Kanye West Loses Because He is Black?
Sep 10, 2007 Uncategorized
Kanye West was a big loser again this year at the Video Music Awards and Kanye, being the spoiled, sore loser that he is, showed his disgust by vowing to never return to MTV. Of course, Kanye could not resist throwing a little insinuation that he lost because he is black when he said; “That’s two years in a row, man … give a black man a chance.”
As far as I am concerned West has received a lot of chance in this great country. He sings song and gets paid for it and while I will not say that he is paid or nominated because he is black I will say that I don’t think he has much talent. I don’t care for his music but some people do and that is fine. The fact remains that more people liked someone else’s music so he did not win.
I realize that Kanye is basically making excuses and trying to find a way to blame his losses on some force that has it out for black people. In Kanye’s world that person is probably George W. Bush, who Kanye said hated black people while on national television pleading for donations to help victims of Katrina. I don’t know who votes on these awards but I am willing to go out on a limb here and state that George Bush does not vote and has no say in the winners.
However, there are people who vote on these things and they are either the listening consumers or the artists themselves. In either event, the people who voted did not like Kanye’s music as much as they liked someone else’s and that, in Knaye’s eyes, must be people not giving a black man a chance.
I personally love watching this self absorbed twit anguish over his failure. I love watching this guy whine because people do not think he is as talented as he believes himself to be and I love to hear him blame his failures on some anonymous being that will not give him a a chance because he is black.
I hope he never wins. Not because I follow his music or the VMAs but because I love watching him get all upset about his failure. One would think that being successful and earning a lot of money would be enough for this pinhead but sadly, he needs little statues to make him feel good.
As I stated, I don’t know who votes on these things but whoever you are thank you and keep up the good work.
Source:
Yahoo News
Tags: Commentary
Maybe We Should Riot for What We Want
Sep 9, 2007 Uncategorized
I have written a number of times about the plan of Islam to take over the world and how that plan includes causing so many problems for people so they will not make noise in the future. This will allow the Muslims to push forward while meeting little resistance. We have seen this time and again as the media and businesses avoid anything that might offend a Muslim so as to keep the Muslims from rioting and crying about how insensitive we are. They never take responsibility for their behavior because it is always the racists who hate Islam who are causing the problem. Imams acted like terrorists and caused a disturbance on an airplane and Ibrahim Hooper and the rest of the idiots at CAIR went nuts.
Just recently, the Washington Post refused to run two strips of the cartoon Opus because it had material that might be offensive to Muslims. The Washington Post does not hesitate to publish items that Christians find offensive. It seems that no business or media outlet ever considers the feelings of any group that does not worship a child molester prophet. Artists who are supported with our tax dollars routinely make “art” that is offensive to Christians. Calls to stop funding these artists lead to discussions of free speech and expression (it is not free if I am paying for it. I get a say if it is my money) yet these very people dismiss any idea of free speech if such speech could upset a Muslim. There was a recent photo or painting that depicted Osama bin Laden as Jesus. Did Christians riot over that?
Perhaps non Muslims need to start bringing violence to the table. It is obvious that the government and the media do not care how non Muslims feel and only worry about offending that one group of people. Imagine Christians rioting in a courthouse because of some ruling that removed a Cross or other Christian symbol? Maybe if a half a million or so tore down one of the New York museums with a Jesus in urine display and destroyed millions in old art they might listen.
I think these methods are a bit archaic (which explains why those backwards Muslims use them) and represent a step in the wrong direction but our government and the media as well as many businesses have shown us that this is the only thing they respond to. We can show these folks the Constitution and they still remove our right to the free exercise or our religion. We are assaulted in court by judges who legislate from the bench and we are supposed to smile while it happens. All the while Muslims have foot baths built, prayer rooms designated, and old practices (like eating at our desks) removed because they find it offensive.
Well, I find Islam offensive and I believe that if this is the kind of action that is given credence then it will not be long until there is a physical clash of cultures in this country. Allah will not be able to help those worshipers of the child molester.
Source:
Federalist Patriot
Tags: Commentary, Terrorism
From Lincoln Bedroom to Stinkin’ Bedroom
Sep 6, 2007 Uncategorized
The stories of the Clinton’s selling the Lincoln bedroom are well known and their lust for power and money allowed them to tarnish the White House, or dirty that room. A lot of people bumped uglies in there after paying quite a handsome sum of money. I guess it means that a lot of people paid for sex at the White House. I wonder why charges were never filed for using federal property for political gain…
In any event, there is word today from B. Hussein Obama’s wife, Michelle, about his hygiene. From the category of information I did not need to know, Mrs. Obama tells us her husband snores and stinks. Yep, she informed the world that her husband snores a lot and stinks so badly in the morning that their daughters will not crawl up in the bed with them. I am afraid that this information is best kept inside the confines of the Obama household.
I know that people produce odors and I am aware that this is natural. That is why we have showers and why the fragrance industry makes billions of dollars selling products that smell nice. Just because one is aware of something does not mean it needs to be made public. I don’t want to know how badly a candidate’s body odor is, if he stinks up the bathroom so terribly that HAZMAT routinely visits, or if his morning breath could gag a maggot. I am happy knowing less about the odoriferous aspects of the candidate and more about political positions and personal values. Let’s leave the olfactory assaults to their family Blazing Saddles nights.
