A Few Cowardly Visitors to My Site
Mar 20, 2007 Uncategorized
I received an email via my contact form at my site from a real hero who must be a bit upset with me because I believe in America. Now this is not the same person who is a Muslim and comes here to drop comments questioning my dislike for Islam in general. As many of you know, I would be just as happy if all religions got along just fine but it would appear that everything we needed to know about Islam we learned on 9/11. As an aside, this Muslim came here and then wrote a piece based on my article about killing all the Muslims who are over there and do the slightest thing wrong. The post was in response to the Muslim animals who butchered several American soldiers and my pointing out that CAIR demands an apology when someone draws the child molester Mohammad but they say nary a word when American Soldiers are butchered. True to form, this coward cut and pasted my article but left out the entire section about Muslims animals butchering our troops. He mocks my wanting to kill the Muslims and posts a picture of dead Muslim kids that were “ALLEGEDLY” killed by coalition forces. His alleged picture is there to make me look like a bad guy while he conveniently omits the real killing done at the hands of a bunch of sub human pieces of waste.
No, not the same guy at all, but a similar attack. Here is the comment from a site visitor:
I feel sorry for people like you, but still want someone other than myself to put a bullet in your head. Ya nazi.
Don’t like being called a NAZI?
I’ll apologize if you call me. Kidding! Of course I wouldn’t because I would be apologizing to a NAZI.
During Marshall Law you’ll be right on cue, NAZI.
I went to the site listed for him and it was for a notary public and I am not going to post the url in case this is some jackass baiting me in order to get me to post his url for advertisement or something. In any event, I might like to address these one at a time.
- I feel sorry for people like you, but still want someone other than myself to put a bullet in your head.
- Ya nazi. Don’t like being called a NAZI?
- I’ll apologize if you call me. Kidding! Of course I wouldn’t because I would be apologizing to a NAZI.
- During Marshall Law you’ll be right on cue, NAZI.
You are the one who people should feel sorry for. You call me a Nazi but then advocate someone putting a bullet in my head. Unfortunately, you make it clear that you are much too cowardly to do it yourself. As is typical of people like you, you want someone else to do your job.
Calling someone a Nazi is a tactic that is employed by the left to make a person appear evil. I doubt you know that a Nazi (the word is an alliteration of Nationalsozialist) was a person who belonged to a political party and it happened to be the party that Hitler was head of. The party espoused a dictatorial relationship and used harsh punishment while preaching about racial superiority. There are many leaders today who have very similar stances as people from the Nazi party but we call them by different names and unfortunately, most of the liberals in this country love them. As for whether or not I like being called Nazi, it does not bother me. I believe in the freedom of speech and you are free to say what you want. I served 24 years so that cowardly little twerps everywhere could say what they want. All the Eagles served so that pukes could make statements such as yours. You do not have the intellect to insult me.
No need to apologize, kidding or not. You should at least have the courage of your convictions, even if you lack any other courage. Since I do not follow the political party of 1930-1945 Germany I can not be a Nazi. I am a Republican.
I am going to go out on a limb and assume you mean MARTIAL LAW which is law enforced by the military when enacted by a government because local police forces are not adequate or unable to maintain public safety. You see, instead of spending your time in moonbat camp learning the talking points, you should have stayed in school and learned a few more words. You could have increased your vocabulary and then when you wrote a comment to an educated person who has educated readers you would not show your self to be a fool. Unfortunately, not only are you uninformed as to what a Nazi is, you are also ignorant of the fact that it is martial as in of or relating to the military and not Marshall as in a surname or a man’s first name.
