeps finding another to give her guidance. I wonder if she wore white to all her weddings. All good kitchen appliances come in white. Erica, I don’t expect you to be bare foot and pregnant, you should have shoes.

Erica, this pink man wants you to feel like a real woman. But in your case that isn’t going to happen because the only thing woman about you is the other pink and it is probably like a public restroom. Everyone uses it.

This pink man says go take an aeronautical intercourse at a revolving pastry.

Big Dog

NOTE: To the real women out there, none of these comments were directed at you. I hold women in high regard. Those who insist on insulting men or asserting some perceived superiority just need to get knocked down a few pegs. Especially feminist dirt bags who hate pink men.