Ann Coulter Has Jumped The Shark
Sep 1, 2021 Military, Political, Terrorism, Tyranny
I will admit that I used to read Coulter weekly and I have read a few of her books which were quite entertaining. But she has been all over the place since not long after Trump was elected because he allegedly did not do things fast enough for her.
Now she has gone off the deep end:
Ann Coulter is the favorite bashing toy for the left and a darling of the right as she uses her acerbic wit and sense of humor to put on full display how deranged the liberals really are. Unfortunately, Ann has jumped the shark by going all in on Joe Biden getting us out of Afghanistan. She claims that Scranton Joe had the balls to do it when Trump did not.
This is not surprising since Ann started out in favor of Trump but soured on him because he did not accomplish things he said he would or did not do them as quickly as Queen Ann would have liked.
The funny thing is Ann’s big deal, which often seemed like HER ONLY deal, was illegal immigration. She wanted the border closed. Trump closed the border (and began building the wall), he made people seeking asylum wait in Mexico and he drastically reduced the number of illegal people and drugs pouring into this country. One would think she would be happy he took care of her chief concern but she would rather dwell on things that were, in some cases, out of his control and in other cases, in progress.
Trump spent nearly four years fighting false accusations by liberals and their RINO friends. It is a miracle that he was able to accomplish anything but he did. Our economy was the best it has been in a very long time and unemployment, particularly among minorities, was at an all time low. But Ann dwells on Afghanistan.
Yes Ann, he had an agreement in place to leave Afghanistan. It was designed to be orderly, get the non-combatants out, remove our equipment, retrograde our troops and blow up anything of value to keep it out of enemy hands. If the election had not been stolen he would have put that in place and we would have had an orderly withdrawal. Instead, we had chaos with thirteen service members killed and lots and lots of Afghanis, who are not SIV applicants, in our nation. You see, Trump set milestones for the Taliban so they would not do what Biden allowed them to do. Trump told them if they reneged he would kill them. Biden let them abuse him and make our nation look weak.
In all of this, the stuff you applaud Ann, there are untold numbers of Americans left behind. People who actually helped us, were left behind. Pallets of cash were there for the Taliban to take and they got billions of dollars of military equipment including helicopters, vehicles, uniforms, communications equipment, night vision gear and weapons. I guess it does not occur to people who sit back smoking Marlboro Lights all day long while thinking of witty stuff for the next book that a lot of people are in danger and many of them will be murdered. I guess since it is not you or your loved ones it is OK, eh Ann?
And what about the psychological damage to the men and women who fought there and who lost loved ones there? This will have far reaching effects on our warfighters. Those of you who sit in your ivory towers and watch from afar will never understand.
Joe Biden retreated in a cowardly fashion and gave our enemy the very things they will use to attack us again in the future. And when they do you better not open your mouth because right now, at this moment, you are applauding it.
In my world we do not applaud cowardice. Maybe that is something you can celebrate Ann but when you do don’t dance too heavily on the graves of those who died because of it. They deserve better from you and they certainly deserve better from their Commander in Chief.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: ann coulter, biden, elitist, protected class, weakness
Ann Coulter Says Ignore Election Fraud
Jul 12, 2014 Political
There is a big mess in the state of Mississippi where challenger Chris McDaniel lost a runoff election to incumbent establishment Republican Thad Cochran. McDaniel beat Cochran in the primary but did not surpass the threshold required to avoid a runoff. MS has an open primary so people from either party can vote for candidates of their choosing. In the runoff Democrats were allowed to vote but only if they did not vote in the original primary and they had to have the intent to vote for the Republican who won the runoff in the general election (there is no way to enforce that).
The RINO establishment and Cochran team rounded up Democrat support and published hateful information indicating McDaniel and the Tea Party were racists who would keep blacks from voting. Democrats supported Cochran in the runoff and he “won.” It appears though, as if many election laws were broken by the Conchran machine and that Democrats who voted in their primary also voted in the runoff. McDaniel is trying to investigate this but has been hitting roadblocks.
