Too Late To Make A Difference
Jan 29, 2021 2020 Election, Commentary, COVID
There was widespread fraud across battleground states during the 2020 election. Joe Xiden was the beneficiary of ballot dumps and machine manipulations and he was helped immensely by the mail in ballot fraud and the lax rules, rules that run contrary to the Constitution.
The rejection rates for mail in ballots were substantially lower than in years past. Now this is not just compared to the last election, it is compared to the history of mail in ballots. This was by design to ensure that Xiden had as many votes as possible and those were still not enough. That is why a number of battleground counting places “closed” at the same time and sent the watchers home. They needed to cheat and cheat they did.
I had remarked that this would not be resolved, the allegations would be ignored, the election would be certified and THEN Republicans would say; Ya know, we need to do something to tighten up elections. There was cheating in the last one and we need to pass some laws to fix that.
As an aside, the same people who say there was no evidence of widespread fraud will now work to change laws because of the widespread fraud they say did not exist.
Snap back to reality. In Georgia, a state with massive election fraud, a newly elected Republican state Senator has introduced legislation that would require a copy of two forms of ID for a mail in ballot.
Since the GA Secretary of State and Governor ignored the law and changed things instead of having the legislature do it (as required by the US Constitution) how exactly will this solve anything? They could just as easily ignore an ID law. They could say well we entered into an agreement that if only one ID is there to go ahead and accept it.
Until states write laws that have teeth to them and include provisions for adjudication (like allowing the legislature to convene without anyone else’s permission) of claims of fraud then there is nothing to look at here.
If the people who cheat can do so with the knowledge that they will not be caught and if they are (they were caught on video in GA) they would be safe from prosecution they will keep doing bad things. If they know that even if caught the cheating will not be addressed or overturned then there is no reason for them to stop.
Try having laws that allow the legislature to act independently for election issues and that provide for very long prison sentences for people who engage in fraud. Prison sentences with no chance of early release.
Look, this thing in GA is a start but we are well past doing any good. The left used Dominion voting machines to manipulate results and engaged in good old ballot stuffing while changing the rules (all justified by Covid doncha know) and were successful. Unless we widescale prosecutions with public disclosure of all the fraud this will just continue until people get upset.
And the people are like the Incredible Hulk. Don’t make them angry, you wouldn’t like them when they are angry.
#FAFO
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: election fraud, georgia, ID
Why Stop At Removing Images?
Jul 15, 2015 Political
The Atlanta Chapter of the NAACP wants all things confederate related gone and they want it now. Mischaracterizing the war of Northern Aggression as a war of racism, hate and white supremacy the leaders along with some politicians want the images of Jefferson Davis, Robert E Lee and Stonewall Jackson sand blasted off Stone Mountain.
Eliminating all images will not eliminate any racists, white or black (or any other color) from existence and saying otherwise is an example of reductio ad absurdum. These people will still be here. Hell, the generals of the north owned slaves and Lincoln was a racist. Are their images the next to go?
If eliminating these images of alleged white supremacy will make things better than why stop there? The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, Jim Crow, and racism. That party holds blacks on its plantation in bondage to the government so eliminating the Democrat Party would make more sense than eliminating inanimate objects.
We need to rid West Virginia of everything named after Democrat Robert Byrd who was a member of the KKK and a racist. For good measure we need to dig his decaying body up and move it. We need to get rid of any image of LBJ who was a white supremacist. While we are at it let’s dig him up as well…
We need to eliminate the Democrat Party because that is the party that epitomizes racism.
There is no denying that the Democrats fought for slavery and opposed ending it (in general as the Civil War was not about slavery). There is no doubt they opposed all civil rights movements and continue to fight to keep blacks oppressed. They all work hard to pass legislation and enact programs that keep black folks dependent on government.
So if the liberals are really hell bent on ridding us of hateful things they need to go away. They need to take Democrats away with them and if blacks in particular are so concerned with this matter they need to leave the Democrat Party and become part of something that is not continuing to enslave them.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: civil war, democrat racists, georgia, jim crow, lies, naacp, stone mountain
Why Not Vote For The Republican?
