Hillary Likes Carter Approach to Diplomacy
Apr 16, 2007 Uncategorized
Hillary Clinton said that we have never had a President like George W Bush, one who is unwilling to have an open dialogue with nations that do not agree with him. She said that after 9/11 we had an opportunity to engage in meaningful dialogue with the Muslim world but Bush squandered that. Ms. Clinton also said:
# It’s regrettable President Bush “hasn’t even been willing to have an international conference” on Iraq.
♦ She wants voters to “look at my qualifications and experience.”
♦ “One thing we’ve learned over the last six years is that we need a steady hand in the Oval Office. We need somebody who can chart a course for our country, that is as much as possible non-partisan, not just bipartisan, that wants to restore competence to the government, who wants to make it clear that I’m willing to work with people of different points of view — I’m not sticking to one particular version of reality, as we’ve seen unfortunately the last six years.”
♦ The United States needs to lead by example, including by helping key nations build schools and pay teachers.
♦ Bush “has broken faith with so much of American history and governmental practices” by unraveling past efforts to help the environment, promote nuclear weapon nonproliferation and restore fiscal responsibility. NewsMax
Perhaps Clinton lives in a different world than the sane people. During Carter’s administration all Jimmy did was negotiate. How well did that work out? Americans were held hostage by terrorists who viewed America as weak. Those hostages were released as Reagan took office. I would imagine that the Iraqis were well aware that the cowboy President would not play games. Look at how much the inaction of Bill Clinton did for us. While he was jet setting around the world we were being attacked time and again by Muslims hell bent on killing us. His inaction and refusal to accept that Muslims were behind the attacks emboldened them and, according to bin Laden, gave us 9/11. Yes, bin Laden said that he was emboldened by America’s withdrawal from Somalia and he realized America was a paper tiger. Couple that with bin Laden’s desire to draw us into a battle and we were going to be attacked until we responded.
Clinton refused to strike our enemies and only launched military action to draw attention away from his mounting scandals here at home. Now Ms. Clinton wants us to go down the same path as her inept husband did. She also wants us to build schools and pay teachers all around the world. Well Hill, we are building schools in Iraq. You probably are not aware of that because the MSM does not show the positives coming out of that country. As for the rest of the world, let them build their own schools and pay their own teachers. When we have American kids (and in some cases their teachers) who can not read or write I would say that we should be building schools here and paying competent teachers to teach our kids. Perhaps we can spend a bit of money to get rid of the liberals who infest academia before we worry about other nations, some of whom wipe us up in achievement tests.
As far as any version of reality, perhaps you can explain how in your version of reality your law firm billing records were misplaced and only discovered two days after the statute of limitations was up when in the real world you carried them around with you and lied about knowing where they were. Perhaps you can let us in on which version of reality is true, your act at “finding out” you husband cheated or the truth that you knew for a while and got angry because of the political implications. Which version of reality are you in today, the one where you support the troops or the one where you loathe them as demonstrated by your acts while in the White House?
As for governmental practices, your husband’s administration broke enough rules to last a lifetime and all the history rewriting in the world will not cover that up. You were complicit in the actions of your husband, remember, you were co-presidents. As for the environment, care to explain Tysons Chicken and the Arkansas River? Did they really pay off Bill so they could dump chicken parts there? I don’t know, I want you to tell me. I also would like you to tell me what example you have given that you consider leading by. Is it voting for a war when you think it is the popular thing to do and then demanding that we pull out before the job is done because that seems like the popular thing to do now? Leadership requires making unpopular, hard decisions at times and you have shown that if it is not popular (as in what the polls say) you will not do it. I know leadership lady and you are no leader (and from that mouth of your you are no lady either). Leadership is not saying that if you knew then what you know now you would have voted differently. Everyone would love the benefit of hindsight, duh.
Hillary Clinton, you are nothing more than a pandering, wishy-washy, egomaniac who craves power and the elitist life. Your God syndrome has you believing that you are the chosen one and are well equipped to tell us peons how we should live our lives. You are certain that you know better than we how our lives should be lived and you are willing to take as much of our money as possible to prove that. No thanks.
I would rather slide down a razor blade naked into a pool of alcohol than vote for you.
Tags: Commentary
Rosie is No Longer in a League of Her Own
Apr 16, 2007 Uncategorized
The bar has been set with the dismissal of Don Imus for his comment that offended the black community and allowed Sharpton and Jackson to come out from under their slime covered rocks to sling mud. The bar has been set and Rosie O’Donnell is under that bar. She insulted the Chinese (which I think make up a greater population in the world than black people) when she did a bad imitation of them while trying to be cute.
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson (who actually made a cameo appearance) helped force Imus out of a job by threatening to boycott and protest. CBS caved (probably because people die when Sharpton has a peaceful protest) and fired Imus so now we must ask for fair play. Unless Sharpton and the rest of the race baiting poverty pimps only care about blacks, which would make them true racists, they must demand that Rosie be fired from The View because of her disparaging remarks about Chinese people. Also, her remarks about the President and what happened on 9/11 have offended many people so she must go.
