Obama Is Like An Empty Shell, No Nuts
Jul 14, 2008 Political
Jesse Jackson made the startling revelation this week that he wanted to cut off Barack Obama’s nuts but that would presuppose that Obama actually has a pair of them to remove. Obama has given a number of hints that he lacks testicular fortitude. It is has been evident each time he has thrown someone under the bus and it is obvious in his inability to take a position and stick with it.
Perhaps the strongest indicator that Obama lacks a set of testicles is his reaction to the recent cover of the New Yorker. Now, I understand what the magazine was doing and I can see what they are getting at. I can also see how it would upset Obama but he is running for the presidency and should man up. If he ignored the thing it would go away and that would be it. By complaining about it he allows it to get more and more air time and it makes him look petty. Wonkette probably said it best:
“Who cares about the stupid New Yorker cover? It just makes the silly-sallies at the Obama campaign look like, uh, silly-sallies, and makes the New Yorker look terribly unfunny, which it is, except for that Anthony Lane who is a stitch.”
It is not like the New Yorker has never done this before. George Bush has been the object of their satire on a few occasions as have members of his administration and other politicians. Barack Obama is the only one who has thrown a fit over it and that is because he lacks the ability to man up an accept the fact that when one is in the public eye he is fair game.
It really isn’t all his fault because the media has given him a pass thus far and people have treated him as the messiah for so long that he actually believes it.
Tags: castration, jackson, messiah, nuts, Obama
What if Jackson had said Lynch Obama?
Jul 14, 2008 Opinion, Political
Last week Jesse Jackson was caught on a hot microphone expressing his displeasure with Barack Obama and he stated that he would like to “cut his nuts off” while making a cutting motion. The sound bite was discovered later by a person who was transcribing the day’s tapes. It was disclosed by Fox (who caught it) but before they did they contacted Jackson about it. He declined to discuss it but made a preemptive apology which was dutifully accepted by Obama.
There are many reasons that Jackson is upset with Obama and the main one, in my opinion, is that an Obama presidency will make him the default leader of the black community and it will put to rest the idea of inequality in America. If a black man can be president then blacks can achieve anything. If Obama gets elected it will make Jackson irrelevant. That is a matter for discussion at another time.
What I want to know is why Jackson was let off so easily. Castration was often used against black men in addition to or instead of lynching them. If a golf commentator can be suspended for saying the other golfers should to take tiger Woods out back and lynch him in order to beat him (a statement Tiger was OK with but Al Sharpton was not) then Jackson certainly deserves greater punishment than his personal embarrassment. Don Imus lost his job over a statement that depicted young black women in an unfavorable light and stories of nooses being hung lead to investigations of a hate crime. Since castration is a symbol of what was done to blacks that “got out of line” why is Jackson let off so easily?
I am not suggesting that Jackson lose his job because to be honest, the man has never worked a day in his life. He extorts money from corporations by threatening boycotts and he uses the tax laws to shelter money from government scrutiny. He has no job to lose so firing him is out of the question.
Why though, has he not been taken to task for his obviously racist remark? Why is he allowed to apologize and all is forgiven when an Imus apology did not stop him from receiving the scorn of the black community and eventually losing his job?
Jackson thrives on face time. That needs to be denied to him and the MSM needs to point out his racist remarks for what they are and not let him off with a weak apology. People like Al Sharpton need to have as much enthusiasm in pursuing this racism as they do when Duke lacrosse players are falsely accused of raping a black woman, when the criminal acts of teens in Jena Louisiana are defended based on their skin color, when a cab driver in New York accidentally hits and kills a black kid, when landlords raise rent on black tenants, when golf announcers mention lynching, and when Don Imus makes a boneheaded statement.
All Al Sharpton and the rest of the race baiters need to do is pursue Jackson just as they would if a white guy had made the statement. In reality, Jackson’s statement was no different than if he had said “I just want to lynch him.”
If you want racial equality, stop having two sets of standards and actually treat everyone equally.
To do anything else castrates your cause…
Tags: castration, Imus, jackson, jim crowe, lynching, nuts, Obama, racism, sharpton