Ann Coulter, the alleged conservative pundit, says it is time for McDaniel to concede. She points to politicians who did not and were never viable again as well as those who were gracious after their fraud gilled losses who were able to have a future career.
In Coulter’s mind the goal is to win the Senate and that is a worthy goal BUT it is not so worthy as to relinquish one’s principle. Coulter is the first one to scream about Democrat election fraud and the need for voter ID but when there is RINO establishment fraud she wants people to ignore it for the greater good.
The greater good is to fight for a system that has integrity.
But the establishment folks will blow this off and then demand people come together and support the RINO candidate for the greater good of taking back the Senate.
It is important to keep in mind that Coulter was all in for Chris Christie, a RINO’s RINO and that she has not backed solid conservatives for years. She is more interested in the end game than pushing for true conservatism and if that means keeping a RINO who has a chance then take your 30 pieces of silver and move on, unite and vote R.
[note]The title of her article tells the Tea Party to learn from a liberal, Al Gore. Why not learn from John Thune or one of the others she touts as having been gracious and who lived to win another day? Only Ann can answer that but I find it an odd way to make her point.[/note]
Ignoring the blatant fraud and encouraging people to gather around one candidate might seem like a winning proposition but it is not.
Conservatives in the state of Mississippi are not happy and if the runoff results stand they will not vote for Cochran. Many Republicans in the state who are upset with the games will likely stay home or not vote in the Senate race (or more importantly will protest vote for the Democrat) and one can be certain all the Democrats who voted for Cochran to help him in the runoff will NOT vote for him in the general election.
It seems to me the Coulter and establishment plan is to ensure a Democrat gets the Senate seat in MS.
These folks, the ones who decry the large Democrat vote among blacks and Hispanics as only voting for the D, want us to do the same thing. That thing is vote for the person with the R next to their name no matter what because we said so.
Republicans have not done much when in the majority whether it be Senate or House and the only advantages of winning the Senate would be to get rid of Harry Reid and to nearly completely roadblock Obama (he still has a phone and a pen).
Coulter is a gifted writer and I like her books. She has a way with words that really brings her points home. But she is a typical Northeastern Republican whose idea of conservatism is in line with the establishment view of middle of the road, go along to get along, anything to win an election mentality. This has not worked and it will not work.
We tried it their way and we have Barack Obama and the twits on the left who are ruining this country with assistance from the RINO establishment. We have not won big using their plan.
We won big when the Tea Party became involved and that is how we took the House. We lost the Senate because the very same establishment types who tell us to circle the wagons around their candidate refused to do the same with candidates who beat their sacred cows. Some of those folks were not the best candidates in the world but they were not the establishment types and if their primary victories got rid of establishment types then all the better no matter what the eventual outcome.
Would it be great to get rid of Harry Reid and roadblock Obama? You bet but not if it means sacrificing integrity.
Ann, a real Republican (and more importantly a conservative Republican) wins on his own merit. If he needs to pander to Democrats then it means his message is more in tune with them than his own party. It is pretty much the same as when liberals run as middle of the road to win the general election and then canter left after they win. You have pointed this out in the past.
Thad moved left (or promised the Holy Grail) to garner Democrat support in a primary about Republicans. His message was not strong enough to garner the support of his own party. The entire process was rife with fraud and that is as infuriating as his appeal to Democrats.
Your advice though, is to suck it up, remove our pants and bend over so long as we support Thad in his quest for continued RINO mediocrity.
Sorry but I don’t work that way and I think you will find that neither do those who were screwed over by Thad.
I am not a citizen of Mississippi but I am willing to bet there are enough Republicans there who will ensure Thad does not win reelection should the results of the fraud filled runoff hold.
No problem though Ann. You can just write another book about the mob mentality of the left that has crept into the RINO establishment.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: ann coulter, bend over, concede, establishment, fraud, lies, mob mentality, RINO
How Did The Victim Die?