I join with Tom Delay in demanding that ABC fire Rosie O’Donnell and I ask that all people who feel this way boycott the shows sponsors until Barbara Walters gives in to our demand. A list of sponsors can be found at The Falling Panda (who has a number of great posts about this). Seems to me Proctor and Gamble were one of the first to threaten to pull ads from Imus. Now is their turn to do the same to The View. It is time for everyone who believes in fairness to contact Barbara Walters at ABC and demand that she fire Rosie. It is also time to contact the sponsors of the show and demand they pull sponsorship if Rosie is not canned.
The time has come to fight political correctness and the double standard in America. The fight is now in our hands, let us not fail.
Tags: Commentary
German Army Film Shows Black-Ops
Apr 15, 2007 Uncategorized
A film made at a German training site back in January 2006 has been released and it has gotten a few people upset including non other than the race baiting poverty pimp, Al Sharpton. The film depicts this scene:
The clip shows an instructor and a soldier in camouflage uniforms in a forest. The instructor tells the soldier, “You are in the Bronx. A black van is stopping in front of you. Three African-Americans are getting out and they are insulting your mother in the worst ways. … Act.”
The soldier fires his machine gun several times and yells an obscenity several times in English. The instructor then tells the soldier to curse even louder. Yahoo News
The President of the Bronx is upset and says who ever is responsible for this should be punished. Sharpton is outraged (he gets outraged when someone farts near a black person) and of course is not happy with this. I can’t say that I blame them because this shows that Germany might not understand America and blacks in America, or do they?
You see, much of what Germany and the rest of the world sees is based on what comes out of America. In Iraq the only news sent home is bad news so Americans can only base their opinions on what they see on the evening news. They never get to see the good things that happen all the time. Likewise, other countries only see the images of ourselves as we portray them. So when Germans buy rap music that depicts blacks as thugs and gangsters, that is what the world thinks of them. When Al Shaprton protests in a neighborhood and people get killed, the world sees a bunch of black people rioting and people dying. It does not matter what the reality of the situation is, it is what the people see and what is reported that matter.
People around the world get to watch American films in which places like the Bronx are made to look like zoos with blacks killing each other in drug wars. We have rap music where gangster rap artists talk about being criminals and committing criminal acts and then we have idiots like Snoop Dogg who gets arrested in London for tearing up the airport “cause that’s how we do it in the hood.” We have 50 Cent being held up as an icon for being shot nine times and people like Sean Combs being arrested secondary to a gun battle in a club.
How can the black community expect the rest of the world to know anything more about them than what is depicted in music, the movies, and the news? How do they expect Germans or anyone else to understand anything about them considering how they have portrayed themselves in movies and in music? I do not find it surprising that the German training film shows this because this is what the black community has portrayed itself as. This is what they say they are.
Truthfully, I find it more disturbing that the film shows Germans depicting Americans as the enemy and fighting us in America. This should give us more concern than black people being portrayed exactly as they wish to be portrayed as demonstrated by their words and deeds.
As for Al Sharptongue, he is only outraged that blacks have taken the place of Jews in the gun sights of the Germans. Given that Al is an anti-Semite, he was quite happy when it was Jewish people on the receiving end. Now that the blacks have come under fire (pun intended) he is not happy.
I have a bit of advice for Sharptongue and anyone else who believes that the Germans are the bad guys in this and that is, clean up your house. If you clean up your house so that people see a better side of you then you will not be depicted as thugs and criminals. If you continue to make rap songs that cast an unfavorable light on you or if you continue to make films that show black people as animals shooting each other in drug and gang wars throughout New York, California and every where in between then you should not be surprised that the rest of the world views you this way. If your rap artists continue to get arrested for gun and drug violations then you should not be surprised that the world views your race in the light cast by the most popular members of it.
The Germans are free to do as they wish and all the crying from America should not change that. We would not listen to them trying to dictate to us what to do in our country and we should not do that to them. I suggest that if the black community wants to be seen favorably around the world it start projecting favorable images.
People believe what they see about you and the only thing being shown is the dark side. Clean up your own act before you ask others to clean up theirs.
Tags: Commentary
Friedman Calls Sharpton and Jackson the N-Word?
Apr 15, 2007 Uncategorized
Kinky Friedman has written a piece, in defense of his friend Don Imus, for the New York Post. In the piece he discusses how Imus was absolutely wrong for what he said but that the PC outcry and the firing of Imus were equally as wrong. These are a few of the paragraphs near the end:
Take heart, Imus. You’re merely joining a long and legendary laundry list of individuals who were summarily sacrificed in the name of society’s sanctimonious soul: Socrates, Jesus, Galileo, Joan of Arc, Mozart and Mark Twain, who was decried as a racist until the day he died for using the N-word rather prolifically in “Huckleberry Finn.”
