What do we do now?
Oct 27, 2021 Immigration, Law Enforcement, Opinion, Political
My wife recently lamented to me, “What can we do in the face of this obvious lawlessness?” My answer may surprise you. Let’s dig.
First, let’s list the ‘obvious lawlessness’:
1. Failure to secure the Southern US border, even though there are existing, passed laws in place to do just that.
2. Misappropriation of US military assets to disperse illegal aliens throughout the US. How is that a legitimate use of military assets? Who approved that massive spend?
3. Executive overreach of mask mandates and vaccine mandates, at every level. Some States may grant such powers to Governors in emergency conditions, but I fail to see such language in the Constitution.
4. Company overreach by making a vaccine under EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) a condition of employment. Note that the only ‘vaccine’ to get normal FDA approval is NOT available in the US. And there is specific language in the FDA EUA material that PROHIBITS using EUAs as a condition of employment.
5. Blatant legal abuse of the January 6th ‘protesters’. Since not ONE has been charged with the specific crime of ‘Insurrection’ (the current charges include ‘trespassing’), why are they continued to be held without bond or bail, some in solitary confinement, for TEN MONTHS? Are there no judges to correct this abuse of the penal system?
6. Blatant abdication of responsibility of local law enforcement to arrest true rioters in the summer of 2020. Either the line officers, the Chief of Police, or the mayors of those cities, if not the Governors of those States, SOMEONE abandoned their job of protecting their people.
7. Complete fiscal malfeasance of Congress by submitting ‘budgets’ or ‘bills’ with trillion-dollar price tags, with no realistic method to pay for them. I should include voting for such bills without reading them, thus abdicating the prime responsibility of their offices.
8. Blatant political usage of the DOJ and FBI. The complete ignoring of some crimes, while aggressively pursuing others, with obvious political motives, is as dastardly as it gets.
9. Attempting to pass blatantly unconstitutional provisions, such as a tax on unrealized asset gains. Note that to tax real income required the ratification of the 16th Amendment. Asset value can in no way be construed as ‘wages’ or ‘income’, so taxing such should be an unconstitutional direct tax.
10. Purging military members for ‘undesirable’ political opinions or thought. Please point to the paragraph in the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) that allows for this. Otherwise honorable members of the military, shown the door for not agreeing with the politics of the current administration?
I’m sure my list is only partial.
Now, for my answer to the question, “What can we do?” NOTHING. At least, nothing legal. We lost our chance when, either legitimately or otherwise, we elected a political party into enough offices, that absolutely hate the US, from the House, to the Senate, to the President. Democrats have shown at all levels that they despise law enforcement, our military, Capitalism, and the rule of law. They put the ‘rights’ of illegal aliens AHEAD of US citizens. They economically damage their own constituents, by championing policies that remove our energy independence (however briefly held), and destroy the absolute value of our currency. I used to think they were just wrong on most policies, but now, I have revised that to be an intentional destruction. Otherwise, they would occasionally do something I agree with, that aids the taxpayer, and advances personal freedom. That simply has not happened, even accidentally, with this group.
And, before you think the GOP gets a clear pass on this, WHERE ARE THEY? Where are their loud, argumentative voices AGAINST this behavior? If I saw more spine, more fight, more determination from the GOP, I would put more stock in the 2022 mid-term elections! As is, I simply do not have any confidence in their ability to fight this nonsense. Protesting? I truly believe that in-the-street protesting is something to draw attention to an ignored topic, or to show the powers that be how angry we are, or how many of us commiserate on a specific issue. But as a method to incite political change? Does anyone really think that protests will change Congress’ views of citizens? That Biden (or whomever is running him) will change his mind about everything listed above? I have a sneaky suspicion that the full weight of law enforcement (see number 5 above) will come down severely on anyone, regardless of how legal such a protest might be.
An illegal action? How about a REAL insurrection? Millions of armed taxpayers, overwhelming DC with the outrage it deserves? The phrases ‘tar and feather’ and ‘torches and pitchforks’ come to mind. We did it from 1774 to 1789, for much less mistreatment. But I don’t think there are enough revolutionaries in this day and time. Geez, I hope I’m wrong.
Incentives and Disincentives
Feb 9, 2021 Commentary, Immigration, Law Enforcement, Opinion, Political
Prior to the New Deal era in the 1930s, the US was a very basic societal arrangement. While there were (and always are) small numbers of the super-rich (for the day), the overwhelming majority of people had very simplistic methodologies to survive. There was no formal ‘social safety net’, so incentives were quite pure: work in some fashion to earn money to buy essentials—food, shelter, etc. Our society has changed quite a bit in the succeeding 90 years. But that coin has two sides. Let’s dig.
