Wealthy Liberals And The Environment
Apr 6, 2015 Commentary
California is in the middle of a water shortage partly because of a drought and partly because of environmental policies that rob people of water. Things are so bad that Governor Moonbeam Brown has imposed water restrictions for the first time in the state’s history. People will be fined for using too much water.
Want a long hot shower? Too bad! You stay in the shower too long and it will cost you a little more.
The wealthy though don’t seem to care too much. Their water usage is much higher than the peon class.
I am sure some of those wealthy folks are conservatives but given the wealthy areas in question and given the demographics of the state it is safe to assume that most of the wealthy who are using all the water are liberals.
These folks are supposed to be the ones who care about the environment and mother earth. I guess that all goes down the drain (pun intended) when their beautifully landscaped properties are involved.
All these rich people are ignoring the environment and the serious water crisis so that they can have lush green lawns and healthy productive fruit trees.
The poor have to cut back and skip showers to avoid fines while the rich ignore the problem because they want the water and can afford any fines they get.
This is not an uncommon thought pattern for liberals. They keep pushing the myth about manmade global warming and then ride in limousines, chartered airplanes and private helicopters to jaunt around town. They use plenty of fossil fuels to provide them with convenience and comfort while telling the rest of us to cut back before we melt from the temperature rise.
They scream that we all need to pay more in taxes and then they find ways to avoid paying them.
Liberals in the entertainment business claim to support unions and then do their work in Canada using non union labor while paying lower wage rates.
So in reality it should surprise absolutely no one that these folks are not complying with water restrictions.
These inconveniences do not apply to them and they will not comply with the restrictions.
Moonbeam will not go too hard on them because he needs their political donations.
And if things get too bad they can afford to move someplace else. Maybe they can try Massachusetts.
After last winter they have enough water to supply just about everyone…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: brown, california, drought, fines, lies, manmade disaster, moonbeam, water restrictions
Why Does Obama Trust Iran?
Apr 2, 2015 Commentary, Political
Barack Obama is hell bent on getting a nuclear deal with Iran. Iran is getting its way in all aspects of the deal though it will not stay true to it in any regard.
Iran wants sanctions lifted so it can continue to make nuclear weapons to put it in a stronger position. Obama is placing his legacy in the hands of people who lie and do not honor agreements.
He is also putting the fate of Israel in those same hands and they are the hands of people who have said that Israel must be wiped off the map and that this is nonnegotiable.
Those same people also continue to chant “death to America” and Obama is working to give them the means.
I don’t really care about Obama’s legacy. He is a failed president and the worst this nation has ever had. He should have to carry a tree around to replace the oxygen he wastes by existing. Unfortunately, his ineptitude has consequences for our nation, not just him.
If he were dead set on sticking his tongue in an electrical socket that would be on him and he is the only one who would get hurt. However, he is set on sticking all our tongues in that socket.
I do not want the legacy of this failed moron to be one where Iran delivered a nuclear device to our nation or actually succeeded in wiping out Israel.
I pray that G-d inspires Prime Minister Netanyahu to strike Iran and wipe out all of its nuclear facilities.
I also hope and pray that if Iran ever strikes us with a nuke it hits a convention of liberals where Obama and Kerry are attending with their families.
This deal is bad and will only get worse. Obama is incompetent and he will cause a lot of death and destruction so I hope that the deal falls through before it can be implemented.
Or perhaps, and this is a big perhaps, the Republicans in Congress can grow a spine and halt the entire deal. Like NOT lifting the sanctions that Iran so desperately wants lifted. Ignore Obama and the deal.
So why does Obama trust Iran? Probably because he believes the same things they do. He is working on Death to America and he is working on getting rid of Israel. He trusts them because they are alike…
There are dark days ahead folks and Obama is responsible for them.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Freedom Of Religion
Apr 1, 2015 Commentary, Political
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment is pretty clear. It states that Congress can’t make any laws establishing religion (as in a state sponsored one) and that it can’t prohibit the free exercise of religion. This means anytime, anywhere.
[note]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. ~ First Amendment US Constitution [emphasis mine][/note]
There are business owners who have deeply held religious convictions and they have refused to do things that they feel violate their beliefs. Many hold that if they participate they are as guilty of the sin, as defined by their religion, as the people committing it.
Indiana is catching hell for a religious freedom bill that assures business people will be protected if they follow their religious convictions. There is nothing in the law that allows discrimination though you would be hard pressed to find that information in the MSM.
There is also nothing that mentions gay or lesbian or any other form of sexual deviancy (and yes, they are deviants from the norm). You would also be hard pressed to find that out in the MSM.
You see, the media, fueled by the radical homosexual community (and liberals, of course), has made this all about homosexuals. They have their panties in a wad over this law and they are spreading the lie that it targets them.
The federal government has this very law, signed by Bill Clinton of all people, and many other states have the law as well. When Clinton signed the law liberals applauded. Now they are attacking Mike Pence for the very law they cheered when Clinton signed on the dotted line.
