Obama’s Radical Agenda Unfolds
by Big Dog on Jan 25, 2009 at 10:25 Political
During the campaign Barack Obama was careful to ensure he was vague about his plans. He never detailed anything and he took positions that anyone with a brain knew were positions he oppsed in the past. He became a proponent for individual gun rights when all his career he was against the idea. He supported the Heller decision when he had openly stated that he was in favor of the DC gun ban. He said he was not out to take our guns when his entire career has been spent trying to ban them. From the White House website:
Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent.
The real problem is that Obama and his group of liberal, anti gun zealots will decide what common sense is. They will impose gun rules and say “Oh, that is just common sense.” One only needs to look at the gun bill Bobby Rush has introduced to know it is about control and not about common sense. It is about creating a national ID card system for gun owners that Obama and his anti gun Attorney General nominee can use to confiscate weapons or to restrict ownership. The Second Amendment is a right that “…shall not be infringed.” Obama’s belief in “common sense rules” INFRINGES. The bill from Rush INFRINGES. Gun control does not work. If it did then Chicago would not have the number of GUN murders that it does.
I know that liberals like the idea of gun control and this whole idea of “common sense” rules. If they are happy with that then perhaps we could start getting a national ID for those who wish to be part of the press (MSM). You would need the AG to issue a license to allow you to write or speak about issues. If the AG found some reason that you should not have that right then you would not get an ID. This way the MSM can’t print incorrect stories that incite riots (like flushing Korans) and end up with people getting killed.
Maybe we can have some “common sense” rules on the use of free speech. People would have to apply to the AG for a picture ID allowing them to speak freely. If the AG found out you ever went to a psychiatrist or some other mental health provider you would not be allowed to speak about anything in public. These common sense approaches are needed to keep dangerous people from saying things that incite riots or cause panic. Members of Congress would especially need this so that idiots like Chuck Schumer don’t cause runs on the banks by saying stupid things.
Imagine the uproar if the government tried to regulate those rights with “common sense” rules. Look at how liberals lose their minds at any attempt to provide common sense regulation to abortion. Obama has taken steps in his first few days to make abortions easier to obtain and to make Americans pay for abortions all around the world. The same liberals who cry when people are killed in war are providing a service to murder their children in the womb, all at American taxpayer expense. Liberals lose their minds when states try to enact rules on abortion (which is not a right enumerated in the Constitution) and fight to have no restrictions whatsoever. Obama does not believe in restrictions on abortions and thinks it is OK to murder a kid born after an unsuccessful abortion. A 13 year old girl can’t be given a Tylenol in school without parental permission but Obama and the libs believe this same 13 year old girl should be able to get an abortion without the permission of her parents. In fact, they don’t believe she even has to tell them.
No common sense restrictions or we are infringing on a woman’s right to choose, a right that is not spelled out in the Constitution. The right to keep and bear arms is clearly spelled out in the US Constitution and it is a right that SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. That one needs “common sense” rules, according to the Leader Hussein. This is the liberal mindset. They want to take guns because that takes away the means to resist. It takes away the necessary check on government. It takes away the ability to fight tyranny.
Same Sex Marriage Is A State’s Issue And Should Remain That Way
Obama said he was opposed to same sex marriage and I don’t think his position on that has changed. However, he is opposed the the defense of marriage act and he wants to get rid of it. If he does, states would be forced to accept the marital status of same sex couples based on the law in the state they were married. If a same sex couple from Massachusetts went to Utah then the people of Utah would be forced to accept the married status and afford them the same rights as married couples even if nearly everyone in the state opposes the idea. This is a wrong move. States have rights and the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution clearly makes this issue one for the states. No state should be forced to comply with something that an overwhelming number of citizens of those states oppose. It is not a matter of fairness as the left would have you believe, it is a matter of the law and who gets to make those decisions.
Obama wants to impose the federal will on the states. Within minutes of his swearing in the White House website was changed and his radical agenda displayed. Under the label of “civil rights” Obama lays out all the radical things he wants to do. These are the radical things he has wanted to do all along but did not express because he knew he could not win an election if he openly stated these goals.
Some of these things would force religious institutions to do things contrary to their beliefs. Religious hospitals would be forced to perform abortions or face fines and penalties from the government. Religious institutions have already gotten out of the adoption business because of the government forcing them to assist gay couples in getting children. It will not be long before religious organizations shutter their doors and stop helping people. This is the agenda Obama has planned.
