If She Were A Muslim They Would Leave Her Alone
Sep 3, 2015 Political, Tyranny
Kim Davis is a Christian who believes that marriage is between one man and one woman. She also happens to be the clerk in a county in Kentucky and her job is to issue marriage licenses. She refused to issue licenses to gay couples and when they balked she stopped issuing them to anyone.
A judge ordered her to issue the licenses and she went through the legal system only to be shot down. She still refused to issue a document that would bear her name. She told the people where they could go to get the license but they would not do so.
A judge held Davis in contempt and had her jailed where she will remain until she issues the licenses.
This is just one more piece of evidence in the war on Christianity. Davis has a strongly held religious belief and she offered a solution that would allow the couples to get their licenses without her having to issue them.
I am pretty sure if this woman were a Muslim and refused to issue the licenses she would have been left alone.
There are a number of stories where Muslims claim their religious beliefs for not removing clothing that covers their faces or refusing to allow dogs in cabs or refuse to sell or handle alcohol or pork products. Has anyone fired any of them for doing this?
Now I understand that Davis is an elected official and the incidents I discussed were in the private sector but there seems to be this atmosphere that certain religions get away with anything but Christians do not.
If a Muslim bakery refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding do you really think there would be hell to pay for them?
Davis has religious beliefs and she is following them but she offered a solution. That was not good enough for Al Gayda (and BTW, two straight couples caught up in this).
I have read a number of items from people saying she is elected and works for the government so she must obey the law even if it goes against her faith.
There are many who are happy she is jailed.
So let us take this a little further.
It is against the law to enter the US illegally. Many people do and elected officials have established sanctuary cities where they are free to be lawbreakers. The elected officials in the US government have kept people from being deported. The US government has ignored immigration laws and allowed millions of people to come here and vote as well as receive welfare.
If they are elected and are expected to follow the laws then should we not be arresting them and putting them in jail for the same reason Davis is in jail?
The courts ordered a sheriff in California to issue concealed carry permits. She has not issued them to thousands of people and she has not been arrested for ignoring the court.
Perhaps they should just make getting a marriage license as difficult as getting a concealed carry permit in California or Maryland.
Those who think that the laws must be followed no matter what (and that includes religious objection or unconstitutional laws) should remember that everything Hitler did was allowed under German law.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: contempt, county clerk, kentucky, kim davis, sodomy marriage
Making Vaccines Mandatory Requires Hiding Data
Jun 2, 2015 Political, Tyranny
There is no doubt government at all levels wants mandatory vaccines for everyone. The big push was for school aged children but in recent years there has been a backlash over the program.
Some parents do NOT want their children vaccinated. I think vaccines are generally a good idea but have issues with them being mandatory. Once government can make any vaccine mandatory it can make them all so. This was the case with Gardasil. It was made mandatory in Texas and people pushed back. But government had a precedent because it has already made some vaccines mandatory.
Gardasil is not a necessary vaccine. While it might be helpful to some it is not something that is required and can cause more problems than it solves.
I understand the whole herd immunity idea but if most kids are vaccinated and a few are not then they are at risk and if they get sick or die because they were not vaccinated then it is on the parents who decided not to do so.
[note]Funny how a woman’s body is her own if she wants to abort her unborn child but if she decides not to vaccinate a child she chooses to have she is in the wrong…(In both cases she is deciding for the child. It just depends on where the child is residing at the time)[/note]
The government wants to extend its reach and force adults to get vaccinated as well. One would expect that most adults are vaccinated but there are some who are not. The government wants to force them to get vaccinated.
Who the hell is the government to force people, particularly adults, to have something injected into their bodies?
What’s the big deal? They should have gotten them as children and they will be healthier. Really? Seems to me they made it this far without them.
Plus, and this is a big plus, what happens when the government decides some new vaccine is a must for everyone? What happens when flu shots are made mandatory (and government never gets that one wrong /sarc)?
