Muslims Set Christians Straight on Jesus
Jan 14, 2008 General, Religion of Peace
A new movie is being released in Iran. The movie, Jesus, The Spirit of God, was directed by Nader Talebzadeh who is kind enough to spell out the real story about Jesus Christ. Talebzadeh said that Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ was a good movie but that Gibson had it all wrong and his movie sets it straight for us. Talebzadeh tells us that Muslims do not believe Jesus was the son of God and that he was not crucified. Thank God we have the Muslims to tell us the truth so we can stop believing what is written in that pesky book, The Bible.
“It is frankly said in the Koran that the person who was crucified was not Jesus” but Judas, one of the 12 Apostles and the one the Bible holds betrayed Jesus to the Romans, he said. In his film, it is Judas who is crucified.
Islam sees Jesus as one of five great prophets — others being Noah, Moses and Abraham — sent to earth to announce the coming of Mohammad, the final prophet who spread the religion of Islam. It respects Jesus’ followers as “people of the book”. Breitbart
I don’t recall reading in the Bible where these folks were here to announce the coming of Mohammad. I do remember this; “Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves” [Matthew 7:15]. Mohammad was one of the false prophets.
The movie follows the New Testament story of Jesus with a difference. He was not crucified and he was pulled straight to heaven by God. The Muslims say the Koran says that Judas, Jesus’ betrayer, was the one crucified. Once again, I am glad the Muslims cleared that up by correcting what is written in The Bible.
Since the last book of the Bible was written between 70 and 95 AD and Mohammad did not get his visions from Allah until around 610 it is easy to see the Koran was written many centuries after the Bible. The Koran does mention Jesus as a prophet and the Muslims are free to view Jesus this way as do the Jews who also do not believe he was the son of God. However, just because the Koran says that Jesus was not crucified does not make it so. None of the people who wrote the Koran were even around when the events took place. The Koran is a book written by a war mongering pedophile named Mohammad and his followers who is no more of a prophet than Ron Paul is.
This guy Talebzadeh is trying to rewrite the history of the Bible and Christianity by denying its basic tenets. Given that Mohammad is not a real prophet and was nothing more than a child molester, let me make it clear. Nader Talebzadeh has it all wrong.
Imagine how the Muslim world would react if Mel Gibson had done a movie that said the tenets of Islam were incorrect and that Mohammad was not a prophet and that the Mahdi never existed. The Muslims would be banging their heads on a wall and killing each other in riots. Amazingly, we don’t see Christians all over the world rioting or issuing death threats to Nader Talebzadeh for his blasphemy and insult of Christianity.
That is the difference between a civilized religion and a backwards one that follows the rantings of a crazed so called prophet who had sex with a prepubescent girl because Allah told him it was OK to do so.
Maybe we can make our own movie about religion and show Mohammad for the brutal, false prophet pedophile that he was. As for the Mahdi, he is fictional and will not be coming back. When Jesus returns he will not be running around with any Muslims.
Others with similar posts:
Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Mark My Words, Rosemary’s Thoughts, A Blog For All, Right Truth, Adam’s Blog, Shadowscope, Cao’s Blog, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Allie is Wired, third world county, DragonLady’s World, , The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, The Pink Flamingo, Celebrity Smack, Right Voices, and Stageleft, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: false prophet, jesus christ, mohammad, muslim move
Is Chelsea Clinton Hurting the Poor?
Jan 14, 2008 Political
Chelsea Clinton works for a hedge fund that was established by friends and supporters of her mother. It is not a stretch to say that the job was a gift to the Clinton family. I don’t begrudge the girl work but I have to ask if she is part of the problem that plagues this country right now?
Chelsea Clinton is taking time off from her job with Avenue Capital Group, a New York hedge fund, to promote the campaign of her mother, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.), for the Democratic presidential nomination. The Stanford Daily
John Edwards went after hedge funds and their tax structure but he was associated with one. Hedge funds have been blamed for fueling problems in the sub prime housing markets leading to record foreclosures. Is Chelsea, the daughter of the people’s champion, helping to cause the problems for those who cannot afford their houses?
