Vaccine Round Up Star Date 2021.314
Nov 10, 2021 Commentary, Tyranny, Vaccines
1. Snitches get stitches b***hes. Joe Biden had OSHA put out emergency guidance for Covid in order to make a mandate for vaccines in the private workplace. Be advised that this is nothing more than Biden doing an end run around the law. He is not allowed to mandate vaccines in private workplaces so he had OSHA drum up a dire workplace emergency. The problem (one of many) is that Covid is not a workplace emergency. Covid is a virus you can catch anywhere whether you are in the workplace or not. OSHA cannot make emergency workplace rules for things that are not workplace specific. OSHA does not have enough enforcement officers to inspect workplaces for violations which cost tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars so Biden wants people in the workplace to tell on their employers. Joe wants people to become whistleblowers (valid whistleblowers are protected under the law so you can’t fire them) and expose their bosses if they allow people who have not been vaccinated to work. I hope people think about this because the boss can’t fire you for being a whistleblower but he sure can fire you if the fines make it impossible to keep a large workforce on. Who do you think will be first out the door? But we all know there will be snitches. Be a shame if they disappeared.
2. We knew that half of the states were poised to file lawsuits once OSHA made the Biden rules for vaccination. They did and a federal appeals court ordered a halt to the mandate stating:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ordered a temporary halt on Saturday, ruling the complaint gives “cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the Mandate.”
I wrote before that OSHA could not make up rules mandating vaccines for things that you can catch anywhere and that the emergency method used has been shot down nearly every time it has been used. But Biden is doing what he did with the court order to end the eviction moratorium and the order to continue Trump’s stay in Mexico policy, he is ignoring it. He did it then by saying the court process is long and he will have accomplished his goals before they stopped him and that Mexico has to agree. That is tyranny. Now he is telling businesses to ignore the court and push on with mandating vaccines. Remember, the court thinks there are serious constitutional issues so if you are a business and you are aware of this and you listen to Joe and it turns out this is unconstitutional you will be sued by employees you forced to get a vaccine in violation of a court order. Biden and his Dem-Commies continue to ignore court orders and the Constitution. Remember when they said Trump was the dictator?
3. It is all about safety and health except when Dem-Commies want to attend parties or it does not fit their agenda. They do not vaccinate illegal aliens and instead of deporting them they just let them loose in America to spread germs all over. If Covid was such a terrible thing then there would be no delays. The government worker’s union (AFGER) that represents 700,000 federal workers is asking Biden to move the mandatory compliance date to January 4th so it lines up with that in the OSHA mandate and the mandate for contractors to the federal government. They want it moved so people do not have to worry about getting a shot or losing their jobs during the holidays. The OSHA date was pushed into January because businesses complained that losing workers during the holiday season would harm them. It looks like Covid is not really that much of an issue so long as we have some more important thing. Covid knows not to attack Democrats at gatherings when they do not wear masks, it knows not to jump more than 6 feet, it knows that it cannot attack when you are eating in a restaurant, it knows that it can’t make you sick during the holidays (unless you gather at home to eat because Fauci has given it orders to attack you) and it cannot attack people rioting and burning down cities. That is one pretty smart virus. If it were truly the end of the world people would be knocking down the doors to the shot clinics…
4. I imagine that the changes to accommodate Covid will come soon for the airlines as there are warnings that there will not be enough TSA and other personnel including workers at airlines to make sure people can travel during the holiday. Travel gets extremely busy during the holidays and after last year’s tyrannical lockdowns many people are anxious to get out and visit family. The airports will be overrun and it will all be because Biden can’t lead, and knows not what he is doing.
5. A flight attendant who was forced to get the Covid vaccine in order to keep her job suffered injury from the vaccine and is now suing her employer. I opined in the past that when employers force you to get it they will be responsible. Many legal experts said they would not and this case will demonstrate who is correct. I believe she will get paid for the injuries because they coerced her. They should pay and it should send a shockwave through business so that they think before they mandate.
6. Either way you are screwed. A brothel in Austria is offering a 30 minute session with a woman of your choice if you get the Covid vaccine. You know, I will let you stick it in me if you let them stick it in you. This is just another example of the depravity involving this entire Covid fiasco. The offer is for people as young as 14 as long as they are accompanied by an adult. Satan is working overtime to bring full blown debauchery to the world.
