Is This Scientist Reputable Senator Kerry?

by Big Dog on Feb 5, 2007 at 20:18 Uncategorized

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn’t exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was the first Canadian Ph.D. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition.“Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg.” . For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is why.

Read the rest of this very interesting story.

Tags:

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

This entry was posted on Monday, February 5th, 2007 at 20:18 and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

6 Responses to “Is This Scientist Reputable Senator Kerry?”

  1. Stanford Matthews says:
    Monday Feb 5th, 2007 at 20:58

    If humans are causing global warming we better conclude the debate or we won’t be able to fix it in time.
    If we’re not causing global warming we better conclude this debate or we will spend ourselves into oblivion. Which is even further than how far governments can spend currently.

  2. Big Dog says:
    Monday Feb 5th, 2007 at 22:05

    In the ovrall scheme it does not mater because even if we are doing it we can not stop it.

  3. Stanford Matthews says:
    Tuesday Feb 6th, 2007 at 01:32

    If your position says we can’t stop global warming, I may disagree. If we accept that humans are not the sole contributor to global warming effects that would not necessarily rule out solving the problem. If enough time is available, sufficient knowledge acquired and methods devised, a solution should be possible. But that is a big “IF”. How many problems in the past looked impossible but were overcome. I treat these questions like the true/false analysis for a test in which you are not sure of the answer. If always or never are in the statement, it is likely false.

  4. Big Dog says:
    Tuesday Feb 6th, 2007 at 07:29

    My position is that man does not affect the changes in temperature because they are a natural occurrance.

    What man has done to effect change has had little or no effect.

    The reason we have changes is because that is what nature does and has done for a long time before man walked the Earth.

  5. Stanford Matthews says:
    Tuesday Feb 6th, 2007 at 10:21

    Thanks for clearing that up.

  6. Raven says:
    Wednesday Feb 7th, 2007 at 17:38

    I think we need to get a blog burst going about this topic…there are so many lies and half truths being spread and TOO many people are falling for this bulloney. I think I’ll email Cao and Teach and see what we can all do…