Obama; Old Application Phony, New One Intrusive
by Big Dog on Nov 14, 2008 at 06:12 Political
Have you seen some of the latest information on the messianic president elect? We have yet to see a vault copy of his birth certificate and now it appears as if he lied about his Selective Service registration. Not only did Obama lie about the date he registered (it could have been a mistake) but it appears as if he was registered in 1980 on a form that did not exist until 2008.
The Obama kool aid drinkers love to claim that his COLB was proof enough of his US birth but a copy of the original was never displayed. However, the Selective Service registration is a handwritten copy and it appears as if one of two things happened. Either Obama signed the form in 2008 or someone filled out the form for him and signed it illegally. The form has the date of 1980 but one of the form’s numbers indicates it is the 2008 version of the form. There are other inconsistencies such as the incorrect postal stamp which indicates a postal abbreviation not used since the 1970s. Did Obama or his surrogates backdate a form and sign it to hide the fact that Obama did not register with the Selective Service?
Debbie Schlusselhas the SS form up at her site and lists all the problems with the form. It definitely appears as if someone broke the law in order to cover for the messiah. Please visit Debbie’s site and review all the information. The Obamabots can deny this all they want but someone has committed fraud and has some explaining to do.
Interestingly, forms are also in the front of the Obama transition. Barack Obama has a 7 page, 63 question application that he intends to use to weed out problems and potential embarrassments. The ironic thing about the application is, Obama could not get a job in his own administration if he had to fill one out. There are questions about domestic help that might not be here legally (but no questions about relatives in the same predicament) as well as this gem that would certainly disqualify the sainted one:
“Have you ever had any association with any person, group or business venture that could be used–even unfairly–to impugn or attack your character and qualifications for government service?” (page 7, question 61).
We all know of Obama’s past associations and they could all be used fairly to disqualify him. The only thing that even allowed these associations to die a quick death without injuring the messiah is the fact that the media ignored the associations or made light of them. Bill Ayers was no big deal but, of course, he is a hot commodity now.
Obama also asks an interesting question that sheds light on his anti gun positions. Obama asks if the applicant or anyone in the applicant’s immediate family owns a gun. Why is this important with regard to a job in his administration? I believe that Barack Obama will now shed his serpent’s skin and show us the true anti gun person who dwells beneath. Obama does not want anyone in his administration who owns guns because he plans on mounting the most aggressive anti gun crusade in the history of this country.
Of course, he could just want to exclude Republicans…
The questionnaire probes applicants more deeply than Obama was probed when he ran to lead the country. Obama asks questions that would exclude him from serving in his own administration and he shows us what he plans with regard to gun ownership. I wonder why he feels it is necessary to know more about those who want to work with him than he was willing to display when he ran for the presidency. One thing is certain, hypocrisy runs deep in Obama land.
Read James Taranto’s piece in the WSJ.
The Obama SS scandal did not hit until after he was elected because the media was in the tank for him. If they had done their jobs, he might not have been elected.
He is not even in office yet and already we have an idea of how intrusive he will be just by looking at what it takes to work for him.
Tags: application, crime, forgery, gun control, Obama, selective service
The display of hypocrisy here disgusts me. Plain and simple.
With regard to the guns, I would like to know two things. 1) What he plans on giving his “civilian army” in lieu of weapons, and 2) What other Constitutional amendments does he plan on scuffing through the dirt?
I honestly, truly believe that he wants to be a world dictator, and his words and actions have yet to prove otherwise.
I have no worry. If no one in his administration will have the guns he can’t very well take over the world.
True, but several other countries have big weapons and seem to be pretty pleased that he was elected…I don’t think he can do it himself, but I also have no reason to think he doesn’t play puppet for some pretty big players out there.