It Is Not About Guns, It Is About Control

There have been a few mass shootings in California over the past month. As is usually the case, the left has come out in full force to ban “assault weapons.” It is also true that before the bodies were cold the left was blaming right wing white supremacists for the murders.

In both cases, the left is wrong. We do not need more gun control and the murderers were not white or right wing. Hell, most of these kinds of crimes are committed by left wing malcontents. The left is the violent ideology in this nation. That matters little to the anti American left because the desired outcome is to disarm Americans in violation of the US Constitution.

It is obvious by the number of lies being told that they are trying to control you. Joe Biden claims the previous “assault weapons” ban reduced firearms related crime. This is a lie. Data did not demonstrate that the ban had any affect on crime so it was allowed to sunset.

Biden and his spokes Muppet Mop Top will parrot the talking points that most Americans agree with these “common sense gun control measures.” Most Americans do not agree with them and they are not common sense. These things are nothing more than violations of the US Constitution and people who push them violate their oaths of office.

Biden and his band of merry communists tell us that more gun control is needed. Gun control ONLY affects the law abiding. It is already against the law to murder people. No one with half an ounce of brains would believe that any person who would commit murder would suddenly have a change of heart because of a law banning guns. The people committing these crimes are already banned from possessing firearms and yet they do. Why is this? Here is a shocker folks and one that the left is unable to grasp:

CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY THE LAW.

Criminals obey the law as well as politicians honor their promises.

Criminals are in favor of gun control for this very reason. They know that the law abiding will follow the rules while they will not so that means there will be more unarmed people for them to prey upon.

Heroin is illegal in this (and about 130 other) nation. It is illegal to buy, sell, possess, transport or use Heroin yet every day in this nation a whole lot of people buy, sell, possess, transport and use Heroin. Why? Because people intent on criminal behavior do not obey the law.

If you want to control something then try controlling criminals. Instead of letting rogue district attorneys release violent offenders we must hold the offenders and the DAs accountable. Put violent people in jail and make them pay bail to get out. If they are out on bail and commit another crime then they stay in jail until their trial.

If a DA lets a person out with little or no bail and that person commits a crime the DA should have to pay, out of HIS OWN pocket, restitution to the victim or the family of the victim. If we make these George Soros DAs pay dearly they will stop or resign. In either case we win.

I am tired of hearing about gun control. I refuse to obey unconstitutional gun laws. The government can ban whatever it wants because I do not intend to obey the bans and I suspect the MILLIONS of firearms owners in this nation will do the same. Molon Labe or FAFO. Take your pick. J6 was a small group of unarmed people who made hundreds of Congress critters cower in the corner and piss their pants. If millions of firearms owners showed up to express their displeasure there would be more than just piss exiting those people. Before some left wing asshat or member of the government Stasi at the FBI gets their panties in a wad, I am not calling for violence. I am merely letting government know it should think before it violates our rights.

The fact is, there are more of us than there are of you. We have more firearms and more people than all the armed forces in the nation and most of those in the armed forces will not violate their oaths to fight their own citizens. Now the woke Generals like Milley and Austin will try to order them to do so but most will not. And while Biden thinks that the government has the upper hand because, in his words, you have AR 15s, we have F15s. No sir, those F15s were paid for with our money (and we pay the pilots who fly them), they belong to us and the pilots will probably not use them against us. If that were the case there are plenty of retired pilots who can fly them after we take them. Once again, not advocating that action, just answering the moronic rants of the dipshit in chief.

The people in government work for us. They are our employees and we damn sure better start letting them know that or they will turn this nation into more of a third world banana republik than they already have.

The progressive/liberal/communist agenda has one goal and it is to completely control you. They are not opposed to firearms, they are opposed to YOU having them. They and their agents have plenty and will use them on you should they ever be able to remove your means to resist. Gun control is really nothing more than people control.

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

Early Round Up Star Date 2021.245

1. The indoctrination of our children continues as activist teachers impose their views on their students in order to retrain their minds. First a teacher hid the American Flag and then told her students it must be somewhere but until she “finds” it they should pledge to the other flag in the room. That flag was the rainbow flag of the lesbian teacher. She said the American Flag bothered her. I imagine if someone said the gay pride flag bothered them she would scream homophobia. In any event, she has been removed from the classroom pending an investigation. Another teacher is a member of Antifa and he has an Antifa flag in his classroom. Project Veritas recorded him saying he has 180 days to turn the kids into revolutionaries. He said that he uses fear to intimidate your kids into submission. The funny thing about Antifa is that it is full of the very fascists they allege to be against. I must admit I love when they clash with a conservative group and get the snot beat out of them.

