Jena 6 Angel Arrested for Assault
Feb 7, 2008 General
Remember the Jena 6 kids? They were six black kids in Louisiana who beat the hell out of a white kid and then they were arrested. Some of them were charged as adults and could have spent a lot of time in jail. The race baiters showed up there with an organized protest and that idiot Mellencamp wrote a song about racism in Jena. As it turns out, the kids had prior records and some of them got in trouble again after they were released. Not much was made of it because the race baiters had already gotten the bang for their buck just as they did in the Duke Lacrosse NON rape case.
Looks like one of those little Jena 6 angels has gotten himself in trouble again. Bryant Purvis was one of the angels and his family relocated to Texas from Louisiana. Purvis was arrested for assaulting a student at school. Purvis choked the kid and slammed his head into a table. He was arrested and released on bail.
I imagine that the race baiters will have to organize and head to Texas. I mean, if this kid was arrested it must be because of the racism there. It could not possibly be that this kid is a thug and he will be a thug no matter where he goes. Not only is he a thug, he is a violent thug who would not have committed this crime if he had still been in jail where he belonged.
A thug is a thug regardless of color. I wonder if the race baiters ever thought about going on TV and saying they were wrong and that the kid is violent and belongs in jail.
Of course not, that would not help them to keep their fellow blacks downtrodden so they can continue to make money talking about it.
Source:
TSG
Tags: jena 6, new arrest, thug
With Muslims there are no Equal Rights
Feb 7, 2008 General
It is no surprise that Muslims do not have equality between the sexes. They treat their women as having little value except as a vessel with which to repopulate. It is also true that the Muslim world does not treat non Muslims with equality. In the Muslim world they refuse to allow churches to be built and if there is one that gets damaged it is not allowed to be replaced. Never mind the idea of a synagogue. In the Muslim world non Muslims are killed because of their religion. The simple act of possessing a Bible could result in a death sentence.
Recently, an American business woman was arrested in Saudi Arabia because she sat with her male colleagues in a Starbucks coffee shop. She was arrested, taken to jail, strip searched, placed in a filthy jail cell where her clothes had been thrown in some muck and she was forced to sign a confession. All of this because some stone aged people did not like her sitting with men. It is their law so I suppose people should follow it. How do you think they would feel about imposing our laws over there? They would certainly be against it and yet they want Sharia law imposed in non Muslim countries.
The Muslims do not play by the same rules either. They come here (or other civilized countries) and if a Muslim woman is required to remove her burqa for some reason the Muslims go nuts and they threaten protests. Anytime they are required to follow a law that disagrees with their beliefs they raise a stink and CAIR shows up talking about the Muslim haters in America.
I would never let my wife go to one of those filthy places for any reason, business or not. First of all I would not want her around all those filthy, smelly, camel jockeys. Second of all I would not take kindly to my wife being treated improperly by these stone aged barbarians. I can’t understand why anyone does business there and certainly cannot understand how people tolerate the backstabbing goat herders they pass off as men.
Screw them all.
Source:
Times UK
Tags: camel jockeys, Muslims, Sharia Law, terrorists
Do the Race Baiters Want Obama to Win?
Feb 6, 2008 General
Al Sharpton, the anti Semite, race baiter has certainly endorsed Barack Obama (at least by his actions) and Obama was proud to stand with the man despite his history of racial divisiveness, riots leading to murder and lies. Additionally, Jesse Jackson is supporting Obama. Though Jackson waited, I saw a picture of him with an Obama sign and after Bill Clinton’s jab at him in South Carolina, support for Obama was inevitable.
The question is, do they really want him to win? Sure they are supporting him but that can’t hold much weight. Obama was already doing well with blacks and he is holding his own with some of the white demographics. The presence of Sharpton and Jackson, depending on how involved they get, could hurt him. Maybe that is the plan.
The whole existence of these two involves race baiting. They go around extorting money from companies with trumped up discrimination charges and they have made a fortune by portraying the blacks as victims of the white society. I am not suggesting that racism does not exist because it does and it comes in all colors. Jackson and Sharpton are two huge racists. However, the country is not anywhere near the way they like to portray it and blacks generally have many opportunities. The biggest limit to the success of blacks is their dependence on the Democratic Party, a group that treats them as if they are not capable of making it without government intervention. There are many successful blacks who owe nothing to government programs. Their biggest chance for success came from the two parents they had in their houses, something that is sadly missing from over 50% of black households.