7. The Pfizer CEO., Albert Bourla, says that people who spread Covid misinformation are criminals. This is coming from the CEO of the pharma company that paid the largest fine in history for fraud involving the illegal promotion of certain drugs. I bet there was a bit of misinformation in that. People are free to say what they want about the vaccines whether it is misinformation or not. Pfizer has certainly been spreading misinformation about its Covid vaccine. They are not safe and they are not effective and they do not have data to show either of these things. They are lying about how it harms people and they are spreading misinformation. When the stuff hits the fan I think we will see who is actually the criminal here.
8. A case is pending in the court system where the United States filed a suit against Ozaukee County, Wisconsin. The case involves a worker who refused the flu shot based on religious objection. She was required to submit a letter from clergy but she does not attend a church. She bases her beliefs on her reading of the Bible. The US Government sued because they violated her rights when they forced her to get the shot. The government’s second Count reads:
Defendant discriminated against Williams on the basis of her religion, in violation
of Section 703(a) of Title VII, by failing or refusing to provide her with a reasonable accommodation of her religious, practice, and/or belief (i.e., her belief that the Bible forbid her from receiving a flu vaccination) that conflicted with Defendant’s policy mandating annual flu vaccinations for its employees and requiring that any religious exemptions to the policy be supported by a letter from a clergy leader.
Note that the very government forcing vaccines on its own workers with no reasonable accommodation is involved in a lawsuit where it is fighting that very thing. This should be enough to shoot down the Biden mandates immediately.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: covid, lawsuit, lies, prostitutes, tyranny
Jesse Ventura Is A Lowlife
Jul 29, 2014 Commentary
That should probably be a given since he was a fake wrestler and then a politician. Yes, he served in the military and implied he was a Navy Seal but his service was long ago and somewhere along the way he forgot what honor is.
Ventura sued Navy Seal Chris Kyle over a passage in his book where he indicated he had knocked out a celebrity who he later identified as Ventura. Kyle was shot and killed so the suit transferred to his estate and today a jury reached a verdict awarding Ventura (real name James George Janos) 1.8 million dollars.
The verdict awards $500,000 for defamation and 1.3 million for unjust enrichment.
How did the jury determine, or better yet, how did Ventura prove that Kyle lied about the encounter? The passage in the book indicates Kyle knocked Ventura out for talking badly about the military and in court Ventura claimed that Kyle lied. Maybe he did but how did he prove it? Without a third party to corroborate the events it is just a he said he said issue and one of the people involved is not alive to defend his position.
The other thing is, how did Ventura merit 1.3 million because of unjust enrichment? It is highly doubtful that Kyle’s book sold because of the passage about Ventura.
While all of this is stunning it is even more disgusting that Ventura would sue in the first place and then continue the suit when Kyle died.
Ventura is a lowlife. It seems to me that perhaps Kyle told the truth and the guy who faked beating people up for a living did not like it.
Kyle died way too young and if there is justice in the world the verdict will be appealed and stalled for so long that Ventura joins him before he ever sees one cent of the award.
Ventura has written several books so perhaps he wrote something that he could be sued for.
Then again, someone would have to read the books to determine that so his money is probably safe.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: chris kyle, jesse ventura, lawsuit, lies, lowlife
A Lawsuit Would Get A Response
May 7, 2013 Political
A 5th grade boy wrote on his desk and the teacher caught him. Now most adults would recognize that the child did something wrong and then provide an appropriate punishment. The child could have been made to wash his desk and all other desks in the classroom during recess or after school. The child could have been made to wash his desk and then be given detention for a certain period of time.
There are plenty of methods of punishing a child for doing something wrong that will provide the child a lesson and prompt him not to do the bad thing again. The teacher’s punishment was not appropriate. She forced the child to lick the desk clean.
The parents of the child were very upset and wanted something done to the teacher for the inappropriate punishment. They have gone through the proper channels to get their concerns addressed but have been stonewalled. They even said that the issue could be resolved if the teacher were forced to get in front of the class and apologize but the principal says he can’t do that because it would be a directive which he cannot give (what sense does it make to be in charge then) and that it would not be sincere.
They have been advised that the teacher was dealt with but the situation is confidential.
I have an idea that will get them a response. The parents should get an attorney and sue the school and the teacher for a ton of money.
