Hogg Wild
Apr 2, 2018 Commentary
In the aftermath of the school shooting in Florida a young man named David Hogg has emerged as the newest pawn for the left wing in America. He is a typical victim in that he is allowed to say and do as he pleases and anyone who dares to speak out in opposition to him is immediately attacked.
Hogg is a vile, vulgar, obscene foul mouthed little punk. There, I said it all and I don’t really care if the left wing, Hogg or anyone else likes it. Piss on them. This is my site and I don’t have sponsors to boycott and even if I did I would say what I wanted. That is, after all, what Hogg is doing, eh?
Hogg has been calling out anyone who disagrees with his call for more gun control approaching the downright confiscation of firearms. Disagree with that and the little Nazi will claim that you want children to die and have blood on your hands.
Laura Ingraham of Fox News dared to tweet something unflattering about little Boss Hogg and he immediately called for a boycott of her sponsors until they pulled their ads from her show. This is how the left wing works. It will seek to destroy you and deny you YOUR rights while whining when it feels its rights have been infringed.
David Hogg is a little terrorist who involves himself in an adult debate but whines that he is a mere child when the going gets rough. Then his media partners and enablers in the Soros clan are the first ones to cry out how terrible it is to attack a child. Here is a clue for little Hogg, if you involve yourself in adult things then you will be treated like an adult. If you don’t like this and think a “child” should be left alone then sit down and shut up until an adult tells you to speak, got it little fella?
The reality is David Hogg is the kind of kid who deserves to get his rear end kicked regularly.
I do think what happened to all the gun control kiddies (Hitler used children to push his agenda as well Mr. Soros) is kind of funny. You see, they are allowed back in school now but will all be issued clear, see-through backpacks. Hogg lost his mind over this saying his rights were being violated and one of his fellow snowflakes whined that all the students should not be punished because one crazy guy did something bad.
Really? I bet the irony is lost on them. These little Social Justice Warriors have been running around demanding that the Second Amendment rights of all law abiding citizens be infringed upon because of the acts of ONE crazed moron (whose actions occurred solely because government failed at all levels)!
Hogg is getting a lot of attention right now but soon his light will fizzle and his 15 minutes will be up (remember Cindy Sheehan) and when he is just a bad fading memory all those companies that decided to pull ads from Ingraham’s show will be stuck holding the bag. Those companies capitulated to a school kid playing adult dress up, a kid who likely does not spend much money patronizing any of them. Ingraham’s audience, on the other hand, is full of hard working people who make and spend money and some of it is on their products.
From the messages I have seen there will be a number of companies that will be feeling the pain on the bottom line long after David Hogg is a footnote in the encyclopedia of liberal failures.
Hogg should take a very long walk on a very short pier. But I hope he waits until November. His moronic work will fire up a number of people who vehemently disagree with him.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: david hogg, liberals, lies, morons, victims
Not Me Too
Oct 17, 2017 Commentary
There is a campaign now (a hashtag campaign since they work so well) to have women who have suffered sexual harassment or abuse to use the hashtag #metoo to indicate they were victims. The issue with this campaign is that it includes people who were the targets of something said (disgusting but not as horrible as what physical abuse entails) and the tag gives this impression that everyone around has been physically abused. It would be helpful if there was a response that said #notme.
I am in no way minimizing the abuse that monsters like Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby and Bill Clinton have done (done rather than said you could do like the current occupant of the White House) because these abuses, whether they be on women, men or children (and that is the next big thing that will break out of Hollywood) are horrible and should not be tolerated.
Actress Alyssa Milano started this campaign to have women speak up if they have been victims and that is an issue because it relegates these folks to victim status. It is horrible that it happened but being a victim is not empowering. Having women disclose to everyone under the sun that they were victims also takes away a privacy they can never get back.
I think it is just as or maybe more important to be a survivor rather than a victim. Hashtags, if that is the way to go, should include things like #neveragain, or #notme, or #ifoughtback, or any number of other slogans that indicate that the subject is not a victim.
Speaking of being victims and empowerment how about these vocal advocates push for less stringent concealed carry laws? Imagine the outcome had one of Weinstein’s RAPE victims had a firearm. There might not have been so many victims. I will also point out that many victims remained silent about the abuse and emboldened Weinstein to continue his predatory ways. That is not to lay blame upon them but to point out that saying it happened WHEN IT DID is vital to ensure there are no other victims.
