Obama Ignores Disasters But Looks For The Money
May 10, 2011 Political
Barack Obama’s regime denied federal assistance to the state of Texas which has been hammered with wildfires. A cynic would say that this is because Texas is a red state and Obama has no chance to win the large pool of electoral votes in the next election. Obama has however, gone to Texas to raise money for the political campaign and I bet there are plenty of liberals there who will give it to him. He will ignore their pleas for help but they will not ignore his.
To get to Texas Obama flew over the Mississippi River and the devastation that it has caused through middle America. The water is at record levels and places are flooded all over and various accounts report that Obama did not even look out the window to get a look at the damage. He was too busy thinking about what to say to Hispanics in Texas regarding amnesty so that he can get their cash now and their votes in 2012.
George Bush was hammered by the press and the liberals when he was photographed looking out the window of Air Force One at the damage from Hurricane Katrina. He was said to be uncaring and Kanye West said that he hated black people.
Obama is only concerned with power and how to hold onto it. His gig in the White House gets him the best tee times on cleared golf courses and free flights to all the hot vacation spots in the world. He needs to hold onto the power he has so he can continue to improve his golf game while working on transforming America into a Socialist country.
And don’t worry about missing anything. The government is working on a mandatory system that will allow it to text your cell phone in the event of an emergency. Of course, it will likely be a plan where those who pay for their cell phones continue to do so while the government uses their tax dollars to pay for phones for those who cannot afford them. It would not be fair, after all, for those poor folks not to get the same warnings as the people who pay for cell phones. Whatever happened to the Emergency Broadcast System?
At least the government will have a way to blast text messages to all of us from Dear Leader.
Wouldn’t want the masses to miss an Obama plea for campaign cash…
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: Bush, campaign cash, disaster, flyover, katrina, mississippi river, Obama, texas
Would A SEAL Club A Liberal?
May 4, 2011 Political
Liberal talk show host Mike Malloy asked a question on his radio program (I am surprised anyone heard it) wanting to know when SEAL Team 6 would drop in on George W Bush. SEAL Team 6 is the team credited with the killing of Osama bin Laden. Malloy said that Bush has killed more innocent people so the team should pay him a similar visit. In other words, Malloy wants to know when a military team will KILL George W Bush. That is the only message one can get from this:
“So when does Seal Unit 6, or whatever it’s called, drop in on George Bush? Bush was responsible for a lot more death, innocent death, than bin Laden. Wasn’t he, or am I wrong here?,” Liberal radio talk show host Mike Malloy said on his show Monday evening. Real Clear Politics
Yes Mike, you are wrong here and so much for the civility the liberals cried for.
But let’s look at this. The military loves George Bush and they know he was a genuine leader. Before some liberal twit links to some soldier or soldier’s parent (like Cindy Sheehan) expressing disgust, keep in mind that any group has people who feel differently than the majority. Believe it or not, some liberals do not like Obama but that does not negate the statement that liberals love Obama. If it makes you feel better, add the word most.
If the SEAL Team had the opportunity to drop in on two people and those two were Bush or Malloy, who do you think they would drop in on?
It would not be Bush.
But this also begs the question, if Bush is responsible for these deaths and should be visited by the SEAL Team, should not they visit Obama? He is responsible for the deaths of lots of people and a lot of those folks are our military members. When Bush was in office we got daily death counts from the state run media but now they ignore the mounting deaths piling up under Obama. Obama is responsible for the deaths of innocent people in Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan, just to name a few. I wonder if Malloy would like to see Obama get a visit for all the deaths he has caused.
And to top it all off, Obama received a Nobel Prize for Peace.
Obama killed Osama (or so the story goes), and he killed the children of leaders as well as some of their other family members.
Mike Malloy is another liberal moron who is a follower of the failed policies of liberalism. He is another in a long line of liberal morons who blame everything on Bush.
Well, except the good things that happen. Then it was a liberal triumph.
Fortunately, our military does not take out our own people (even though liberals seem to desire this) but if they did Bush would not have to worry.