Oct 13, 2010 Political
The Democrats are in for a good thumping in November and they know it. Right now they are trying their best at damage control but there are only so many fingers to plug the holes in the dike. Many of them are running from their records and pretending they did not support the Obama-Pelosi-Reid agenda. Many hardly mention their “achievements” if at all and there are some who are proudly touting that they voted against their leaders. Some are the so called Blue Dogs but most are those who Pelosi allowed to vote against the agenda in order to pander to the folks back home.
Democrat Representative Jim Marshall of Georgia’s 8th Congressional District has an ad out in which a narrator proudly proclaims that Marshall voted with the GOP 65% of the time. Marshall wants the people of his district to vote for him because he votes more with the GOP than with his own party. Depending on how it is measured he actually voted with his party about 88% of the time but let’s go with his numbers.
If he is proud to have voted with the GOP 65% of the time (and therefore with his party only 35% of the time) and this is a reason to put him back in office then why not just vote for the Republican in the race?
The Republican will more than likely vote with the GOP in the 90% range so if 65% is a good thing and warrants reelection then more than 65% would mean the other guy deserves to be elected even more.
The Republican opponent, Austin Scott, is a business man who understands the economy and the business environment so why not vote for him?
He will give the folks of Georgia, and the rest of the country, a far better effort than 65% on conservative issues.
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: 8th district, austin scott, conservative, georgia, jim marshall
Justice Department Sanctions Voter Fraud
Jun 3, 2009 Political
Eric Holder’s Department of Justice handed down a ruling stating that the state of Georgia had to stop asking for proof of citizenship to register to vote. The Justice Department gave the same lame arguments that are always given when one speaks of proving eligibility to vote; it will disenfranchise minorities. I guess minorities don’t have a birth certificate or a Social Security number in addition to the ID they never seem to be able to get. Given that Obama has refused to release his birth certificate it is not surprising that voters in Georgia would not be required to show one.
This is nothing more than a ruling to help people who should not vote do just that. This ruling will allow illegals to register. The opponents claim there were over 7000 people flagged who turned out to be eligible to vote. Perhaps there is a larger problem. Did someone else have the same Social Security number? Did the birth certificate not have the raised seal? Who knows but it appears as if the problems were cleared up. Seems to me that these folks were flagged and upon further investigation they were cleared. Isn’t this how things should work?
Not under the Obama Justice Department run by Holder. Under that corrupt organization voter intimidation is excused because the criminals involved were Obama supporters. The New Black Panthers violated the Voting Rights Act but were not prosecuted because they have many branches around the country and they support Obama. Can’t go ticking off the supporters especially when they might be needed to intimidate white voters in the future. They also can’t go ticking off the illegal voter population if they want to win.
Georgia is one of two states required to get Justice approval for voting issues because of Jim Crow law problems of the past. That requirement is up before the Supreme Court and if all goes well they will remove the requirement so Georgia can run its own program without interference from the criminals at Justice.
But until then Georgia must allow anyone who wants to register to vote to do so without any proof of citizenship. Citizenship is a requirement to vote but it is a pesky nuisance for Democrats so they work around the requirement.
Voting is an important civic duty and everyone who is eligible should be allowed to do so under our current laws. I have problems with people who have no stake in the country voting in it but the law says they can. But we should make absolutely certain that the people who are voting are eligible.
We need to prove citizenship for many things. One must prove citizenship to get a job (though Democrats make that a hazy process to accommodate illegals), one must prove citizenship (or legal status) to join the military, Americans must prove citizenship (with a passport) to get back in the country, one must have ID to rent a movie, cash a check, board a plane and to buy cigarettes or alcohol. Why is it so difficult to prove one is a citizen in order to register to vote and to show ID when voting?
I am tired of the bogus arguments about people not having ID. People have birth certificates and most people have a Social Security number. The downtrodden that the Democrats always feign worry for are never put out when ID is needed for government benefits. People who show up to apply for any of the various welfare programs have to show ID and by some miracle they always seem to have it. Yet, the act of voting puts some undue burden on them.