It is not enough to say you were a victim (and maybe counterproductive). You MUST indicate that you are a survivor and that you will never be a victim or never be one again. Powerful people knew of the abuse, engaged in the abuse and facilitated the abuse. Some of the abused went along in order to further careers and others stood up to the monster but remained silent.
It is not lost on me that the people who hashtag metoo are the ones who ignored the women who claimed Bill Clinton raped or otherwise sexually harassed them. I also think it is likely that if Hillary Clinton (who likens Harvey to Trump rather than her own husband) had won the presidency we would not be hearing about Harvey Weinstein, #fogeddaboudit.
The victims, of course, are not to blame for the behavior of people like those mentioned in this piece. But it is difficult to scream about the sexualization of women while dressing in clothing that, well, sexualizes you. Dressing that way is NOT an invitation to being abused or raped but it does take away any claim that Hollywood sexualizes you or that you don’t want to be thought of that way. Talking about your sex life, what you like or don’t sexually, who you have or would sleep with and your fantasies coupled with clothing that exposes more than it covers sexualizes you. That does not mean you should be attacked in any way shape or form but it removes the argument that someone else sexualized you or is at fault for people thinking that way. Your sexuality empowers you and is an important part of the human experience but it is not a reason to be attacked and certainly not an excuse to be a victim.
If you want to be empowered then get away from the victim mentality and fight back. But fight back when it happens, not when it is convenient or trending and make sure you hold all abusers to the same standard.
If the reaction to Harvey Weinstein, Bill Clinton and Bill Cosby (at the time of their actions) had been as intense as the reaction to what Trump said in a recording (not what he did but what he said you COULD do) then it is likely these men would not have abused for so many years. The same outrage Hillary [and the I’m with her liberal crowd] had for Trump when the tape was released should have been the outrage she had when her husband was diddling an intern nearly the same age as his daughter. Her response to the allegations of rape by her husband should have been as strong (or stronger) than her response to Trump. She and the movement lose credibility when the response is selective outrage.
So hang tough and be empowered. Do not be victims. Yes, you can tell us #metoo but let us know #iamstronger and #neveragain. Let us know so it is not just a #politicalstunt.
And if you have not been a victim let us know #notme. Your strength might help others.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: Clinton, cosby, hashtag, liberals, lies, metoo, victims, weinstein
Comey Raises More Issues
Jun 12, 2017 Political
James Comey testified last week in an event that the media treated like the second coming. The networks preempted their regular programming to show Comey’s testimony because all of them thought he would drop a bombshell that would mean the end of the Trump presidency.
Comey did not drop any kind of bombshell and he left the media and their liberal puppet masters in distress. For months they have been anticipating a death blow to the Trump presidency and they knew for sure they had that blow in Comey. But as luck would have it, Comey confirmed what Trump stated about being told three times he was not under investigation and while Comey said he was concerned that Trump was trying to influence the investigation into General Flynn, his testimony told a different story.
Comey told us that Trump hoped that Flynn would be let go or the case would be dropped but Comey also told us that Trump told him that if anyone from his campaign were involved with the Russians it would be good to know. Rather than try to thwart the investigation it appears as if Trump wanted it done with as quickly as possible so he would not have a cloud hanging over his head.
That cloud could have been removed if Comey had been decent enough to inform the public that Donald Trump was not under investigation. That would have settled a lot of things but Comey did not do that.
As was stated in the Senate hearing, it appears the only thing not leaked was the truth about Donald Trump.
Comey also admitted he was the one who leaked his memos to the NYT through a surrogate. This was probably a criminal act since Comey took those notes after a meeting with the president, took them on a government issued computer in a government vehicle on his way to his government office. The notes he recorded were government property and Comey leaked them to eh media.
What else did Comey leak?
Comey also pointed his finger at former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the things he said indicate she was involved in illegal activity.
There are things here that can be easily cleared up.
Was there collusion with the Russians? Yes, Obama was recorded telling the Russians he would have more latitude after the election (to do things that might cost him reelection if they were done prior to Election Day). Was there an effort to impede an investigation? Yes, Loretta Lynch told Comey to call the Hillary INVESTIGATION a “matter” and this was done solely for optics. It was done to keep from casting an unfavorable light on Hillary over her illegal server and mishandling of classified information. Did Trump try to influence the outcome regarding Flynn? Comey said he took it that way and if that is the case then he must have taken Obama that way when he said Hillary should not be charged because she did not intend to do anything wrong. That was a public statement and Comey made sure she was not charged. If the liberals are going to say Trump tried to influence Comey they must then acknowledge that Obama DID influence Comey.
