Democrats are in Attack Mode
Sep 6, 2007 Uncategorized
It was obvious from the moment that word started spreading that the troop surge was working that Democrats needed a way to defeat and lessen any good news that might come from Iraq. They have spent a lot of energy in helping the enemy and in trying to paint all things Iraq as bad. They put a lot of stake in the idea that the surge would not work and that they could then get what they wanted with regard to de-funding our troops and bringing them home. They lack the testicular fortitude to just come out and do it without a reason because then they would look weaker on national security than they already do.
Democrats agreed to the surge and agreed to let General Petraeus give a report on the effort before they took up the issue again. When the news from Iraq began to get better and it looked like the surge was working Democrats began to insist that it was not working and that they needed to do something right now, rather than wait to the agreed upon time. Since they got nowhere with that (and since they did not want to interrupt their month long vacation) they shelved it. During the time they have been out of session they, and their minions in the media, have been finding other ways to discredit the effort. They have all begun dissing the report before it has even been given. Idiots like Stolz have declared it a failure and John Kerry (he served in Vietnam) chimed in with his assertion that the surge had failed. The Democrats are in full attack mode and they need desperately to make this look like a failure no matter what because a success would be a bad thing for them. They have already publicly admitted that if the surge is a success it will be a bad thing for their party. As Rush says, if it is good for America, it is bad for the Democrats.
The Democrats have now resorted to calling the report the “Bush Report” in an effort to get their drones, like the boot lickers at the Daily Kos, chiming in unison in hopes that if it is repeated enough people will believe it. The Democrats are basically calling into question the integrity of a four star general officer in the Army, a man who knows better than any of the cut and run Democrats, how to fight an insurgency. The Democrats know no honor and when it comes to their quest for power and their desire for America to lose they will tarnish the good name of anyone, including highly decorated officers, in order to achieve their goals.
They agreed to a time line for the surge and the report and they tried to break it. They declared the surge a failure very early on in order to diminish the positive outcomes we have experienced and now they are questioning the integrity of the military officer who will deliver the report. They have no shame and they need to know our displeasure.
I will be in DC next week with the Gathering of Eagles for Operation Eagle Justice where tens of thousands of us will make our feelings known about the war and the cut and run Democrats who are determined to give our enemies a victory. We will be heard and there will be no doubt in the minds of the people in Congress that we are there and what we expect. There will also be no doubt in the minds of the anti war crowd that they no longer speak without opposition. We told them we were coming in March and then we showed them and they cowered. We showed them time and again and watched as Sheehan ran for cover and we will show them next week that we are here to stay and that they are no longer the voice of America.
I always like these events. It is fun to watch the anti war zealots walk around with their tails between their legs when they realize that they no longer have the market on demonstrations. They seem to lose their toughness when the people they deride are there face to face.
Sometimes unrelated trackbacks to: Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, Rosemary’s Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, Right Truth, Nuke’s News & Views, Shadowscope, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, The Amboy Times, Conservative Cat, Conservative Thoughts, Pursuing Holiness, Right Celebrity, Faultline USA, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, The Pink Flamingo, CommonSenseAmerica, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, Gone Hollywood, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Link Fest, Political Opinion
Is Katie Couric a Convert?
Sep 5, 2007 Uncategorized
Many on the right have indicated that what we see on the news is not indicative of what is actually taking place in Iraq. The troops who watch the news in Iraq can tell how different the news version is from the actual events that they participated in. Interestingly, those who rely on the news have a bleak view of the situation in Iraq while those who go there have a different opinion, in most cases, anyway. Katie Couric is in Iraq and she had this to say:
“We hear so much about things going bad, but real progress has been made there in terms of security and stability,” Couric said Tuesday. “I mean, obviously, infrastructure problems abound, but Sunnis and U.S. forces are working together. They banded together because they had a common enemy: al Qaeda.” WCBSTV
Imagine that, Katie uttered the phrase used by the right, We hear so much about things going bad, and of course her network is one of those that tells us these things. She sees real progress! A journalist who sees progress and reports on it from the battlefield rather than from a hotel.
Things are not perfect in Iraq but they are not as bad as the drive-by media would have us believe. Couric was able to see first hand, and to report honestly, the successes that have taken place.
Will she now be a convert? I doubt it, but I hope her trip has given her a new perspective from which to view things. I hope she takes her trip into account when she returns and reports the news.
Sometimes unrelated trackbacks to: Webloggin, The Pink Flamingo, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Cao’s Blog, Right Celebrity, third world county, and Right Truth, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest
Is Nigger OK in Certain Parts, Whoopi?
Sep 4, 2007 Uncategorized
Whoopi Goldberg made a splash debut on the Gal Pal Gabfest known as The View by defending Michael Vick. If anyone had any questions about whether she will be as controversial as the woman she replaced, this might be part of the answer. As far as I see it, there is no defending a man who tortured animals for sport. We are not talking about killing something to eat or wear, we are talking about electrocuting, drowning, and beating dogs to death. This type of behavior is indicative of someone with a very disturbed mind. Whoopi does not see it that way and said this:
“It’s like cockfighting in Puerto Rico,” she said. “There are certain things that are indicative to certain parts of the country.” Breitbart
I guess under Goldberg’s explanation that certain things are indicative to certain parts of the country we can now stop Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson from holding riots every time some KKK member or other white supremacist calls black folks niggers. It is just indicative of the way they live and beating blacks for sport or dragging them behind trucks is OK, according to Goldberg logic, because the blacks are not viewed as humans in those certain parts.
