Mayor Daley Out Of Touch With The People
Jun 29, 2010 Political
Mayor Daley is not happy with the decision by the Supreme Court that says the Second Amendment applies to the states. He is an anti gun politician and he wants guns banned. He has no concern for the Constitution or for freedom. He only cares about power and how to get rich through Chicago corruption.
The people of Chicago see things a bit differently. They are happy with the decision. Some indicate that they have weapons to protect themselves even though the weapons are illegal (by virtue of the gun ban). People are willing to break the law to ensure their safety.
Daley cares not one bit and he vowed to enact a new law that will make it extremely difficult to own a gun. These tactics usually involve undue barriers that prevent people, particularly the poor, from getting weapons. The very same tactics that liberals used after slavery to terrorize the freemen.
Why should Daley care? He has armed guards to protect him.
At least the people get it. As one person puts it:
Another neighbor, 50-year-old Charlene Figgins, thinks Chicago Mayor Richard Daley is living in a different Chicago than she is and that he doesn’t understand the citizens’ need for protection.
She says it can take 30 minutes for police to respond to calls for help in her neighborhood. She says the mayor doesn’t have that problem. Chicago Tribune
Or as the bumper sticker says, when seconds count the police are minutes away.
9-1-1, government sponsored dial a prayer…
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: armed guards, chicago, daley, gun control, liberty, Second Amendment
Daley Machine Tells Obama To Fake It
Dec 24, 2009 Political
William Daley wrote an Op-Ed piece for the Washington Post and in it he tells Obama that the decision of some Democrats to retire rather than run for reelection as well as the defection of Parker Griffith spells trouble for the left going into next year’s election. Daley’s suggestion is that Democrats plot a more moderate and centrist course.
Daley laments that many Democrats won seats in traditional Republican strongholds because they are moderates, or Blue Dogs as they are called, and that they risk losing because they have had to support the more radical elements of the party in Congress. Anyone with a little political sense knows that Pelosi will try to protect the moderates by allowing them to vote against unpopular legislation as long as she has the votes for it to pass. However, when push comes to shove and she needs the votes she expects them to vote lockstep with the party.
This sets up problems and shows why there is no such thing as a true Blue Dog. When it gets down to brass tacks the so called Blue Dogs vote party over conscience. It might take a good bribe but it always happens. It is very unlikely that the citizens in the traditional Republican strongholds who are now represented by Democrats want the health care bill, cap and trade or the stimulus but in many cases they have representatives who support those items.
Daley’s solution is for the Democrats to put up a moderate and centrist front but this is all smoke and mirrors. How many people believe that any of these people who get reelected acting as moderates will actually be moderate when votes are needed and the leadership is applying pressure? Barack Obama ran as a person who would be transparent, ethical, moderate and bipartisan. In essence, he appeared to be rather moderate. This fooled a lot of people who failed to pay attention to his radical past. Now we are seeing him as the far left radical, Chicago politician that some of us saw despite the whole hope and change mantra.
If the left moves to the center and works as moderates many of them might be reelected by those with short memories but make no mistake, they will not remain moderate after they are elected. You folks in conservative America need to look at the Democrats representing you and see if they truly stayed moderate after they won or if they fell in line behind the radical liberal agenda. Don’t be fooled by those who vote for something and then against it when the votes are secured. Don’t be fooled by those who are allowed to vote a certain way under the cover provided by Pelosi. You need to actually look at them and what they are doing. If they voted for the things you do not want and did so under pressure then they are playing a game and it is not likely they will change should they win reelection.
When it comes down to it the so called Blue Dogs vote party over constituent and party over country so keep this in mind should they run around begging for your vote and your money while telling you how they had your best interests at heart.
Daley wants the Democrats to put on a ruse in order to avoid a real problem in the next election. His plea for Obama to take on a centrist agenda has nothing to do with really being centrist or running the country as a centrist. It is a political ploy designed to keep Democrats in power so that once the election is over they can continue the radical agenda set forth by Obama, Pelosi, and Reid.
Vote them all out and put people in who will be concerned with your interests and not the interests of the party.
And if that person turns out to be bad replace him as well.
We The People own this country and it is time we started acting like it.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: centrist, daley, liberal, moderate, Obama, radical, washington post
Obama Is Spreading The Wealth
Oct 23, 2008 Political
Barack Obama has collected around 605 million dollars, some of it from legal donors who are not fictional characters. Obama understands how the world of Chicago politics works and he is very cleverly transferring 2 million dollars of that money to Mayor Daley and his crime machine.
Recently it was revealed that Obama was planning an election night party in Chicago (the one where he will charge reporters for access). The party will be a big, outside event because Obama’s ego does not allow anything else (acceptance speech).
Today it was reported that Mayor Daley has placed a 2 million dollar price tag on the event. Bingo, now you know how Obama will be able to transfer a couple of million dollars from his campaign war chest (money from all over the world) to the city of Chicago to help them with their budget woes. Barry could not write them a check but he can hold an extravagant event and pay them top dollar. Daley and Obama are experts at skirting the law in the tradition of Chicago politicians throughout history.
If he is this loose with your money as a candidate think how loose he will be with billions of dollars from all taxpayers.
Ever wonder how greedy Obama is? He has enough money that he will have to spend about 12 million a day before the election and he has sent out an email asking for another $10 from all his donors (I presume he even means the ones who have either maxed out or more than maxed out because he is really loose with the rules when it comes to taking in money). He could not possibly need that kind of money but he keeps asking for more.
Kind of sounds like how he will run government, should he be elected. Keep taking more and more so that he can spend more and more.
Now you know why they are called the tax and spend party. You also know that Barry has demonstrated that he really does believe in spreading the wealth around, especially to his crime boss friends.
Tags: chicago, corruption, daley, Obama