From its very inception, even pre-USA, America was the epitome of EARNED. People came from all over the world to participate in a rare combination of political, religious, and economic freedoms, coupled with an untamed wilderness, along with private property ownership. None of those elements could be removed from the equation, as each were essential to the magnetic draw of the US. People felt that their efforts and risk-taking, would result in EARNING a better way of life. It was not an easy thing, and there were zero guarantees—in fact, the wilderness was quite dangerous, even life-threatening. Wild animals, Indians, lack of any type of law enforcement or medical assistance, and an unyielding landscape, all met the settler. Starvation, adverse weather, sickness of many kinds, were all potential outcomes. But even those dangerous prospects were viewed by many as a dramatic improvement over whatever situation they left. The idea that they, not some royalty or military figure, would benefit from their efforts, was enough of an incentive to warrant the dangerous travel to the New World. Many came with little or no money, and only whatever they wore or could carry. The pure guts needed to make that journey, leaving familiarity and family, to go to a completely unknown environment, was considerable. And still they came.
As towns and villages popped up, civilization took small steps to improve. The gathering of people to a similar locality had many advantages. Law enforcement, banks, medical folks, dry goods stores, saloons, butcher shops, even groups of folks (that were not family) to assist in home and barn raising, all were a product of collective people. If you help folks, they may help when needed, in the future. Not a defined ‘social safety net’—no one got paid to do nothing—but a mutual assistance arrangement. Each function matured over the years, especially as populations grew. With enough people, folks could specialize in various trades, with money earned and spent based upon the community value of those trades. It was nearly pure Capitalism: no boundaries to business creation, just the efforts and visions of those attempting new enterprises. Many such endeavors failed, but many succeeded. As more such towns grew to become cities, a nation raised itself from infancy to adulthood.
Fast-forward to the 1930s. Up until this time, assistance for those in need was purely a local affair. Churches usually took the lead, offering soup kitchens for the hungry, sometimes including shelter for the needy. But the Great Depression changed the scope of ‘needy’. Over 25% of the workforce was considered unemployed. The causes and effects of the Depression have been chronicled and debated in the decades since, but the one thing almost everyone agrees upon is that the economy was terrible. The lines for the soup kitchens were long and constant. Other than local farmers that could grow their own food, many people in cities faced possible starvation. The Social Security Act of 1935 was an attempt to alleviate many facets of the misery, from a Federal government standpoint. Included in this legislation was retirement income for the elderly (Title I), unemployment compensation (Title III), aid for children (Title IV), and several other specific areas. For the first time, Welfare programs existed at a Federal level. That is, folks that had no job, or the potential for a job, received a minimal stipend from the Federal government. Additional support came from other legislation: SNAP (food subsidies) is part of the Agriculture Department; rent subsidies are part of Housing and Urban Development, and so on. Pertinent to this article, for the first time, Federal government created programs that required no work incentive to receive benefits. Note that these benefits were not ‘free’, it is just that the taxpayers, as a whole, pick up the tab. The money to fund such programs began back in 1913, with the ratification of the 16th Amendment to the US Constitution: Income Tax.
Originally, Welfare benefits were quite meager: food and rent subsidies were the bulk of benefits received. There were disbursements of agricultural products, such as cheese and peanut butter, that not only provided food assistance to those that needed it, but helped maintain the market prices for those items. Direct cash benefits were rare. The incentive was for Welfare recipients to seek and find work, thus removing their need for Welfare. Welfare was intended to be a true ‘safety net’, to catch those that fell through society’s ‘cracks’. Not many were expected remain on Welfare for any long duration—it simply did not provide for much of a lifestyle, just minimal sustenance for those in short-term need.
Over time, Welfare changed, and people changed along with it. Food distribution gave way to check payments. Technology allowed for cash disbursements to checking accounts or ATM cards. Surprisingly or no, some folks became accustomed to the Welfare system. The major motivators of hunger, shelter, and even social stigma, eroded over time. Unfortunately, along with those erosions went the ability to find and maintain a job—or even the desire to do so. Why work a minimum wage job when funds can be had for doing nothing? The incentives to work entry-level jobs for many such people disappeared entirely. We now have multiple generations of Welfare recipients—grandparents, parents, and children of the same family, with none possessing the skills necessary to become productive citizens.
