A Good Guy With A Gun
May 8, 2014 Political, Second Amendment
A security guard at a McDonald’s in Baltimore (the city that bleeds) shot a man who fired at him inside the restaurant. It is not clear if the security guard was working at the McDonald’s (a sad statement about our society) or there to order a meal. In any event, someone shot at him and he returned fire. The would be murderer is in the hospital and will be charged with attempted murder when he is released. His name will be released at that time.
The security guard was armed as part of his job. He was allowed, under Maryland’s restrictive and unconstitutional gun laws that bar the average citizen from carrying, to carry a gun.
His job saved him and others because if he were some regular Joe he would not have been able to defend himself.
This is how Maryland works. It has a lot of programs to help people like illegal aliens, welfare queens and other Democrat supporters but it refuses to follow the Constitution so that law abiding, not otherwise restricted, people can carry a firearm.
[note]Disarming people is the best way to enslave them to tyranny[/note]
It is fortunate the guard was there (whether he worked there or not) because if he had not been people might have been killed. A criminal does not care about the law so gun laws do not affect him (want to bet that the guy who did this was not allowed to have a gun). Gun laws only affect, AND HURT, law abiding citizens.
Maryland should move to be a Constitutional carry state where people who are not otherwise prohibited (felons, mentally ill) can carry a firearm either concealed or open. If one passes the comprehensive background check (yes, contrary to what liberals tell you, this is required) then that should be sufficient with regard to carry.
Maryland will likely never get to that state because it involves freedom and Maryland is not free at all though, ironically, one of the nicknames of the state is The Free State…
The least Maryland should do (and likely will not without court pressure) is to remove the good and substantial reason to carry a concealed firearm.
Maryland is run by liberals particularly in the city and counties surrounding Baltimore and DC. These places are full of liberals who are enslaved to the government. They vote for liberals so they can keep their hands out to receive the fruits of other’s labor.
If Maryland were truly a free state then people could carry firearms which, in turn, would lower the crime rate. Criminals do not like to face armed opposition. The gunman in the story probably did not expect to see an armed guard. If he had known an armed person was inside he would probably have picked an easier target (and there are plenty of them in Maryland).
Things will not change until the population votes out the liberal cretins who have enslaved the people of the state and as long as liberal politicians plunder from earners to give to the gimmiedats there will be no such vote.
Is it any wonder that Maryland is third on the list of states people (47%) want to LEAVE?
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: constitution, firearm, good guy, gun control, liberals, lies, Maryland
Hillary: Gun Rights Way Out Of Balance
May 7, 2014 Political, Second Amendment
Hillary Clinton was at the National Council for Behavioral Health conference and she addressed firearms in this country. She said the nation’s gun culture had gotten “way out of balance” and the idea that everyone could have a gun was not in the “best interest of the vast majority of people.”
Who is Hillary to determine what is in the best interests of people and, for that matter, how is she even qualified to make such a claim? There is no way to quantify this and it is nothing more than an emotional statement followed by a few examples of shootings, many of which were committed by people who were not allowed to own a firearm.
There is also a flaw in this claim that everyone could have a gun. The first problem is that not everyone can. Felons and the mentally ill are not allowed to own them. How do they get them? Some are not caught on the government background check (the same government that let the 9/11 terrorists in the country) and most buy them illegally. Just because something is banned, illegal or forbidden does not mean people won’t have access. I think the experience with prohibition demonstrates that quite clearly as does the problem with Heroin overdoses.
The second problem is the statement “could have a gun” as if a right is something the government is allowed to dole out regardless of circumstances. In other words, we have laws that forbid some folks from owning firearms because they have shown they should not have them. To Clinton government should decide if you could have the gun no matter what you have demonstrated.
If you are a law abiding citizen who is not otherwise prohibited you CAN have a firearm regardless of what Hillary thinks.
If Hillary is so willing to decide that the gun culture is out of balance and needs government action what other right will she infringe upon?
She had a real tough time of it when her hubby was caught having sex with an intern. Drudge broke the story. Hillary is getting a lot of press about her failure in Benghazi (she did not do too well with that 3 am phone call) so what if Hillary decided that the information culture has gotten out of balance and the idea that everyone can post information is not in the best interest of the vast majority of people? Perhaps people would need to jump through the same hoops they do to purchase a firearm. Perhaps information will be as regulated as firearms and the only people with access will be the politically connected.
What if Hillary decided that there are too many religions in America and religion is way out of balance and the idea that everyone could worship as they see fit is not in the best interest of the vast majority of people? Perhaps she will deem that there are too many religions and only certain ones are worthy to exist. Maybe she will force people to go through the same process to join a religion as to purchase a firearm.
Rights are not something the government deemed we could have and they are not something that government granted to us. They preexist our government and they are protected (not granted) by our Constitution.
This is the problem with liberals. They think they know what is best for you and who can blame them considering the number of people willing to be enslaved by the government?
Liberals want control and they know they can’t get it outright so they incrementally take rights away from a population too busy worrying about American Idol than what is going on in this country. Liberals keep upping the ante and then one day rights are gone because people sat by and allowed them to be eroded away by a tyrannical government.
I think, to paraphrase Hillary, the political class has gotten way out of balance and this notion that elites can make a career out of politics is not in the best interest of a vast majority of people.
The difference between our statements is I am correct.
I am willing to bet that the four Americans who Hillary allowed to be murdered in Benghazi would have loved to have a bunch of Americans (citizen or soldier) with guns the night they lost their lives because of her incompetence.
Hillary’s incompetence is responsible for more American deaths than all my guns combined.
And how many armed guards watch over her anyway?