May 9, 2014 Commentary
The left is up in arms about the attempted execution of Clayton Lockett. He was being put to death when something went wrong and the execution was stopped. He ended up dying of a heart attack not long after.
Wasn’t the point to kill him?
In any event, the left wants us to know how cruel it is to put a convicted murderer to death and this case, they assert, points out how things can go wrong. The guy was in obvious distress and he suffered.
Oh the horror.
The left has not considered the way this guy’s victim died. He shot her and he shot her again but she continued to breathe so he had his thugs bury her alive. This was after the victim and her friends were raped and sodomized by the thugs.
Ann Coulter has a brilliant piece about this and she spells it out quite clearly. Lockett was not a nice guy; he was a thug who was brutally violent.
So he might have suffered a bit, big fricking deal. I am just glad he had the heart attack and died anyway or we would have his sorry butt filing lawsuits and claiming he had been abused.
I have no sympathy for the criminals, particularly the thuggish violent ones.
They can rot in hell. I hope Lockett had an out of body experience and saw a bright light from the flames of hell.
The victims and their families are who we should be concerned with.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: ann coulter, clayton lockett, death penalty, lies, suffering, victims
Left Only Tolerant Of Those On The Plantation
Nov 14, 2011 Political
The liberal Democrat party in America claims to be tolerant. It has rewritten history to ignore or change the fact that the Democrats supported slavery and were anti civil rights. The left has brainwashed generations of minorities into believing that only the liberal establishment loves them, cares for them, and will help them.
Until the day after Election Day. Then, those minorities get some “goodies” to placate them and they are pushed into the background and regaled with stories about how wonderful liberals have always been to the minorities. We love you women, you blacks, you Hispanics, and you gays. We are there for you now vote for us and shut up.
The left keeps harping on how tolerant it is but the reality is that the left is only tolerant of those who stay on the plantation.
The left loves blacks unless the blacks are conservatives. Then the real racism rears its ugly head and the racial slurs begin. Women, the liberals love you and will defend you unless you are conservative and then no liberal organization INCLUDING NOW will defend you. Gays, we love you and want you to have everything you want unless you happen to be a conservative. Then you are a turncoat who needs to be assaulted. Gay conservatives can be assaulted and will not be held up as examples of intolerant bullying like a Matthew Shepard was.
Intolerant liberals do not believe they can ever be guilty of racism, hate crimes or intolerance because they claim not to be. They claim it so it must be true.
A gay TV star named Taylor Garrett can tell us all about intolerance. He happens to be a Republican and conservative. According to Garrett, he was recently targeted by the so called tolerant left, because he is conservative. Garrett was beaten by a man who Garret discovered defacing his car. Some thug was scratching a vulgarity aimed at Ann Coulter whom Garrett was supposed to meet with to discuss gay marriage and to show that just because you do not support it (like Coulter) does not make you a bigot.
Garrett confronted the man who was scratching the words into his car and was assaulted.
How dare this guy stray from the plantation? Does he not know that the liberals own him along with the others who have been enslaved?
The violence of the Occupy crowd, the violence of the left toward TEA Party members, the racist remarks by the left, and the attacks on gays and blacks who happen to be conservative are examples of the intolerance toward those who do not follow the orthodoxy of the left. The violence is even more pronounced when the person involved is of a protected class the liberals have claimed as their property.
Truth be told, the liberal establishment is only mildly tolerant of those who remain on the plantation. As long as they know their place they are tolerated. The ones who stray get whipped by the liberal taskmasters. Those who leave the plantation get pummeled.
You just don’t see that coming from conservatives. We fought to end slavery so we don’t think we own anyone or are entitled to own anyone.