Now we add the last part of this dynamic: immigration. Remember, prior to the early 1900s, the US had no real immigration policy. If you could get here, you were welcome. But, since there was no ‘safety net’, you had to work to survive, since no programs were in place to assist you. For some, that meant nearly slave labor, either in fields or sweat shops, doing hard, menial work that paid little. But little pay was better than no pay, especially when food was involved. The ultimate incentive: work to avoid starvation.
Current day policies collide with each other. Immigration now comes in two flavors: legal and illegal, both with their own problems. The legal system is way too cumbersome, and takes years and thousands of dollars to perform a simple function: make someone from another country a legal US citizen. Unless your goal is to create a cottage industry of immigration lawyers, it is an antiquated, nearly failed system. The illegal immigration system may actually be worse. Those that choose to avoid the legal system can enter the US via thousands of miles of common international border, both with Canada and Mexico. There are also Visa overstays, where students and temporary visitors get ‘lost’ into US society. The risk there is that it simply is not legal—not quite the same stress as our early settlers. Political positions vary greatly—some want the border policed and maintained, others really do not want a border at all. And those that choose to enter illegally stand a reasonable chance that legislators will grant them amnesty—rewarding the illegal by letting them ‘jump the line’ ahead of those in the legal process. Either way, legal or illegal, the immigration system hits the Welfare system head-on: should immigrants, that have not paid taxes into the system, gain taxpayer-funded benefits? Everything from Welfare to retirement benefits fall into this category.
Back to incentives: the US Welfare state is an incredible incentive for immigrants to change countries. As much as a disincentive Welfare is to entry-level workers, it is quite the stimulus to third-world people, sometimes fleeing abject poverty, political strife, and persecution. Some are even criminals, both in their original and new countries. What would the incentives to legislators be to allow this flow to continue? Some want new immigrants for a new voting bloc, as most are perceived to want and vote for more government programs. Some want new illegal immigrants as a near-slave labor pool, where companies can pay sub-minimum wage rates, usually in cash (or, with fake or stolen social security numbers). The unavoidable stress illegal immigration puts on the US education, prison, medical, and ‘safety net’ systems is very real, and very expensive. Once again, the US taxpayer foots the bill for all expenses. And the taxpayer is a captive payor—incentives are not required. Whether the taxpayer can continue to pay for all of the poor, disenfranchised, and persecuted people of North, Central, and South America remains to be seen. That such unfettered immigration, coupled with a taxpayer-funded social safety net, is unsustainable is almost a dead certainty.
Tags: Welfare state
What If…
Jan 22, 2021 Commentary, General, Immigration, Law Enforcement, Opinion, Political
If you are like me, and you probably sometimes are, you go thru life with many preconceived notions and assumptions. Introduced by friends and family, reinforced by school, TV, movies, and our own experiences, we have certain ‘givens’ in life that we rely upon to try to understand a very complicated world. But what if they are all or mostly wrong? Let’s dig.
What we are taught in elementary school is likely our bedrock for more assumptions. Our history, how current events impact us, the roles of many people in society, all have the opportunity to be learned here. What do police do? Firemen? Doctors? Congressmen and Presidents? Judges? Lawyers? While some of these may be discussed at home (depending upon the home), most are introduced in school, in one form or another. If your teacher or teachers were pro-cop, you would get entirely different views than if your instructor(s) were anti-cop. And so on.
Some of my assumptions were about how systems work in the US: police, law, courts, elections, military, Congress, virtually everyone in elected or appointed roles in US society. Speaking entirely for myself, I always assumed that checks and balances were in place in ALL of these systems to prevent criminal behavior by those folks in those roles. Sure, some folks of every position stretched the rules, and benefited personally by those stretches. But I always assumed that the overwhelming majority were honorable people, doing their part in society to keep things running. But what if ALL of those assumptions are flat-out wrong? What if the systems are inherently broken, by the past and present office holders, and because of their control over those systems, they will NEVER be fixed?
What if Congress has nothing to do with representing ANYONE but Congressmen? The rest is pure marketing. What if the courts are so complicit in the malfeasance, that they rule however they want, to protect the entire elected and appointed class? Boat rockers and folks with integrity are shooed away, or absorbed into the cabal. Once elected, they are shown the REAL deal: do it our way, or you will be an army of one, with zero assistance from anyone in the system. What if the police only superficially enforce the law, and only how and where their chain of command dictates? The same may hold true for the military, just on a much larger scale. What if wars are fought just to advance the fortunes of the defense contracting companies, with appropriate kickbacks to those elected folks again?
