It Sure Was Challenging For Hillary
Feb 3, 2016 2016 Election, Tyranny
Hillary Clinton, fresh off her tie in Iowa, is in New Hampshire to discuss why she should be the Democrat nominee for president. At the end of an event she was asked about cyber security and she was actually able to answer it with a straight face.
Hillary stated that cyber security is one of the most important challenges the next president faces and that there are nations constantly attacking our cyber networks and that we, among other things, have to let them know we will not tolerate their cyber evasiveness.
The very same woman who used an unsecured personal server for official emails, a server that was undoubtedly hacked by the very nations she mentioned, and who was very evasive with her cyber footprint wants us to believe that she is able to handle cyber security.
Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information and put it at risk of disclosure, particularly to hostile nations. She broke the law and she did this in order to avoid having her email archived in accordance with federal law (cyber evasiveness).
Hillary Clinton said that cyber security would be an important challenge for the next president.
She should know since cyber security was very challenging for her. In fact it was so challenging that she failed it miserably and will only avoid indictment if the hacks in DC play politics and give her a pass.
Loretta Lynch is unlikely to prosecute any Democrat particularly the one running for the presidency.
In any event, Hillary broke many laws.
During the last election Hillary asked us who we wanted to answer the 3 am phone call. Turns out she was not the right choice as demonstrated by her response to the events in Benghazi. She failed the 3 am test miserably.
[note]Obama proved to be equally unqualified to answer a 3 am phone call.[/note]
Hillary is no more qualified to handle cyber security than she is to handle a 3 am phone call.
We don’t need Hillary in cyber security, we need her in maximum security.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: classified information, cyber security, email server, failure, Hillary Clinton, liar
All Is Good, Hillary Apologized
Sep 8, 2015 Political
Hillary Clinton has been under fire for some time now for a number of things. One of the lasting items is her use of a private email server that bypassed official channels. As new information trickles out it is obvious that Clinton passed classified information through that server. She broke the law and a lot of her staff did as well.
[note]Barack Obama had to know about the server so he is just as guilty as Clinton.[/note]
Hillary has been under fire and while she is the presumptive nominee for the Democrats Bernie Sanders is giving her a run for her money and worried Democrat donors are trying to entice Joe Biden to enter the race.
But all is OK now. Hillary Clinton apologized for using the server saying it was a mistake she is sorry for and that it is something she could have and should have done better.
Perhaps if she were not trying to skirt the law by keeping her communications out of the eye of oversight and perhaps if she were above board this would not be an issue because she would have done the right thing and used the official email that all government employees are required to use.
I imagine there will now be screams to leave this poor woman alone. She has apologized and gee whiz, she is trying to win the presidency.
All well and good for a liberal twit but to the rest of us she broke the law, her actions resulted in the deaths of Americans and she is a criminal. We need to bury her under her own evil deeds.
But I have to ask. If she believes she was wrong (that is what an apology is for) and that she could have done things better why should we now believe she is qualified to run the country?
We already know she is not fit to handle the 3 am phone call she touted in the last campaign and now it is clear she will cut corners to do what she wishes.
In this case she wanted to avoid being detected doing something wrong. She wanted to make sure she could control what others saw so none of it would damage her when she ran for the White House. She was involved in criminal acts and she covered them up (that is what deleting 30,000 emails is) so why should we trust her to run the country?
She is a liberal criminal (but I repeat myself) and the only term she is qualified for is 25 to life.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: apology, criminal, Hillary Clinton, inept, liar, server
No Wonder America Is In Trouble
Feb 3, 2015 Commentary
One only needs to watch the man on the street or similar TV segments to see how woefully under educated the young people in America are. The people interviewed have no clue about our history and most can’t name political leaders or parts of the Constitution. It is embarrassing to watch these people display their absolute lack of knowledge.
I don’t know how else to write this so I will just do it. These people are stupid.
A recent poll shows that young folks age 18-34 favor Hillary Clinton as the next president and they are excited to make her the first female president. In other words, they failed to learn from their mistake regarding Obama. Just because someone will be the first at something does not mean that person will be the best at something.
Of those young people, 57% who describe themselves as Democrats favor Clinton who is favored at 38% when everyone is considered.
Clinton has more baggage than an airport terminal and is a horrible leader. She is a progressive power hungry big government hack who will continue down the same disastrous path that Obama is on.
These young people want government to get them jobs and help them out. This should come as no surprise since these people were raised to think government is the answer to all their problems. They have been brainwashed by a system that tells them government is the answer to every problem.
This is dangerous and needs to be reversed. Government is not the answer to our problems and often is the cause of them. When the young in this nation become completely dependent on government our freedom will be lost and the collapse of our society will not be far behind.
There is a move to force children to pass civics exams before they graduate. I fully support that provided the exams are based on the truth and not the revised history so often taught in the school system.
The poll that shows these folks favoring Hillary Clinton also showed that only 23% of these young people could name ONE of their Senators. That is right, 77% of the people surveyed could not name one of the US Senators from their state.
These are the people who are responsible for running things when we are all gone and they have a say in things now with their vote.
An uniformed population is more detrimental to a nation than corrupt leaders and this poll demonstrates we are in real trouble.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: Hillary Clinton, lies, uninformed voters
Hillary Clinton Has Always Been A Radical
Sep 22, 2014 Political
Saul Alinsky was an ends justifies the means person and his Rules for Radicals basically spelled that out. Hillary Clinton was a disciple of Alinsky and wrote her college thesis about him.
