Concentrate On The Gangs
Jun 9, 2015 Immigration, Opinion
There are a lot of gangs in the US and they create chaos for the general public by fostering drug and gun markets and by waging violence on people. One of these gangs is MS 13. They are a bunch of thugs from El Salvador and they have no regard for human life. They are lower than animals and should be eradicated.
Many of these violent cretins are here illegally. The US continues to allow these kinds of people to cross our borders and inflict pain and suffering on our people.
A 16 year old girl in New York was savagely raped by three members of the MS 13 gang. She was raped on a golf course and discovered by golfers when she appeared from a wooded area. She was nearly naked at the time of her discovery.
These no good lowlifes might have decided that they were entitled to take from the girl what they wanted and they did not care how it affected her. Maybe they were part of an initiation. Perhaps they were just bored.
These gangs use violence as a way of life. If they suspect someone is cooperating with authorities they hunt them down, torture them and then murder them. They murder people, beat people or rape people as part of their gang initiation.
Make no mistake. None of the animals in that gang is worth the $2 in chemicals their bodies are made of. They should be hunted down like animals and executed on the spot.
This would be a great activity for all the law enforcement in this nation. Instead of concentrating on veterans, or people who follow the Constitution or conservatives as some kind of threat to the nation perhaps the law enforcement community could concentrate on finding these thugs and bringing them to justice.
These gangs have a lot of money they have gained through less than legal means so let the cops keep what they seize if they can get rid of the bangers.
I know a lot of bleeding hearts will talk about the tough life they had or some such nonsense but I DO NOT CARE.
That young lady will now have a tough rest of her life. Her family will have a tough time from this point forward. Imagine if this were your daughter. It could happen.
[note]I want this handled as if the victim were Barack Obama’s daughter.[/note]
MS 13 is a well organized criminal element that has long arms throughout this country. They have no regard for the law, for human life or for the rights of others and they have no issue with doing horrific things to people.
I pray for this young lady. She did not deserve this and she has been failed by a government that allows these kinds of people to come here and stay here and then turns a blind eye to their illegal acts.
The three thugs who did this have been captured and they are being held without bond. I hope they are not in a prison with other members of their gang and are in a place where they can be continuously ass raped by hardened criminals (see what I did there).
We need to declare open season on these people and hunt them down until they leave or they are exterminated. Right now they have no fear. We need to put the fear in them.
Unfortunately Obama will probably give them a medal and reward them with welfare cuz, you know, if he had a son…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
When Bush Did It The Left Went Nuts
Sep 23, 2014 Opinion, Terrorism
Let me start off by saying I agree with bombing ISIS and any other terror group and I think the US should keep it up. I would say to bomb them back to the Stone Age but since they already live in that era I say bomb them back to before they existed. I have no problem with attacking them where they live rather than waiting for them to come here. I have no problem with preemptive strikes.
But I am not the problem here because I never held the view that we should not attack them.
Barack Obama and ALL the Democrats who opposed George Bush did though. They derided Bush for waging war in Iraq when they claimed Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and never attacked us. Afghanistan was the good war, they said.
So during Bush’s terms we had Code Pink and the rest of the anti war crowd along with the Democrats screaming about Bush’s War and George Bush attacking a nation that never attacked us, blah, blah.
Barack Obama arrived on the scene fresh from his community organizing state and US Senate gigs to claim the mantle of anti war hero and to stop George Bush’s illegal wars.
The US, along with coalition partners, has begun bombing ISIS and other terror groups in Syria. Syria has never attacked us and ISIS has never attacked out country. Yes, they murdered some Americans but they did not come to our home nation and attack us. Do I think we should avenge their deaths? Certainly but then again, I am not the problem.
The problem lies with those who were so vocal in their opposition to George Bush who now remain silent as their messiah attacks an enemy in a sovereign nation, one that did not attack us. The problem lies with those very groups who said we should not be at war and who told us to try and understand the other guy’s side of things.
Where are these groups now? Where is Nancy Pelosi? Where is Harry Reid? Where are the protest groups that were so up in arms about the Iraq war? Where are these people when Barack Obama is basically doing the same thing they attacked Bush for?
They are curiously silent on the matter.
George Bush got Congressional approval before he waged war and Barack Obama did not. George Bush told us exactly what would happen if we announced the date we were leaving and pulled completely out of the region and what he said would happen, did.
Barack Obama was against the war in Iraq and he campaigned on ending it. Barack Obama campaigned on what he perceived to be the lawless and unconstitutional acts of Bush and now he is doing the very things he campaigned against.
These people are hypocrites and it would do the nation well for them to lose their jobs in November (for those up for reelection). Barack Obama is a disgrace to this nation. Is he doing the right thing now? I think it is right to attack the enemy but I always did.
He did not. This is what happens when you have a progressive Alinskyite with no work experience, no military experience (and who actually loathes the military) and no real life experience running things.
Community organizers are rabble rousers, not leaders.
The left remains silent because it is their messiah who is doing the things they previously opposed.
We need to rally as a nation while we are at war but that does not mean we can’t question the integrity of the leader who took us to war.
If the nation had questioned that integrity during the campaign we might not have a hypocrite and first class amateur running things now.
And in all likeliness there would be no need for more war because the enemies would fear us.
No one fears Obama because he lacks anything resembling manhood and he is certainly not a warrior.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: Bush, code pink, hypocrites, isis, lies, Obama, preemption, protests, Syria, war
No To O’Malley for President…
Sep 18, 2014 Opinion, Political
Martin O’Malley, the Governor of Maryland, is thinking about running for the presidency in 2016. He has lived nearly his entire adult life in a political office and he does not want to get a real job so he is looking to move on up to another taxpayer funded position.