You may ask: Dude, what makes you think so negatively about these things? The riots and mayhem over the Summer started the crack in my mental veneer. Then, the recent elections process, coupled by the omnibus spending bill, made me think that no systems appear to be working as advertised—certainly not to the benefit of the taxpaying citizen.
Tags: Systems
Crazy Times
Jan 20, 2021 Commentary, General, Immigration, Law Enforcement, Opinion, Satire, Tyranny
Are you a ‘normal, red-blooded American’? Are you tired of every single problem, real or imagined, in the country blamed on you? Are you up-to-here with being called racist, homophobic, xenophobic, sexist, patriarchic, deplorable, or whatever the Liberals decide is an appropriate description of you (even though they don’t know you at all)? Have you had enough of ‘learning’ that the United States of America was not only BUILT upon slavery, but slavery is the only reason for its existence? Or maybe your ears will bleed if you hear one more time that rich, White, European business tycoons get wealthy or extend their current wealth on the backs of the poor and destitute of all races here? Have you been told that everything from math to proper English, to Climate Change, is the result of racism? I may have an answer to all of the above! Let’s dig.
First, please understand that I am aware that what I am about to propose is an insane idea. That, had I not been mentally abused by the nonsense in the first paragraph for literally decades, I wouldn’t have ever entertained such nutty policy suggestions. I hail as a Constitutional Conservative, very much right-of-center politically. I’m normally a live-and-let live guy—almost Libertarian in thought. Other than protecting children, I think most people should have the opportunity to screw up their lives in whatever method they choose, so long as it doesn’t infringe on the rights or property of others. On the other hand, I feel very strongly that, if I’m going to be constantly accused of some crime, regardless of lack of evidence of said crime—or even if I have exculpatory evidence that I absolutely did NOT do the crime, I am going to DO THE CRIME! If I’m guilty and will incur punishment either way, might as well! So, I have a radical idea: take the Liberals’ accusations to heart.
Therefore, effective immediately, we should turn the US into the country the Liberals think we already are. Pendulums swing, and it is time to swing that bad boy in the opposite direction than its current path! As stated above, the US is accused of being so many awful things, so it is time to implement that which we are already guilty of, by our critics!
Dissenting opinions will be tolerated—once. You get your say, as our 1st Amendment allows for. But once stated, anything further is just agitation. We, as a country, don’t want it, don’t need it, and it serves no positive purpose. So, such opinions are now reason for the Ejection Clause below.
Calls for ‘racial equity’ end NOW. This is a meritocracy, and will continue to be so. Anyone wishing to give preferential treatment to any particular race will be subject to the Ejection Clause below. Note that all minorities are still welcome in the US—as are all productive people. Those that make a living by perpetuating the sins of the distant and near past are no longer welcome. Take that particular show on the road. Anywhere but here.
All history textbooks that depict the US as a country founded upon racism and genocide are GONE. No problem telling the story of the US as a factual presentation, but adding the author’s opinions, based on current modes of morality and society, is not only erroneous, it paints the US in a poor, incorrect light. It stops now. Authors of said view will be subject to the Ejection Clause below.
The US has carried able, non-productive people for decades, via our Social Safety Net. This ends now. While we will continue to provide assistance for people in-between jobs, it will no longer be a lifestyle. If you are able to work, you will work—or be assigned work. Don’t like the assigned work? Get a job in a role you like. All Welfare and unemployment compensation will have an end date. Unemployment will be issued based upon real attempts to become employed. Past that date, person will be subject to Ejection Clause below. Note that this section does not cover mentally or physically disabled people. We will use funds recovered from the idle able to implement true care facilities for those that simply cannot function well in society alone. And we will continue to honor our promises of Social Security to those that paid into the system. We will provide food for children and those that need—not money. We will distribute basic foods, relieving our surpluses. Do not like the food available? Get a job. Anyone else, see Ejection Clause below.
