Will Anyone On The Left Hold Hillary Accountable?
Mar 23, 2015 Political
Hillary Clinton is a typical progressive who, like her former boss, believes the ends justify the means and that anything she does in pursuit of liberal ideology is OK. How dare anyone try to hold her accountable. Is this some kind of vast right wing conspiracy?
[note]In true liberal style Hillary blamed a vast right wing conspiracy for the uproar over her husband’s inability to keep his private parts off other women. Liberals always blame others.[/note]
Clinton used a private email server to conduct business when she was the Secretary of State. There is no doubt whatsoever that she did this to avoid scrutiny and so that she could scrub the emails before they were ever released. She circumvented (and more likely broke) the law so she could not be held accountable for what she wrote.
There were 18.5 minutes of erased recordings in the Nixon tapes (and there is evidence that was an error by the secretary) and he was forever branded a crook. Hillary has done much worse and she has defenders from the left who claim this is much ado about nothing.
Yes, there are those who are using servergate to derail her as the front runner but the fact she is still a frontrunner says a lot about what liberals are willing to allow in order to keep power and to keep big government growing.
Hillary asserted that she did not break any laws and that she made sure her emails were addressed to at least one State Department email address so they could be captured and archived.
Turns out that this is not true (shocked face) as it has now been disclosed that she sent information to others working with her to their PRIVATE email addresses which means those items were not archived.
My good friend Alan West reports on this here.
In addition to Hillary breaking the law there are additional concerns that her server was not secure and that it was vulnerable to many attacks. There is evidence (though no one has confirmed) that a hacktivist group successfully infiltrated her server. Images of emails allegedly sent by her have been released to the interwebs.
She lied about many things and I am willing to bet (I am certain enough to say I know) she discussed sensitive, and likely classified, information through her private address.
The next place Hillary occupies should not be the White House. It should be a cell in a federal penitentiary.
How fitting it would be if the wife of Bill Clinton ended up in a penal institute…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: alan west, email, Hillary, lies, President, servergate
Transition Of Email
May 1, 2013 General
To all subscribers of this website. I am working on transitioning to a newsletter format for those who signed up for email alerts. For a little time you will likely get two emails when a post is published. I want to ensure the new system works before the old one is discontinued. If you have signed up I have ported you over to the new site. If you decide you do not want the alerts any longer there is an unsubscribe link at the bottom of each email.
There are a number of options. The new system allows per post and/or weekly alerts. I might add a daily if I publish more often (could use a few more writers for that to happen).
You can always add this site to any feed reader and there is an option to have text alerts sent to a text enabled phone. All options are in the right sidebar at the top. Those who register for the site also have the choice of subscribing at the time of registration.
If you are registered with this site I have sent a message to you asking if you want to be included. No one will be added unless they respond that they want to be.
Thanks for your patience while I work on the transition.
If the new system does not work out I will keep the old one in place.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: email, registration, site maintenance
Palin Email Witch Hunt Proves Fruitless
Jun 13, 2011 Opinion
The Washington Post and The New York Times received about 300 pounds of paperwork that contained some of the emails from the time Sarah Palin was the governor of Alaska. The newspapers enlisted volunteers to sift through the mails in hope of revealing dirt that might be contained in those emails. Make no mistake about it, the desire was to find something to smear Palin with and this is because the liberal media must smear her to protect its puppet master in the White House.
The effort was a bust. The emails revealed thus far indicate that Palin encouraged her staff to be open with the media, she took her work seriously and that she was principled. The media made itself look like a bunch of fools in this effort.
Here is an idea, and it is just an idea. How about the government release the electronic communications of Anthony Weiner to several newspapers and those newspapers enlist an army of volunteers to sift through looking for anything to smear him with? I bet they will find a lot more stuff by going through his emails than they did going through Palin’s.
While they are at it, why not release the electronic communications from Barack Obama. It would be interesting to see what kind of dirt an army of volunteers sifting through them could find.
Of the three, Palin is the only one who is not in office and is not paid by taxpayers and yet she is the one that the left is gunning for.
I imagine Obama’s electronic communications would bear more fruit than Palin’s did.
And Weiner’s would most assuredly render more dirt than Palin’s ever would.
No, let’s ignore Weiner and go after Palin. To the Lame Stream Media, she is more worthy of such attention.
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: email, lies, NYT, Obama, palin, smears, washington post, weiner
A Little Website Housekeeping
May 30, 2011 Political
I have been approached by several folks on my email subscription list who told me they stopped getting email notification of new posts. I looked back and realized that I too stopped receiving emails of new posts (the control, as it were). I have spent about a third of today looking into it and I believe I have fixed the problem. When I upgraded Mailpress the settings and how emails are sent changed a bit and I was not aware. The documentation was not very specific with regard to it (to be fair, it is a free plugin and the guy who writes it is not a native English speaker).
I believe that I have fixed the problem and this post will serve as a test to see if everyone gets it. If I have you as active in my list then it means that YOU signed up to receive them. If you do not remember doing so or no longer want them please follow the instruction in the email to unsubscribe. Please do not report this as spam to my service provider or your ISP. Like I said, you asked to get them by signing up.
Which also means if there are folks reading this who would like to be notified when there is a new post please use the “per post” sign up in the right top sidebar.
If you receive this then let me know.
Have a great day!!
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: email, maintenance, website
Sarah Palin’s Email Hacked
Sep 18, 2008 Political
Some cretin hacked into the personal email account of Governor Sarah Palin and posted screen shots of her email on the web. The Secret Service and the FBI are investigating.
I watched the cable shows and on Greta the host asked a panel of lawyers if the person (or persons) who hacked in should go to jail if they are caught. Two of the three immediately assumed that Palin was doing state work on her personal email. They eventually discussed the issue of privacy and how wrong it was but they kept hammering on state business on the email even though none of the emails had anything to do with state business. They kept saying it to plant the seed. The issue here is that someone hacked email. If they find anything else then they can discuss it.
This would be like if someone stole Barack Obama’s checkbook and published his banking information and the panel was asked if the thieves should go to jail and they said well, Obama might have robbed the bank, they need to see. He might have robbed the bank where he has that checking account.
Let me give the answer the idiot lawyers had some trouble with. The people who did this, if they are caught, should go to jail for a minimum of 5 years and then they should be forbidden from ever using a computer again. I would feel this way if they hacked Obama’s email. This is wrong and it should be strictly punished.
I will be looking around to see how people feel. It will be interesting to see how many liberals condemn it seeing how they are so concerned with privacy (unless you are Chuck Schumer who steals Social Security numbers).
No to Patriot Act but yes to hacking Palin?…..
