Clinton Crime Family Leaves Evidence
Jan 24, 2008 Political
Bill and Hillary Clinton have been in public life for decades and there have been allegations that they have broken the law. Unfortunately, the MSM never fully investigated any of the claims and the top bosses of the crime family were able to escape justice. I have made claims about Democratic voter fraud in the past (most recently in response to a few of the Kos kids) and I am challenged by those on the left to show the fraud. Despite the fraud being before their eyes they refuse to see it. Let a Republican sneeze at a polling place and Michael Moore is there with a camera to shoot another documentary.
It appears that the Clintons have turned their election stealing ways inward and are now using them in the Democratic primaries in order to ensure Hillary beats Barack Obama. Obama led by double digits in New Hampshire and then Hillary pulled out a 3 point win. There have been allegations that a large number of cars from neighboring states were at the polling places and in new Hampshire if one shows up and states he plans to move there, he may vote.
In Nevada the Clintons claimed that strong handed tactics were being used by the Obama campaign but in reality it was the Clintons who were intimidating voters and breaking the law. Whenever the Clintons accuse the other side of something it is a pretty good indication that they are the ones actually doing it. The Obama campaign has asked Nevada officials to look into more than 1600 complaints of voter intimidation by the Clinton crime family. Obama’s people are not challenging the results, they just want the allegations investigated.
Particularly interesting is an instruction sheet for the Clinton workers detailing how to get people to caucus for Hillary. The particularly telling line is one that reads:
“It’s not illegal unless they tell you so.”
This should come as no surprise since this is how the Clintons have always lived their lives. Bill’s sexcapades were not illegal unless he got caught, the land deals, Hillary’s law firm work, none of it was illegal unless they were told so. In reality though, to the Clintons personally, it is not illegal even when they are told that it is. She broke FEC rules regarding campaign donations and it was caught on film and yet she has not been taken to task.
The Clintons will say and do anything to get elected. They seek power and will do whatever it takes in order to attain it and they feel that whatever they do is legal so long as no one tells them otherwise.
Perhaps Michael Moore can start showing up at Democratic polling places and film the irregularities. There were plenty of them in Nevada and that was told by a member of Kos who was caucusing for Obama. I imagine I would have been arrested if I had been there…
It is important for people to see the Clintons as they really are and now that she is in a tight race with another Democrat the methods will be more widely scrutinized by the people on the left. They will finally see what we on the right have known all along.
You cannot trust the Clintons because they will do anything, legal or otherwise, in order to win.
As an aside, anyone want to bet Chelsea runs for office in the next few years? I know she makes good money but mommy and daddy got rich and never held a real job.
Source:
Breitbart
Clinton Backers Want to Suppress Vote, Bill Agrees
Jan 17, 2008 Political
The vote in Nevada is an interesting thing because back in March of last year it was agreed upon that the casinos would be used to caucus for candidates. The Nevada Democratic Party agreed to this as did all the players involved including the teacher’s unions. The Culinary Worker’s Union endorsed B. Hussein Obama and its 60,000 members are the ones who work in those casinos. Two days after the endorsement, groups that agreed to the casino caucus sites filed a lawsuit to reverse this process. I know in my heart that if the union had endorsed Clinton this would not be an issue. It is important to note that the Clinton campaign did not file the suit but in this interview, it is obvious that Bill Clinton agrees with it.
Notice that Bill says that the votes will count 5 times more than other votes. This is a lie. It is not unusual for caucus sites to weight the votes to encourage candidates to visit outlying areas that would otherwise be ignored. Bill makes it sound as if this was just discovered and that it is a travesty of justice. Notice the typical Clinton style of turning it around and asking accusatory questions. “So you believe it is fair to…” The fact is, every participant last March, as the report states, knew exactly what was involved in this process and how the votes would be weighted. It is obvious that Hillary expected to pick up the endorsement of the Culinary Union.
It is also noteworthy that Clinton discusses whether it is fair for people to get to caucus at a work site. He wants to know how many others are able to take off to caucus. Well, the teacher’s unions in each state get to caucus because the schools are usually closed because many of them are polling places. In this case, the caucus is on a Saturday so the biggest group of people who will actually be working are the members of the union that happened to endorse Clinton’s main opponent.
Bill Clinton leaves no question that he (and by extension, the campaign) supports the lawsuit and that he wants the unions workers to be disenfranchised. If the union had endorsed Clinton and Obama backers had filed the lawsuit the Clintons would be
Tags: Clinton, culinary union, disenfranchisement, lawsuit, nevada, Obama
Clinton: Obama is Establishment Man
Jan 16, 2008 Political
This is rich. Hillary Clinton was hoping for the endorsement of the largest union in Nevada but it went to Obama so Bill Clinton says it shows Obama is an establishment man. This is just too funny to be true. If Hillary had picked up the endorsement Bill would have been saying that the workers recognized her commitment to the working class folks who make America what it is. Hillary has other endorsements and some of them are from unions so does this also make her an “establishment” woman?
Clinton also had a few other interesting comments while speaking about his contractual spouse.
Bill Clinton said he talked with many of the 60,000-member Culinary Union’s rank-and-file who intend to ignore the endorsement and vote for his wife.
“In this case the establishment organization is with him and the insurgents are with her.” USA Today
It is interesting that Bill would make a big deal out of the fact that a few people he talked to in the Culinary Union are voting for Hillary. This happens all the time. If a candidate gets an endorsement from a union some members vote for another person. Bill acts like this is a big deal, as if any union that endorses Hillary has 100% of its members vote for her. I also doubt his claim that he spoke with “many” of the members given that there are 60,000 of them. It is also interesting that the insurgents are voting for Hillary. I believe we can make that claim world wide. The terrorists would certainly side with a candidate with a familial history of selling out our country. It is also interesting that he took a swipe at the union leadership in this fashion. The leadership of a union never bothered him when he was getting their endorsements.
I wonder if any of the MSM will ask Bill if Hillary is an establishment candidate because of any of the endorsements she holds or any she might receive. This could be a double edged sword. If Hillary gets the nomination this union is certain to endorse her because she is a Democrat. Then she will be the establishment candidate and we have Bill’s words to verify that claim.
The Clintons are sellers of snake oil and they will say or do anything to get back in the White House. Bill Clinton feels he owes Hillary the dedication after he embarrassed their family and since they had a lifelong pledge to help each other become president. Hillary, for her part, believes she is entitled to the presidency and that Obama should wait his turn as if people in America get turns at the office. All this talk of Hillary being the candidate of the people is pure BS. She is on a power trip and a quest to make this country a bastion of socialism.
Hillary Clinton has a dismal record. She has done very little as a Senator and she did very little as the US First Lady and the First lady of Arkansas. All this blather about helping kids or some other program is a smoke screen. She has no record that is worthy of the presidency and she acknowledges this by refusing to release her records from the time she was in the White House. Bill’s claim that she is able to work with republicans is hollow when one considers that she could not do that with health care. She even had Democrats who did not support her plan.
Yes, Hillary has been in the Senate, her gift for enduring an adulterer rapist husband. Let’s face it, she would not have been in the public’s eye if it were not for the fact that she slept with the president and she would not have won the Senate seat in New York if her husband had not had sex with an intern. Her stints as First Lady (of Arkansas and the US) were the result of her marriage so any accomplishments she has, and there are very few, are the result of her marriage of convenience.
Hillary will lose Nevada. She is Satan.
Others with similar posts:
Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Right Truth, Leaning Straight Up, Adeline and Hazel, third world county, Allie is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, CORSARI D’ITALIA, Right Voices, The Yankee Sailor, and CatSynth.com, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: BS, Clinton, nevada, power trip, union support