But Liberals Think Obama Is Transparent
by Big Dog on Apr 3, 2011 at 09:12 Political
Barack Obama said he would have the most transparent administration and many liberals believe that this is the case. One who comments here will link to liberal sites and their claims of more transparency to bolster claims that are evidently not true. The very liberal Washington Post has taken issue with Obama and his regime and the lack (get that liberals, lack) of transparency:
But the reality has not matched the president’s rhetoric. We, presidents of two of the nation’s largest journalism organizations, and many of our thousands of members, have found little openness since Obama took office. If anything, the administration has gone in the opposite direction: imposing restrictions on reporters’ newsgathering that exceed even the constraints put in place by President George W. Bush.
Wow, EXCEED the constraints put in place by Bush. This must be making the Obama cheering section (read, media) lose their minds. How could their messiah be so non transparent after he promised them he would be so open?
Because he is a liar. He is a Socialist who will manipulate (and has) the media in order to pass his Socialist agenda.
Some are waking up but even with the complaints the media (including the authors of the cited piece) will support the empty suit in his bid for reelection.
They can’t help it, it is in their blood.
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: media complaints, Obama, transparency, washington post
Some can see right through that colored boy.
From BBC,
“On Friday, 14 people, including seven UN staff, were killed in Mazar-e Sharif after similar protests.”
Well, that is one benefit of this burning already! Seven UN’er’s dead! Burn more Korans!- Eoj
“US President Barack Obama described the killings as “outrageous” and the Koran burning as “intolerance and bigotry”.
I describe Obama’s statements as “outrageous” and “intolerance and bigotry”. I thought that we, as Americans can burn any book or flag or cross we choose to burn,
as long as we don’t burn the cross on the White House lawn…
“Afghan President Hamid Karzai has called on the US Congress to condemn the Koran burning and prevent it from happening again.”
Has he now? He presumes to the office of President of the United States? Well, considering we lack a man in that office, I can see his thinking even if I deplore Obama for not bitch-slapping him back into the 7th century for it. Maybe his wife can do that?-Eoj
On another positive note;
“Ten people in Kandahar died and dozens were injured following Saturday’s protests.”-BBC
Well done, I say; get the presses rolling! Start printing Korans and run them right off the press into a furnace that would put Hitler to shame! You do the math; if one Koran burnt equals 10 dead lunatics, that is a weapon without equal!
Burn baby burn!
Eoj, I do not care what color he is, I DO care about his policies and his lies, which are the only thing transparent about him.
This “war” which helps NATO far more than US, is a “WAR OF MASS DISTRACTION”, and we need to concentrate on what is happening behind this facade.
No, he doesn’t want to commit boots on the ground, because he wants to stay “clean”- but when you are mucking out the stalls in a barn, expect to get some poo on you.