As for these memos and the information that the liberals waited on with baited breath, how do we know they really exist and if they do how do we know they were written when Comey said they were? He never took notes on all these other people who he had concerns about but he immediately started taking them with regard to Trump. I bet if there are notes he wrote them after he was fired and did so from memory. Without a third party to confirm it boils down to Trump’s word against Comey’s. Trump denies some of the substance of the notes and that means, barring another source, we will never really know what was said.
It is important to note that Trump said Comey told him he was not under investigation on three occasions and the media all panned that claim. During his Senate hearing Comey proved Trump was being truthful.
I think Comey put himself in a bit of a spot. He could well be charged with crimes and end up in real hot water.
The Russians tried to interfere with our elections as they have for decades (we do the same thing). However, Donald Trump did not collude with the Russians and had no contact with them regarding it.
Comey wanted a special prosecutor appointed and that is, according to him, why he leaked information. It appears that there is really no need for a special prosecutor. Perhaps it is time to realize this entire story is concocted by the people who lost the election and need someone to blame.
They lost and they are doing everything they can to keep Donald Trump from doing his job.
We need to make them pay for this.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
There Is No National Popular Vote
Dec 19, 2016 2016 Election, Political
The left is continuing its assault on freedom by whining about the last election. Today the electors will convene in each state capitol and cast their votes and when all is said and done Donald Trump will officially be the next president of the US. The electors selected to do this have been harassed non stop by the left because they do not want Trump in there and are fighting to make that so.
They are also convinced that the electoral college system is outdated and cost Hillary the election. They believe the winner of the national popular vote should be the president. The way it is now is no democracy, they say.
First of all we are not a democracy. Second of all and just as important is that Hillary Clinton DID NOT win the national popular vote because we DO NOT have a national election. A national popular vote insinuates that there is one great big nationwide election and that Hillary won that but we do not have such an election.
We have 51 individual elections (each state and DC). The winner of each individual election in each individual state gets the electoral votes for that state (usually winner take all but different in a few states).
So Donald Trump won the popular vote in enough states to get more than the 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidential election. Hillary Clinton did not win the popular vote in enough states to become president.
The idea that she won the national popular vote is based on adding the totals of all 51 INDIVIDUAL elections and then declaring her the winner. Since we do not have a national election the total for all the states does not matter. The electoral college is in place to prevent a scenario where a heavily populated part of the nation could determine the outcome of an election even if the rest of the nation wanted otherwise just as it did in this case.
Hillary Clinton won by a huge margin in California so much so that it gave her the advantage in the total of all 51 elections. If California were removed from the totals then Trump has the highest vote total of the remaining 49 states and DC. In other words, if we had a national election (the democracy the left wants) then California would get to decide the president even though the other 49 states and DC combined wanted Trump.
By using the electoral system we ensure that all states have a say in the matter
The reality, whether they want to face it or not, is that Hillary did not win the national popular vote because we do not have a national election.
That should settle the debate once and for all but it will not because liberals are like little children who throw tantrums until they get what they want.
If only we could get them to hold their breath until there is a change…
Related:
Marketwatch
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: electoral college, Hillary, liberals, lies, popular vote, tantrums, trump
The Troops Will Lose Out Again
May 10, 2016 2016 Election, Military
It seems like every election cycle our troops are disenfranchised. We can send them and their equipment around the world but can’t seem to get their ballots to them and back in time to be counted. Every election liberals look for reasons to exclude the vote of the military. There is a reason for this, the military tends to overwhelmingly vote Republican.
They will get screwed again this year:
In a new survey of American military personnel, Donald Trump emerged as active-duty service members’ preference to become the next U.S. president, topping Hillary Clinton by more than a 2-to-1 margin. However, in the latest Military Times election survey, more than one in five troops said they’d rather not vote in November if they have to choose between just those two candidates. Military Times
If surveys showed the military voted overwhelmingly Democrat the left would bend over backwards to ensure the votes were cast and counted. You know, like they do for criminals…
Perhaps the government should work as hard protecting the votes of our military (those who protect the nation and our freedom) as it does to get the vote for felons (and illegals)…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: disenfranchise, felons, liberals, lies, Military, votes