Madonna Bullies Boy Scouts
Mar 18, 2013 Political
The singer Madonna was at the GLAAD Awards Ceremony where she was presenting Anderson Cooper with an award (for what, finding his way out of the closet). I don’t care if they have these award programs or that they are up there saying what they feel but someone should tell Madonna that private organizations can do what they want.
She blasted the Boy Scouts because they do not allow gay people to join or to be leaders.
THAT IS THEIR BUSINESS.
If gay people don’t like that then they can start their own scouting organization for gays only. Ever notice that groups perceived as victims by the government and liberal twits always screech about inclusiveness but then restrict who can join their groups?
[note]What next? Will liberals demand that the VFW or American Legion allow non veterans to join so more liberals can be included?[/note]
In any event, Madonna showed up in a scout uniform and said she wanted to join the boy scouts but they would not let her. I imagine this was some kind of joke but if not, here is a clue for the clueless singer; BOY Scouting is for BOYS. She claims she was in the girl scouts but they threw her out because she wore a skirt that was too short and ate the cookies instead of selling them. Perhaps this too was a joke but if not it seems to me the problem is Madonna and not any particular organization.
Madonna, after blasting the Boy Scouts, proceeded to rant about a few things including bullying.
So let me get this straight. Madonna bullies the Boy Scouts about its position on gays and then rants about how bad bullying is. Madonna has a history of bullying people who hold political positions with which she disagrees.
But this is typical liberalism. Deride others for what you do.
Hell, Michael Moore says he hates the rich and lives in a house that is the size of a small village. Madonna could move in but only one idiot is allowed per village.
But I digress.
Madonna is a dim witted moron who happens to have a particular talent. The world would be a better place if she stuck to only opening her mouth while singing.
Perhaps the gay community is GLAAD she spoke out but I doubt she had any impact on the Boy Scouts.
They stand for tradition, values, and service, things Madonna has no clue about.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[jpsub]
Tags: anderson cooper, boy scouts, bullies, glaad, lies, madonna
Instead of Questions, Hillary Plants Questioner
Nov 28, 2007 Military, Political
The CNN/YouTube debate for the Republicans was held earlier this evening and I think it was a lively event. The problem with the event is that CNN allowed an activist who is a member of Hillary Clinton’s Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transsexual steering committee two minutes of talk time. It is absolutely true that CNN allowed a person affiliated with the campaign of a Democrat running for President to ask questions of the Republicans at the Republican debate. Not only was this gay retired Army general’s question one of the YouTube submissions selected but he was allowed to be in the audience and ask follow up questions. Before the LGBT community or the Democrats get their panties in a wad I want to make it clear that this person had a right to ask his question and he had a right to be at the event. However, CNN should have disclosed that this man was on a Hillary Clinton steering committee so that the public would know that he was not a Republican and that he was not unbiased.
I thought it was strange early on when someone asked a question and Anderson Cooper disclosed that the guy was in the audience and asked him if his question was answered. He gave a short answer and sat down. The only other person allowed to do that was the gay general. Now, it might be because he was the only other person to ask a question who attended the event. But it sure appears as if CNN had the first guy there so the second would not seem unusual. It also seemed strange to me that this guy asked why the candidates felt gays should not serve openly in the military and they gave their answers but when Cooper asked if he had been answered he said no and then went on a rant about his gayness and time in the service. It almost seems like it was set up that way.
As I stated, I have no problem with the question or the guy being there. I just feel that his affiliation should have been disclosed. This event makes it look like instead of planting the questions the Clinton campaign is now planting the people who ask them as well because the campaign had to know he was going to be there. CNN had to know who this guy was and it is no secret that he is connected to the Clinton campaign. The Gay general, Keith Kerr, is listed on her website as part of the steering committee and that they support her for president:
Members of LGBT AMERICANS FOR HILLARY [Keith Kerr is listed] have endorsed Hillary Clinton for President in their individual capacity. The names of past or present affiliations are included to assist in identifying the individuals listed and do not indicate any endorsement by that group or organization. HillaryClinton.com
There were well over 4000 questions submitted for the debate so it is unlikely that this guy was selected at random. His question was selected and he was present to show Republicans as people who hate gay people. I thought all the answers were pretty good. They told why they were opposed to gay people in the military. They did not say anything hateful but just that they felt it was not a good thing. The only one who tripped up on it is Romney who flipped from a previous position where he said he could not wait for the day when gays could serve openly in the military. This part of the debate is sure to rile up the gay brigade and have them out in hater mode tomorrow discussing how terrible the Republicans are. Don’t buy it, the answers were fine. People do not have to agree with that lifestyle and that does not make them hateful people. It just means they do not agree.
I wonder why it is that no Republican was at the Democratic YouTube debate to be selected for follow up. Can you imagine how Hillary would be in full conspiracy mode with the VRWC and black helicopters if a person on a Republican steering committee who had endorsed a Republican candidate was there and asked a question in an attempt to make the Democrats look bad? They would go nuts and Hillary, in particular, would be carping about the Republican attack machine. After all those years of being someone’s bitch in private tonight, this guy was Hillary’s bitch in public.
It does seem amazing that the Democrats did not have this happen to them but the Republicans did. Not too amazing because CNN (and they have some explaining to do) is the Clinton News Network but the Republicans allowed a Democratic operative, and a gay one at that, to come to their debate and ask a follow up question.
Who says Republicans are not inclusive?
Want to bet Hillary denies, claims ignorance or blames it on someone else? How about she says it is a coincidence?
UPDATE: Anderson Cooper says they did not know. I guess that means the gay general is unethical. But then again we knew that because if he served for 43 years he answered the “have you ever engaged in homosexual behavior” question and he had to put NO.
Big Dog salute to Webloggin and Stop the ACLU.
Others:
Liberty Pundit
Right Voices
Sister Toldjah
Michelle Malkin
Right Angles
Assorted Babble
TownHall Blog
Tags: anderson cooper, army general, clinton campaign, cnn, Democrats, gayness, Hillary Clinton, lesbian gay, lgbt community, Military, President, republican debate, Republicans, trans gender, youtube