Another question. Is Chelsea receiving her salary during this time off? If the company is paying her to go around and campaign for her mother, isn’t that a campaign contribution? Is it a violation of FEC rules?
Tags: chelsea, Clinton, fec, hedge funds
Governor O’Malley will Reward Lawbreakers
Jan 13, 2008 Political
The Governor of Maryland is looking to use a two tiered driver’s license system. One would give licenses to those who are here legally and could be used to board aircraft. The other would issue licenses to ILLEGAL aliens and allow them to drive only.
Governor O’Malley is developing a two-tiered driver’s license system that would provided undocumented immigrants with a separate license. WBAL
It isn’t bad enough this twit has passed a tax bill that raised the taxes in Maryland higher than they have ever been raised in history but now this bottom feeding Governor is pandering to ILLEGALS by rewarding their unlawful behavior. We have to know that they are ILLEGAL or we would not be able to issue them the special license. If we know they are ILLEGAL we should report them to ICE so they can be deported from this country.
I do not want ILLEGALS to get licenses and I really do not care how it affects their families or their lives if they are caught and deported. This Governor is an idiot and the people who voted for him should have their right to vote taken away. I can only hope that the ones affected greatly by his tax increases are eating cat food to survive.
Possession of a second tier license means that the state knew the person was ILLEGAL when it was issued. Therefore, if one of those ILLEGAL jackasses hits someone and causes injury the state should be held accountable and the victims should sue for all they can get. Then we should take the Governor out and cane him.
How is it that the people voted for this idiot and how is it he feels it is OK to reward ILLEGAL behavior? Governor Martin O’Malley is about as stupid as they get and those who voted for him are not any brighter.
Tags: driver's licenses, illegals, liberal idiot, martin o'malley
Congress Should be Paid for Performance
Jan 13, 2008 Political
Some parts of the Federal Government have gone to a new pay system called the National Security Personnel System (NSPS) and it is supposed to be a pay for performance program where performers are paid more and non performers are laid less or even dismissed from service. From what I have read it is nothing more than a revised old boy system where those who have connections get great ratings and those who are not so well connected get an average rating. Despite being called pay for performance, my sources tell me it is only as good as the ability of the supervisor to understand what his employees do and how their actions equate to performance. Regardless, Congress allowed NSPS to take place and I think pay for performance is a good idea as long as they don’t change the rules a million times or lie about how it works, which seems to be the way government programs take place.
Congress should be on the same kind of system. The Congress just received a $4,100 cost of living pay raise that raises the average salary to over $169,000. When one considers the dismal performance of Congress it is not hard to see why they not only do not deserve the increase in pay but they should be giving money back. The last Congress had only 180 items signed into law and most were real important items like naming buildings such as post offices. If they ever rename the Capitol they can use the name Dewey, Cheatum and Howell building of corruption and inactivity.
Congress was good at adding earmarks and loading bills with pork. They added nearly 10,000 earmarks to the omnibus spending bill to steer our money toward pet projects in their home states. They have no idea of what fiscal responsibility is and they have no concept of being prudent with our money. Couple this with the fact that they work about 100 days a year and it is not hard to see that they are grossly overpaid for what they do. They take off for weeks at a time around every holiday and they take the entire month of August off. They have extended time off during elections and there are quite a number of members who have missed nearly a year of work because they have been on the campaign trail. We are paying them a salary to campaign.
Pay for performance is a good idea. Congress has this sneaky little method of receiving increases in pay. If they do not vote to stop the increase it is automatic. Then they can say they never voted to increase their pay. I think we should tie Congressional pay to performance. My first performance indicator is the budget. Congress receives absolutely no pay increase until the budget is balanced without raising taxes at all. In any year the budget is not balanced (and that means passed on time) they would not receive a raise. They would also not receive the raise until the end of the year so we could assess their performance. If you pay these schmucks up front you will never get good work out of them.