Congress will return to its original boundaries and intentions. All spending will only be allowed under Constitutional enumerated powers. The position of Congressman will pay zero salary, with an appropriate expense account that is subject to audit by a citizen committee. Violation of oath of office is terms for immediate office loss, and subject to criminal prosecution. Income taxes will be replaced by a national sales tax. Changing the sales tax rate requires a super-majority of States to ratify. There is no longer a reason to field an IRS, other than to audit sales tax collections, and prevent black market avoidance of sales taxes. There will no longer be a yearly tax filing for individuals—such private information is no longer shared with government. Corporate income taxes, that are currently passed on to consumers, go away completely. Since the ‘progressive income tax’ and ‘corporate income tax’ are gone, Congress no longer can play favorites with the tax code, also removing their ‘fundraising’ hammer. Lobbyists will continue to be legal, via 1st Amendment, but the first dollar that changes hands between lobbyist and Congressman is grounds for criminal prosecution of both parties. ‘Redress of grievances’ will no longer be a monetary transaction. Don’t like the new rules? Don’t run for Congress. Note: voting will be with verifiable ID, in person. The ONLY exceptions are deployed military and hospital patients. Voting will occur from 7am to 7pm, local time zones, only on Election Day. If it isn’t a priority to go to the polls, stay home. Voting machines, if used, will only tabulate votes. Any other function is an attempt to defraud that election, and will not be tolerated. Every voting machine will pass an audit, and must retain all pertinent information for future analysis.
College professors will teach their subject matter. Period. Any attempt to insert political views where unwarranted will be grounds for Eject Clause below. College degree programs will be indexed by anticipated income potential for each specialty. Pre-med, pre-law, IT, engineering, etc. will be full tuition cost, but teaching degrees, and most degrees ending in ‘Studies’ will cost less, in anticipation of the degree holder’s ability to pay. The entire Student Loan program will be reevaluated, top to bottom, every 10 years.
Public sector unions will disappear, effective immediately. With no one representing the funder (taxpayer) at the bargaining table, these negotiations were always political stimulus. Pay will be based upon performance, like any other job in the US. Anyone attempting to change that environment will be subject to the Ejection Clause below.
Our immigration policy is now quite simple: enter thru designated areas. Folks who desire entry will be assessed physically for disease—those failing are denied entry. They will be assessed for their work habits, desire to assimilate, and skill sets. If there are unsatisfactory answers to those queries, they will be denied entry. The US is not responsible for anyone outside of its borders, and we will decide who can come in. Period. Another new rule: new immigrants will be put on a new database, with the sole purpose of verification of good citizenship. In addition, new immigrants will NOT be eligible for any Welfare programs for 5 years, and will not be eligible to vote for 10 years. Our Border Wall will be complete, and our temporary VISAs will be monitored. Overstays and those that avoid proper procedure for entry will be subject to the Ejection Clause below.
The penal system will work into this process. Career felons, with emphasis on those dangerous to society, will serve their sentences as prescribed. Repeat offenders will be subject to the Ejection Clause below. Minor offenses will not be dealt with as severely, but will be tracked for repetition. Those that decide that rioting, looting, arson, and mayhem are appropriate methods of political protests will be immediately subject to the Ejection Clause below.
The Ejection Clause. Mentioned many times above, this is the centerpiece of the new US, that will be run as heartless as it has been accused for decades. Simply put, anyone subject to the Ejection Clause will have six months to get their affairs in order, then will be escorted out of the US. Part of the six-month window will be to pick the country the person wishes to land in. Paperwork to make that happen will be attempted. If their first choice of country isn’t available (or doesn’t want them), the next available country will be chosen for them. Once ejected, the person is forbidden to re-enter the US for 10 years, and even then, it is by application only. All who are ejected get added to a new database. Attempt to re-entry prior to or without application will put that person on a ‘do not allow’ list. This entire process should make everyone happy. The gist of the issue: you don’t like the US, and how it is run; we don’t want you here. Those here will contribute to the economy and advance the history and traditions of the US. So, now we are the mean, whatever-phobic country that everyone accuses us of. Except we will gladly allow anyone productive, of any physical or minority status, to prosper here.
Tags: US policy
Random Thoughts For 12 January 2021
Jan 12, 2021 General, Law Enforcement, Tyranny
Congresswoman Liz Cheney accused Donald Trump of inciting violence and causing an insurrection. She stated she will vote to impeach him. I guess Cheney has looked in the mirror and mistaken herself for a liberal totalitarian. Trump made a speech. He called for peaceful protests. He did not in any way call for violence. But Cheney is still upset because people invaded the Capitol. The Antifa agitators were the ones damaging things and looking to harm people. The patriots who entered (many of whom were let in) did not damage anything and did not harm anyone. You can tell the Antifa types because they had gas masks with them. Cheney does not like that she was scared so badly she had to hide somewhere and she probably wet her pants. Trump did nothing wrong and the fact you people will impeach without due process shows just how corrupt Congress is.