The left, on the other hand, considers them bought and paid for.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: ann coulter, blacks, gays, liberals, plantation, racism, taylor garrett
Obama Supporters Deserve The Money
Feb 12, 2010 Political
Barack Obama and his Democrats took over where George Bush left off and bailed out banks and other financial institutions to the tune of billions of dollars. These entities were “too big to fail” and were spared the consequences of their bad decisions, decisions fueled by greed. Fueled by greed and knowledge that they would be bailed out if they made bad mistakes.
The financial giants reap huge rewards when they make investments and then get taxpayer money to save them when they gamble and lose. Ann Coulter has a great piece this week laying this all out. In it she describes what happened with regard to Goldman Sachs and other institutions that packaged bad loans and then insured them through AIG which could not cover the losses. Taxpayers bailed out AIG which was the same as bailing out Goldman.
During all of this, Obama went on the blame the bankers tour and discussed the greedy guys and how their salaries needed to be capped. There were tours by the homes of AIG executives, Congress worked on legislation taxing bonuses at 90% and the citizens of America were worked into a frenzy over the greedy bankers.
But these people helped put Obama in office. Obama received huge sums of money from the financial industry and they have been friends of the Democrats for a long time (as Coulter points out, Clinton bailed them out during his presidency). So it came as no surprise this week that Obama said he did not begrudge the bonuses of savvy bankers (particularly the ones who are his supporters):
Whatever Obama has in mind for punishing the financial industry, I promise you, he won’t punish his friends. After JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon took a $17 million bonus this week, and Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein got a $9 million bonus, Obama said he didn’t begrudge them their bonuses, saying, “I know both those guys.” Ann Coulter Human Events
What happened to people not getting huge bonuses? What happened to Barney Frank and his desire to cap salaries and bonuses of all of them even if they took no TARP money? What happened to the outrage generated by Obama and his minions over these greedy bankers?
I have no problem with bankers (or any private business people) making huge sums of money for doing a good job and I have no problem with huge bonuses. I did not have trouble with the AIG bonuses particularly because the Obama administration knew about them and people worked for a dollar a year in salary on the promise of the bonuses (which the administration then reneged on). I also have no problem with a business failing if it can’t make money and that includes financial giants and auto makers. If they can’t cut it then they can fail.
However, I am not the one who ran around whipping the country into a frenzy over greedy bankers. How dare Obama call these people greedy and rail against them last year and then step up to defend their huge bonuses this year? How can he do this and remain consistent?
He can’t, but he does not have to. If he says it is good his base will blindly follow. They will ignore Obama’s words and deeds of the past and focus on what the messiah says now. They will not draw the connection between Obama and the campaign dollars he gets from these people.
When Obama said he knows these people he meant the bankers but it could apply to his base.
Interestingly, David Reilly at Bloomberg has a piece that basically says Obama needs to man up and knock a few heads to show people who is in charge (note to Reilly, coequal means that he is not in charge of Congress). He writes about several issues which are better saved for another time but he does address financial regulation. Reilly spells out a number of tactics that Obama can use to threaten the banking industry into submission. The tactics look like something one would expect from Tony Soprano and not the leader of the US but Reilly is encouraging the kinds of tactics the left would scream fascist or Nazi over if a Republican did them.
The government owes the private sector about 7 trillion dollars. Suppose the banks called those markers all at once? Suppose the banks stopped lending for a week. I imagine if they tried hard they could send the economy in the Great Depression range so perhaps the mafia style tactics would be a poor idea.
Then again, Reilly is like typical supporters who decry strong-arm politics when Republicans use them but espouse them in order to push the Democrat agenda. This is typical of the left and we see it in Congress whenever they are in charge. We can’t knock heads of terrorists or it is torture but we can do what we want to those who oppose us…
I think the hypocrisy of Obma has been exposed in the past and it is very clear in his latest support of the huge bonuses. I also think we have a number of leftists in the media calling for him to get tough because they are worried about a Palin presidency.
Whether she will run or not or could even win is not the point.
Just the idea of that drives liberals and the progressives nuts.
And that is a joy to see.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: aig, ann coulter, bailout, bonuses, goldman, hypocrisy, Obama, savvy