I believe that an Obama presidency would negate many of the arguments that the race baiters make when they decry the racist whites who are oppressing. How can they possibly make a claim that a black person does not get the same chances as a white person if the president is a black man? An Obama presidency would lay to rest many of the bogus arguments they use to extort money and to fatten their personal bank accounts.
America is certainly ready for a black or a woman to be president. We are just not ready for this black or that woman to be president and it has nothing to do with race or sex. It might just be in the best interests of the race baiting poverty pimps to derail Obama before he screws up their scheme.
A loss might actually reinforce their claims and fit better into their agendas, especially if the convention is brokered and Obama is not selected. That would allow the race baiters to claim discrimination and say that America is a racist country where white people keep blacks down.
I would not be surprised if that is not their actual agenda.
Tags: discrimination, jackson, Obama, race baiters, racism, sharpton
A Peek at the News; Clinton, Football, and Flatus
Feb 4, 2008 General
What do all items in the title have in common? They are all full of air, one hot, one fresh and one stinky.
Chelsea Clinton is calling the super delegates
This would not be news except for the fact that Bill and Hillary have always stated that they wanted their daughter to be a private person and not involved in the process. That is why she is off limits to the media to such a degree she refused to answer the question of a school kid. Hillary must be worried because she knows that without super delegates she won’t win and since Bill has pissed most of them off she has Chelsea calling. I don’t see an issue with an adult child helping a parent but to me that makes her fair game and the media should start asking her questions. She has already been out campaigning and she has Hillary’s talking points down pat so the people who attend should be able to ask her questions. “Hi, this is Chelsea, will you vote for my… hello? hello?”
BTW, there was a story on Drudge, that said Chelsea told people they were not voting for the Clintons, they were voting for her “mawm.” Sorry Chelsea, your daddy (Bill not Web) made it clear that you get two for the price of one. We can’t stand the idea of that rapist being in the White House without a job to distract him. The media following her were not allowed to ask questions.
Bob Dole sent a letter to Rush Limbaugh in an effort to get the talk show host to stop attacking John McCain for being a liberal. Dole gave his assurance that McCain was a true conservative and that Rush had it all wrong and that it would be best for the party if ole’ Rush could jump on board. Just what we need about now, an old crusty politician who lost to a Clinton assuring us about another old crusty politician running against another Clinton. There are many things about John McCain that bother me and chief among them is his dismissal of the POWs left behind in Vietnam. What Dole needs to learn is that free speech goes both ways. you see, when Dole was running and Rush was wall to wall Clinton bashing Dole never sent a letter asking him to leave Clinton alone. When Rush, or any of the conservative talk hosts, bash the left the Republican politicians love it and will call the shows talking about the issue. During those times they have faith in Rush’s assessment and believe what he says and now, all of the sudden, Rush is wrong because he opposes John McCain? Bob Dole should go back to hawking Viagra and leave politics in the same ash heap as his presidential campaign.
Hillary Clinton brings back the tears
It worked in New Hampshire so why not in Connecticut. In NH she brought out the waterworks prior to the election and miraculously wiped out a double digit Obama lead and now that he is gaining on her in many states and pulling even in the nationwide polling, Hillary needed to do something so back to the tears it was. Hillary was at an event where some liberal pansy named Penn Rhodeen was introducing her and he choked up and she got misty and had to wipe a tear. Penn Rhodeen said one thing I agree with. He told the audience that Hillary would say what needs to be said and that is true because she will say (and do) anything to get elected. Sniff, sniff, but its my turn. I want my turn and that dark fella is making it hard, boo hoo. I read some comments by people who said she was human and crying is a human emotion. Since when did she get classified as human? Also, this was some event for children’s services and Penn Rhodeen talked about how she was such an advocate for the kids and protecting them and all that. She seems to have missed protecting Mr. Lewinsky’s child from her sexual predator husband. She protected her hubby though…
Middle school boys not allowed to intentionally fart
This from Knox County Maine, 8th grade boys have been warned about intentionally passing flatus. It seems the boys have had a gas at passing gas on purpose. The school is not happy about it so anyone who intentionally farts will be suspended. I wonder how they will know if it was intentional. What if a kid has to pass gas and lets one rip. Will he be suspended. What if he holds it in and explodes? Will the school be in trouble? There is no word on recent efforts to ban intentionally laughing, crying (Hillary would get suspended), or smiling. Burping and borborygmi are definitely in trouble.
