Open Trackback Post October 26th
Oct 26, 2007 General
This is an open trackback post. I just got in from Utah and do not feel like writing anything so have at it.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Stop the ACLU, Perri Nelson’s Website, , Right Truth, Stix Blog, The Populist, Shadowscope, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Pursuing Holiness, Adeline and Hazel, Right Celebrity, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Right Voices, Church and State, A Blog For All, 123beta, guerrilla radio, Adam’s Blog, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Cat, Conservative Thoughts, Nuke’s, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, CORSARI D’ITALIA, High Desert Wanderer, Gone Hollywood, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Nature Can Just Evolve Some More
Oct 25, 2007 General
The people who believe in evolution are an interesting lot. These folks believe in a theory that one species can evolve into another (though we have never actually seen this) and they believe that humans evolved from lower primates. Darwin’s theory also tells us that only the fittest survive which would include a species and individuals within a species. This seems to be where those who espouse evolution have a problem because every time a species becomes endangered they want it put on a list and they want all kinds of measures taken to protect said species. If the fittest survive and a species is not surviving then that species must not be the fittest. Seems that we would be interfering with the whole natural selection thing by getting involved.
There is a story out that a third of all primates are now endangered and the problem is reported to be that their habitats are encroached upon and they are running out of places to live. The commercial sale of their meat is also reported as part of the problem (who would eat these things). The way I see it, if Darwin was right then these animals should be able to adapt to new surroundings and if they cannot then they are not the fittest and should die off. That is the part of his theory that evolutionists seem to ignore when they decide we need to save a species. Of course, not all that want to save a species believe in evolution but evolution seems to be found among the more liberal people out there and they are also the group that tends to be involved in all the “save the [insert endangered species here]” campaigns. There is a chance we can save the primates as well.
“If you invest in a species in a proper way and do the conservation measures needed, you can reduce risk of extinction,” Mittermeier said. “If we had resources, we would be able to take every one of the species off the list in the next five or 10 years.” My Way News
I have no doubt we can save a species if we try. The thing is, why should we. The people who believe in evolution should be forced to accept the whole thing or else they should stop pushing the evolution agenda and take it out of our schools.
Besides, if Darwin was right, nature can just evolve some new primates.
Tags: endangered species, evolution, evolutionists, extinction, natural selection, primates
More Judicial Stupidity
Oct 24, 2007 General
A judge in Baltimore Country Maryland has gone against a century of forensic science and ruled that fingerprint evidence is not reliable enough to use in a homicide case.
A Baltimore County judge has ruled that fingerprint evidence, a mainstay of forensics for nearly a century, is not reliable enough to be used against a homicide defendant facing a possible death sentence – a finding that national experts described yesterday as unprecedented and potentially far-reaching. Baltimore Sun
I know this judge based this ruling on a case that involved a mistake based on fingerprints but there have been countless cases where fingerprints were used to appropriately identify the criminal. Certainly the fingerprints in this case should have been allowed to be presented along with the rest of the evidence. This just makes no sense.
What will happen if there is a mistake made with DNA evidence? Will we then have judges throwing out DNA a evidence because of one case? This judge, Susan M. Souder, has made a gross mistake and she is either a moron or needs to be removed from the bench. It is bad enough we have judges legislating from the bench but when they get into deciding the validity of a science that has been used for 100 years they have really gone too far.
What kind of world is it where judges ignore 100 year old science and little mention is made but junk science like global warming gets all the press?
Tags: baltimore county, county judge, death sentence, fingerprint evidence, fingerprints, forensic science