The Party of NO
May 3, 2014 Obamacare, Opinion, Political, Religion of Peace, Second Amendment, Terrorism
Democrats often call Republicans the Party of NO – because we oppose Barack Obama and the Liberals (sounds like a good name for a Death Metal Band) where they want to Give everything to their constituents. Even noted Republican RINO Chris Christy has called us the party of no, saying that’s not good enough – that we have to offer something to the voters.
I will admit, it makes us look bad. People call Barack Obama Santa Claus, but he’s not – he’s Monty Hall. All flash and bright colors and big gifts behind unknown laws – I mean curtains. The problem is that the current Republican leaders in Washington want to be Monty Hall too – be all flashy and glittery with gifts – to BRIBE their way into office – because that’s how they get good ratings and stay on TV – I mean, in Congress.
It’s DAMNED hard to beat someone who can give piles of MONEY and TREASURE to their minions.
But – unlike Christie – I believe Republicans should BE the Party of NO. After all, the Republican Party was formed to say NO to the Democrat Slaveowners. The current festering pile of Republican Party leaders want to give out shiny gifts – they have no MESSAGE, no RIGHTEOUSNESS to inspire people as to WHY they should vote for NO.
I EMBRACE NO:
NO to RAISING TAXES – WE DO NOT WORK JUST TO SUPPORT CONGRESS!!!
NO to FUNDING ISLAMOFASHISTS!
NO to FUNDING SYRIAN MUSLIMS WHO ARE EATING DEAD CHRISTIANS!!!
NO to TAKING AWAY OUR RIGHT TO DEFEND OURSELVES BY OWNING A FIREARM!!!
NO to LIMITING FREE SPEECH!
NO to OBAMACARE!
NO to LETTING OUR VETERANS DIE!!!
NO to ABANDONING ISRAEL!!!
NO to ALLOWING IRAN TO DEVELOP NUCLEAR WEAPONS!!!
NO to ALLOWING AMERICANS TO DIE IN BENGHAZI SO DEMOCRATS CAN LOOK GOOD!
NO to MOCKING THE LORD OUR G✡D BY BOOING HIM ON NATIONWIDE TV!!!
I AM A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN! I AM THE PARTY OF NO!!!
Tags: conservative, party of no, Republicans
A Tale Of Two Race Stories
Apr 28, 2014 Commentary, Opinion
Cliven Bundy was alleged to have uttered racist things about black people, or as he called them, colored and Negro. An 80 year old man is probably more likely to use such terms since those are the ones used in his youth and terms that blacks once said were socially acceptable. That might explain why we have a United NEGRO College Fund and the National Association for the Advancement of COLORED People.
Bundy’s words, while not eloquent by any stretch of the imagination, were not racist. One who listens to the entire message and not just the edited one can see Bundy is discussing an overreaching government that has destroyed minority families. His words might not have been as beautiful as those delivered by a teleprompter reader but they were accurate.
Harry Reid was quick to jump up and call Bundy a racist for the terms he used. Yes, the same Harry Reid who said Barack Obama did not have a Negro dialect unless he wanted to…
The goal, of course, is to demonize Bundy so the next time SWAT Teams arrive people will let them have their way at the Bundy ranch.
Sean Hannity (who made sure to tell us not to jump to conclusions in the George Zimmerman case) was quick to distance himself from Bundy as was Glenn Beck and a number of Republicans. They were too concerned with their ratings or opinion polls to step back and look at the big picture. They jumped to conclusions.
I don’t know Bundy. He might be a racist though people who know him (including black folks) say he is not. One thing I know is that a reasonable person cannot conclude he is a racist by the remarks he made.
This leads us to a guy named Donald Sterling, an 81 year old man who owns the LA Clippers professional basketball team.