2. Not a real doctor Jill Biden said if we listen to the science we can keep the schools open. I imagine Jill does not understand that the federal government has no say in whether or not schools in states stay open. Schools are under the control of the state government and if a state wants schools open then they can be open. Jill wants everyone in school to wear masks despite the science that tells us children are the least affected by Covid and that masks cause harm to the children’s development. You would think a former school teacher would know that. She did say that

“Parents, I want you to know that your child, your school and your family are at the heart of all that my husband, Joe, is doing to help our country defeat and ultimately recover from this pandemic”

I bet that your kids are at the heart of what he is doing like sniffing their hair and touching them inappropriately. If it were anything else he would recognize the science regarding children and Covid.

3. Tucker Carlson went after Joe Biden and his push for gun control. Carlson pointed out that Biden armed a terrorist organization with hundreds of thousands of rifles, handguns and machine guns. Wrap your head around that. The same guy (and his party) who have been working to disarm you for decades had no issue with giving firearms to people who have a record of murdering anyone who does not agree with them and/or who does not follow their way of life. Americans have a Constitutionally protected right to KEEP (own, possess) and BEAR (carry) arms and we should be allowed to own the same arms we paid taxes for the Taliban to own. Biden and his band of terrorist enablers will spend more time trying to disarm the American citizens than they ever will the Taliban. But remember government, the Taliban numbers fewer than 100 thousand. We are nearly 200 million strong. The armed population of the US constitutes the largest fighting force in the entire world. Be careful when you say you will take our firearms because you will have to actually take them and that will not be easy. There will be a rifle behind every blade of grass…

4. Joe Biden, the alleged Catholic, is upset that Texas enacted a law banning abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected. Biden immediately claimed that the law violates the Constitution. The word abortion is not in the Constitution and the federal government has no say over it BUT it did so anyway in a twisted ruling by the SCOTUS in Roe v. Wade. The issue was a 10th Amendment issue and should have been left at the state level (as an aside, this is true of marriage as well – all gay or straight). The right to keep and bear arms is written in the Constitution. Keep in mind that the Constitution does not grant us rights or give us rights, it protects rights we have as a result of our existence. All rights predate the Constitution and therefore the US government cannot take them away. Since the Second Amendment states that the right shall NOT BE INFRINGED, then any law or restriction on that right is null and void. Yet Biden at the federal level and state legislatures pass and impose gun control laws each and every day. We are told that they are allowed to enact “common sense” gun laws. When a state has some onerous gun laws the SCOTUS rarely takes the case and the state claims it has a right to regulate the ownership of guns. So tell me, if the government can regulate the right to keep and bear arms and that is not a violation of the Constitution (according to liberals like Biden) how is it unconstitutional for Texas, or any other state, to have “common sense” abortion laws? Texas basically said, OK the SCOTUS has created this right our of thin air and any attempt to ban it completely is deemed as an assault to a right that is not actually in the Constitution BUT we can regulate that alleged right. Joe Biden denounced the Texas law almost immediately after it was signed by the governor. He waited nearly all day long to talk to America about the 13 US Service Members he allowed to be murdered in Afghanistan. Funny how liberals are OK with violating your rights and rationalizing their actions but when a “right” they like (they make up a lot of rights too, like the right to housing, to food, to free college etc) they scream about the Constitution that they routinely ignore. More states need to act like Texas and do what they want while ignoring the federal government.

5. Social Security is a scam that has been in existence since FDR imposed it upon us. It is not now what it was intended to be and has morphed into many things including disability insurance. It was supposed to be a way for workers to put away money for retirement BUT the government actually taxed those working to pay for those who were retired. The scheme worked well when there were 16 or so workers for every retiree but now there are about 3 workers for every retiree. You couple this with the baby boomers all retiring and there is not going to be enough money to pay for the program. The real reason though, that Social Security is running out of money is because in the 1960s under LBJ the government decided to take all the money collected each month for Social Security and put it in the general fund and issue a government bond (an IOU) for the money. Then the money was spent on other things politicians felt like wasting it on. Now the fund cannot pay retirees with what is collected each month and needs to cash in the IOUs. But the government is 30 TRILLION dollars in debt so it can’t pay the IOUs. It has to borrow money to make ends meet. The government has been trying for years to make SS whole by increasing the percentage of income taxed, by raising the amount of income it is collected on (but not the amount higher earners get when they retire) and the government has floated ideas like means testing. This means if you make too much money in retirement (if you were responsible and saved) then you will not be eligible to get SS. There are also ideas about taxing the rich (this eventually hits everyone) to make SS whole again. They took what YOU paid in. They spent it and left an IOU and then they want to tax YOU more to pay off the IOU. What a great racket. SS should not be a plan at all and should be abolished (continue to pay out to those who are drawing it and those over a certain age who will retire and draw it until they die off) but if we will not do the right thing and get rid of it (can’t do that, politicians like to use it as a club to scare old people into voting for them) then the money collected should go into an account that belongs solely to the person who paid in and cannot be touched by government. Federal workers have a plan called the Thrift Savings Plan. They elect to put a certain amount of money each pay into it and it grows over the years and they have a good retirement. If we forcefully take the money of workers for SS why not invest it in the TSP? Allow all workers to elect which funds their money goes in to and they control it. When they retire they will have a larger return on their money and they will not get screwed out of the money by the government (and can pass it to their heirs). I imagine the federal government will never allow this to happen because many workers will have greater wealth in retirement and they will not have to worry about bills. Government won’t be able to scare them for votes. But if I were in charge this is what I would do. For disability I would impose a small tax on imports to fund that. Make others pay the freight, so to speak.

