Obama’s Global Welfare
by Big Dog on Jul 2, 2008 at 09:48 Political
As if it were not bad enough that Barack Obama wants to tax the hell out of Americans so that he can pay for billions in new social welfare spending in our country he is now advocating that the US set up welfare for the entire world. Senator Obama sponsored Senate Bill 2433 which would, in essence, take money from Americans through increased taxes and send that money to the United Nations so that the UN can redistribute it all over the world to end global poverty. Obama believes that we can make nations be more friendly to us by giving them money. In his world that is how things work and considering all the friends he has because they paid him for something, it is easy to see why he would feel that way.
I am opposed to welfare (government provided) in general but I am vehemently opposed to global welfare paid for by American taxpayers. The left in America keeps telling us that we are not the world’s police but they seem to think we are the world’s nanny. It is not up to America to solve the problem of poverty in other nations. It is up to the often corrupt governments of those nations to solve their problems. Americans have their pockets picked every day by government and this bill would allow them to stuff their hands even deeper in order to extract more of our money. It is time for our government to stop wasting our money, not just on stupidity like this, but on all kinds of wasteful projects. It is OUR money and we need to demand that they be more fiscally responsible with it.
To top this off, Obama’s Bill would have the UN handling the money. The UN is second to none in corruption and mismanagement (though the US government might be a close second) and giving them all that money is an open invitation for more illegal activity. The oil for food scandal should cement this in everyone’s minds. The UN is comprised of people from all over the world, many of whom are corrupt and care only about achieving wealth by picking American’s pockets. Obama’s Bill would allow the UN to send our money to places like Venezuela, North Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba and any other place where human rights are non existent and people are led by brutal people hell bent on maintaining rule by aggression.
This Bill is one more example of Obama’s overt Socialistic beliefs and should be a reminder to all Americans, regardless of party, that Obama will implement Socialistic policies that will ruin our country.
People achieve through hard work and that work provides satisfaction that cannot be replaced by a government program. America has been around for a much shorter time than many nations but has achieved more than they ever have because of hard work and self reliance. Those traits will disappear under a Socialist leader and soon everyone will be at the trough of government. Only the elite, ruling class will have wealth while the rest of us wallow in mediocrity. If other nations are not able to achieve then they need to try what worked for us and made us great.
One things is for certain, they should not be living on our hand outs any more than should our own citizens.
Politicians from both parties support this Obamination. Contact your Senators (and Representatives for H. R. 1302 which passed on a voice vote) and tell them not to support this gross misuse of American taxpayer money.
Related:
American Thinker
Tags: crimes, global welfare, Obama, oil for food, redistribute wealth, socialism, united nations
Investment heavy-weight Bill Gross thinks Obama will be the next president. He wrote an open letter to President Obama where he think he will run up a trillion dollar defcit Find out what he said @
http://www.theinvestingspeculator.com
Unfortunately, those traits are already scarce in our own country. No one wants to work for things anymore, we have become largely a country of “entitled” people. I am sick and tired of having most of my paycheck ripped from my hands and misused by the government. They get cars paid for by us – and we have cars paid for by us. They have numerous homes and fly across country on our dollar, we have to struggle to afford our own homes and gas for our cars. It’s time to start taking back countrol of this country and Obamination is going to send us into a socialist hell if he gets in there. Perish the thought.
maybe we need to go on strike for a week or two so the government will be short on money. change your dedutions to exempt for 2 or 3 weeks and keep the larger part for yourself for a change.
Meathead, nothing with vulgar language gets posted. I have told you that before and yet you keep using the vulgar language. You are a moron.
The only money government gets is through taxes. Since the bill would require increased spending (in the neighborhood of 845 billion dollars) then that money must come from somewhere. Or as the analysts put it:
Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.’s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the “Millennium Development Goals,” this amounts to $845 billion. And the only way to raise that kind of money, Sachs has written, is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels.
It will require a tax, they prefer a carbon tax but it could be any tax. If businesses pay a carbon tax that cost will be passed on to all Americans. Any bill that requires spending will require the use of tax dollars to accomplish it. It is all basic economics.
Meathead, are you lonely again?
I want to thank Meathead for pointing out all the comments where vulgar words were used. I use to have a plugin that converted them to **** but I got rig of it. When I did all the past bad words showed up. I found a newer version that should hide the past bad words.
I never said the bill in question specifically calls for new taxes. The experts have stated that this will result in increased taxes. When a bill requires a good portion of GDP ithas to come from somewhere.
The problem with guys like Meathead is he is incapable of reading comprehension. He will take a statement and use it in the most literal sense. If you wrote that you heard a noise so you killed the lights he would demand you show how you took the life of a light.
So, when I say that the bill will require an increase in taxes he takes that to mean the bill literally has those words in it instead of the bill will result in increased taxes.
I only publish a few of Meathead’s comments. He continues to write vulgarities and call me names. I told him that he would not do that here an he said that I thought I could dictate how people commented but that I was wrong and he continued to write the stuff so I stopped publishing him.
I own this site and I pay for the bandwidth. I will decide what gets published. Meathead is powerless here.
For those wondering, he keeps calling me a coward. He would never do that to my face because he is aware I would beat the hell out of him. I have seen pictures of him and he looks like an evil little perverted child molester.
I would love to run into him because I would love to see him cower when I went after him. He is a cowardly punk who could not fight his way out of a wet paper bag.
Meathead, thanks for pointing out the problem with the words. If you find any more let me know. You still won’t get published because I make the rules and I love screwing with you. BTW, take the screen shots and shove them up your mother’s rear. She seems to like that kind of stuff.