Sterling was recorded making very racist remarks to his 23 year old girlfriend (yes, 23). He was caught telling a woman he is dating, one who is young enough to be his granddaughter, that he does not like to see pictures of her with black people and he does not want her bringing black people to his games but he was OK with her hanging out with them or sleeping with them (quotes from recording in above link).
This has sparked an outrage among a lot of people and rightly so. There is no doubt from the recording that Sterling made very racist remarks and he should be held accountable for them.
Paul Begala, a Democrat, warned conservatives not to jump in to defend this guy. Begala was not really informed because Sterling is a Democrat and records show he donated to Democrat politicians (but not to Obama).
In other words, Sterling is one of the Democrat’s own. This should not come as a surprise since the racists are overwhelmingly among the Democrats.
Harry Reid, Joe Biden, and Bill Clinton have all made racially charged comments but since they are Democrats it was never pursued. Sterling is a Democrat who will be taken to the woodshed because the left cannot paint him as part of the right wing, though Begala tried.
Snoop Dogg had a racist rant to denounce Sterling’s racism (yes Snoop, calling someone a redneck white bread is racist). One does not stop racism by using more racism but then again, Snoop is not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Al Sharpton is up in arms (SURPRISE!!) and he wants the NBA to take Sterling’s team away from him. How exactly would that be allowed? Does Sharpton think people’s property can be taken because they say things that are deplorable? If so Sharpton should not have any property because his history is filled with deplorable racist remarks.
Then again, he was an informant for the FBI. This might explain why the government is not going after him for the millions he owes in taxes while it spends millions to collect from Bundy.
I digress. If you want Sterling to pay then don’t go to his games. Don’t buy his team’s merchandise and don’t watch his team on TV. Players can refuse to sign with him and those on the team can go to other teams. If he loses money he will be forced to take action, action that might include selling the team.
Sharpton will be stirring the pot and calling for his network to protest and riot. He must be short on funds so he is fortunate to have this issue to use to raise money (or extort it). It was reprehensible but having Sharpton in the lead on an issue does not do it any good.
Look on the bright side. At least Sterling did not call them coloreds or Negroes…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: Al Sharpton, cliven bundy, democrat donor, donald sterling, nba, racist remarks
Warner’s Immigration Reform; No Bieber
Feb 4, 2014 Immigration, Opinion
Senator Mark Warner, Democrat Virginia, is seeking reelection so jumping on board the get rid of Bieber bus is perfect for him. A majority of the voting public is disenchanted with Bieber and his antics so much so that a petition calling for his deportation generated more than enough votes to require review by the White House.
In an interview Warner was asked about the petition and his response was to ask if there was someplace he could sign.
Now Bieber is a douche and is spiraling out of control and I couldn’t care less if he is deported. He is dangerous and could end up hurting someone with his behavior. But he is here legally and he makes money and pays taxes. That does not mean he should not go but if he is here legally making money and paying taxes why should he be deported when so many ILLEGAL aliens are here?
Their mere presence is a violation of the law and Warner is pushing for comprehensive immigration reform which will involve allowing those who are here illegally to stay.
Why should we allow them to stay here and suckle at the teat of welfare and at the same time deport a person who is contributing to the Treasury?
Bieber probably needs to go home to Canada and work out whatever demons he has. But those who are here illegally should not get a pass just because their crimes have not been as public as Bieber’s.
If Warner wants to throw himself into the process of deporting people perhaps he should start by deporting those who are here illegally.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: bieber, deportation, hypocrisy, Immigration, mark warner
The Obama Sequester End Game
Feb 27, 2013 Opinion
Barack Obama’s sequester is set to kick in on Friday and there appears to be no stopping it from taking place. This means that about 85 billion dollars will be cut from the growth in the budget (not the actual budget but what they said they would spend) and about 48 billion of that will come from the Defense Department. Obama and his Democrats could easily cut items that do not affect people but have chosen to cut where it will hurt the most. In the DOD 800,000 people will lose 20% of their salary when furloughs start at the end of April. This is being done to hurt people and there is a reason for it.