She had a close relationship with him, sought him out, communicated with him and he had strong feelings about Hillary so much so his secretary opened a letter from Hillary so she would not have to wait two weeks (Alinsky was away) for a response if there was an urgent matter.
Hillary downplayed her adoration of Alinsky and claims she did not agree with some of his tactics and ideas. In her book she claimed that those differences led to a parting of ways in 1969 just before she went to law school.
Letters that have been recently released show that Clinton did not part ways in 1969 (over differences or any other reason) and that she remained in touch with him up until his death in 1972.
The aforementioned letter was written by Hillary in 1971 and she expressed that she survived law school and was in California and hoped that she could meet up with Alinsky should he happen to visit the state. Her letter stated that she “would love to see [Alinsky]” and for him to let her know if there was any chance of the two getting together.
The words in the letter hardly paint a picture of a person who parted ways over differences. Instead they paint a picture of a person who was an admirer. Keeping in touch with glowing words is hardly evidence of a parting of ways.
Hillary Clinton is a radical and she will say or do whatever she has to in order to obtain and keep power. Hillary lives by Alinsky’s 12 rules and the only reason she did not win the Democratic nomination (and likely the presidency) is because Barack Obama was better at using the rules than Hillary was. Well, he was at least as good and he had darker pigmentation and spoke more eloquently than she did.
Make no mistake, all these left wing radicals follow these rules and they do so in order to take control of your life. While Alinsky might have discussed the haves and the have nots and the imbalance between them the one thing that is overlooked is the elitists. They are the ones who lord over the haves and the have nots and bring some kind of calm to the storm the radicals stir up.
Clinton and Obama are two of those elitist radicals and their goal is to pit us against each other and to lord over us.
Hillary was and still is a radical and while she whitewashed her radical past and adoration of Alinsky the recently released letters paint a much different picture, one that all the whitewash in the world cannot cover.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: adoration, Hillary Clinton, letters, lies, rules for radicals, saul alinsky
Hillary: Gun Rights Way Out Of Balance
May 7, 2014 Political, Second Amendment
Hillary Clinton was at the National Council for Behavioral Health conference and she addressed firearms in this country. She said the nation’s gun culture had gotten “way out of balance” and the idea that everyone could have a gun was not in the “best interest of the vast majority of people.”
Who is Hillary to determine what is in the best interests of people and, for that matter, how is she even qualified to make such a claim? There is no way to quantify this and it is nothing more than an emotional statement followed by a few examples of shootings, many of which were committed by people who were not allowed to own a firearm.
There is also a flaw in this claim that everyone could have a gun. The first problem is that not everyone can. Felons and the mentally ill are not allowed to own them. How do they get them? Some are not caught on the government background check (the same government that let the 9/11 terrorists in the country) and most buy them illegally. Just because something is banned, illegal or forbidden does not mean people won’t have access. I think the experience with prohibition demonstrates that quite clearly as does the problem with Heroin overdoses.
The second problem is the statement “could have a gun” as if a right is something the government is allowed to dole out regardless of circumstances. In other words, we have laws that forbid some folks from owning firearms because they have shown they should not have them. To Clinton government should decide if you could have the gun no matter what you have demonstrated.
If you are a law abiding citizen who is not otherwise prohibited you CAN have a firearm regardless of what Hillary thinks.
If Hillary is so willing to decide that the gun culture is out of balance and needs government action what other right will she infringe upon?
She had a real tough time of it when her hubby was caught having sex with an intern. Drudge broke the story. Hillary is getting a lot of press about her failure in Benghazi (she did not do too well with that 3 am phone call) so what if Hillary decided that the information culture has gotten out of balance and the idea that everyone can post information is not in the best interest of the vast majority of people? Perhaps people would need to jump through the same hoops they do to purchase a firearm. Perhaps information will be as regulated as firearms and the only people with access will be the politically connected.
What if Hillary decided that there are too many religions in America and religion is way out of balance and the idea that everyone could worship as they see fit is not in the best interest of the vast majority of people? Perhaps she will deem that there are too many religions and only certain ones are worthy to exist. Maybe she will force people to go through the same process to join a religion as to purchase a firearm.
Rights are not something the government deemed we could have and they are not something that government granted to us. They preexist our government and they are protected (not granted) by our Constitution.
This is the problem with liberals. They think they know what is best for you and who can blame them considering the number of people willing to be enslaved by the government?
Liberals want control and they know they can’t get it outright so they incrementally take rights away from a population too busy worrying about American Idol than what is going on in this country. Liberals keep upping the ante and then one day rights are gone because people sat by and allowed them to be eroded away by a tyrannical government.
I think, to paraphrase Hillary, the political class has gotten way out of balance and this notion that elites can make a career out of politics is not in the best interest of a vast majority of people.
The difference between our statements is I am correct.
I am willing to bet that the four Americans who Hillary allowed to be murdered in Benghazi would have loved to have a bunch of Americans (citizen or soldier) with guns the night they lost their lives because of her incompetence.
Hillary’s incompetence is responsible for more American deaths than all my guns combined.
And how many armed guards watch over her anyway?
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: benghazi, gun rights, Hillary Clinton, liberal, lies, moron, political elite, sex scandal