CNN Ignores The Real Content

Fred Thompson was at an event in Houston and a young lady started screaming at him and questioning if he was a real Conservative. She kept saying “you are not a Conservative sir.” CNN reported on it and they reported the things she asked such as why he is on the Council for Foreign Relations. Thompson told her to stop fussing that she asked a question and he wanted to answer. There is a video and none of this is on it. There is one thing that is on it but this little tidbit was not reported by CNN.

The young lady asked him “…what he thought about the World Trade Center 7 it was an inside job.” Seems to me if you are trying to be balanced as a news organization one might want to include this little tidbit. Instead, the written piece is designed to make people believe a Conservative was questioning Thompson’s level of Conservatism when it is quite obvious that this woman is deranged. Anyone who believes that anything on 9/11 was an inside job should have to be on a leash when in public and should have to sleep in a cage at night.

The unfortunate thing is that this young lady had good points about the CFR and their desire to bring about the North American Union. We should not become one with Mexico and Canada and if our government does this we should have an armed revolution. The problem is she loses credibility when she starts talking about inside jobs on 9/11. In all fairness to her, this is a link to her website (WARNING: this is a 9/11 conspiracy website) and her account of the incident with Thompson. I have real concerns about the NAU but this post is about CNN ignoring a major part of a story. We can discuss the NAU another time or you can read more about it at her site (and watch an informative video).

Now I understand that this is a campaign (well at least it will be when he announces) and I understand that all kinds of people will ask all kinds of questions. That is all fair and if Thompson has any issues that need to be addressed I am sure he is a big enough man to address them. What I take issue with is the lack of integrity of CNN. It would seem to me that the part about 9/11 was pretty important to the story especially when you consider that her site is a 9/11 conspiracy website..

CNN does stand for Clinton News Network and a Clinton is running. That might explain a lot.

Big Dog

Others:
Stop the ACLU

Any Doubt Hillary Will Say Anything to Get Elected?

The Democrats held their You Tube debate last night where video questions sent in by tech savvy people were selected and played for the candidates to answer. I did not watch the debate though some analysts have indicated that B. Hussein Obama won the debate and Joe Biden carried himself well. I don’t like Biden and can not imagine him as President. John Edwards reportedly came off as a snake oil salesman who would say anything to get elected but deeper analysis indicates that Hillary Rodham is no different in that respect. Hillary must be fuming today over reports that people changed from supporting her to supporting Obama. Why wouldn’t they? Say what you want about Obama he appeared more genuine than some of the other front runners (in the highlights I saw).

Hillary, on the other hand, was very disingenuous. The candidates were asked if any of them would be willing to be President for minimum wage. Hillary replied that she would and why wouldn’t she? Her husband makes $15 million a year so she really does not need the 400 thousand dollars a year the president gets. The Clinton financial disclosure statement shows they own quite a bit of stocks and have other investments as well as income from their book deals. Hell, Hillary could PAY 400 thousand dollars a year to be president. The answer was obviously given to tell folks that she would work for minimum wage to help the country but the underlying message is that she is comfortable with the minimum wage (so don’t ask for more). My question for the left is, what makes Hillary any different than the evil rich business owners who want to keep the minimum wage where it is so they can make more money? Hillary is rich and is happy with that pay but then again she would do anything to be the President, and that should worry people.

Additionally, a question was asked about meeting with the leaders (in the first year in office) of the countries with whom we disagree (read our enemies). Obama indicated that he would and that he felt we could not work out our differences without talking to people. Rodham said that she would not because that could be used a propaganda. Last night the pundits were drooling all over this indicating how the answer showed that Rodham has more experience than Obama and was able to see the pitfall involved in meetings, blah, blah. What it showed was that Hillary took an opposite position to Obama and tried to justify it with something that made her look experienced. I imagine that if Obama had said no she would have said yes because that is how you resolve differences. Hillary said what was politically convenient at the time in order to push her agenda.

You see, back in April Hillary Rodham had a completely different take on meeting with our enemy’s leaders. Hillary, while blasting the Bush Administration, said that she would talk to the leaders of other countries and indicated that it was just wrong that a President would not do so. So, when she is blasting Bush there is no worry about propaganda but when she is trying to outmaneuver Obama she is worried about it. This is typical Clinton speak in that they will say anything to get elected and fulfill their 20 year plan of both of them serving as President.

