Dhimmitude in New York, of All Places
Oct 10, 2007 Uncategorized
New York City will become the latest entity to acquiesce to the Muslims by illuminating the Empire State Building with green lights in celebration of the Muslim holiday of Eid. The green lights will begin Friday and mark the first time Eid has been celebrated by such an event in the Big Apple. This will also become an annual event as more of this country submits to the will of the pedophile prophet, Mohammad.
One would think New York would be a bit sensitive about anything Muslims since a bunch of Muslim radicals flew planes into buildings there and killed thousands of innocent civilians. One would think that but obviously such is not the case. I imagine this was something that was decided without much, if any, public input. Considering how many New Yorkers reacted to Ahmadinejad, one has to wonder what the city is thinking. One can only wonder what kind of riot will take place if a bulb burns out or the illumination is deemed inadequate. Muslims are sensitive that way and riot over the smallest things.
Well, at least New York made it an easier target for a night invasion by the radicals.
Source:
Breitbart
Tags: Commentary, Dhimma, Eid, Empire State Building, Muslims, New York, Terrorism
Mexican Murderer’s Fate Obscured by Bush
Oct 7, 2007 Immigration
An interesting twist has developed in the death penalty fast lane known as Texas. The former Governor of Texas, George Bush, is trying to block the execution of a Mexican who was sentenced to death for raping and brutally murdering two girls. This is the same Bush who had an express lane to the executioner and who presided over a lot of executions. Not that I think there is anything wrong with a fast lane to ole Sparky. I believe that waiting 20 or 25 years to execute a murderer is way too long so I applaud the Texas method.
What I am amazed at is that George Bush would try to halt the execution of a Mexican killer. Can someone tell me what it is the Mexicans have over George Bush. Do they have pictures of him in a brothel, or smoking crack? He constantly looks out for their interests at the expense of Amercian interests. One only needs to remember the Amnesty fiasco he tried to shove down our throats to know where his allegiance is. Now he is trying to stop the execution of a murderer.
First of all, this is a state matter and the federal folks need to back off. Secondly, the US needs to tell Mexico to take an aeronautical intercourse at a revolving pastry. Mexico has filed a lawsuit on behalf of the murderer and 50 other Mexicans on death row. Why is it the Mexican government gets involved with its citizens who come here and murder but wants nothing to do with them otherwise? So long as Mexico can send these leeches up here to suck the lifeblood out of our economy they are happy. As soon as they commit a crime and are sentenced, the Mexicans want to file a lawsuit. It is amazing that the same people who use our laws to their advantage want to ignore our laws when they get punished.
I have a few ideas that will help out. First of all, instead of voting on the condemnation of Rush Limbaugh, the Congress can vote to condemn Mexico. Then, we can answer Mexico’s lawsuit by filing one of our own for all the money that their citizens have syphoned out of our economy by breaking the law. We can sue them for the money plus interest. That should keep them picking fruit for a very long time to pay the bill.
Another thing we can do is take the Mexicans who have been convicted of murder and execute them. If there is a doubt about evidence in any case they can let that go through appeal but for the ones where there is irrefutable evidence, I say line the bastards up and shoot them. It is not cruel and unusual punishment, they will have died of lead poisoning.
I am getting a little tired of the Mexicans and their candy assed government and its attitude that somehow America owes them something. They should be happy we did not wipe them out and take their country after the Alamo. They should also be happy we are not air dropping Mexican ILLEGALS from airplanes back whence they came.
As for the Mexican consulate and the government officials of Mexico, if one of these girls were my daughter and you helped the murderer, I would hunt you down, chain you to my bumper, and drag you until there was not enough left to fill a taco shell.
I am surprised the people of Texas have not told their former governor to mind his own damned business and then executed these murderers.
Source:
Fox
Tags: Commentary, death penalty, immigrants, Mexican, murder
Obama Wants Openly Gay Military
Oct 6, 2007 Military
For a very long time the United States armed forces had a rule that made it illegal for gay people to serve in the military. Homosexuality was deemed incompatible with military life. When Clinton became President he tried to change that to appease the homo crowd who he had pandered to but the best he could do was get don’t ask, don’t tell passed. Now, B. Hussein Obama wants to end DADT and make it OK for openly gay people to serve. To Obama, since England and Israel do it that way, it is fine. I love the way that liberals say we should do something because some other country does it but let’s give Hussein this one and say that additionally, Israel requires service in the military from everyone when they graduate high school. It is compulsory service so if we should follow Israel’s lead, we need to start making EVERYONE serve in the armed forces.
There area number of reasons that homosexuals should not be serving in the military, though to be honest, in a firefight I would not give a hoot in hell. However, there are more negatives than positives in this issue and the military has to look out for national defense first and foremost. Allowing homosexuals in would be another problem and cause other issues that would take away from the mission of the military. It is not the job of the armed forces to have equality and fairness. Fat people are not allowed, those with poor sight, those with other conditions are not allowed. The military has decided that homosexuality is incompatible with military life and that is how it should stand.
Hussein Obama should also be careful what he asks for because of the unintended consequences. Let us suppose that Obama wins the presidency and has a majority Congress and gets this passed. The recruitment of soldiers would go way, way down. Then Obama would be forced to implement a draft in order to provide national defense, something he claims to have a grasp on. You see, the majority of our enlistees come from the mid west and the south. These areas are full of the Christian right, people who believe homosexuality is an abomination. The liberal elitists in New England and the west coast regions have much fewer people enlisting than does the south and mid west. If Hussein Obama allows gays to openly serve a bunch of people who are in will leave at the end of their hitch and those who thought about joining would skip it. This would mean Obama would have to institute the draft.