Speaking of which, there will always be plenty of Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons around. There will be plenty of cowardly executives, plenty of fair-weather friends, and plenty of Jehovah’s Bystanders, people who believe in God but just don’t want to get involved. In this crowd, it could be argued that we need a Don Imus just to wake us up once in a while. New York Post
Notice what he says at the end of the first paragraph above, that Twain was decried as a racist until the day he died for using the N-word in one of his books. The next paragraph begins with “speaking of which” there will always be Sharptons and Jacksons around. Exactly which “speaking of which” was he referring to? Is he referring to (or speaking of) the word racist or the N-word in the preceding paragraph? Did he say that Twain was decried as a racist and speaking of which… or did he say for using the N-word and speaking of which…?
It is not clear if he was equating Sharpton and Jackson to the word racist or the N-word. Far be it from me to correct the man, I just wish he would have made it a little clearer. I guess depending upon who you ask, they might be both. I know they are racists, I would not call them the other, but everyone is entitled to an opinion, except white people who say something remotely wrong in the PC world. Then we need a genuine lynch mob led by pretend civil rights leaders in their $500 suits.
I guess Kinky Friedman will be the next person taken to the hanging tree.
Tags: Commentary
Fierstein; The Op-Ed Drama Queen
Apr 14, 2007 Uncategorized
Actor and playwright Harvey Fierstein is a gay man and he has written an Op-Ed piece for the New York Times describing how, as a gay person, he has been relegated to the cheap seats and is watching the Imus debacle with amusement. His claim is that there has been blatant discrimination against gays and that this Imus situation has made people look up and act like they are just now becoming aware of discrimination in America. He uses the Imus lynching as a platform to strike out at Americans for their intolerance of homosexuals.
Harvey seems to think he is the only person who pays taxes in America because at least twice we are reminded that it is his taxes that pay for one thing or another. When he mentions General Pace he has this to say:
Face it, if a Pentagon general, his salary paid with my tax dollars, can label homosexual acts as “immoral†without a call for his dismissal, who are the moral high and mighty kidding?
The first question is, where does this guy get off saying that a general should be fired for calling homosexuality immoral? That is his opinion and a lot of people pay his salary. Matter of fact Harvey, our taxes pay for a lot of things that we might not like but I guess that has not occurred to you. A lot of Christians are completely against abortion and don’t feel our tax dollars should pay for them. A lot of us are not too happy that our tax dollars pay for ILLEGALS to go to school, siphon our health care and burden our judicial system. A lot of folks are not happy that our tax dollars pay people to sit on their asses while the rest of us work. In case you did not read it, the Constitution does not say you have the right not to be offended but it does say that general has a right to free speech. Interestingly, if Pace had said he thought there was nothing wrong with homosexuality and the rest of us called for his dismissal people like Harvey would say we are homophobes.
Harvey also cries about attempts to change the Constitution in order to define a marriage as between one man and one woman. Harvey, we would not need to change the Constitution if homosexual advocacy groups would stop trying to change the laws as they exist. If they would stop trying to change tradition then we would not need such measures.
No Harvey, you can claim to be in the cheap seats watching everything as you are discriminated against but that is not true. The fact is, the homosexual agenda has been forced on people against our wills. Let me be clear before some wacko calls me a homophobe or bigot, I have no problem with homosexuals. It is their behavior that I find to be wrong. They are all children of God and it is not for me to judge them but I do not have to understand, accept, or like the behavior and this does not make me a hateful person or a bad guy. I don’t have to explain to anyone why I think homosexuality is immoral and I do not have to accept that behavior as normal just because the homosexual lobby was able to bully the psychiatrists to remove it as a disorder.
This is America and we have every right not to like a certain group or behavior. If whites want to hate blacks or blacks hate whites, they are allowed to do so. If people want to vote against gay marriage or not like homosexuals or their behavior then that is their prerogative. The only thing you are not allowed to do is use these traits as a reason to discriminate. The law makes it illegal to deny housing or a job based on sex, color, race, religion, or sexual orientation. THAT DOES NOT MEAN PEOPLE HAVE TO LIKE OR ACCEPT ANY OF THOSE THINGS. They are just not allowed to discriminate with regard to them. Of course, our society allows us to discriminate against whites people (especially males) when it comes to college admission or job placement but that is a story for another time.
Harvey, the Constitution does not say you have the right not to be offended. There are rights enumerated in it and this is not one of them. You have many freedoms but just as you are free to live your life as you see fit, I am allowed to live mine as I see fit and that includes the right to like or dislike many things. I have nothing against homosexual people and I wish you and all of them the best in life but I am free not to like the behavior just as you are free to engage in it. It also means that just because you pay taxes does not mean you have the right to dictate how things go. If that were the case, there would be a lot of changes.
Harvey, come in from left field and sit in the box seats. Quit feeling sorry for yourself and quit trying to make the rest of us understand or accept your lifestyle. If you understand it and accept it, that should be good enough for you.
Tags: Commentary