Whoopi became very defensive back in 1993 when then boyfriend Ted Danson did a skit at the Friars Club roast that had him wearing black face. Whoopi was in on the gag and thought it was a hoot but there were blacks who did not appreciate the stunt. She defended the act noting that Danson had been referred to as a nigger lover for his relationship with her. Whoopi was not happy that people would call Ted a nigger lover and she was not happy that people would infer that the stunt was racist (though it is illogical to refer to him as both a nigger lover and a racist). There are two opposing things here that seem to involve items indicative to certain parts of the country. The black folks who were offended did not like it and that is indicative of the struggles and racism they have overcome. There is also the group of people who come from certain parts of the country that think interracial relationships are wrong. She should not be upset with either group because to one being upset by this was indicative of their parts and to the other not liking “nigger lovers” was indicative to their part.
We could play this all day long. To certain parts it is OK to sell and use drugs, kill people in drive-by shootings, become part of violent gangs that steal and kill, demean women as hos (was Imus just acting in accordance with his certain parts?), have sex with children and on and on. It should also be noted that the Confederate Flag is perfectly acceptable in certain parts but some people come unhinged when it is displayed.
The fact is, regardless of what parts people come from, the majority of people in this country find these acts either criminal, reprehensible or both. This includes the majority of folks who live in these certain areas of which Whoopi speaks. The notion that Vick might have been acting in accordance with the culture of “his certain parts” does not negate the fact that what he did was absolutely disgusting, inhumane and abominable. But hey, if Whoopi wants to defend it, power to her. I find most of the acts to be despicable and contemptuous of civilized society. Only Danson, Imus, and those who said offensive words were actually exercising their right to free speech, regardless of how distasteful that speech might have been been and those sparked a firestorm.
I just wonder if she would accept the argument that in certain parts of the government, torture of our enemies is OK, and allow this argument to dismiss what took place at Abu Ghraib. I also wonder if it was OK for three white racists to drag James Byrd Jr to his death in Texas. Maybe they should have used the “certain parts” argument?
Of course the title might be rhetorical since Goldberg is a black comedian and use of the word nigger is acceptable in that case and in the case of rap artists and blacks to each other. The answer just might be yes…
UPDATE: It is not OK here.
Sometimes unrelated trackbacks to: Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary’s Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, Right Truth, Adam’s Blog, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Thoughts, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Walls of the City, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Planck’s Constant, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest
My Protest to the Mexican Presidente
Sep 3, 2007 Immigration
Mexican President Felipe Calderon is a little bit upset with the United States because we are cracking down on ILLEGALS in this country. The Mexican President is protesting the United States enforcing its laws, laws neither Mexico nor its presidente have any say in. I am not surprised that the Mexican President would protest our enforcement of laws. First of all, the enforcement hurts ILLEGALS from his country, it hurts the economy of his country which benefits from money sent home, and third, Mexico does not enforce its own laws so it is not unusual that they would protest us following ours. Of course, Calderon is upset with the US for not passing an immigration reform bill that would have made millions of felons from his country US citizens by granting them amnesty. Before some whacked out troll tells me that not all ILLEGALS are felons let me make it clear. Crossing the border is a felony so being here ILLEGALLY means they committed a felony, regardless of the BS civil laws involved in them being caught here (as opposed to caught crossing the border).
Here is what Calderon said:
“I want to express again an energetic protest at the unilateral measures taken by the U.S. Congress and government which exacerbate the persecution and abusive treatment of undocumented Mexican workers,” Calderon said in his state of the union speech.
~snip~
“The Mexican government will continue to insist firmly … on the need for an integral immigration reform and the categorical rejection of the building of a wall on our common border,” Calderon said to raucous applause. al_Reuters
All I can say to Felipe Calderon is screw you and all your little law breakers. We do not care how much you protest our enforcement of our laws because we do not want your people who have entered ILLEGALLY to stay here. We do not care how firmly you protest our immigration laws or how firmly you protest a wall on the border. You have shown that Mexicans can not be trusted to honor the laws of this country and that a wall is necessary. You and your slimy law breakers have demonstrated why it is true when people say that good fences make good neighbors.
You, Felipe, are like a shoplifter who cries about cameras being installed in a store. You are an enabler of criminal behavior and you have this illusion that you have some say in the legal process of our country. You sir, are a little man who has no ability to lead his country or its people and you are even more ineffective at enforcing the law. You and people like you are the reason that Mexico is a third world crap hole that allows a major part of the population to live in absolute poverty while you and your cohorts live in luxury. No wonder you people are the darlings of the Democrats.
As a citizen, I have the right to speak about this and to make demands of the government, something you do not have. I will continue to demand that the federal government crack down on ILLEGALS but I insist they spend time in jail before being sent home. I will continue to insist on a wall to keep you cretins on your side of the border and I will insist that we have immigration laws for Mexicans that Mexico has for those who come to Mexico.
Perhaps you should clean up your crap hole before you try to tell us how we should run our country. To make it clear, I protest you and all the ILLEGAL slugs from your country who cross our borders. I think we should execute you and your government for the lives that were lost here because ILLEGALS killed our folks. I don’t care what that sissy Geraldo Rivera has to say about it, it does matter.
ILLEGALS go home!
Sometimes unrelated trackbacks to: Is It Just Me?, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Right Truth, Shadowscope, Nuke’s News & Views, DragonLady’s World, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, Conservative Cat, Stageleft, Adeline and Hazel, third world county, Faultline USA, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, High Desert Wanderer, and Church and State, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Link Fest
Mohammad the Prophet Balloons
Sep 2, 2007 Uncategorized
I think that these Mohammad (PBUH – Pig Be Under Him) balloons are pretty classy and people should get some for when the Muslims have parades and march around screaming about cartoons or some other crap that people think we should care about. I made this, BTW, in response to a picture that shows Osama bin Laden as Jesus which is pretty ironic because Jesus was a Jew and we know how the worshipers of the child molester feel about them.
Enjoy the picture!
Read the rest of this entry »