Finally, there was some football game on yesterday
The Super Bowl was played yesterday and the Patriots and their perfect record were defeated by the Giants and their not so perfect record. The Patriots end the season 18-1 and there is nothing wrong with that kind of record depending on when the 1 comes. The Giants were relentless in their defense and attacked Tom Brady from all sides. They beat him like a tied yard dog and disrupted the rhythm of the entire team. Eli Manning played well enough to win and he stepped it up at the end when he needed to. He was solid and kept to the game plan and allowed his team to win. I am glad the Pats lost because I can’t stand their Head Coach and the smug players who took this game for granted. I also wonder how long it will be before Hillary tells us she has always been a Giants fan.
Others with interesting posts:
Right Pundits, Rosemary’s Thoughts, A Blog For All, 123beta, Right Truth, A Newt One- Shared News!, DragonLady’s World, Cao’s Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Wolf Pangloss, Dumb Ox Daily News, A Newt One, Right Voices, Stageleft, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Clinton, flatus, football, super bowl
Economic Relief Package is Socialism
Jan 25, 2008 General
The economy is in a downturn right now with some saying we are headed for or in a recession and others saying that things will be better by the third quarter of the year. The White House and Congress have drafted a plan to stimulate the economy, a package that has rare bipartisan support. The problem with the package is that it is a redistribution of wealth.
The plan calls for rebate checks for people who did not earn enough money to pay income taxes and caps the rebates at income levels of $75,000 for single taxpayers and $150,000 for married taxpayers. The rebates completely phase out at $87,000 and $174,000 respectively. The word rebate in this plan is misleading because a rebate is the return of something a person has paid. When one buys a camera with a rebate then part of what the person paid is sent back. If the economic plan were applied to the business world then one person would buy the camera and the company would send the rebate to a person who did not buy one.
The Democrats are not completely on board with the plan because it does not include more benefits (such as unemployment) along with the redistribution of wealth from those who pay the taxes to those who do not. In other words, they like it but feel it is has enough socialism built into it.
The government likes this plan because it will put money in the hands of people who are likely to spend it. If they gave the money back to the people who actually paid it then about 70% would be invested. Instead, the money will go to those who will run right out and spend it instead of putting some of it away for the future. The plan is short term as well as short sighted and since the government is slow with these kinds of things the money is likely to hit people’s hands about the time the economy starts to get better (depending on what economists one listens to). Additionally, this plan will do absolutely nothing to fix the part of the economy that is causing most of the problems, the housing crunch.
I know one thing that can end with this so called rebate and that is the mantra that our tax policies only help the rich. In this case, the rich are sending their money to the poor. There are some who will say that we are borrowing the money (which increases the deficit) so it is not coming from the rich. In reality, the government will have to get the money from some place and that place is from those who pay taxes.
If we want to stimulate the economy how about we cut taxes across the board so people will have more of their income to spend? How about we make other countries pay tariffs on the items they export to our country. How about we force our elected leaders to limit spending and force them to balance the budget? How about we force them to stop adding pork to bills and end the earmark practice? We could start drilling for our own oil and drive the costs down?
Of course these things are unlikely to happen because our elected officials are short sighted. The only reason they came up with this plan is because it is an election year and they all want to be able to say they helped the poor. While they like to pretend there are enough rich to tax into oblivion, they realize that the middle class and poor make up the lion’s share of our population. They will have far more votes than those who will foot the bill.
Socialism is the way of the left and they will certainly expand upon it should a Democrat be elected to the White House and the Republicans are so fragmented they are going along with it.
Sources:
Washington Post
The Politico