Let us be clear. You have no right to do business in a shop. You have no right to that owners business. He has no right to your patronage. He is free to decide what he will and will not do and you are free to decide whether or not you will shop there.
The big difference is the shop owner can’t discriminate against YOU. He can’t decide not to do it because you are gay or black or anything else. He can decide not to do it because of what you want [him to do] if it violates his religious beliefs.
You, on the other hand, are free to discriminate against the shop owner for any reason. If you don’t want to shop there because the owner is gay or black or white or whatever you have the right to discriminate that way and the government cannot arrest you for it or fine you for it or force you to shop there.
Should a black baker be required to bake a cake for the KKK or skinheads? Should a Jewish baker be required to bake a cake for a neo Nazi group?
Should a Muslim deli be forced to make you a ham sandwich or cook you bacon for breakfast?
If these things would violate their religious beliefs then they should not have to do them.
The outcry from the gay community is deafening but I never hear any of them attack a gay baker who refuses to make cakes for straight people.
I use a baker for most of the examples because this is what started all this mess but there are plenty of other examples (including my Muslim pork example above).
Should religious hospitals and clinics be forced to provide abortions or birth control if it violates their beliefs?
Should a person of religious conviction be forced to provide some service to a porn shop? Suppose a very religious air conditioner repair person was called to give an estimate and arrived at a porn shop. Should that person be forced to provide the service or should that person be able to decline?
Should a gay florist be forced to provide the floral arrangements for the Westboro Baptist Church (you know they hate gays and blame everything bad on them, right)?
The law in Indiana is to protect people who act in accordance with their religious convictions and does not allow discrimination.
Unfortunately the MSM and the radical homosexuals do not understand this. They are only tolerant of other people’s views as long as those views agree with their own.
If I owned a bakery or any other business I would have a sign that said what the business will not do. Imagine telling the gay folks I will bake you a cake but I will not do any gay themes. It would be helpful to post that sign and then list other bakeries (or businesses similar to yours) that will provide the service.
Perhaps, and this is me thinking outside the box, these folks could move on and find a bakery (or other business) that WILL provide what they want. There are plenty of other places that are more than happy to take your money. Why cause problems?
Because that is the agenda.
Destroy religion. Destroy opposition. Make homosexuality normal.
Sorry but it is not and it never will be.
FWIW, I don’t care if you are gay or straight, black white or any other color and I don’t care what religion you are or what sex you are (or anything else that makes you different from me). Treat me right and I will do the same to you.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: gay, indiana, laws, lies, mike pence, radical homosexuals, religious freedom
The Transgender Community Will Be Upset
Mar 30, 2015 Commentary
Two men dressed as women were shot when they tried to enter Fort Meade in Maryland. One of the men died as a result of his wounds.
Officers opened fire after two men dressed as women refused to stop a stolen car around 9 a.m. Monday at the National Security Agency gate at Fort Meade and then smashed into a police vehicle blocking the road, officials said. CBS DC
There is no doubt these guys tried to enter the facility illegally and deadly force was used. But what if these two transgender individuals were only looking for a ladies room? Maryland allows that sort of thing now and these two gender benders might have needed to powder their noses.
Will the transgender community get its collective panties in a wad over the fate of their sisters?
Will Obama comment that if he had sons they would look just like these two or that the police acted stupidly?
How long before he uses his phone and his pen to write an executive Order allowing trannies off the street to enter military facilities without fear of getting shot?
The fact they were in a stolen car (an illegal act) and they tried to enter unlawfully is of no consequence. Obama is just fine with people entering illegally.
Ask Mexico…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: deadly force, fort meade, illegal entry, shootout, transgender
Will The Same Rules Apply?
Mar 24, 2015 Commentary
A man in Maryland was sentenced to three years for slashing a dog’s throat.
Forty-four-year-old Lamont Coston was sentenced to three years in jail for an animal abuse case in Baltimore County where a German Shepherd was killed. The judge suspended all but 18 months. Coston will be spending the next year and a half in the Baltimore County lock-up. FOX 45 Baltimore
A Baltimore police officer slashed the throat of a dog and he did so when it was not necessary. The officer, Jeffrey Bolger, claims he did this to put the dog out of its misery after the neck loop, according to him, left the dog near dead. But as the story reports:
That statement about Bolger’s big heart heavily contradicts Bolger’s statement prior to the slashing where he was overheard saying “I’m going to gut this (expletive) thing.” The Free Thought Project
**The officer cleared in this story is the one that held the dog down. The one who slashed its throat awaits his day in court.
The officer will stand trial later and there are plenty of others who have condemned his action. The question is, will he receive the same punishment as Lamont Coston or will his cruelty to the animal be ruled as justified?
Officers should be held to a higher standard but that is rarely the case.
We will see how this all plays out. If I had to bet on it I would say he walks but stranger things have happened.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.