Can’t We All Just Get Along?
Nov 12, 2020 Political
After four years of telling us Donald Trump is illegitimate and that he did not win fairly because of Russian interference the left is telling us that Joe Biden has won, Trump should concede and we should all just accept it and get along.
Yes, the very people who for years called us names, told us we were deplorable, that we were reprobates and that the president was elected with Russian help, who refused to accept the results are now saying we should bow down, accept the results and anoint Joe Biden the president.
Well screw that.
There was a lot of cheating involved in the Biden “win” and things are not settled. The left has worked hard to secure this “win” and they are pushing for a Trump concession so they can sweep the cheating under the rug. If Trump keeps fighting there is more chance for the right people to look into the shenanigans that took place and work to get the true and proper results.
So no, we will not play nice. We will not accept that win (if in fact it is a win) and we will not take it gracefully.
We will give Biden the same consideration Trump was given and we will ride him until he strokes out and then we will ride his replacement like a rented mule (not that she hasn’t been ridden hard before).
We will not play nice and we will never make nice. We owe it to Biden and the Democrats to give them the same treatment they gave Trump.
And if Biden were really concerned with getting along he would have called for us to all get along four years ago. Instead, he stoked the flames of hatred for Trump.
Now, if he wins, it will be his turn to get pressure and a lack of cooperation.
Just as it should be.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
States Want A Bailout
Apr 23, 2020 Political, Tyranny
The Democrats like to say never let a crisis go to waste. That is particularly true with regard to the Corona Virus. Democrats have used it to impose authoritarian rule, to limit what people can do and to ignore the US Constitution.
This crisis, if you want to call it that, has demonstrated that states were woefully unprepared for the pandemic. It is the responsibility of the states to have plans in place and to have adequate supplies for the beginning of a problem. The federal government is there to provide help to hot spots and coordinate movement of items among the states. It has bulk supplies to supplement the ones the states are supposed to have. As an aside, it is also the responsibility of hospitals to have supplies and plans in place.
When these things occur there is a fouled up response and then they have meetings, blue ribbon panels meet and they come up with plans to “ensure this never happens again” and then they put the plans in a drawer and the next time there is an emergency it happens again. And each time they encroach on our liberties.
Now it looks like these liberals are going to use this emergency (or try) to take more of our money. All these states that were screaming about being in control and not having the feds run their show are now saying they will need BILLIONS of our tax dollars to recover from the pandemic. If you think they mean to recover from Corona related items you are only partly correct. These liberals (and no doubt a few RINOs) want the federal government to pay for failing pension systems, budget shortfalls and billions of dollars worth of other shortcomings that states have had for years.
The Democrats in Congress are all on board making bold statements that the next stimulus (you know I hate stimulus packages) will include money for states to make their public sector pensions whole. There are plans to include money in the recovery to help states pay off debt including debt that was there BEFORE COVID-19. New York was 7 Billion in debt prior to the outbreak. Under the ideas floated by the Democrats, this debt would be paid off by the federal government as part of a stimulus package.
Why exactly should we pay the debt of the states? How is it the states can scream they have rights and the feds need to butt out (all very correct) and then say we need you to pay our bills, past and present? I hate stimulus packages but if the feds are going to take money from workers in each state then some of that needs to go back to the state to make things whole BUT only things that are a direct result of COVID-19.
States are already inflating COVID death numbers to get higher reimbursements. Now they expect the feds to pay all their bills, cancel out all their debt and make them whole again. I do not see that as being the way to go. States are responsible for the pensions of their public sector employees so they need to make those systems whole. Perhaps they should use this crisis as an opportunity to pare down those lucrative pension plans.
Fortunately, Mitch McConnell says that he and most Republicans will not be on board with bailing out the states. He says they might want to consider filing for bankruptcy. I agree 100%. States can pay their own bills or they can file for protection.