Mitch McConnell expressed is opinion that Trump committed an impeachable offense and he is glad the House is bringing up the articles. According to the Turtle, he thinks impeaching Trump will rid the Republican party of him and his brand. He thinks once this is a fait accompli, the people who followed the president will fall back in line and be good little compliant Republicans. He has no clue whatsoever. I support President Trump (and will never, ever support Xiden) and if he lost in a fair election then shake hands and move on. But this election was stolen, there was massive fraud and the numbers were enough to make a difference in the margin of error. These are undeniable despite the false stories painted by the left and the RINO wing of their party. I think it is time we had a new party and would be more than happy to join in. The Constitution party sounds good. I already changed my voter registration from Republican to unaffiliated so I could go for a real party. One thing is certain, I will NOT fall in line with the spineless party of McConnell.
I have been telling people since November when many Republicans turned a blind eye to the fraudulent election that Republicans would send emails listing all the horrible things Democrats will do and how we need to send money to help them fight AHHHHHHHHHH. Well, I got one today from Kevin McCarthy. He is begging for money for the take back the House effort. It almost seems to me these parties switch from minority to majority on a regular basis so they can all get rich begging suckers for money. I wrote a nice long letter to ole Kevin explaining why they will never get another cent from me. I doubt he will read it.
If you wondered what was in store for us with the Democrats set to be in control of government you did not have to wait until they took control. Cancel culture is in full swing. Most social media platforms have removed President Trump from their sites and they also purged tens of thousands of conservatives who committed the crime of, well, being conservative. Most headed over to conservative site Parler and established accounts and then the hosting service for Parler, none other than Amazon Web Services, took Parler down. Parler has had lawyers stop representing them and hosting services change their minds and decide they can’t be hosted. Apple removed the Parler App and is playing a part in the cancel culture pile on. The PGA (shame on you) removed a major tournament (the 2022 PGA Championship) from one of Trump’s properties. Trump’s organization will take the PGA to court because the course spent a lot of money to make sure it was ready. I hope at the least the PGA has to reimburse. There are many other things that have happened that appear to be out of Orwell’s 1984. Suffice it to say that the left is not content with winning (or cheating to a win) they are now trying to destroy Trump. These things have a way of working out and I hope it ends up costing all of them. I would like to see Trump declassify all the dirty little secrets of DC and spread them all over on his way out. Perhaps them banning him is to keep him from publishing. Many of us have websites and will publish it.
What can we do? Close social media accounts. No Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat or any of the other ones. Just get rid of them. If you have Amazon, cancel it. You can order directly from most companies and many smaller companies could use the business. If you play golf do not purchase PGA logo items and do not donate to their programs. Do not watch the 2022 PGA Championship on TV. Let the ratings go in the dumper. If you do business with any financial institutions that are unfriendly to conservatives or have targeted the President then switch. Also, do not donate to the Republican Party. Consider jailbreaking your Apple device. Do not purchase apps in the app store and cancel Apple music (and other services).
Looks like we are in for a bumpy ride. People who think know that it was paid agitators who stormed the Capitol and did the damage (with an assist from the Capitol Police). The patriots did no damage and did not hurt anyone. But the way Democrats are acting one has to ask how long it will be before there is an all out assault on that place. I do not favor that and am not calling for it (I have to put this because idiots like Cheney and McConnell will swear I incited something), but you can only push people so far. It is almost like they are piling on to see if they can provoke a response. I can promise them they do not want a response. Funny thing, they all keep saying violence is not the answer and this is not what we do in America. Our Founders had grievances with the government and tried over a long period of time to get them addressed peacefully. Their pleas fell on deaf ears and they were subject to more tyranny (sound familiar). They then took action. So please do not tell me this is not who we are. We Declared in a document that it was our duty to cast off such government and start new.
We would normally accomplish that at the ballot box. We have been told for years, don’t like it then vote for change. It would appear that our vote no longer counts (and maybe it never did which is why they keep getting reelected) and the elections are a fraud so what is left?
I think they better get their acts together or they might wish they had. I hope I am wrong. BTW, to the Chiefs of Staff, your oath is to the Constitution so remember that.
#FAFO
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: cancel culture, FAFO, trump