He wants to do for the nation what he has done for the People’s Republik of Maryland. The nation does not need that.
O’Malley has fudged crime statistics by changing how they are reported, he has infringed on our Second Amendment rights by imposing gun control laws that violate the right of the people to keep and bear arms (though he has armed guards around him all the time) and he has raised a number of taxes. In fact, O’Malley has never met a tax he didn’t hike.
The guy is worthless. When he talks he is lying and he should NEVER be considered for the presidency.
O’Malley likes to talk the same smack all the progressive morons talk. You know, about working together and pushing things for the poor. O’Malley does not work with the Republican minority in Maryland. He gets his Democrat sock puppets to push things he wants through and he uses his political appointments to help push his agenda.
He flip flops on any issue depending on political value.
He is an evil man who only does harm to the people. He is a typical progressive who thinks he must be involved in regulating every aspect of the people’s lives and that we are too stupid to live without his intervention.
He is a big supporter of open borders and giving illegals the hard earned tax dollars paid in by working AMERICANS. He is so hooked on helping illegals that he calls them New Americans. He supports their law breaking. The story that he opposed the illegals coming to Maryland is untrue. He did not want them going to a conservative part of the state because he was worried about their safety (Conservatives would not have treated them badly but would have worked to send them back).
Martin O’Malley is not a leader, he is not a problem solver and he is not a patriot. He is a statist who thinks big government funded through lots of taxes is the appropriate way to run a state and by extension a country. He does not follow the Constitution of the state or the nation. He is a progressive puke who thinks he knows better how you should live your life.
He is bad for America. Disregard him, ignore him and for all that is sacred…
DO NOT VOTE FOR HIM IF HE RUNS FOR PRESIDENT!
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: constitution, lies, Maryland, O'Malley, President, statist, taxes
Maybe Congress Should Mind Its Own Business
Sep 13, 2014 Opinion, Political
Sixteen female Senators have sent a letter to the NFL Commissioner calling for a zero tolerance policy regarding domestic violence after the Ray Rice video was released.
[note]Many of these women defended Bill Clinton who is a known sexual predator.[/note]
Why is this Congress’ business? It would seem to me that Congress should worry about the nation and its problems and leave private business to solve its issues without the nanny state jumping in.
It also seems to me that Congress might want to adopt a zero tolerance policy regarding its own members before demanding others do so. Congress is full of people who have done various bad things from tax evasion to domestic violence (gasp). If Congress wants to set an example how about it expel any member who has been involved in a domestic violence episode? How about dumping the tax evaders and the drunkards?
Clean up your own home before you demand others clean theirs.
I do not believe that Commissioner Roger Goodell is telling the truth about the Rice incident and I think he mismanaged it terribly. How the issue is handled is up to the NFL and not Congress.
Perhaps Goodell should respond to the letter by informing the Senators that the NFL is a profitable business that generates 6 billion dollars a year in profit and that its problems are not the concern of Congress. He might want to let them know that while the NFL is profitable the US is 17 TRILLION dollars in debt (and continues to run a deficit) and their attention might be better focused on solving their issues instead of worrying about things that are not their business.
He might even offer to give them some advice on working to get rid of the debt they have accumulated.
Spousal abuse (whether a man or a woman is the abuser) is a bad thing and needs to be addressed by private organizations in the manner they see fit. It is not the business of Congress or the harpies who want some face time.
If these Senators want to make an impact perhaps they could write letters to law enforcement agencies demanding zero tolerance policies since police officers are involved in more domestic violence incidents (nearly twice the rate) than the general population.
Then again that would not be their business though they would at least be interacting with another government agency rather than a private business.
Of course, the first step would be for Congress to clean its ranks of law breakers, sexual harassers, predators and those who engage in domestic violence.
They turn a blind eye to their own and stick their noses in the business of others.
Better yet, these folks might want to turn their attention toward the Muslim Terrorists who treat women badly as a way of life.
No, these morons will embrace them.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: business, female senators, goodell, nfl, ray rice, violence
You’d Have To Be Stoned To Vote Democrat
Aug 25, 2014 Opinion, Political
Paul Bedard writes an article for the Washington Examiner where he indicates that if Democrats want to retain control of the Senate or limit losses the party should push marijuana legalization initiatives in November.
The reasoning is that if these initiatives are on the ballots the young (read pot smoking) Democrat voters will be compelled to vote and while they are voting for marijuana they will also vote for Democrats on the ballot.
This is probably true. The young want marijuana legalized and they would turn out to vote if it were on the ballot (assuming they were not too high to remember to vote) but can Democrats get these initiatives on the ballots by November?
And more importantly wouldn’t they, as Bedard points out, be more likely to hold off until 2016 to help keep a Democrat in the White House and pick up Democrat seats in Congress?
I am not a marijuana user, never have been and do not intend to start now. I think it could be legal and taxed and that it is probably no more dangerous than alcohol (and no, please do not tell me it is safer because it is not) but we need a lot of things in place. How do you determine driving under the influence of marijuana (other than people driving at 4 miles an hour)? THC (the active component in marijuana) is fat soluble and stays in the body long after the intoxicating effects have subsided. This is particularly true for habitual users.
How will law enforcement be able to determine if one is high or not when THC levels are present? This is important. States that have legalized marijuana have undoubtedly had an increase in use of the drug and that means more people are driving under the influence. They are a danger to others.
But I digress. The issue is should Democrats put marijuana on the ballot to increase Democrat voter turnout (especially among the young)?
Enticing voters with pot kind of signals desperation and would only bolster the impression that politicians will do anything to keep power.
Democrats would love to offer pot as an incentive. They like their voters to be zombies who follow along without question.
And they also know one has to be stoned to vote for a Democrat.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.