Malloy, on the other hand, might be swimming with Osama and the fishes…
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: Bush, mike malloy, Obama, osama, seal team 6
Is There Anything Obama Will Not Lie About?
Apr 19, 2011 Political
We know that Barack Obama is a liar. It is obvious when he opens his mouth that he is not telling the truth and anyone with a brain can see it (which excludes liberals). Obama has already been caught doing the flip flop with regard to the debt limit. Back in 2006 he said that the president (G W Bush) and Republicans looking to raise the debt ceiling demonstrated a lack of leadership and that we had a debt problem. I agreed with his words from then. Now he has his mouthpiece say that he was in error to vote against raising the debt limit and only did it out of spite because he opposed Bush’s policies. That does not negate the fact that he said it demonstrated a lack of leadership and now that he is asking for the debt limit to be raised, he is the one lacking in leadership qualities (though to be fair, he never possessed any to begin with).
Now we have Obama, in his own words, from 2008 with regard to presidential signing statements. Obama said that this was not part of the president’s power and reinforced that by telling people he taught Constitutional law for 10 years. God help us because he, no doubt, taight his interpretation rather than that of the people who wrote it. In any event, here is Obama from 2008:
That’s not part of his power, but this is part of the whole theory of George Bush that he can make laws as he goes along. I disagree with that. I taught the Constitution for 10 years. I believe in the Constitution and I will obey the Constitution of the United States. We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end-run around Congress. Real Clear Politics
One could argue that Obama is now using signing statements, not to do an end run around Congress, but to make his point clear. That would be a BS argument but I know many liberals will make it. Obama makes it clear from the outset that IT IS NOT PART OF HIS POWER. That means that any signing statements are not part of the president’s power. Whether they are or not is irrelevant because Obama said they were not and based it on his teaching the Constitution so he said what he meant and what he wanted people to believe was true.
Now it is a little different. Obama used a signing statement on the recently passed budget compromise in which his czars were eliminated. Obama issued a signing statement that he was not going to follow that part of the deal.
He used a signing statement to do an end run around Congress. There is no other way to look at it. He did exactly what he said he would not do. That makes him a liar. Obama lied, got it liberals, your messiah lied to you. How many of you will call him on this? My guess is that most will defend him. The rationale will be something like, well Bush was wrong when he did it but Obama is right.
In fact, his mouthpiece (Jay Carney) said just that and he too lied along the way:
His concern was with what he saw as an abuse of the signing statement by the previous administration. So that the positions he took in signing statements on the budget bill entirely consistent with that position, you need to retain the right to, as president, to be able to issue those signing statements, but obviously they should not be abused. Real Clear Politics
Compare the two statements and you can see the glaring lies. Obama never said he opposed the abuse of signing statements. He said that the president did not have the power to use them and that he knows it because he taught the Constitution. He said he would not use them to do an end run around Congress but Carney is saying that Obama was never opposed to them and that using them is consistent with his previous position (the false premise Carney began with). This is all a lie and it is all recorded and presented in their own words.
Obama is a liar though his change of position on this issue might be consistent with him being a teacher of the Constitution. You see, liberals believe the Constitution is a living document that can be molded and adapted to meet any condition (see FDR). This is utterly false and the Founders never meant for it to be that way but to Obama and liberal/progressive schmucks like him, the Constitution is a barrier to what they want to do to this country. It gets in their way so they need to keep changing it to suit their needs.
It suited his purpose to say that Bush had no authority to use signing statements when he was trying to take Bush’s place but now that he is in the position it suits his purpose to use the very instrument he derided as unconstitutional.
He is a liar and we need to keep beating him with his own words.
And Republicans need to stop making deals and lay down the law. Stop funding everything until we get the budget under control and tell Obama to stuff it. I would also recommend that any bills submitted by Congress include language that says the use of signing statements is not allowed on the bill.
Hamstring this Socialist and keep him from doing any more harm to this country.