Keep in mind, government has the ability to tax you to death (and after you die) so in the long run you will pay for this. If your state has to foot its own bills it will raise taxes (and they will never go back down) or impose new ones (and they will never go away) to pay the bills. States are looking for the easy way out by spreading their misery to all the other states. It is important to remember if the feds pay the bill the federal taxes will need to be raised in order to pay the bills so everyone pays even if they are in a fiscally responsible state.
I am not in favor of paying the bills of the states. I am all for as little government as possible. Government has gotten too big and has imposed tyranny on us in the face of another “crisis”. We need to put an end to this mess. We are speeding toward 25 TRILLION dollars in debt and members of Congress and the leaders (or so called leaders) in the states are stomping down on the throttle.
And they are doing that because they will be dead long before their malfeasance destroys the nation. All of them are old and they will be dead before the mess they are causing has any affect. They will not be bothered by it so they do not care.
But your grandchildren will. Do not allow these cretins to further destroy our nation.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: corona virus, government tyranny, state's rights, taxes
The Impeachment Saga
Jan 21, 2020 Political
It looks as if the Senators are debating the rules they will follow to conduct the trial of President Donald Trump. There is a lot of screeching going on from people like Chuck Schumer.
Schumer is one of the most despicable people on the planet and the sound of his voice is enough to make deaf people jump off cliffs. In any event, this guy is trying to dictate the terms of the trial. Nancy Pelosi tried doing that but was unsuccessful. Of course it now appears as if she held up sending the articles to the Senate so that Joe Biden would benefit from the absence of his opponents or she was waiting for her $450K gold pens to arrive.
Schumer said he did not want a fast trial and he wants witnesses. His big claim is that failing to do these things will be part of the cover up. Cover up is the new Democrat talking point. Chuck wants things done in the open and thinks limiting access of the media and holding closed door sessions hides things from the American people and should not be tolerated because it is part of the, you guessed it, cover up.
The House of Representatives rushed the impeachment through stating that it was of the utmost importance to keep DJT from interfering in the next election. The House held secret hearings in the SCIF and the only information the public received was the leaks from Adam Schiff as he ran to cameras to selectively leak information carefully choosing or omitting items that would be particularly damaging to the president. The House chose the witnesses that were allowed to speak. All Republican requests had to go through Schiff and he had to approve them. He approved none of the ones Republicans wanted (unless they had already been interviewed by the Democrats). The entire process was carefully controlled to get the results the Democrats wanted.
So to recap, the Democrats who held secret interviews, refused witnesses to the Republicans, and rushed to get the articles passed are now demanding that everything be held in the open, there be as many witnesses as the Democrats want (and their choices NOT be infringed upon) and that they take their time and not rush things.
Folks, the House had as much time as it wanted to make its case and it decided to punt. It is not up to the Senate to fix things for the House. They handed off the articles and now the Senate has COMPLETE control of the trial.
If Democrats think they are going to remove Mr. Trump they are crazy. If they think they could remove him and survive the resulting civil unrest they are absolutely bonkers.
But then you already knew that didn’t you?
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
What if it backfires?
Mar 20, 2019 Political
There is a national effort to do away with the Electoral College by many states in a manner that circumvents the Constitution. These states want to award their Electoral Votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote.
We do not have a national election in this country. We have 51 separate and individual elections run by each state and the District of Columbia. Each state has a certain number of electors and those are based on the number of Representatives and the two Senators for each state. Most states are winner take all so the candidate who wins the state is awarded all of the Electoral Votes.
With this system it is possible (and has happened five times) that the person who wins the presidency has fewer cumulative votes than the other candidate. This system provides protection for the smaller states and gives them proportional representation.
The liberals proposing the elimination of the EC do not like this system and say it is unfair. They do not think a state with a low population should have an equal weight when it comes to the presidential election. To them it is more fair that several densely populated states can decide for the entire country who gets to be president. They like the idea because they think Democrats would have an edge and they are probably right.