Next year needs to be the year where we get rid of all incumbents. In primaries people need to vote for the other person to represent the party so that incumbents are knocked out early. Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland should be a casualty of the primary but if he makes it through I and hundreds of my associates will be voting for the Democrat who runs against him. Why? Because he, like all others there, has become irresponsible. We need to rid ourselves of all of them.
I think we need to start over with fresh faces and fresh ideas. Until we can make that happen we should limit their pay and ensure they are not rewarded for the dismal performance we have seen.
Sources:
Townhall 1
Townhall 2
Tags: Congress, do nothing congress, failure, pay raise
Clintons Defend Racist Remarks
Jan 12, 2008 Political
Looks like the Clintons are now finding out what Republicans have to go through all the time but what most Democrats get a free pass on and that is the issue of race. Any Republican who makes a remark that is perceived as racist is boycotted by those idiots Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. It becomes a circus while the race hustlers have people kissing their rear ends begging for forgiveness. Then, ultimately, the person who offended the black community loses a job or position or some other thing because God knows we can’t offend the race hustlers.
The Democrats always get a pass. Hillary speaks in a black voice and talks about plantations and she is excused. There are plenty of examples of this. Hell, it isn’t only race. It deals with sex as well. Let a Republican talk about women and he is a sexist pig with NOW having a cow. Let Clinton rape women and let Ted Kennedy kill them and there is nary a word. Let’s face it, Hillary is only a viable candidate because of her husband. She had an unremarkable career and only has name recognition because of him. Without his sexcapades she might not have even been elected to the Senate. NOW surely does not chide her for needing a man to get ahead. She is qualified because she slept with the president…
Back to the point. The Clinton campaign is trying to put an end to the outrage over some comments made by them which were taken as racist by many in the black community. Bill and Hillary are used to having their way with the black community but now that a brother is running for the White House (kind of ironic when you think about it) they are fair game just as any Republican would be. Bill had to go on the Sharpton radio show to kiss his butt and explain what he said. Bill told Al that the campaign was not a fairy tale after stating that it was (which started the mess for him).
Bill was on some satellite radio program where he talked in circles, lied through his teeth, and generally used a lot of words to say nothing of substance. The Clintons also have to worry about the South Carolina primary because the black vote is capable of making the difference. In addition, New York, once though to be in the bag for Hillary, is now considered in play. The Clintons have probably feared this the whole time but never really thought it would happen. Now people can complain about the race issue being brought up (it was not raised by Obama) but no one gave it a second thought when Hillary was playing the gender card.
It is fun watching them squirm and it would be great to see the black vote ruin her after all the years the Clintons pandered to blacks and then abandoned them after the votes were counted.
As for the racism, let us not forget that Obama is probably a racist as well. He hangs with Sharpton and other shady characters who hate white people and make racist remarks about them. As one of the other bloggers put it, Obama is a smile in an empty suit. However, that empty suit is just as racist as the Clintons are made out to be.
But the black guy will always get the pass on that issue. Look at Sharpton and all he has gotten away with. Kos was interested in helping the Republicans fight with each other blah, blah. It appears that the black guy and the racist woman in the Democratic party might cause a lot of fragmentation. If they are not careful the Breck girl John Edwards might sneak in.
It is getting fun and keep this in mind. If the Clintons did not think they had made racist remarks (they probably meant to and figured they would not be taken as such) then why are they all over the airwaves and TV shows defending what they said?
They know they are wrong and they are now pandering.
Hillary is Satan.
Related items:
Emperor Misha has a great post.
The Politico
Yahoo News
The State
The New York Times
Tags: bill clinton, Clinton, Hillary, NOW, Obama, racist, sex, sexist