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: benghazi, gun rights, Hillary Clinton, liberal, lies, moron, political elite, sex scandal
The Party of NO
May 3, 2014 Obamacare, Opinion, Political, Religion of Peace, Second Amendment, Terrorism
Democrats often call Republicans the Party of NO – because we oppose Barack Obama and the Liberals (sounds like a good name for a Death Metal Band) where they want to Give everything to their constituents. Even noted Republican RINO Chris Christy has called us the party of no, saying that’s not good enough – that we have to offer something to the voters.
I will admit, it makes us look bad. People call Barack Obama Santa Claus, but he’s not – he’s Monty Hall. All flash and bright colors and big gifts behind unknown laws – I mean curtains. The problem is that the current Republican leaders in Washington want to be Monty Hall too – be all flashy and glittery with gifts – to BRIBE their way into office – because that’s how they get good ratings and stay on TV – I mean, in Congress.
It’s DAMNED hard to beat someone who can give piles of MONEY and TREASURE to their minions.
But – unlike Christie – I believe Republicans should BE the Party of NO. After all, the Republican Party was formed to say NO to the Democrat Slaveowners. The current festering pile of Republican Party leaders want to give out shiny gifts – they have no MESSAGE, no RIGHTEOUSNESS to inspire people as to WHY they should vote for NO.
I EMBRACE NO:
NO to RAISING TAXES – WE DO NOT WORK JUST TO SUPPORT CONGRESS!!!
NO to FUNDING ISLAMOFASHISTS!
NO to FUNDING SYRIAN MUSLIMS WHO ARE EATING DEAD CHRISTIANS!!!
NO to TAKING AWAY OUR RIGHT TO DEFEND OURSELVES BY OWNING A FIREARM!!!
NO to LIMITING FREE SPEECH!
NO to OBAMACARE!
NO to LETTING OUR VETERANS DIE!!!
NO to ABANDONING ISRAEL!!!
NO to ALLOWING IRAN TO DEVELOP NUCLEAR WEAPONS!!!
NO to ALLOWING AMERICANS TO DIE IN BENGHAZI SO DEMOCRATS CAN LOOK GOOD!
NO to MOCKING THE LORD OUR G✡D BY BOOING HIM ON NATIONWIDE TV!!!
I AM A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN! I AM THE PARTY OF NO!!!
Tags: conservative, party of no, Republicans
Sure Hope The Militia Stuck Around
Apr 15, 2014 Political, Second Amendment
I knew there was something fishy about the BLM announcing it was leaving the Bundy Ranch. The BLM and local authorities asked everyone to remain calm while the BLM packed up and left. The supporters were happy because they had “won”.
But did they?
Harry Reid said this was not over and now it looks like it is not. While the BLM was saying it would seek administrative ways to handle the situation events on the ground tell a very different story.
GOP Daily Dose is reporting that the feds are moving in with a Command Post, paddy wagons and lots of officers. The video posted at the site matches that narrative and gives the appearance that the feds are back and ready for war.
I knew the BLM was lying when it said it was leaving. It pulled back just to get the supporters to leave. Now the government is back with a larger force and ready for bloodshed.
I hope the militia members who arrived there stayed and I hope those who were in route did not turn around. The Bundys will need a lot of well armed militia to fend off the invasion that is no doubt going to happen.
My guess is an assault in the middle of the night with overwhelming numbers of armed, trigger happy federal agents. It would be a shame if they did not meet much resistance.
I truly hope the militia stayed and more showed and there is a huge force in hiding waiting for them when they come.
If the Bundys have no help there and the BLM assaults them there will be hell to pay. You can rest assured that no one will leave the next site and there will be a lot of short fuses on the freedom side.
I agree with the man who said they won’t fire the first shot heard round the world but they will fire the rest of them.
The link above has a still and a video of what is taking place.
God bless the Bundys and those who are there to help them. May they be successful in defeating this tyranny.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: armed agents, assault, blm, bundy, command post, lies, paddy wagons, tyranny
Gun Runner Holder Keeps Trying To Control Us
Apr 8, 2014 Second Amendment
Eric “The Red” Holder is determined to take guns away from law abiding citizens. He and Crazy Uncle Joe Biden keep saying they want common sense reforms but are really only interested in making it nearly impossible for people to own guns.
These two morons along with the rest of the anti American anti gun progressives have been working hard to infringe upon our right to keep and bear arms. The latest tactic is to develop technology so that a firearm can only be discharged by its owner. This involves tracking devices as well as electronics that keep the gun from operating unless the person with the gun has a bracelet on that allows the gun to fire.
So what we have here is a scheme to be able to track firearms (and therefore their owners). Imagine how this will play out if the technology ever comes to be. The government can have manufacturers of the bracelets install something that would allow them to be centrally deactivated. Sure, that sounds great so if there is a school shooter they can deactivate the firearm. However, government could send out a signal and deactivate all firearms in the event of civil unrest. Sure, that sounds like a great plan.
[note]There would be no need to deactivate a firearm or worry about mass shootings if all people constitutionally carried. This is about control and nothing more.[/note]
This is a non starter. They will end up spending millions to see if they can do this (probably to enrich their friends) and people will not comply. We will find ways to deactivate the devices and there are certainly enough older firearms that do not have these things.
Let me repeat; WE WILL NOT COMPLY.
If they want common sense reforms then they need to get out of the way and the Federal Government needs to make it clear that ALL states must have Constitutional Carry (The 2A applies to all states so enforce it). What that means is if you are not prohibited from owning a gun (felon, mentally ill, etc) then you can carry the gun either openly or concealed. PERIOD.
I also note that tracking guns did not work out too well when Holder was busy gun running into Mexico. The only tracking bracelet that should involve Holder is the one he is forced to wear as a condition of his arrest. Of course the old fashioned kind of “bracelets” should be on his wrists as well…
The tree of liberty is parched…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: electronics, eric holder, gun control, joe biden, tracking bracelet.