It would seem from this list that proof of citizenship or an ID is required for everything except running for president and voting. Funny how the Democrats always seem to defend the flaws in the systems, flaws that make it easier to commit fraud. Then again, the Democratic Party is the one all the dead people vote for. They are in line right next to the illegals.
Maybe people should start complaining about having to get a passport to reenter from Canada or Mexico. This is an undue burden on people. How dare the government require proof of citizenship to enter the country when it will affect so many people.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: eric holder, georgia, jim crow, justice, voter fraud
Quit monkeying around with racism
May 13, 2008 Opinion, Political
Pat Buchanan has an interesting piece up at Human Events where he talks about how Bill and Hillary Clinton have been called racists by the very people who viewed him as the first black president. He discusses his view that Obama and his people have shouted racism at anything and everything and therefore have defined the parameters of what is allowed to be talked about. He notes that John Mccain has already said what is off the table for the general election and that by allowing the opponent to dictate the terms the results are usually defeat.
This is evident in Marietta Georgia where a pub owner is selling shirts with a picture of Curious George on them with the words Obama 08 underneath. This has certain groups of people up in arms decrying the racism involved in using a picture of a monkey to depict a black man. Protests are planned outside the establishment where groups opposed to the shirt will gather:
The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the Nation of Islam and the Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials were among the organizations expected at Tuesday’s rally.
“Mulligan’s is promoting and selling racially offensive T-shirts, and Marietta and Cobb County residents and taxpayers abhor and cannot condone, any longer, this type of divisive and incendiary behavior in our community,” said Jerry Gonzalez, executive director of GALEO. AJC
The owner said that he is not racist and feels that Obama resembles Curious George. The groups are not buying it and they want to put an end to calling black people chimps. I want to know when it became bad to call a black guy a chimp but OK to call a white guy one. For the last seven plus years the left in this country has referred to George Bush as Chimpy, Chimpy McBush, and Chimpy Bush. His picture has been altered to make him look like a monkey and yet none of these people who protest today said a word. Bush’s face was placed on the body of a handicapped person in an ad for the Special Olympics, not a word.
First of all, I think the owner might be right. Obama does kind of look like Curious George. If he says he is not a racist and that this is the reason he picked the picture then I am OK with that. He should not let others decide the boundaries for him as the Obama backers will want to do. If these people cared about how people were treated they would have protested all the references to George Bush and a chimp. Here are a few, just for fun. Google Bush chimp and see what comes back.
From Hot Air, a short on Saturday Night Live
Time Magazine search for chimp (it is in the comments)
And this site called The Smirking Chimp (look at the picture in the title)
There are 142,000 results in Google for the search phrase “chimpy bush” so it is safe to say that the phrase has been used quite a bit. Add the nice Hitler phrases to it and you have people equating our president with a maniacal killer who happens to be one of the most despised people of all time. And yet, people are upset about Obama being compared to a cartoon character (sounds like the Mohammad cartoon issue).
Like I stated, I take the guy at his word but even if he meant it to be offensive I don’t care. I don’t care about the protesters (which curiously includes the Nation of Islam, hmmmm) because they are not interested in fairness. They kept quiet while this was being done to Bush and now want to complain because it involves Obama. I would not be surprised if half of them referred to Bush as a chimp or as Hitler. To hell with them. They can all suck wind as far as I am concerned. The only thing I want to know now is how I can get one of those shirts.
The last item to offer is this. Maybe they are right to be upset that Curious George is being used to represent Obama. After all, Obama is not 100% black. He is half white. Perhaps it would have been OK if the picture was of a zebra or an Oreo cookie. I also don’t want to read about context and slavery and all the other crap that is used to justify behavior. If it is bad for one group it is bad for the other, period. Otherwise, what goes around, comes around.
Hats off to the owner, Mike Norman for exercising his right to free speech.
Tags: curious george, georgia, mulligan's bar and grill, Obama, racism