I realize that he said that he would bring the troops home so people might not feel any need to have a strong, full strength military. They might feel that way until the next natural disaster comes and there are no guard soldiers to assist or the next attack comes and we do not have the troops to deploy. No, B. Hussein will have to force people to serve, unless of course, his plan is to weaken the military to make it easier for Muslims to take control.
Why is it that Democrats who have never served in the military feel free to use the military for their social experiments?
Military phrases we will have to be careful with if Hussein gets his way:
Is your chute packed?
Go get your sh*t packed.
I’m locked, cocked, and ready to rock.
Who is the rear Admiral?
I only want to see asses and elbows.
Where did you get your training son? Fort Dix, sir.
Tags: Commentary, experiments, homosexuals, Military, Obama, socialism
Prosecutor Agrees, Death Penalty to Child Molesters
Oct 6, 2007 Uncategorized
The federal prosecutor who was arrested when he flew to Detroit to have sex with what he believed to be a 5 year old girl has committed suicide in his jail cell. Assistant U.S. Attorney John D.R. Atchison, who was arrested last month after being caught in a sting operation aimed at Internet predators, was found unresponsive in his jail cell and taken to the hospital where he was pronounced dead.
I have long advocated the death penalty for adults who have sex with children. I would be just as happy with life in prison without parole but as we have seen in the past, life without parole does not necessarily mean life without parole. We have a number of lifers who have been released because of one reason or another and for this to happen with a child molester is a problem because they cannot be cured. There is around a 97% recidivism rate in the child pervert community so letting them out means there is a 97% chance it will happen again. For some reason the bleeding hearts do not understand this or somehow believe the guy they are releasing is among the 3%. These are the same people who will carry an umbrella if there is a 20% chance of rain, go figure…
How many times have we read stories about child molesters who were released only to molest a child again. Unfortunately, the child is often murdered. The death penalty takes all of this away. If the guy is dead, there will be no person for a judge or advocacy group to fight for. There will be no releases that end up in the molestation and death of other children and the world will be rid of an evil person.
One has to wonder what kind of evil person has sex with children? What kind of person has sex with 5 year old children? This is not just some case of a 16 year old having consensual sex with her 18 year old boyfriend (a non crime as far as I am concerned) this is a grown man who wants to pleasure himself at the expense of a 5 year old kid. This is evil and it is one of the most perverted things that man can do (speaking of which Mohammad was a child molester too). Atchison promised that he would be gentile and that he had done this many times before. Of course, if this is the case, there are either parents who do not know what has happened or they allowed it. That would be another group of people who deserve the death penalty.
While I would like to believe that Atchison committed suicide because the death penalty was appropriate, it is likely he could not face his family and friends after what he did so he took a cowardly way out but in so doing, saved us a lot of money.
Tags: Commentary
General Pace Takes Parting Shot
Sep 26, 2007 Military
General Pace will retire shortly and he had his opportunity to explain his position on gays in the military. This exchange was prompted by a question from a Democrat who found Pace’s previous comments “very hurtful.” Senator Tom Harkin is evidently dense and did not understand Pace’s clearly defined point of view. Pace stated:
“Are there wonderful Americans who happen to be homosexual serving in the military? Yes,” he told the Senate Appropriations Committee during a hearing focused on the Pentagon’s 2008 war spending request.
“We need to be very precise then, about what I said wearing my stars and being very conscious of it,” he added. “And that is, very simply, that we should respect those who want to serve the nation but not through the law of the land, condone activity that, in my upbringing, is counter to God’s law.” My Way News
Pace did not change his view, he did not pander and he did not bow down to the great Senator Harkin. He clearly restated his position, one that is in keeping with both his religious beliefs and the law. The issue here is morality and General Pace is a religious man who believes that homosexuality is against the teaching of his religion. He is also a military officer who is responsible for upholding moral behavior and following the law.
Harkin is a Democrat so it should be no surprise that the issue of morality is tough for him to handle. Here is the exchange that took place at the end. It is one that clearly defines the differences between a man of principle and an immoral buffoon:
“It’s a matter of leadership, and we have to be careful what we say,” Harkin said.
Pace noted that the U.S. Military Code of Justice prohibits homosexual activity as well as adultery. Harkin said, “Well, then, maybe we should change that.”
There you have it. First Harkin talks about leadership as if he can show a four star general anything about leading. Harkin could not lead a group of people out of a burning building. Then, after General Pace cites the law against homosexuality and adultery in the military, Harkin says maybe we need to change the law.
Leave it to a politician to want to change a law he does not like. If that is the case, I do not like our tax laws and would like to change them. Of course, being a Democrat, Harkin would want to legalize adultery and homosexuality in the military.
I am glad that Pace did not change his stance on the subject. It is nice to see someone whose opinion is not formed by the latest poll. Anyway, what did he have to lose? It is not like they can fire him.
What else will Democrats do to tear down the armed forces?
Who knows? Maybe Harkin was sucking up to the homosexual base…
Sometimes unrelated trackbacks to: Outside the Beltway, Stop the ACLU, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson’s Website, Rosemary’s Thoughts, The Random Yak, DeMediacratic Nation, Adam’s Blog, Right Truth, The Pet Haven Blog, Nuke’s News & Views, Webloggin, Cao’s Blog, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, , Conservative Cat, Inside the Northwest-Territory, Faultline USA, Allie is Wired, Right Celebrity, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Pirate’s Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, The Pink Flamingo, Right Voices, Public Eye, The Yankee Sailor, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, General Pace, homsexuality, immoral, law, Link Fest, Military, Senator Harkin