But, But, There Is A Consensus Among Scientists On Global Warming
by Big Dog on Jan 31, 2012 at 18:59 Political
The global warming zealots have been running around for a long time telling us the science is settled and that we need to buck up and submit to the stupidity that will cost us a fortune and have no measurable affect on the climate. After a long period of no warming they started using the phrase climate change so that Al Gore could continue to rake in billions of dollars with this scam.
Even after the scientists were caught lying about global warming we were told to just ignore the man behind the curtain and submit to the global warming gods. After all, how can we argue with all those scientists.
I have argued with them for a long time. I pointed out that they had something to gain by continuing the charade because they keep getting money if they keep saying it exists.
Interestingly, a group of scientists has come forward to tell us that not all of the science world is on board with global warming and that it is not really anything to worry about. They even point out many of the items I claimed when I argued against the hoax.
These scientists do not believe the science is settled and they believe there is nothing to worry about.
Don’t expect the mush filled heads of the adherents of the Church of Global Warming to believe this or to give these scientists credit.
Only scientists who agree with them are credible and deserve to be listened to.
This is how science works in the liberal world. They claim an issue is settled and refuse to hear anything else contrary to their beliefs. Then they stick their fingers in their ears and sing la,la,la.
They will soon devise another climate scam to bilk governments out of the people’s money.
Source:
Wall Street Journal
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: global warming, hoax, scam, settled science
I am so sick of these charlatans who attempt to push the AGW myth, just so they can sell their killer “volts” and the windmills that kill 40,000 birds (a conservative estimate).
“Alternative energy” would be nice, if it were only feasible, in a real world “workable” way- right now it isn’t.
The “Volt” barely exceeds the speed of smell, even when it doesn’t catch on fire, solar doesn’t cut it for the money, and I rent, so I can’t paint my roof white, even if I wanted to.
Let’s talk fossil fuels- now THERE, you get some bang for your buck, or you WOULD if the Minstrel-in-Chief” would quit singing and get a brain.
“After a long period of no warming they started using the phrase climate change so that Al Gore could continue to rake in billions of dollars with this scam.”
I guess we thought “Climate change” sounded more accurate after folks like yourselves looked out and saw snow in winter and thought that was proof that global warming was a fraud and Al Gore was a fat liar.
They actually used climate change so they could have something to blame any change on. They got tired of looking like fools by claiming everything was the result of global warming. Perhaps the scientists are not as in tune as you and Al Gore but it proves one thing, there is not universal acceptance like you claim. In other wordfs, the issue is not settled science.
The science of climate change is settled. I know it’s confusing to you that “global warming” can cause anything but hot weather but you know…science is hard.
Now, what’s not settled is the theory of why you take the word of any unqualified scientist that questions global warming while denying the global consensus. I wonder sometimes exactly why that is. We may never know for sure.
Yes science is hard which is why scientists are usually not quick to call something settled especially when there is a lot of evidence to the contrary of a stated position. The reality is that these people call it settled because they get lots of money for research. It is far from settled and since the history of the world shows CO2 levels thousands of times higher than they are now (and during ice ages no less) along with cycles of ups and downs it is unlikely that things will get drastically bad.
Yes, it stands contrary to common sense that global warming can be responsible for all changes. Sunspots are a much more likely reason for changes as we will soon see after the recent solar flares that come after a very long period without.
But Al Gore said we would end in about ten years so we have like 3 or 4 left. What will be the battle cry when we don’t all burst into flames?
“We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination… So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts… Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”
~ Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports
Settled science or dishonest manipulation to push an agenda? I report, you decide…