Big Dogs Weblog

Conspiracy, Paranoia, or Rhetoric?

by Big Dog on Mar 14, 2007 at 09:37 Political

During Bill Clinton’s time in office his wife coined a phrase that has been used time and again. When Clinton was denying the allegations that he had sex with “that woman” his wife was making the talk show circuit and she said that the attacks were part of a vast right wing conspiracy to get her husband. Interestingly, the allegations turned out to be true (which would indicate that no such conspiracy existed) but Hillary was undaunted by the revelations and she continued with the VRWC rhetoric. Many people on the left believe that there is a VRWC and that Hillary is balls on with this. They believe that the Republicans employ dirty tricks and that the Democrats are the only ones with any virtue when it comes to the election process. Though there are many who think Hillary was unaware of her husband’s affair when she made the VRWC remark, Dick Morris points out that she was well aware long before she let on. This allowed her to concoct this VRWC remark to deflect the attention from her hubby and it allowed her to play the victim when the truth was finally revealed. Well, now Hillary wants to be the Queen and she has taken out the defibrillator and revived that VRWC once again:

Clinton asserted on Tuesday that the conspiracy is alive and well, and cited as proof the Election Day 2002 case of phone jamming in New Hampshire, a case in which two Republican operatives pleaded guilty to criminal charges, and a third was convicted.

“To the New Hampshire Democratic Party’s credit, they sued and the trail led all the way to the Republican National Committee,” Clinton said.

“So if anybody tells you there is no vast, right-wing conspiracy, tell them that New Hampshire has proven it in court,” she said. My Way News

I guess that this big revelation that the courts found law breakers from the right guilty means that there is a VRWC and Hillary is its next target. I guess if the Democrats are so damned wonderful, Hillary might just take time out of her busy campaign schedule (instead of say, her schedule as a Senator) and explain if these items indicate a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy:

• Michigan, 2006: Democratic Challengers wore brightly colored vests reading “I can help you” leading people to believe they were poll workers. The action led to a temporary injunction against the workers for violation of Michigan Voting Laws.
• The American Center For Voting Rights found that Democrats committed far more voting fraud in 2004 than did Republicans.
• In the 2004 Washington State Governor’s race Dino Rossi (R) won two recounts before some ballots were miraculously found and allowed to be counted by a judge. The margin of “victory” was 133 votes which included 1600 that were cast illegally. The “discovered” ballots should not have been allowed and neither should those that were cast illegally.
• On election day 2004, four Democratic operatives slashed the tires of the vehicles used by the Republicans to get the vote out. The four pleaded no contest to the charges. I believe one of those criminals was the son of an elected official.

So now, if Hillary is convinced and she wants her drones to be convinced that the Republicans are guilty because New Hampshire proved one case in court, then what does it say about the Democrats given this sampling of their dirty deeds? One only needs to read that lengthy report to see how dirty and underhanded the Democrats are. If a VRWC exists because it has been proven in court then what exists on the left with regard to what has been proven in court? Yes Hillary, it goes both ways (much like you) and if it is proof on one side then it is proof on the other.

This is not to say that Republicans are squeaky clean because they engage in bad behavior as well. The point of this post is not to exonerate Republicans because politics draws bad people from both parties. The point is to show that Hillary is using an instance and coupling it with some tired rhetoric to try and paint Republicans as evil people who are out to get her. She is pandering to her base of mindless people who do not have enough sense to see that there are bad things on both sides of the political spectrum.

I would prefer to have clean elections where only eligible voters cast a ballot and they all only do it once. History has shown that this is not the case. Kennedy stole the 1960 election with a bunch of dead voters, there was Watergate during the Nixon administration, and now we have Democrats who vehemently oppose any kind of ID in order to vote. The Democrats want criminals, inmates, and ILLEGAL Aliens to be able to vote because these groups overwhelmingly support Democrats. As an aside, it should tell you something about the Democratic Party when criminals, inmates, and ILLEGALS vote for them is large numbers. What is more telling is that the Democrats actually court those votes.

Hillary is a screeching moonbat who is dredging up some tired phrase that she used to deflect the shots taken at her husband when he failed to keep his pants up and so that she could play the victim wife when the defecation hit the orbiting cooling device. This kind of thing might wax nostalgic with the drones but it is based neither in fact nor reality. Of course, there will always be idiots who beleive this smack:

New Hampshire Democratic Party chairwoman Kathy Sullivan said she absolutely agreed with the New York senator’s description of the case.

“People think we’re paranoid when we talk about the vast, right-wing conspiracy, but there is a real connection of these groups – the same names keep popping up,” Sullivan said. “They are the most disgusting group of political thugs that I have ever seen.”

But for the record, I am part of the VRWC and I am proud of that.

Other information:
National Journal

UPDATE: This WSJ piece points it out perfectly and disputes Hillary’s claim that Bill did what every president does. She is lying and she knows she is lying.

Tags: Political