Obama wants people to hurt and he wants to pin the blame on Republicans. Obama came up with the sequester but he will put the blame on others.
No surprise there.
He wants voters to be angry with Republicans so they will be voted out in 2014 and Obama can have a majority in Congress. Then he can run roughshod over the country.
There is also another reason Obama chose to hurt people. He needs people to hurt so he can claim that cuts to government hurt people so there can be no more cuts and taxes have to be raised.
Imagine how bad it would be for Democrats if the cuts took place and no one noticed. Imagine how it would be portrayed if those cuts were so painless that people began demanding more in the way of cuts. That can’t be allowed to happen if you are a big government socialist like Obama. He needs people to get hurt so he can brainwash them into thinking big government is the answer and that there is no spending problem (after all, we need the spending to prevent people from being hurt) and that the problem is revenue.
Obama got his revenue increase and it is far above the amount of the looming cuts. The entire cut amounts to about 2.5 cents of every dollar of the projected spending. The government could easily cut 2.5% from spending (the growth in spending) and not even feel it.
That is why they are targeting people and programs that directly help people. Obama needs to inflict maximal pain to push his agenda.
This guy who so many believe cares for people is a cold and calculating political monster who cares nothing about anyone. He cares for his agenda and socialism and that is all.
So if you support him and his cuts hurt you then you got what you voted for and what you deserve. If you don’t support him and get hurt then you will have to suck it up and do the best you can.
Strong people will come through the other side intact. The weak will be worse off because their baby daddy in government is spanking them.
Deliberately harming people is wrong and the mark of a true beast.
Maybe someone in Congress can make one of the cuts the executive Air Force that ferries people like Obama and his vacation addicted wife around. Be kind of nice to see them stuck in DC actually having to do something.
Anyone with some testicular fortitude on the right side of the aisle willing to make this cut?
I doubt it. They will probably cave and give king dufus all that he wants.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[jpsub]
Is Obama Working To Improve National Security Creds?
May 2, 2012 Opinion, Political
While Barack Obama criticized George Bush and the use of military force (remember, Obama opposed everything Bush did) he has done some of the things he accused Bush of doing. It was Obama who used military force without Congressional approval, not Bush.
While Obama is working to draw down troop levels in Iraq and Afghanistan the Pentagon is preparing contingencies for Iran. I would normally think that the Pentagon has these contingencies and plans for this stuff all the time. I would have thought that we have plans for Iran and many other countries that could initiate violence against us.
The fact that the news is being reported and that there are claims we could defeat Iran in short order coupled with plans to engage North Korea appears to be election year bluster in order to improve the standing of the lame Commander in Chief.
This is reported as Obama uses the Seals and the troops in Afghanistan as props in his election campaign stops (but his toadies claim it is not political). He is using the troops to push a tough guy image while he guts the military and its capabilities.
The plans call for doing more with less and perhaps this is the reason the plans are being revised or are being announced.
The Pentagon is faced with a lot of cuts in troop strength and budget money is being reduced as weapons systems wear out and age. The Pentagon needs to have plans in order to react to any threat but now it must do more with less.
I imagine this is probably the regime’s attempt to show that we are still able to protect our nation even after the cuts. It is probably designed to make it appear as if Barack Obama is not harming the country and its armed forces.
It might even be an attempt to show the members of the armed forces that the Commander in Chief has their backs and is looking out for them.
Since a large percentage of the armed forces are conservative it is hard to believe that Obama will get much of their votes.
This is, after all, why Democrats work hard to disenfranchise the military by making sure their votes don’t count.
I realize the Pentagon war games all the time. However, when Bush was President the left loved to tell us he would trot out bin Laden or start a skirmish in order to win an election. Those things never happened under Bush but it is only fair to apply the same standard to Obama.
He has trotted out bin Laden. Will a war be next?
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: creds, lies, Military, Obama, props, war games. contingencies