Wake up America. This man and his people are telling you lies because they think you are too stupid to notice or to care. I might agree there are a lot of stupid people because Obama was elected but even dumb animals learn from their mistakes.
Any of you liberal/progressive Obamabots want to defend this? I know there will be someone who does.
Hmm, another war in the Middle East, extension of the tax cuts, excessive spending, signing statements, and asking that the debt limit be raised. They told me if I voted for McCain I would get Bush’s third term.
Looks like they were right.
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: Bush, carney, constitution, law professor, liar, Obama, signing statements, socialist
Big Oil Obama Allows Gas Prices To Rise
Apr 18, 2011 Political
Barack Obama is in bed with Big Oil and he is allowing them to manipulate oil prices so that we have to pay more at the pump. The price of a gallon of gas is inching up to the $4.00 mark which it has eclipsed in several localities including Washington, DC. It looks like this is the result of having an oil man in the White House, a man beholden to the Big Oil companies.
I will pause while the Obama supporting liberal/progressives catch their breath and work on their defense of Big Oil Obama.
When George Bush was the President and gas prices went up (to $2.80 a gallon when Democrats began complaining), the liberals were fond of going in front of the cameras (often leaving their tax payer funded gas guzzlers running to stay cool inside) and bashing George Bush and Dick Cheney as Big Oil men who were allowing their buddies in the oil industry to manipulate prices so that the cost of gasoline would go up and make their buddies rich.
McCumber joined Speaker Pelosi Monday to dramatize the tough times businesses are having because of fuel costs. The speaker blames what she labels the Bush-Cheney big oil agenda, using graphics to point out gasoline prices have more than doubled in the Bush administration.
“This is a scam of the greatest magnitude,” says Speaker Pelosi. ABC 7
Now that Obama is in the White House this MUST be the reason for the rise in gas prices. There can be no other explanation because the liberals already told us that the rise in gas prices is the result of having a Big Oil man in the White House. It is they who made the claim so they cannot change the reasons now.
Barack Obama must be a Big Oil puppet who is allowing his friends in the oil industry to manipulate gas prices so they can get rich.
More liberal Bush gas price info here, here, here, and here.
I am willing to bet that these liberals will not be out bashing Obama the way they bashed Bush. They will have some excuse to present for the spike that has nothing to do with their messiah.
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: big oil, Bush, Democrats, gas prices, lies, Obama, Pelosi
If I Voted For McCain…
Mar 19, 2011 Political
…I was told I would be getting a third term of George W. Bush.
I voted for Sarah Palin, same result though as Barack Obama has now used military force in Libya to help topple a dictator who is slaughtering his people. That is what George Bush did in Iraq and the left was vehemently opposed. We were told that it was a quagmire and that we were nation building, all things the left opposes. Barack Obama was not in the Senate at the time as he was busy voting present in Illinois but he did assure us he would have voted against military action in Iraq.
I guess the people of Iraq who were being murdered by a brutal dictator do not carry the same weight as those in Libya. Oh I know, Bush talked about weapons of mass destruction but that was only about three of the twenty or so items in the authorization for force but why let the others get in the way of lefties screaming and hollering over military action.
Despite what Obama claimed and how superior he was supposed to be, it looks like he is a lot like George Bush in certain areas and this is not sitting well with his base. Drudge has this on his front page:
MARCH 19, 2011
OBAMA: ‘Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the United States and the world’…MARCH 19, 2003
BUSH: ‘American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger’…
Let us see how the left handles Mr. Obama and his blatant aggression against another nation. I mean, who is he to tell the leader of another country what to do? Isn’t that what he and everyone like him screamed about with regard to Bush?
I doubt that we will send troops into Libya but we have launched missiles into that country and that is an act of aggression.
So where is Code Pink? Where are the left wing loonies and their cries over this aggression?
My guess is they are oblivious to it because their messiah Obama is the one doing it. They did not mind when Clinton launched missiles and they do not mind Obama doing it.
The D after their names allows them to do such things.
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]