Any Doubt Hillary Will Say Anything to Get Elected?
by Big Dog on Jul 24, 2007 at 09:38 Uncategorized
The Democrats held their You Tube debate last night where video questions sent in by tech savvy people were selected and played for the candidates to answer. I did not watch the debate though some analysts have indicated that B. Hussein Obama won the debate and Joe Biden carried himself well. I don’t like Biden and can not imagine him as President. John Edwards reportedly came off as a snake oil salesman who would say anything to get elected but deeper analysis indicates that Hillary Rodham is no different in that respect. Hillary must be fuming today over reports that people changed from supporting her to supporting Obama. Why wouldn’t they? Say what you want about Obama he appeared more genuine than some of the other front runners (in the highlights I saw).
Hillary, on the other hand, was very disingenuous. The candidates were asked if any of them would be willing to be President for minimum wage. Hillary replied that she would and why wouldn’t she? Her husband makes $15 million a year so she really does not need the 400 thousand dollars a year the president gets. The Clinton financial disclosure statement shows they own quite a bit of stocks and have other investments as well as income from their book deals. Hell, Hillary could PAY 400 thousand dollars a year to be president. The answer was obviously given to tell folks that she would work for minimum wage to help the country but the underlying message is that she is comfortable with the minimum wage (so don’t ask for more). My question for the left is, what makes Hillary any different than the evil rich business owners who want to keep the minimum wage where it is so they can make more money? Hillary is rich and is happy with that pay but then again she would do anything to be the President, and that should worry people.
Additionally, a question was asked about meeting with the leaders (in the first year in office) of the countries with whom we disagree (read our enemies). Obama indicated that he would and that he felt we could not work out our differences without talking to people. Rodham said that she would not because that could be used a propaganda. Last night the pundits were drooling all over this indicating how the answer showed that Rodham has more experience than Obama and was able to see the pitfall involved in meetings, blah, blah. What it showed was that Hillary took an opposite position to Obama and tried to justify it with something that made her look experienced. I imagine that if Obama had said no she would have said yes because that is how you resolve differences. Hillary said what was politically convenient at the time in order to push her agenda.
You see, back in April Hillary Rodham had a completely different take on meeting with our enemy’s leaders. Hillary, while blasting the Bush Administration, said that she would talk to the leaders of other countries and indicated that it was just wrong that a President would not do so. So, when she is blasting Bush there is no worry about propaganda but when she is trying to outmaneuver Obama she is worried about it. This is typical Clinton speak in that they will say anything to get elected and fulfill their 20 year plan of both of them serving as President.
America made a mistake two times by electing Bill Clinton to the White House. We can not afford to make the same mistake of putting another Clinton in office. Haven’t we had enough of the Bushes and the Clintons?
Tags: Political Commentary
[…] [Discuss this article with the Big Dog…] Share Article You Tube debate, Obama, Hillary Rodham, Bill Clinton, White House Sphere: Related Content | Trackback URL […]
More insightful comments from someone who admitted in the 2nd sentence of the post that he didn’t even watch the debate. Now that’s what I call ‘conservative analysis’!
People might find your ‘analysis’ more compelling if you actually, you know, bothered to watch it and form your own opinion.
Just an idea.
I gave no analysis of the debate, only positions on answers that I read and saw on the videos. I do not need to see the whole debate, just the highlights and the transcripts to know when a person is answering dishonestly.
Did I give any analysis of the debate? Well did I? You are becoming a pain in the ass with your stupidity.
I formed my opinion on two questions of which I saw the clips and of which I read the transcripts. Get it right or move on.
I am getting tired of you quickly. I guess reading comprehension was not big for you. One does not need to see a debate to know if an answer was disingenuous if one has seen or read the exchange.
Have you ever served in the military? If not you are not allowed to give an opinion on the military. If you serve, then you would be more insightful.
BTW, look at the links and you can see where I read it. Then you can see exactly what I analyzed. Not the debate, the answers to two specific questions.
Either you are dumb or you are good at playing dumb.
Big Dog,
I can only hope that the people that are on the Hillary band wagon wake up before the election. I don’t think a lot of them understand that Hillary as president is 100% not the Bill Clinton “hey ya’ll come on in it’s party time.” terms. This is probably the most dangerous woman on the plant. I worked in DC for the whole Clinton debacle and you would not believe some of the storey’s that were never put out there but came via staff and local items in the papers. If you haven’t been to the Stop Hillary.com site and looked at the scandals of the Clinton president years. It’s worth a look. I can remember each and everyone of them. These people play for keeps. Trust me she doesn’t have a sense of humor. When one of these things happened I was about 300 ft away in the GT diner with another of my crew members and a half dozen cops having breakfast. None of us heard a thing. A couple of hours later we all were divistated when we found out what had happened and we weren’t aware of anything.
If she does get in we will all be in way over our heads. Just going through her site and looking at the lies there are scary. She changes her bio daily to fit where she will be talking.
I don’t like to even think about it very long because I feel like throwing up at the thought.
I know most of her support comes from young women and the gay crowd because she is their idol. All I know is we would be in a very deep place if she is elected.
I know a lot of people will not agree with me now but (God forbid) if she does get in I hope they remember what I have said and remember you were warned.
Bigdog,
Hillary has always been a two face liar, and always will be, just like Bill Clinton. I know exactly what your talking about, regarding the debate. That woman is evil.
Hey, Billy Joe, you on here as a troll ? your last name Clinton? I do not waste my time with people like you, so do not even try to blast me, I only answer people that are sane.