But the problem they face is a Constitutional amendment would be required to get rid of the EC. It is unlikely this would make it out of Congress and even more unlikely that enough states would ratify. This is why states are doing an end run by passing laws saying they will ignore what their citizens vote for and will award their EVs to the person who has the most cumulative votes nationally. The idea is to get states with a total of 271 EVs to commit so they can get their person in, assuming their person is tops in the nation. This has been brewing for a while but came to a head when Hillary Clinton was beaten by the Electoral Vote even though she allegedly had more votes nationally. If Democrats cannot win with the rules in place they will change the rules.
But what happens if this backfire? Suppose a number of states do this and in 2020 Donald Trump wins the national total vote total. Suppose further that many of the states signed on to this new scheme voted for the Democrat candidate. All of those states would be required, by their law, to award their EVs to Donald Trump instead of the Democrat the state’s citizens voted for. The real horror to them would be realizing their candidate would have won if they had not changed the rules.
I like the Electoral College system. It was a great idea by the Founders designed to give the states an equal say in the process. They wanted to make sure a few heavily populated states did not decide for all the others.
I do admit there are issues with the EC. The main problem is the way the EVs are awarded. It is grossly unfair for a state to award ALL of its EVs to the winner of the state when a portion of its population did not vote for that person. Many areas of California vote for the Republican but the Democrat gets all the EVs. The same, in reverse, is true in Texas.
Since Electoral Votes are awarded based on the number of Representatives in each state (I’ll get to the Senators next) and each Representative is in a specific Congressional District then the EV vote for the Congressional District should be awarded to the candidate who wins that district. So if a state has 50 Congressional Districts and the Democrat wins 35 of them and the Republican 15 the EVs would be awarded exactly like that.
The two Senators for each state represent the state’s interests in Congress so the EVs associated with them would go to the candidate who wins the total votes statewide. In the above example the Democrat would end up with 37 and the Republican 15.
This is inherently more fair and allows people to have their votes count the way they intended.
It is unfortunate that the liberal left is working to circumvent the Constitution but this is not something new as they do it all the time (think Second Amendment). So I truly hope that if they implement this new scheme it comes back to bite them in the rear.
Imagine how their heads will explode if their actions lead to a second term for Donald Trump…
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Dems Will Say, Do Anything To Win
Oct 16, 2018 2018 Election, Political
Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri is in a battle to keep the Senate seat she currently occupies. While her ideologies are out of touch with those of most of the people in her state she keeps getting reelected. It was baffling to most folks how she could get elected in a place where a moderate or conservative should have a better chance.
A recent undercover video from Project Veritas might well explain how McCaskill continues to win.
She lies.
In the video McCaskill, as well as many of her campaign workers, admits to being deceptive on her positions and that those positions change depending who she is speaking to. Her position on the Second Amendment is anti Constitutional but she does not want people to know that because there are Republicans who she needs to vote for her. She is opposed to a border wall and will willingly ignore immigration laws to help dreamers and to push DACA.
But this is all kept hush hush so that she will appear to be moderate. She takes tons of money from Chuck Schumer (his PAC) and her political beliefs are identical to Obama’s (their words, not mine) but that information is not allowed to leave the room. It must be kept under wraps so she can win reelection.
How is that for a kick in the pants? She will not do what is right (or at least be honest about her positions) because it is more important for her to win reelection.
Case in point, McCaskill is in favor of impeaching President Trump (or as Maxine Waters would say Impeat poddy pie) but they do not talk about it. They want to appeal to moderates who don’t want him impeached. When asked how she would respond to the moderates if she were reelected and went forward with impeachment a campaign worker stated he would tell them to “Get over it.”
This is your Democrat Party. These are the folks who lied about Romney’s taxes (Harry Reid who stated he didn’t win, did he, when asked about his lie) and those who hide their true intentions just to stay in office. Remember, these are the people who weaponized the FBI and initiated illegal surveillance on then candidate Trump. These people are evil.
Rush Limbaugh once said the left had to lie because if they told the truth they would never get elected.
Well now we know the truth and it is time for the great folks of Missouri to ensure McCaskill does not get reelected.
Read the article and see the video here.
#walkaway
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: Democrats, gun control, impeachment, lies, mccaskill, midterm, project veritas