America made a mistake two times by electing Bill Clinton to the White House. We can not afford to make the same mistake of putting another Clinton in office. Haven’t we had enough of the Bushes and the Clintons?

Big Dog

Inept Judge Releases Child Molester!

A man who was generously granted asylum in this country betrayed the goodness of our people by raping a 7 year old child for a period of a year. Three years ago, Mahamu Kanneh of West Africa, was arrested in Gaithersburg Maryland for the sexual assault and the case went to trial. It has been going on for about three years and today a judge, Katherine Savage, dropped the charges because there was no interpreter for this child molesting pervert. There have been several interpreters throughout the last three years and reports today indicate an interpreter was in court interpreting for this man when he was released (the interpreter can be heard on the audio of the case!).

Rapist Animal

This is a gross miscarriage of justice and Judge Savage needs to be removed from the bench. The prosecutor in the case has filed an appeal and let’s hope he is successful so Kanneh can be put back behind bars before he rapes again. Judge Savage, if you have daughters make sure they are locked in the house, you let a pervert run free. Girls, mommy put you and the children of many parents across the state in danger by letting an animal go. This guy will rape again and next time is likely to kill a child at which time that judge should receive the death penalty.

If there was a problem, why not stay the case until an interpreter was found? I am sure that somewhere in this country we have a person who speaks the same language as this child raping filth. The last thing we needed was to have him released to prey upon other children.

The biggest scam in this case is that the pervert in question reportedly speaks ENGLISH! The guy conducted an interview in English, he attended college and learned in English and yet he does not understand it well enough to stand trial??? If he speaks English he should be held in contempt and if not it demonstrates that we need to FORCE immigrants to learn our language. We should force them to learn English or send them back to their home nation. Personally, I do not care why he received asylum. As far as I am concerned send him back and let someone there kill him.

Maybe we will get lucky and a drunk ILLEGAL Mexican will run over this piece of dung and kill him. The pervert will be dead and the ILLEGAL in jail. Gets rid of two of them at one time.

**The photo is form the Fox website. People should know who to look out for.

Sources:
WBAL
FOX

Big Dog

Another Step Closer to Socialism

A recent FT/Harris poll shows that many in the world would like to see rich people taxed more and the government cap the salaries of company executives. The people from the richest countries said that they would like the government to sock it to the rich. Of course, those who are not rich tend to get more in the way of government programs so, of course they want to tax the rich. How on Earth could they survive without the redistribution of income? Studies show they pay far less than they consume and that the rich consume far less than they pay so the only way to even things out is to tax the rich to death. One of the problems though, is that people in government have a funny idea of what constitutes rich and people who are well off but in no way rich get taken to the cleaners by the “shire reeve.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Should Shays Be Arrested?

Republican Christopher Shays got into a shouting match with a Capitol Police Officer and reports are that he grabbed the officer. Shays has apologized for the incident and hopes to speak to the officer sometime next week. This incident reminds us of the Cynthia McKinney incident where she slapped a Capitol Police Officer. Of course, she immediately screamed racism and did not apologize for her actions until pressured by the Democrats who were anxious to recover the majority.

Should Shays be arrested for the incident? On any other day I would say he needs to face the same music that any other citizen would under similar circumstances. However, since the Capitol Police and the DC Grand Jury already determined that such acts are OK by dismissing McKinney’s outburst, the bar has been set and Shays should receive the established punishment, nothing.

The incident with McKinney showed that it was OK to abuse a police officer if you are a member of Congress. Shays should have the same standard applied to him. For anyone to ask for a different standard would demonstrate discrimination. This is what happens when we refuse to follow the law ans when we allow our elected officials to live above the law. Of course, the Capitol Police do not do themselves any favors by treating members of Congress like royalty as they did with Patrick Kennedy. If everyone in Congress were held to the same standards as the rest of us there would be no special treatment.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out especially given that Shays was immediately repentant as opposed to Cop Socker McKinney.

Source:
The Politico

Big Dog