I think the last thing this campaign wants to see are bumper stickers that read “Obama Stinks”…
Tags: Commentary
Is Katie Couric a Convert?
Sep 5, 2007 Uncategorized
Many on the right have indicated that what we see on the news is not indicative of what is actually taking place in Iraq. The troops who watch the news in Iraq can tell how different the news version is from the actual events that they participated in. Interestingly, those who rely on the news have a bleak view of the situation in Iraq while those who go there have a different opinion, in most cases, anyway. Katie Couric is in Iraq and she had this to say:
“We hear so much about things going bad, but real progress has been made there in terms of security and stability,” Couric said Tuesday. “I mean, obviously, infrastructure problems abound, but Sunnis and U.S. forces are working together. They banded together because they had a common enemy: al Qaeda.” WCBSTV
Imagine that, Katie uttered the phrase used by the right, We hear so much about things going bad, and of course her network is one of those that tells us these things. She sees real progress! A journalist who sees progress and reports on it from the battlefield rather than from a hotel.
Things are not perfect in Iraq but they are not as bad as the drive-by media would have us believe. Couric was able to see first hand, and to report honestly, the successes that have taken place.
Will she now be a convert? I doubt it, but I hope her trip has given her a new perspective from which to view things. I hope she takes her trip into account when she returns and reports the news.
Sometimes unrelated trackbacks to: Webloggin, The Pink Flamingo, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Cao’s Blog, Right Celebrity, third world county, and Right Truth, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest
Is Nigger OK in Certain Parts, Whoopi?
Sep 4, 2007 Uncategorized
Whoopi Goldberg made a splash debut on the Gal Pal Gabfest known as The View by defending Michael Vick. If anyone had any questions about whether she will be as controversial as the woman she replaced, this might be part of the answer. As far as I see it, there is no defending a man who tortured animals for sport. We are not talking about killing something to eat or wear, we are talking about electrocuting, drowning, and beating dogs to death. This type of behavior is indicative of someone with a very disturbed mind. Whoopi does not see it that way and said this:
“It’s like cockfighting in Puerto Rico,” she said. “There are certain things that are indicative to certain parts of the country.” Breitbart
I guess under Goldberg’s explanation that certain things are indicative to certain parts of the country we can now stop Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson from holding riots every time some KKK member or other white supremacist calls black folks niggers. It is just indicative of the way they live and beating blacks for sport or dragging them behind trucks is OK, according to Goldberg logic, because the blacks are not viewed as humans in those certain parts.
Whoopi became very defensive back in 1993 when then boyfriend Ted Danson did a skit at the Friars Club roast that had him wearing black face. Whoopi was in on the gag and thought it was a hoot but there were blacks who did not appreciate the stunt. She defended the act noting that Danson had been referred to as a nigger lover for his relationship with her. Whoopi was not happy that people would call Ted a nigger lover and she was not happy that people would infer that the stunt was racist (though it is illogical to refer to him as both a nigger lover and a racist). There are two opposing things here that seem to involve items indicative to certain parts of the country. The black folks who were offended did not like it and that is indicative of the struggles and racism they have overcome. There is also the group of people who come from certain parts of the country that think interracial relationships are wrong. She should not be upset with either group because to one being upset by this was indicative of their parts and to the other not liking “nigger lovers” was indicative to their part.
We could play this all day long. To certain parts it is OK to sell and use drugs, kill people in drive-by shootings, become part of violent gangs that steal and kill, demean women as hos (was Imus just acting in accordance with his certain parts?), have sex with children and on and on. It should also be noted that the Confederate Flag is perfectly acceptable in certain parts but some people come unhinged when it is displayed.
The fact is, regardless of what parts people come from, the majority of people in this country find these acts either criminal, reprehensible or both. This includes the majority of folks who live in these certain areas of which Whoopi speaks. The notion that Vick might have been acting in accordance with the culture of “his certain parts” does not negate the fact that what he did was absolutely disgusting, inhumane and abominable. But hey, if Whoopi wants to defend it, power to her. I find most of the acts to be despicable and contemptuous of civilized society. Only Danson, Imus, and those who said offensive words were actually exercising their right to free speech, regardless of how distasteful that speech might have been been and those sparked a firestorm.
I just wonder if she would accept the argument that in certain parts of the government, torture of our enemies is OK, and allow this argument to dismiss what took place at Abu Ghraib. I also wonder if it was OK for three white racists to drag James Byrd Jr to his death in Texas. Maybe they should have used the “certain parts” argument?
Of course the title might be rhetorical since Goldberg is a black comedian and use of the word nigger is acceptable in that case and in the case of rap artists and blacks to each other. The answer just might be yes…
UPDATE: It is not OK here.
Sometimes unrelated trackbacks to: Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary’s Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, Right Truth, Adam’s Blog, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Thoughts, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Walls of the City, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Planck’s Constant, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest