Conspiracy, Paranoia, or Rhetoric?
Mar 14, 2007 Political
During Bill Clinton’s time in office his wife coined a phrase that has been used time and again. When Clinton was denying the allegations that he had sex with “that woman” his wife was making the talk show circuit and she said that the attacks were part of a vast right wing conspiracy to get her husband. Interestingly, the allegations turned out to be true (which would indicate that no such conspiracy existed) but Hillary was undaunted by the revelations and she continued with the VRWC rhetoric. Many people on the left believe that there is a VRWC and that Hillary is balls on with this. They believe that the Republicans employ dirty tricks and that the Democrats are the only ones with any virtue when it comes to the election process. Though there are many who think Hillary was unaware of her husband’s affair when she made the VRWC remark, Dick Morris points out that she was well aware long before she let on. This allowed her to concoct this VRWC remark to deflect the attention from her hubby and it allowed her to play the victim when the truth was finally revealed. Well, now Hillary wants to be the Queen and she has taken out the defibrillator and revived that VRWC once again:
Clinton asserted on Tuesday that the conspiracy is alive and well, and cited as proof the Election Day 2002 case of phone jamming in New Hampshire, a case in which two Republican operatives pleaded guilty to criminal charges, and a third was convicted.
“To the New Hampshire Democratic Party’s credit, they sued and the trail led all the way to the Republican National Committee,” Clinton said.
“So if anybody tells you there is no vast, right-wing conspiracy, tell them that New Hampshire has proven it in court,” she said. My Way News
I guess that this big revelation that the courts found law breakers from the right guilty means that there is a VRWC and Hillary is its next target. I guess if the Democrats are so damned wonderful, Hillary might just take time out of her busy campaign schedule (instead of say, her schedule as a Senator) and explain if these items indicate a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy:
- Michigan, 2006: Democratic Challengers wore brightly colored vests reading “I can help you” leading people to believe they were poll workers. The action led to a temporary injunction against the workers for violation of Michigan Voting Laws.
- The American Center For Voting Rights found that Democrats committed far more voting fraud in 2004 than did Republicans.
- In the 2004 Washington State Governor’s race Dino Rossi (R) won two recounts before some ballots were miraculously found and allowed to be counted by a judge. The margin of “victory” was 133 votes which included 1600 that were cast illegally. The “discovered” ballots should not have been allowed and neither should those that were cast illegally.
- On election day 2004, four Democratic operatives slashed the tires of the vehicles used by the Republicans to get the vote out. The four pleaded no contest to the charges. I believe one of those criminals was the son of an elected official.
So now, if Hillary is convinced and she wants her drones to be convinced that the Republicans are guilty because New Hampshire proved one case in court, then what does it say about the Democrats given this sampling of their dirty deeds? One only needs to read that lengthy report to see how dirty and underhanded the Democrats are. If a VRWC exists because it has been proven in court then what exists on the left with regard to what has been proven in court? Yes Hillary, it goes both ways (much like you) and if it is proof on one side then it is proof on the other.
This is not to say that Republicans are squeaky clean because they engage in bad behavior as well. The point of this post is not to exonerate Republicans because politics draws bad people from both parties. The point is to show that Hillary is using an instance and coupling it with some tired rhetoric to try and paint Republicans as evil people who are out to get her. She is pandering to her base of mindless people who do not have enough sense to see that there are bad things on both sides of the political spectrum.
I would prefer to have clean elections where only eligible voters cast a ballot and they all only do it once. History has shown that this is not the case. Kennedy stole the 1960 election with a bunch of dead voters, there was Watergate during the Nixon administration, and now we have Democrats who vehemently oppose any kind of ID in order to vote. The Democrats want criminals, inmates, and ILLEGAL Aliens to be able to vote because these groups overwhelmingly support Democrats. As an aside, it should tell you something about the Democratic Party when criminals, inmates, and ILLEGALS vote for them is large numbers. What is more telling is that the Democrats actually court those votes.
Hillary is a screeching moonbat who is dredging up some tired phrase that she used to deflect the shots taken at her husband when he failed to keep his pants up and so that she could play the victim wife when the defecation hit the orbiting cooling device. This kind of thing might wax nostalgic with the drones but it is based neither in fact nor reality. Of course, there will always be idiots who beleive this smack:
New Hampshire Democratic Party chairwoman Kathy Sullivan said she absolutely agreed with the New York senator’s description of the case.
“People think we’re paranoid when we talk about the vast, right-wing conspiracy, but there is a real connection of these groups – the same names keep popping up,” Sullivan said. “They are the most disgusting group of political thugs that I have ever seen.”
But for the record, I am part of the VRWC and I am proud of that.
Other information:
National Journal
UPDATE: This WSJ piece points it out perfectly and disputes Hillary’s claim that Bill did what every president does. She is lying and she knows she is lying.
Tags: Political
Where Were the Democrats Then?
Mar 13, 2007 Political
The Democrats, led by that windbag Chuck Schumer, are in a tizzy about the firing US prosecutors. The Justice Department dismissed eight federal prosecutors and the Democrats are acting like a crime was committed. These lawyers serve in at will jobs and can be replaced at any time and for any reason. The problem is, Democrats do not like it when George Bush’s administration uses its authority. Since the administration was considering canning all 93 of them I imagine the Democrats would have then been foaming at the mouth. Schumer, who makes me ill whenever I have to listen to his whiny voice, has demanded that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales step down. I have an idea. How about if Chuck Schumer steps down and shuts the hell up?
The Democrats say that the firings were politically motivated and they might well have been. The fact is you don’t need a reason to dismiss an at will employee. I wonder where all these champions of justice were when Janet Reno requested the resignation of all 93 during Bill Clinton’s presidency. The firings under Clinton were believed to be retribution for the investigation of Representative Dan Rostenkowski who just happened to be a key Clinton ally. Where was Chuck Schumer? Did he show up and ask Janet Reno to step down? Did any of these hypocrites on the left make any such demands? No, they did not and the reason they did not is because the savior Bubba was in the White House.
Schumer can take a long walk off a short pier as far as I am concerned. So can anyone else who is upset about these eight lawyers. Perhaps we can send these guys back to school so they can learn what “at will” actually means. Perhaps we can tell them to stick to their business and let the President stick to his. For a bunch of people who are all upset about lawyers being fired they sure do not appear to have any concern about getting judges on the bench. These guys are worried that at will employees were terminated for political reasons and yet they refuse to give an up or down on judges nominated by the President for purely political reasons.
Schumer is a twit.
Related items:
NYT (archive)
Breitbart
Breitbart (2)
Breitbart (3)
My Way
Tags: Political
Jackass of the Month March 2007
Mar 7, 2007 Political
The votes are in for the March Jackass of the Month and, no surprises here, Jack Murtha is the winner.
- Keith Ellison 4 votes (8%)
- Nancy Pelosi 13 votes (25%)
- Jack Murtha 29 votes (57%)
- John Edwards 2 votes (4%)
- Hussein Obama 3 votes (6%)
Murtha will take the place of dishonor on the right where the Dog can do his bidniz…
Need nominations for the April JOTM!
Tags: Political
Hillary Clinton Panders to Gays
Mar 7, 2007 Political
Two days after Ann Coulter referred to John Edwards as a faggot, Hillary Clinton was at a gay groups meeting where she addressed the assembly. You might not have heard about it because Clinton made no prior announcement of the speech. In that speech she stated that she was opposed to the don’t ask don’t tell policy her husband instituted and promised that when she is president she will take care of this little problem. The Clinton camp said the speech was not announced because the meeting is closed to the press. That seems a little weak to me.
Clinton probably tried to secure the gay vote while taking care not to tick off the Christians she has been pandering to. Clinton went from using a southern drawl to pander to a black church to swishing into a gay convention to pander to the queer constituency. Hillary Clinton will be everything to everybody in order to get elected. She made it clear to the gay group that she wanted gay people to marry and was proud that she helped defeat the same sex marriage amendment. Clinton told the gays that the White House would be as open to them as her Senate office is. Considering the past rumors about her this is not hard to believe. But does America need a bunch of gays prancing around the White House? I guess if they have enough money they can stay in the Lincoln bedroom.
Clinton wants it any way she can get it (the presidency) and she will say anything to anybody to get it. I guess she is OK with putting the group that has the largest responsibility for the spread of HIV in a battle zone where blood gets all over. I want this to get a lot of publicity and when the Christian vote starts to slip further away I want to see how Ms. southern drawl, Rebbecca from Sunnybrook Farms spins this one.
Source:
NewsMax
That old song about Pink Berets comes to mind when I hear the debate of gays in the military:
Falling fairies from the sky
I broke a nail G-d I could cry
Don’t you like the way
My tushy sways
I’m a man in a pink beret
Tags: Commentary, Political
New Democrats? Right, When Pigs Fly
Mar 7, 2007 Political
During the last campaign season we were told all about the culture of corruption and how Bella Pelosi was going to clean House when she became the mother hen. Harry Reid was going to run a tight ship in the Senate which is funny because he is as crooked as they come. Two months into their reign of terror power and they are already screwing the pooch. The Democrats, who promised a more responsible government, have already blown to bits the five day work week they promised. They have already shown no support for our troops and they have been involved in their own extravagant displays of power (like special aircraft).
Now those principled Democrats are going to add a bunch of PORK to the spending bill for the war. The donks are betting that Bush will not veto a spending package that is for the troops so they are adding all kinds of items that have absolutely nothing to do with the war. The donks will add farm relief for California fruit farmers and Colorado livestock owners who were hurt when freezing temperatures and blizzards, no doubt the result of global warming, wiped out their products.
The spending package is for the war and the Democrats need to keep from adding non war items to it. If they want to spend taxpayer money on these other things they should introduce legislation to do so and see if it passes muster. I think that if they add to the bill George Bush should go on national TV and say that he is going to veto it because the Democrats added things that are not for the war and that they are not fulfilling their promises of being responsible. He could then say that America has this because they voted for a bunch of closet criminals. He might want to hurt them even more by pardoning Libby at the same time.
It is high time the President had line item veto authority so that these abuses can be stopped. Any member of Congress that feels froggy can contact me at any time so I can set you straight on what you are supposed to do. You seem to have forgotten, once again, that you work for us. I will be happy to set you straight.
If Flight 93 had made it to the Capitol this country would have been a lot better off than it is today. Instead, Congress does not care because they were not affected. They would prefer to play games with the lives of our men and women in uniform. Piss on Congress. They do not deserve the air they breathe.
Trackposted to The Virtuous Republic ♦ Perri Nelson’s Website ♦ Adam’s Blog ♦ basil’s blog ♦ Stuck On Stupid ♦ Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog ♦ The Amboy Times ♦ Conservative Cat ♦ Conservative Thoughts ♦ Pursuing Holiness ♦ Rightlinx, Faultline USA ♦ stikNstein… has no mercy ♦ Overtaken by Events, Pirate’s Cove ♦ Planck’s Constant ♦ The Pink Flamingo ♦ Dumb Ox Daily News ♦ Right Voices
Thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest, Political