I bet that all kinds of directives can be issued by the principal if they will avoid a huge lawsuit and I bet the teacher would publicly apologize and be sincere if it will keep her from paying out money.
Of course I think it is too late for that and the parents should go for all they can get. The people in these positions need to be made examples of in order to keep them in line.
I do not condone what the child did and certainly he deserved an appropriate punishment. If that had happened there would be no issue.
But this teacher went over the line and the principal is not working to resolve it to the satisfaction of the parents so now it is time to make them pay.
If they can’t get satisfaction then lick them in court…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: lawsuit, licking desk, school, teacher
Michael Moore, Closet Capitalist
Feb 9, 2011 Political
Michael Moore likes to dress in raggedy clothes and pretend he is like everyone else. He is an every man and he is out there in the fight against the establishment. To Moore, capitalism is bad and the people deserve more through wealth redistribution. But Moore has another side. He likes to make money and he does not like it when someone else gets his money.
Moere is suing the people who handled his production of Fahrenheit 9/11 for $2.9 MILLION that he says they kept instead of giving to him. It is his money and he wants it.
Let me be clear, if the money is his he is entitled to it and he should get it.
But why is he all up in arms about this? He made $19 MILLION off the movie. Isn’t that enough for him to live on? How much more does he actually need?
After all, this is the guy who made a movie about corporate America and how terrible it is that the Wall Street executives make lots and lots of money. Moore is not happy that the Wall Street tycoons get millions of dollars in salaries and millions more in bonuses. He believes that they are not entitled to that money even though it is theirs.
Why is he entitled to what he has earned when he thinks others should not be granted the same consideration?
Moore is a hypocrite and he is a closet capitalist. He likes to pretend that he is looking out for you but he is looking out for himself.
He is entitled to all that he earns and I will never dispute that no matter what I think of him.
But so is everyone else no matter what Moore thinks of them…
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: capitalist, hypocrite, lawsuit, michael moore
Obama Regime Files Suit Against Arizona
Jul 7, 2010 Political
The Obama regime has filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona declaring that its immigration law is unconstitutional. The suit claims that under the supremacy clause of the Constitution, the federal government is responsible for immigration and the states cannot have their own immigration policies.
The Arizona law mirrors the federal law but the Justice Department claims the Arizona law will cause problems for people who do not follow federal law:
The legal action represents a thorough denunciation by the government of Arizona’s action, declaring that the law will “cause the detention and harassment of authorized visitors, immigrants and citizens who do not have or carry identification documents” while altogether ignoring “humanitarian concerns” and harming diplomatic relations. Yahoo News
Federal law already requires non citizens to carry their documents so how could any of them be harassed by the Arizona law?
The federal government is responsible for immigration and it is failing miserably. Obama refuses to secure the border until he gets immigration reform and while he dithers, people cross the border. His idea of security is to post signs telling Americans that it is not safe to travel in parts of Arizona because of illegals. This is not leadership.
If the feds have the Constitutional authority for immigration what is to stop a state from determining if you are in the state illegally? States should have the right to arrest people if they are in the state illegally. It would just so happen that the people are in the country illegally but Arizona is not trying to capture people in the country illegally, just those in the state illegally.
Why is it that Arizona is under attack from illegals and from our federal government? If the government was doing its job then the Arizona law would be unnecessary. Instead, American citizens are under siege from criminals, drug traffickers, and other illegals who drain us of our resources.
As for the concern over diplomatic relations, who cares? Mexico encourages its people to come here illegally and helps them do it and there is little concern from them when Americans are attacked or murdered at the hands of the illegals. That country certainly has no regard for our laws and no concern for diplomatic relations.
Good fences make good neighbors and we can solve most of the issue by putting up a wall that keeps them OUT.
Obama refuses to do his job because he wants immigration reform before he secures the border. He is concerned that closing the border will take pressure off the immigration reform issue. We have played this game before. Each time this country has granted amnesty it came with a promise of securing the border. Each time we ended up with more illegals waiting for the next amnesty program and an unsecured border.
NO immigration reform until we close the border.
And Arizona should keep right on going regardless of what the feds do. It is their state and they have a right to preserve their sovereignty.
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: arizona, ILLEGAL immigration, lawsuit, Obama