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

Dems Will Say, Do Anything To Win

Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri is in a battle to keep the Senate seat she currently occupies. While her ideologies are out of touch with those of most of the people in her state she keeps getting reelected. It was baffling to most folks how she could get elected in a place where a moderate or conservative should have a better chance.

A recent undercover video from Project Veritas might well explain how McCaskill continues to win.

She lies.

In the video McCaskill, as well as many of her campaign workers, admits to being deceptive on her positions and that those positions change depending who she is speaking to. Her position on the Second Amendment is anti Constitutional but she does not want people to know that because there are Republicans who she needs to vote for her. She is opposed to a border wall and will willingly ignore immigration laws to help dreamers and to push DACA.

But this is all kept hush hush so that she will appear to be moderate. She takes tons of money from Chuck Schumer (his PAC) and her political beliefs are identical to Obama’s (their words, not mine) but that information is not allowed to leave the room. It must be kept under wraps so she can win reelection.

How is that for a kick in the pants? She will not do what is right (or at least be honest about her positions) because it is more important for her to win reelection.

Case in point, McCaskill is in favor of impeaching President Trump (or as Maxine Waters would say Impeat poddy pie) but they do not talk about it. They want to appeal to moderates who don’t want him impeached. When asked how she would respond to the moderates if she were reelected and went forward with impeachment a campaign worker stated he would tell them to “Get over it.”

This is your Democrat Party. These are the folks who lied about Romney’s taxes (Harry Reid who stated he didn’t win, did he, when asked about his lie) and those who hide their true intentions just to stay in office. Remember, these are the people who weaponized the FBI and initiated illegal surveillance on then candidate Trump. These people are evil.

Rush Limbaugh once said the left had to lie because if they told the truth they would never get elected.

Well now we know the truth and it is time for the great folks of Missouri to ensure McCaskill does not get reelected.

Read the article and see the video here.

#walkaway

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

Note To Libs: Muskets Were Weapons Of War

Liberal LogicEvery time there is a shooting in this country, that is every time some deranged liberal or Muslim terrorist shoots a bunch of people, there is always a cry to ban guns. The left wants to ban all firearms in this country regardless of what they say.

Make no mistake about that, they want to ban all firearms and all private ownership. They will do it incrementally but their end goal is a complete ban. If you listen to them you can hear them saying it. One only needs to hear them say we need what Australia has to know they want private ownership to end or be so difficult that no one has anything more powerful than a pea shooter.

The issue is not the gun, it is not the background checks, and it is not the availability of guns or the alleged ease with which a person can buy one (this ease all depends on where you live).

[tip]The firearm used was not an AR 15 though anti gun nuts keep calling it that and showing pictures of one when they appeal to the masses. They want control and nothing else.[/tip]
Removing all guns will not end gun violence and the liberal model of Australia shows us that crime will actually rise as all other categories of crime did in that nation. Background checks exist and every time a person who bought a gun legally uses it to harm others liberals scream we need expanded background checks. What do they actually hope to find that government (the entity conducting the checks) does not already have access to? The government has failed in doing background checks when it fails to discover the future motives of people.

Sound ridiculous? That is what government wants you to believe it can accomplish with “expanded” background checks. It wants you to believe that it can tell what a person will do in the future if only we could look a little deeper.

The reality is most of the gun crimes committed are done by people with illegally purchased firearms and legal gun owners account for a small fraction of the murders.

