Survival of the Fittest; Liberals Losing
Nov 23, 2007 Political
Though I do not believe in evolution, at least not in the Darwinian sense, I do believe that the fittest of a species survive in order for that species to continue to survive. Some creatures, unable to adapt, become extinct. I believe that one day a certain segment of the population of humans will be gone because they are not the fittest or, in some cases the smartest, to continue on.
Liberals (and I use that rather than Democrat or Republican because I realize there are liberals and conservatives in each party) are generally killing themselves off. The Supreme Court decision allowing abortion has resulted in about 40 million murders since that ruling took place. While I am not naive enough to believe that they were all liberals, I believe that the vast majority were. Given that abortion is a predominantly liberal position it only stands to reason that more liberals get abortions. This means that while liberals are having fewer or no children, conservatives (for the most part) are continuing to repopulate. This does not bode well for liberals as they will dwindle as a force in the future because they will not be bringing little libs into the world. This might explain why the school system attempts to brainwash our children with liberalism. They do not have their own kids to raise as liberals so they attempt to do so with ours.
In France there is another trend and that is that young women are deciding not to have children (1.89 births per woman), possibly in pursuit of a career. I do not know if they are aborting children or working hard not to have them but they are not repopulating at a high enough rate to ensure France’s continued existence. I also do not know how the political ideology breaks down but since France has overwhelmingly liberal views I would have to venture a guess that it is mostly liberal women not having kids.
In the UK there is another very small movement of environmentalist women deciding not to have children in order to protect the planet. The Daily Mail reports on two women who have decided not to have children for this reason. One was surgically sterilized and the other woman’s husband was surgically sterilized. The indication is that more couples are deciding not to have children as a matter of saving the planet though there is no indication as to what good a planet is without life on it.
These practices, by people who would be considered predominantly liberal, all but ensures that sometime in the future there will be few if any liberals left to make much of an impact on anything. At the rate liberals are going they will fail to be a force in the world.
While the lower-income males are feeling their genes being squeezed out of the human gene pool may be a bit of a surprise, no one should be surprised at the sharp decline in white Liberal male and female reproduction. This is to be expected, as Liberals, on average, have lower incomes when compared to Conservatives. However, even when controlling for income, the Liberals are still abandoning reproduction at a faster rate than Conservatives. Neuropolitics
[Author Note] The idea that Conservatives make more money seems to be at odds with recent data that shows Democrats represent more of the wealthy people in this country. Washington Times
Let us only hope that they do not become extinct because we need them. We need a small group of them to remind us why liberalism is not good.
Tags: abortion, brainwash, darwinian, environmentalist, liberal views, liberal women, liberals and conservatives, political ideology, supreme court decision
About Faces; The Hillary Story
Nov 3, 2007 Political
I know that people change their minds about things over the years and I do not expect a politicians, or anyone else for that matter, to hold the same views held 20 or 30 years ago. People change and their tastes change but that change is usually a gradual process. Hillary used to be a Republican and then when she went to College she morphed into a Democrat after all those years of Liberal brainwashing. The lady who Roe vs Wade was about is now against abortion and I am sure that people can find any number of positions that have changed over the years. That is the real key, that they change over years.
Hillary Rodham changes positions each week, sometimes each day and in the last debate she changed in two minutes. Hillary has not had some epiphany, she just says what she thinks people want to hear at the time. She will take a position on an issue when she is in one town and take another when she is in a different place. This worked really well 100 years ago when there was no instant transmission around the world. A politician could claim that he was misquoted in the other town and dupe people into giving their votes.
Hillary has taken many positions in all the time she was in her husband’s political shadow. One could not really fault her is she changed from an opinion held 15 or 20 years ago but this woman has changed positions since she entered the race. She has changed positions on the war, on Social Security, on ILLEGALS and any number of things and she has done so in order to get people to vote for her because getting in office and obtaining power is the most important thing to her. She does not care what people thing after she is in. She can change her mind, ignore promises and do what she damn well pleases and then lie about it when it is time to run again.
She will certainly get votes no matter what because there are people in this country who could not pour water out of a pail if the directions were written on the bottom. There are people who do not know who the Vice President is. There are people who can run 80 Bingo cards at once and cannot figure out a butterfly ballot. There are idiots living in this country and they all get to vote.
Here is a video put out by the John Edwards campaign showing the many faces of Hillary. When you view this, keep in mind that she has said these things since she became a presidential candidate. Better view it now because I do not know how long You Tube will keep it up. If it were put up by a Republican it would be gone already but since it was another donk, they might leave it alone.
If they put Hillary’s head on a coin it will have to be on both sides to reflect that she talks out of both sides of her mouth.
If they put a tail on the coin they couldn’t use hers, it wouldn’t fit. They would have to put her on paper money to pull it off.
Big Dog Salute to the Doug Ross@Journal website
Tags: abortion, brainwashing, dupe, hillary rodham, politician, politicians, republican, roe vs wade, social security