Democrats Have Been Telling Us To Do This To Ourselves All Along
Mar 26, 2014 Second Amendment
A Rhode Island State Senator named Josh Miller, who is an anti gun (and oath violating) politician was confronted over his anti gun stance by Dan Bidondi of the truth Radio Show. Bidondi said to Miller; “The Second Amendment shall not be infringed, you people need to understand that.” Miller’s response was:
“Go fu*k yourself.”
To make sure it was understood Miller’s photographer leaned in and repeated Miller’s words. Bidondi responded to both men with the same answer; “Good comments sir, thank you.”
Miller has apologized for cursing at the gun rights advocate and said his [Miller’s] words were unjustified. So that makes it all OK, I guess. Truth be told Miller only said what he was feeling.
It should not surprise anyone because this is what Democrats have been telling us to do all along. Oh, they have not used those words but they were certainly implied and any reasonable person can infer them.
How so?
A majority of Americans did NOT want Obamacare, period. The Democrats (and only the Democrats) passed Obamacare so their message was:
“Go fu*k yourself.”
The IRS targeted conservative groups and kept them from having an impact or participating in the last election. This is something that many Americans of all stripes had a problem with. Folks like Elijah Cummings of Maryland are upset that the entire issue is being investigated. His (and their) message to those who did not like it:
“Go fu*k yourself.”
Americans overwhelmingly support the Second Amendment and do not want government infringing on the right protected by that Amendment. Some people in this country are OK with the infringement but the majority is not. Democrats keep pressing for tough, unconstitutional, gun control. Their message to LAW ABIDING gun owners:
“Go fu*k yourself.”
Democrats continually lied when they said if you like your doctor or health care plan you can keep them, PERIOD. When the lie was exposed their message was:
“Go fu*k yourself.”
Americans want energy independence and they want to increase our own production of those resources. They want the Keystone pipeline and they do not want the EPA and the Obama regime getting in the way. The Regime and the EPA keep doing things to keep our production down and our costs up. The message from them:
“Go fu*k yourself.”
The majority of Americans want the debt brought under control. They want limited government, reduced spending and lower taxes. They want social programs reduced and they want jobs so people can pay produce rather than consume money meant to run the government. The government, and this includes members of both parties, has increased the debt ceiling and continues to grow and spend like there is no tomorrow. They now have no ceiling on the debt. Their message to those who pay the bill:
“Go fu*k yourself.”
As you can see this sentiment is not limited to Miller. He was just the one who had the testicular fortitude to say it out loud. But make no mistake, these politicians (particularly Democrats) have been telling you to do this to yourself for a long time.
All of them in the House and a portion of those in the Senate are up for reelection in November as are huge numbers at the state level. These Democrats and their RINO assistants will be campaigning and they will ask you to vote for them so they can continue to do what they have been doing all along. They want you to vote for more of the same.
They want you to vote for them to do to you what they suggest you do to yourself.
But when they come asking for your vote you can respond then and on Election Day by repeating Miller’s words.
Here is a link to the video. WARNING: The vulgar word is not edited out.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: dan bidondi, go f*ck yourself, gun control, josh miller, liberals, lies
Feinstein Drones On
Mar 17, 2014 Political
Dianne Feinstein has no problem with the government using drones. There is evidence that she is concerned about police use of drones without some kind of oversight but she has no problem with big government using drones to spy on Americans. She has no problem with the NSA spying on Americans.
That changes a bit when she is one of the Americans being spied on. There have been revelations that the NSA has been spying on members of Congress. That is not sitting well with people like Feinstein who have stated that we need such spying for national security.
[note]We need it for national security, the cry of tyrants everywhere.[/note]
It also appears as if Feinstein is not happy with unregulated drones that are used by private citizens to invade privacy, at least not her privacy. Code Pink folks were demonstrating at her home over government surveillance and according to Feinstein she looked out her window and there was a drone looking back.
It was probably some small craft that was privately owned (it was claimed that it was a toy helicopter) but it was invading her privacy and she did not like it.
So what to do what to do. Like everything else in life Feinstein thinks government needs to regulate private drones. You got that? It is OK, in her mind, for the government to use drones to spy on citizens but if citizens use their own drones to spy back well that is a different story.
Feinstein has indicated that we need to do this spying for national security. Well if that is the case then spying on members of Congress would be a better use of our assets with regard to national security. Congress is more dangerous to this nation than its citizens and politicians like Feinstein are the most dangerous.
This idea that citizens need to be regulated but government (or its elitists) does not should not surprise you. Feinstein wants to take every firearm from every citizen. She has called for a complete ban on guns and said she would confiscate them if she could. Feinstein authored the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban.
This is the same Feinstein who had a concealed carry permit in the past because of threats she received. She thought she would be safer carrying a gun so she got a permit (something that the average Joe in CA has a hard time doing) but she wants to take the firearms from everyone else. She is more important than us.
So it is no stretch to see how she would be upset that a group demonstrating government surveillance used the same kind of surveillance to make a point.
She did not like it one bit.
But only because it was directed toward her. When it is directed toward YOU it is necessary and we serfs should just shut up and bow down to our overlords.
But, but, Dianne, if you have nothing to hide why would you worry?