Suppose a vaccine is developed to prevent HIV and government decides that everyone MUST get it? Now a vaccine for that might be good and it might help at risk populations (homosexual males and IV drug users) but for the larger population it will have no value. It will likely be worse for them in the long run given the low odds of getting HIV.
There are also the sinister aspects of this. Government can’t be trusted. What if they decided that mandatory vaccines would be a good way to put RFID chips in people without their consent? Can’t happen you say?
The US used a vaccine program as a cover to get DNA samples of people in the Middle East to look for relatives of terrorists particularly Bin Laden in hopes of tracking him down.
What is all the hidden data you referred to in the title?
Sharyl Attkisson has a piece up about how the government has wiped recent vaccine injury data from its website. It is a good read and worth the time.
What does that have to do with your whole rant here?
In order to get buy in of the population to willingly line up and let people inject stuff into them it must be presented as safe. By hiding data the government can tell people that it is safe and there are no worries. If people can’t find information to the contrary they will foolishly believe that their government is telling them the truth and they will not resist. Why else would they hide it?
The liberal/progressive/socialist people in government don’t care how they get you to comply so long as you comply.
If you want to be vaccinated then by all means do so. But you are supposed to be free and if you do not want things injected into your body then you can say no.
Just don’t sue if you catch something you could have been vaccinated for and get sick or die (in which case it would obviously be your heirs suing).
Government lies so it is best to know the facts before doing anything.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: data, government control, hidden, lies, vaccines
This Is What You Get With Tyranny
Apr 7, 2015 Political, Tyranny
The federal government has a closely held plan known as SOP 303 which allows it to disrupt cellular service in a geographic area. The plan was requested under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request but the government agrued and the court agreed that disclosing the plan would put people in danger.
I am not sure how knowing about the plan would put people in danger. It seems to me that a government disrupting cellular (actually any wireless signal) in an area would be much more dangerous.
[note]Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ~ Benjamin Franklin[/note]
The government argued that it needs to be able to do this in case of emergency like if there is a bomb that will be detonated by a wireless device. The claim is that the government can disrupt the signals and keep people safe.
Before I move on to other parts of this let that stated purpose sink in. Then ask yourself when government ever knows about the bombs before they go off. The only times we see where government stops a bomber is when they stop people they hooked in and provided the bomb to. They had no idea about the Boston Marathon bomber until the bomb, you know, detonated.
The only way they can ensure that a bomb does not go off in a crowded or sensitive area is to shut off the wireless signals during the entire period people are there. Do not put it past government to do just that, for your safety and all.
The stated intent of the SOP is just a smoke screen. It is unlikely, absent a complete blanket when danger might be present, the government will know of a bomb and be able to shut the signals before it goes off. So the reality is in addition to shutting off all service when the government is worried about a threat, there must be another goal.
This entire issue started because of the transit authority in San Francisco disrupting service in order to disperse a protest. You got that? It was not to stop a bomb it was to stop a protest probably by keeping people from contacting others to join in and to keep them from communicating with those there.
What would stop the government from using this disruption whenever it wanted to achieve a goal that had nothing to do with a bomb. Suppose the government decided to impose martial law for one reason or another and people were intent on disobeying. Government could disrupt the communications of the people trying to organize resistance.
Suppose there was another attack on this nation or some other catastrophic event (or government committed atrocities) and the government did not want people communicating this with others?
Governments become tyrannical. Eventually all governments become too big, too bloated and too powerful and they all begin to impose their will on the people. Governments eventually put their collective boots on the throats of the people in order to control them.
Our government is no different. We have plenty of people in office who want to rule over us. It is why they tell us what we can eat, drink, smoke and use. It is why they indoctrinate our children with revisionist history that raises a generation of compliant robots. It is why government runs health care and wants to take firearms away from people.
It is all because government wants to control us and lord over us.
All governments eventually end up this way. One day you are free and the next day you are living in a nation where jack booted government agents are shooting you and your family in the back of the head.
And they will block the cell signals so no one else will know.
Until it is too late.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: cellular disruption, government, liberty, lies, sop 303, tyranny