He plans on ensuring that states are forced to comply with his and the LBGT agenda for America. Obama plans on slowly eroding the rights of states and the rights of citizens until all rules come from a centralized government. We are moving toward an Oligarchy and along the way there is going to be a great backlash. It will either be during elections or it will be in armed resistance. This is why he wants to take your guns.
The radical agenda will continue as they try to sneak things past. One day we will wake up and it will all be in place and we will be asking; How? It starts when they begin eroding our rights and it ends with us under one collective government where we are ruled by a few elitists. They do it by inserting things like money for universal health care into a stimulus package. They will continue until one day we wake up and all our health care decisions are made by government and paid for by the taxpayer. Again, we will ask; How?
By 2010 we will have one of two courses. Obama and the libs will have taken control of our lives and removed any chance of resistance or their acts will cause such a backlash that they lose a great number of seats in the midterm election.
Keep and eye on this. Anyone who votes for the bailout and other items designed to take our freedoms away needs to be removed from office.
Related:
Vatican calls Obama arrogant
Bloomberg
Ms. Underestimated
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: erosion of rights, gun control, Obama, oligarchy, scoialism, Second Amendment, universal health care
This may sound crazy, but I long for the day someone comes to my door telling me I have to disarm myself….
Then we can get on with what needs to be done….
It is my opinion that this radical Muslim’s final deed will be to turn us over to our enemies like sitting ducks. I tried to tell people what was going to happen, but the only thing they could see was “color”.
Why don’t you just come out and tell us all “what needs to be done” Buffoon? Why bother being cryptic about it?
Barbara, that isn’t an opinion, it’s a prediction. And one that isn’t grounded in reality at all.
Randy, her opinion is that it will happen. It can also be a prediction but a prediction is one’s opinion of what will happen in the future.
What needs to be done, not necessarily now but in the future, is another revolution. It is our duty to cast the bonds of a tyrannical government. Declaration of Independence spells that out pretty clearly.
When they come to get the guns, what needs to happen is we need to fight to keep them.
Buffoon and I swore to protect the Constitution from all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC.
Semantics aside, Barbara’s prediction/opinion is not grounded in reality at all.
What are you, an anti Semantic? LOL
I don’t think if Obama is not careful he will give our enemies an opening.
They do not care who is in charge because they hate our way of life. They want to destroy us and turn us into an Islamic country.
That could happen from within and a lax attitude could facilitate it. I believe we will be attacked again because he will be perceived as weak and inexperienced (which he actually is).
We will see. I pray it does not happen but I feel it will. If I were the enemy I would attack right after he causes turmoil in the military by lifting don’t ask, don’t tell.
Good point about DADT. I really hadn’t thought about it (of course I’m not a military strategist so go figure) but that would be a most opportune time. I believe a lot of the military will be seriously disappointed if this goes through and we will see a significant drop in sign up as well as reenlistment.
So many people say we are already stretched thin militarily, why would BO want to rock the boat at a time like this? I mean is it really necessary to address that issue RIGHT NOW? And as for funding abortions in other countries, we have got to be kidding. We need to discontinue ALL foreign aid until we get our SH** together at home. Period.
heh, I suppose I may be a bit anti-semantic. I’ll try and work on that :).
DADT? I couldn’t disagree more. But that is too much of a tangent for this discussion. Another time, another post maybe.
Here’s a thought. Instead of trying to make guns unusable by children, why not have required gun safety classes in school?
The problem Ozone, is that too many people have to have it their way only and are unwilling to discuss simple and reasonable compromises such as the one you just offered. They are more interested in slighting one another.
Looks like Babs is one of the newer “end of worlders” on this board. I’ve been gone awhile, sweetheart. Please, tell me how it all will end. Who will be the first to go? Will it be them lib-rals? Them my-norities? Wait, I know…the Clintons. No no, those pesky log cabin (r)epukes. Foley? Haggard? Tina Fey?
Do tell.
Short leash…
And no donate to your messiah urls here.
I told you I wasn’t lookin’ fo no trouble. I ain’t usin’ no foul language. Jus gots some questions I thought Babs might be able to answer for me. Where else am I supposed to go for the “conservative” viewpoint? This place is tops yo!!