The morons in California will probably never vote her out of office. On a positive note she is 80 and time is not on her side…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: dianne feinstein, drones, elitists, firearms, gun control, lies, nsa, surveillance
Concealed Or Open Carry, It Has To Be One
Feb 13, 2014 Second Amendment
The Ninth Circuit Court (of all courts) recognized the Second Amendment as applying to carrying (bearing) a firearm outside the home. The case was from San Diego County where people have to show a good reason to get a concealed carry permit (like in Maryland). The Court stated that a review of the history of the nation found ample evidence that supports the right to carry a firearm outside the home.
The Court specifically stated that a state does not have to grant a permit for concealed carry for self defense but elaborated to say that the Second Amendment does require the states to allow some form of carry outside the home.
If a state does not allow concealed carry then it must, by default, allow open carry.
I am sure this is not over because the gun grabbers will continue to fight. But if a fairly liberal Court has looked at our history and affirmed the right to carry a firearm outside the home then it will be up to the Supreme Court to decide any case that is brought regarding this issue. There are several Circuit Courts that have ruled the other way so the SCOTUS will have to decide this one.
Maryland requires a good and substantial reason to get a concealed carry permit and does not allow open carry. The law does not say what a good and substantial reason is but the Maryland State Police, who decide on permits, has determined that people need to carry valuables as part of a business or have documented threats (through police reports). Showing the dangerous environment in the state and stating the permit is for self defense will not get it approved.
With this ruling Maryland will be pressed by pro firearm groups to approve concealed carry permits or allow open carry.
The Ninth made it clear that law abiding citizens have a Constitutionally protected right to carry a firearm outside the home.
Now it will be up to states like Maryland to decide if they want that to be open carry or concealed carry.
This is a big win from an unexpected place.
It would, I might add, be refreshing if all the courts looked at history and what the people who wrote the Second Amendment actually said on the subject. There would be no doubt that the right to keep and bear arms (in or out of the home) is all encompassing and not subject to the whim of some political entity.
I will not hold my breath waiting for the anti Constitutional politicians in Maryland to change the law. They will only do so when pushed by the legal system.
And even then there is no guarantee the state will follow the law…
Keep in mind that gun grabbers only dislike firearms if YOU have them. They have no problems if they decide to own or carry a firearm or to be protected by people with them. If you are part of the political elite you can break the law and then get a waiver or permit when your lawbreaking is discovered.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: gun control, gun rights win, ninth circuit court, right to carry
ILLEGAL Heroin Killed Gun Control Actor
Feb 3, 2014 Second Amendment
Philip Seymour Hoffman died this week at the age of 46 from a heroin overdose. Hoffman was a pretty good actor and had all that life could offer and yet he died with a needle in his arm.
Hoffman was in favor of gun control and narrated an animated ad for the Nanny Bloomberg gun control group. Hoffman (like all other gun control [read anti Constitutional] nuts) believed that gun control would stop deaths due to firearm use. Gun control nuts want people to think banning guns will stop crime. The reality is these people only want to control our lives and remove the means we have to defend against the tyranny of government.
But banning things does not keep people who don’t obey the law from getting them. Maryland enacted very strict (unconstitutional) gun laws and people are getting shot right and left. Of course the gun grabbers will use this as an excuse to enact even tougher gun laws. But this will not work.
Hoffman is the case study of why it won’t. It is illegal to buy, sell, use or possess heroin but Hoffman was able to buy it, possess it and use it. Heroin has no medical use so it is absolutely illegal but Hoffman managed to get enough to kill himself and have about 50 bags leftover.
How is it that a man who broke the law to obtain the illegal drugs that took his life was ever in a position to dictate whether law abiding citizens should have guns? Was it his drug addled mind that prevented him from seeing the irony of pushing gun control laws as a means to prevent people from obtaining guns as he was obtaining the illegal substance heroin?
According to experts heroin use is a public health crisis. The drug has caused havoc in families across this nation and it IS ILLEGAL! Banning it (by making it illegal) does not keep people from getting and using it so how will any law banning (or otherwise making gun possession nearly impossible) guns keep bad people from using them to do harm?
The evidence is clear that it won’t. In all the cities where there are strict gun control laws there are large numbers of crimes where guns were used. Chicago, Baltimore, DC and countless other liberal controlled cities are living (or should I say dying) examples of why gun control does not work.
Liberals are always telling us that the war on drugs is a failure and since people are going to use drugs we should make them legal. In the same breath they tell us to ban guns to make society safer. The reality is that banning guns will not make society safer.
Perhaps Hoffman should have worked on ending illegal drug use in this country instead of helping to infringe on our rights.
His needle has killed more people than my guns…
Related:
Examiner
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: gun control, heroin, lies, phillip seymour hoffman, tyranny
A Song For All The Gun Grabbers Out There
Jan 23, 2014 Second Amendment
This song is to the point and it asks the question; “Who the hell gave you the right to take my guns from me?” In America the Second Amendment is there to protect a preexisting right of the citizen to keep and bear arms. It is not about the military (addressed elsewhere in the Constitution) and it is not about hunting (not addressed at all). The reality is the Founders fought a bloody war against the ruling nation to gain independence. That ruling nation was oppressive and even tried to take away firearms, an act that was not well received.
We fought to gain our freedom and now we must continue to fight to protect our freedom. Ronald Reagan said Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
That generation is now and we are in real danger of losing freedom (much of it has been lost already). Listen to the song and think about the law abiding who do no wrong and would never use a firearm to hurt someone without just cause. And then think of criminals who do not obey the law and ask yourself if any gun law will stop them.
You know the answer.
Well, who the hell gave you the right?
Here is an example of tyranny.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: america, australia, constitution, criminals, gun control, Second Amendment