I wonder if the moon is full? There are so many barking moonbats that want to kill me. I have a Muslim talking about someone should shoot me and I have some twerp saying that he wants me shot in the head so long as he does not have to do it. I never let people like this bother me but as Misha has pointed out, always take a threat on your life seriously (which I have, I just never let it bother me). If it is my day to go then it is a glorious day to die. But if one of these twerps shows up here messing with the Dog, there might be a hole in them big enough to walk through.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway ♦ Perri Nelson’s Website ♦ The Virtuous Republic ♦ Mark My Words ♦ DragonLady’s World ♦ Shadowscope ♦ The Amboy Times ♦ Pursuing Holiness ♦ Rightlinx, Right Celebrity ♦ third world county ♦ Wake Up America ♦ stikNstein… has no mercy ♦ Pirate’s Cove ♦ The Pink Flamingo ♦ Dumb Ox Daily News ♦ Right Voices ♦ Blog @ MoreWhat.com ♦ The Random Yak ♦ Adam’s Blog ♦ basil’s blog ♦ The Bullwinkle Blog ♦ Conservative Cat ♦ Conservative Thoughts ♦ Faultline USA ♦ Allie Is Wired ♦ stikNstein… has no mercy ♦ The World According to Carl ♦ Walls of the City ♦ Blue Star Chronicles ♦ Planck’s Constant ♦ High Desert Wanderer ♦ Gone Hollywood
Thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest
Any Doubt Who Russia Supports?
Mar 12, 2007 Uncategorized
Iran is developing nuclear technology and will begin enriching Uranium. There is no doubt in the minds of most that Iran will use this technology to develop nuclear weapons and that will spell disaster for the Middle East. Iran will then have the means to strike at and wipe out Israel, a stated goal of Iranian President Ahmadinejad. The United Nations addressed this issue and issued sanctions.
The sanctions were watered down and are being ignored by Iran. Russia, Iran’s friend, has been instrumental in insuring that the sanctions were not too bad. Russia has mad ensure that Iran will be able to continue to enrich Uranium because Russia ensured that the sanctions lacked the teeth to make a difference. Russia is helping Iran in more ways that that.
Russia is providing the nuclear reactor and will supply the Uranium. The news today indicates that Russia is suspending work on the reactor. Are they doing it because they are worried about Iran having nuclear weapons? No. They are suspending work because Iran is behind on its $25 million per month payments to the Russian company providing the service.
It seems to me that if Russia, or a Russian company, has interests in the nuclear program of Iran that they would need to recuse themselves from the process at the UN. Russian interests directly benefit from the actions the Russian government takes at the UN. This is beyond belief and is another reason for us not to trust Russia. Israel should be very concerned about this as should any country that Ahmadinejad has targeted in his hate filled speeches.
It is not like the Russians are unaware. Russia asked that all references to the program be removed from the UN sanctions. They are well aware that there is a conflict of interest and their refusal to recuse themselves could have catastrophic consequences for many in the world.
Source:
Yahoo News
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway ♦ The Virtuous Republic ♦ Perri Nelson’s Website ♦ Mark My Words ♦ Right Truth ♦ Shadowscope ♦ DragonLady’s World ♦ Stuck On Stupid ♦ The Amboy Times ♦ Leaning Straight Up ♦ Pursuing Holiness ♦ Rightlinx ♦ third world county ♦ Woman Honor Thyself ♦ ♦ stikNstein… has no mercy ♦ The Right Nation ♦ Pirate’s Cove ♦ Overtaken by Events ♦ The Pink Flamingo ♦ Dumb Ox Daily News ♦ Right Voices ♦ Right Pundits, Blog @ MoreWhat.com ♦ A Blog For All ♦ The Random Yak ♦ 123beta ♦ Adam’s Blog ♦ basil’s blog ♦ Phastidio.net ♦ The Bullwinkle Blog, Cao’s Blog ♦ The Florida Masochist ♦ Conservative Cat ♦ Jo’s Cafe ♦ Conservative Thoughts ♦ Faultline USA ♦ The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns ♦ The World According to Carl ♦ Blue Star Chronicles ♦ High Desert Wanderer
Thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest
Blogger Defies Court, Stays in Jail
Mar 8, 2007 Uncategorized
A blogger who filmed a protest in San Francisco is in jail because he has refused to turn the film over to the police per a court order. This blogger, Josh Wolf, fancies himself as some First Amendment crusader. I will leave that debate to the lawyers but it seems silly to me that he filmed a public event and will not release the tape. I understand some criminal acts took place and some people were hurt. In fact, a police officer received a fractured skull when one of the hooded thugs hit him with a pipe or a bat. It appears that the cops want to get the person who did it. Wolf evidently interviewed some of the protesters and they did not have their hoods on. The cops probably believe they can get a match by looking at clothing. I really don’t care but this strengthens my view that once protesters stop being peaceful they lose their protection and should be handled appropriately, including shooting them if they are violent. We will see on March 17th just how peaceful the anti-war crowd is down in DC. In any event, Wolf’s mother had this to say about why the police want the tape:
“Truthfully, I don’t think it’s even about the tape or the police car,” she says. “They want him to testify so they can develop a list of who protests in San Francisco.” WaPo
Give me a freaking break. The police already have a list of who protests in San Francisco. They call it the San Francisco White Pages.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway ♦ The Virtuous Republic ♦ Blog @ MoreWhat.com ♦ Perri Nelson’s Website ♦ The Random Yak ♦ basil’s blog ♦ Stuck On Stupid ♦ The Bullwinkle Blog ♦ Conservative Cat ♦ Conservative Thoughts ♦ Pursuing Holiness ♦ third world county ♦ Faultline USA ♦ Right Celebrity ♦ Allie Is Wired ♦ stikNstein… has no mercy ♦ The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns ♦ Pirate’s Cove ♦ Overtaken by Events ♦ Blue Star Chronicles ♦ The Pink Flamingo ♦ Dumb Ox Daily News ♦ High Desert Wanderer ♦ Right Voices ♦ Gone Hollywood
Thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
New Democrats? Right, When Pigs Fly
Mar 7, 2007 Political
During the last campaign season we were told all about the culture of corruption and how Bella Pelosi was going to clean House when she became the mother hen. Harry Reid was going to run a tight ship in the Senate which is funny because he is as crooked as they come. Two months into their reign of terror power and they are already screwing the pooch. The Democrats, who promised a more responsible government, have already blown to bits the five day work week they promised. They have already shown no support for our troops and they have been involved in their own extravagant displays of power (like special aircraft).
Now those principled Democrats are going to add a bunch of PORK to the spending bill for the war. The donks are betting that Bush will not veto a spending package that is for the troops so they are adding all kinds of items that have absolutely nothing to do with the war. The donks will add farm relief for California fruit farmers and Colorado livestock owners who were hurt when freezing temperatures and blizzards, no doubt the result of global warming, wiped out their products.
The spending package is for the war and the Democrats need to keep from adding non war items to it. If they want to spend taxpayer money on these other things they should introduce legislation to do so and see if it passes muster. I think that if they add to the bill George Bush should go on national TV and say that he is going to veto it because the Democrats added things that are not for the war and that they are not fulfilling their promises of being responsible. He could then say that America has this because they voted for a bunch of closet criminals. He might want to hurt them even more by pardoning Libby at the same time.
It is high time the President had line item veto authority so that these abuses can be stopped. Any member of Congress that feels froggy can contact me at any time so I can set you straight on what you are supposed to do. You seem to have forgotten, once again, that you work for us. I will be happy to set you straight.
If Flight 93 had made it to the Capitol this country would have been a lot better off than it is today. Instead, Congress does not care because they were not affected. They would prefer to play games with the lives of our men and women in uniform. Piss on Congress. They do not deserve the air they breathe.
Trackposted to The Virtuous Republic ♦ Perri Nelson’s Website ♦ Adam’s Blog ♦ basil’s blog ♦ Stuck On Stupid ♦ Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog ♦ The Amboy Times ♦ Conservative Cat ♦ Conservative Thoughts ♦ Pursuing Holiness ♦ Rightlinx, Faultline USA ♦ stikNstein… has no mercy ♦ Overtaken by Events, Pirate’s Cove ♦ Planck’s Constant ♦ The Pink Flamingo ♦ Dumb Ox Daily News ♦ Right Voices
Thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest, Political
LIBBY FOUND GUILTY!
Mar 6, 2007 Uncategorized
Scooter Libby was found guilty on four of five counts of perjury and obstruction of justice stemming from the probe into the leak of the identity of a non covert CIA agent named Valerie Plame. Though many people had poor recollections or lied under oath (if that is what Libby’s poor memory equates to), Libby was the one who eventually took the fall as Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald continued to push for answers even though he had discovered the leak three days after he started his investigation. Ironically, that person was never charged.
Libby now faces jail time but just how much is in question. If convicted on all five counts he could have received 30 years though federal sentencing guidelines allow much shorter sentences.
If George Bush really wants to drive the left over the top he should pardon Libby. That would lead to calls for impeachment from the group that defended Clinton when he pardoned criminals for payment. By the way, how much jail time did Clinton serve for the exact same crime Libby committed?