It is also important to note that the government conducted a background check on the Islamic terrorist who shot up the gay night club and said he could own a gun. They said nothing in his background kept him from buying the firearm. If that is true then we just have a case of a person who had not done anything wrong deciding to do so. That happens all the time in our country though the case of legal firearms owners doing so is rare.

When these things happen we get this outcry of people who want more gun control as if restricting those who follow the law will stop those who don’t. It is more convenient to blame a gun than it is to blame the liberal moron, or in this case the Islamic terrorist, who pulled the trigger. Liberals would rather moan about one guy with a gun and claim him as the problem rather than seeing the issue was the 150 people who did not have a gun. Even if half of the club goers were carry permit holders they were banned from having their firearms in the club. Evidently the Muslim terrorist did not follow that law either.

Look, the reality is bad people do bad things and we can’t predict when they will but we can’t infringe on the rights of the law abiding as some feel good measure to make liberal bed-wetters think they are doing good. We also can’t allow liberal (and sadly some alleged conservative) politicians to take away our rights. Doing so will allow them to control us instead of us controlling them.

When they take away your means to resist they will then do as they wish, just ask some old German and Jewish folks about that.

The problem is not the firearm, it is the person using it illegally (and to some extent politicians who refuse to allow law abiding people to carry firearms). We do not ban cars or alcohol because people drink and drive. We don’t say that some person might drink and drive so he can’t own a car or buy alcohol. We don’t do these things even though more people die in alcohol related accidents than are murdered with firearms. In these cases we hold the driver responsible for his actions.

Blaming firearms for the shooting at the night club is like blaming the planes for 9/11.

I am also tired of hearing liberals tell us we don’t need these assault weapons or these weapons of war.

[note]Alan Grayson, a moron politician and wife beater from Florida, claimed that these firearms could shoot 700 rounds a minute. A semi-automatic firearm’s rate of fire depends on how fast the shooter can squeeze the trigger. To shoot 700 rounds a minute the shooter would have to squeeze the trigger almost 12 times a second and that does not include the time to change magazines. Misinformed people are easy to control and government is doing the misinforming because it wants to control people. Though in this case it is likely Grayson, who is unintelligent, does not know.[/note]

First of all, there are no assault weapons. Assault is an action and people commit that action. They use many things to do so but whatever they use is not an assault item.

Second, all firearms can be weapons of war. In fact, the musket was a weapon of war and everyone had a musket. Obviously the Founders made no distinction and neither should we.

The important words are shall not be infringed. There is no qualifier, no sentence about weapons of war or only if you need or only if government says it is ok or anything else. The words are the right of the PEOPLE (all citizens) to keep and bear arms (to have and to carry) shall not be infringed.

Remember, the people telling you that you don’t need these firearms are surrounded and protected by people who have these firearms.

How many more Islamic terror attacks are we going to allow before Obama is held accountable?

The gun is not the problem. Anti-gun politicians, Muslim terrorists and bad people are the issue. But keep pushing for gun control and one day there will be pushback and you will not like it at all.

We will not comply.

MOLON LABE

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

From El Chapo To Oh Crappo

Mexican drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman is the Houdini of drug lords. He manages to escape from prisons that are supposed to be top notch. I imagine with his drug money he pays a lot of people off to make sure he is able but that is another issue for another time (like when the Mexican government starts going after them).

El Chapo recently escaped and was on the run until he did an interview with potential CIA operative Sean Penn and ended up captured. El Chapo is now back in jail waiting to be extradited to the US.

As far as this guy is concerned they should ship him to Gitmo and leave him there until he rots but before they do officials might want to ask him about a particular rifle found at his hideout.

El Chapo had a 50 caliber rifle that he had his men use to try and take down law enforcement helicopters. That rifle came from the United States.

Now before you go all Obama on me and scream that this is why we need more gun control you should know the rifle was part of the Fast and Furious operation. You know, the one where Obama allowed thousands of firearms to be illegally transferred to drug cartels so they could track them. Only problem is the ATF lost track of the firearms. They have turned up at crime scenes and one was used to kill border patrol agent Brian Terry (yes Obama should be tired for being an accomplice to that murder) but all the documents relating to that operation are locked up under the claim of executive privilege (a judge has ruled that Obama must turn the documents over to Congress, make some popcorn folks).

So Obama has a couple of oh crap moments going on. He has to turn over his Fast and Furious documents at the same time one of his firearms was found in the possession of a well-known drug lord.

The news went from El Chapo to Oh Crappo pretty quickly.

Keep in mind that you would go to jail for the kind of strawman purchases (which Obama erroneously blames for most of the gun crime in places like Chicago) Obama is involved in.

Maybe gun control should involve controlling the government and nothing more…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline