Muslims Teach Hatred to Maryland Students
Nov 30, 2006 Uncategorized
Frontpage has an article entitled Maryland’s Madrassah that discusses a book on the shelves of public school libraries. The book is entitled The Meaning of the Holy Qur’an and it is written by Yusuf Abdullah Ali. The book is not a reference but is described more as an interpretive work. Those interpretations cast Jews and Christians in a bad light and promotes hatred toward those religions.
For instance, there are many anti-Jewish and some anti-Christian references in the explanations of Suras. One such explanation states: “Israel’s story is then told according to their own records and traditions–what privileges they received and how they abused them (2:40-86), thus illustrating again as by a parable the general story of man.” The use of false and degrading examples of Jewish behavior to portray the general story of humanity is a theme repeated throughout the work. The very next sentence states: “In particular, reference is made to Moses and Jesus and their struggles with an unruly people: how people of the book played false their own lights and in their pride rejected Muhammad, who came in the true line of prophets.” It then states: “They falsely laid claim to the virtues of Father Abraham….”
The article has many other examples of how this book is poisoning the minds of children at school. I wonder how this book is allowed to be in the school. If it were truly a reference that described the passages of the Qur’an and told what it meant, i would have no problem just as I would have no problems with books doing the same with regard to other religions.
This book however, is nothing more than propaganda designed to teach hatred toward Jews and Christians and to instill acceptance of the religion of Islam as the only religion to follow. Imagine how many groups would react, groups like the ACLU and CAIR, if public schools had books about understanding Judaism or Christianity and the book contained negative depictions of Islam. Hell, the Muzzies get upset when a cartoon Mohammad is drawn, can you imagine how they would act, as peaceful as they are, if there were a book calling their religion of killers, a religion of killers? Muzzies all over the world would be rioting and CAIR would be telling everyone about profiling and insensitivity.
I do not believe the author’s claim about the Separation Clause of the Constitution because there is no mandate in that document to keep books of religion from public schools. There might be a school rule that allows the institution to remove it based upon the hated depicted in it but on the basis of religion it is a weak argument. Besides, the library is not a place where they make laws establishing religion or where people (except Imams) would practice it. The library is a place of reference and there should be Bibles, Torahs, Qur’ans and books from many other religions there so people can use them for reference.
Montgomery County Maryland is a bastion of liberalism. It only stands to reason that a book like this would be allowed while similar books against Islam would never make it through the door. The Muzzies have a plan and our sheeple are falling into it. The Muzzies, in order to take over our country, will get people elected to office, gain the sympathies of the American media, and they will start indoctrinating our children so they grow up hating Jews and Christians and viewing Islam as the way.
We need to put an end to this now. As an aside, where is the ACLU and where is CAIR? You know they would be the first to open their mouths if there were anti-Islam books in public schools. But then again, these two organizations are determined to destroy America.
Tags: News
Be a Lover, Not a Fighter
Nov 29, 2006 Uncategorized
This link is to a video at Something and Half of Something. The video is a night vision of one of the sand dwellers having a good time with a donkey.
Tags: News
Helping the Supreme Court
Nov 29, 2006 Uncategorized
The Supreme Court of the United States is debating the issue of “Global Warming” and greenhouse gas emissions and whether the Environmental Protection Agency had the right to regulate those gases. This is a complicated issue brought by several states with the city of Baltimore jumping on the pile. Here is what Chief Justice Roberts said:
“It depends what happens across the globe,†Chief Justice John Roberts said, noting that any reduction in US emissions might be overcome by a rise in emissions caused by China’s rapid economic development. Several liberal justices supported Massachusetts but the pivotal swing justice, Anthony Kennedy, did not reveal where he stood. FT.com
Let me help the Supreme Court because they are evidently a bunch of judges who have a little problem understanding their roles. You guys are supposed to interpret law to see if it is allowed by the Constitution. You are not supposed to make the laws, or enact the laws, you are supposed to interpret them. This matter is one that needs to be sent to the Congress, the lawmaking body in this country.
Whether or not the EPA can regulate greenhouse gases is a matter for the legislative body to decide. They need to hold hearings and listen to experts, things the court can not do. They can then decide if the law needs to be changed or if the power of the EPA needs to be expanded, that is what lawmakers do. This is not an issue that should be decided by the courts, Supreme or otherwise. As for the idea that the SCOTUS needs to determine if Massachusetts has the right to bring the suit they can dismiss that because the Supreme Court should not be ruling on it.
There ladies and gentlemen of the Supreme Court, now you have some sense to go by. Do us a favor and use it.
Tags: News
Talk About Privacy
Nov 26, 2006 Uncategorized
Police in England are considering placing microphones with their CCTV cameras so that they can listen to conversations. In the UK they already watch every move people make via those closed circuit cameras. Now they will be able to listen to anyone, not just terrorists. In England, they do not enjoy the same freedoms and rights we here in the states do.
Here, we have to have a warrant to listen in on people, though I imagine the courts could get rule that the street is a public place and you can be monitored. Hell, many places are setting up closed circuit cameras to try and reduce the crime rate. Many big cities (notice that rural communities never need these kinds of things) have either started or are considering installing these cameras. I guess if the UK is successful it will not be long before they try this in the US. I wonder how they would square that with the uproar to the perfectly legal wiretapping of terrorist’s phone calls?
Here’s looking at (and listening) to you kid.
Source:
Times on Line (UK)
Tags: News
Officer in Bush Motorcade Dies
Nov 26, 2006 Uncategorized
Last week when the President was in Hawaii there was a mishap and three motorcycle officers were involved in an accident. On of those officers, Steve Favela, has died as a result of his injuries. It is a shame that this man was injured and died in what was probably pretty routine duties. I know the President and First lady have expressed their condolences:
Bush said in a statement that he and the first lady were “deeply saddened” by the death, and sent their condolences.
“Officer Favela risked his life every day to protect the people of his community,” Bush said in the statement. “In this time of great sadness, we give thanks for his life of service.” Breitbart (AP)
My prayers are also with the family.
Tags: News