Ellison Sends Muslims Veiled Message; Fight for Sharia Law
Dec 26, 2006 Political
I have written several times about Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress. I also expressed concern that when he swears in he will be swearing allegiance to the Muslim idea of converting everyone. He was at a rally of Muslims and I think he gave us a veiled message that he believes he is here to convert us:
“You can’t back down. You can’t chicken out. You can’t be afraid. You got to have faith in Allah, and you’ve got to stand up and be a real Muslim,” Detroit native Keith Ellison said to loud applause.
~snip~
“Muslims, you’re up to bat right now,” he said. “How do you know that you were not brought right here to this place to learn how to make this world better?” Detroit Free Press
Stand up and be a real Muslim is a very concerning issue because most Muslims believe that in order to be a real one you have to impose Sharia Law and you either have to convert or kill infidels. That is also the gist of his remark about being here to make the world better. To Muslims making the world better means making everyone a Muslim. This whole revival smacks of inciting Muslims to stand up in the name of Allah and take over America. Ellison had the benefit of the doubt from me when he was elected but now I am very suspicious of him.
I believe he is a covert agent for CAIR and the rest of the Muslim terrorist organizations and he is the point man for a movement designed to get enough Muslims in office so that they can obtain their goal of replacing the Constitution with the Koran. Fortunately he does not represent my district because I have a feeling only the Muslim agenda will get attention from this covert terror agent.
I also want to know where the ACLU and the rest of these separation idiots are. Here is a person who was elected to Congress telling a throng of zealots that they have to have faith in Allah and stand up and be real Muslims. He told them to be steadfast in their faith and push for justice. We know what justice the Muslims seek and Ellison is on the front lines of their battle to achieve it. Can you imagine how this would be attacked if a Christian politician stood before a crown of people chanting Jesus is our Savior while the politician declared that they had to stand up like good Christians and push for justice?
I do not trust Ellison and I think he will turn out to be another Muslim bad guy, but fortunately, on first contact with the enemy the point man is often eliminated.
Others writing about this:
Always on Watch | The Amboy Times | Jihadi Du Jour | Right Truth | MSNBC/NewsWeek
Bush Will Screw Up Immigration
Dec 25, 2006 Immigration, Political
There was always tepid support for an immigration bill that actually had any teeth. Democrats want ILLEGALS to have a direct path to citizenship and are willing to overlook the fact that laws were broken in order to secure the almighty vote, albeit at the expense of national security. Now that the Democrats are in charge it is a certainty that they will push to make America weaker while rewarding lawbreakers. They will give these lawbreakers a pass on infractions that would land a real citizen in jail.
Last year, under Republican leadership, a bill passed directing the erection of a 700 mile long wall on the southern border. The funding for that is in jeopardy as Democrats get set to run the country into the ground. Additionally, the Democrats will introduce legislation making it easier for all the law breakers to become citizens. Some Republican (as well as conservative Democratic) opposition is expected but the fact is we will likely have a watered down bill that basically grants amnesty to every ILLEGAL.
Where does President Bush stand on this? It is obvious that Bush is in favor of more robust immigration and that he supports some type of amnesty. His desire to establish the North American Union plays into his immigration position and in all likelihood, he will support an amnesty bill. Bush has turned from leading to worrying about his legacy. When any leader puts his legacy before the welfare of the nation the outcome can not be good. Clinton’s desire for a great legacy made him soft on terror and our national security and helped give us the mess we have today. Bush’s desire to ensure his legacy will give us similar problems because national security is taking a back seat to this desire to be remembered kindly by historians.
God help this nation. Our leaders are selling us out and it is only a matter of time before we are weakened to the point of disaster or are engaged in our own civil war. When that war comes, the politicians will find no safe refuge.
Source:
NYT
Tags: Political
Pelosi Tries to Shake Liberal Elitist Image
Dec 25, 2006 Political
Incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been plagued by her rivals with accusations that she is a San Francisco liberal elitist who is out of touch with the mainstream. Though Pelosi is very wealthy and is very liberal, she has worked hard to shake this image. So how does a rich liberal elitist shake the image of a rich liberal elitist? Why throw an elitist $1000 per ticket exclusive 4 day gala to celebrate her coronation. San Fran Nan will spend part of the time getting back to her roots in Baltimore where they will name a street after her.
Baltimore has a perfect street to name after Pelosi and that is Baltimore Street itself. The street has a history for a section known as the block. Back in the day it was filled with strip joints and prostitutes peddling their wares. This would be a great street to name after Pelosi given how she makes money for selling herself. Given the seedy history of the street it would fit her (or most politicians) perfectly.
Nancy Pelosi, Queen of the Block.
Source:
Times Online UK
Tags: Political
Time For Liberals To Stand up to Iran
Dec 23, 2006 Political
Ever since the United States invaded Iraq as part of the war on terror the liberals have been beating the same tired drum about going to the United Nations. The liberals have made an issue of the invasion by saying that George Bush did not go to the UN. He in fact did give the UN time to do things through diplomatic channels but the UN failed in its assigned duties. This should be no surprise because the UN had failed for the previous 14 years with regard to the sanctions imposed upon Iraq an, in fact, the UN’s leadership was profiting off the situation.
The left has been going bonkers with regard to Iran ans its pursuit of nuclear weapons. Iran has been enriching Uranium for years and was doing so even when they were supposed to have halted during negotiations. Last week Iran declared itself a nuclear nation and that can only mean they are a little closer to having a nuclear weapon. The world community threatened to impose sanctions through the UN and Iran threatened to retaliate if that happened. Despite some resistance from China and Russia (two countries with close ties to Iran) and last minute appeasement of Russia in its demands to soften a thing or two, the UN Security Council finally voted on sanctions against Iran.
Iran is not happy and is throwing a temper tantrum. In typical fashion for a Muslim country, Iran immediately rejected the resolution. The Muslim countries never follow UN rules or resolutions but are the first to whine if they think another country has done the same. The Muslims will jump in and tell everyone that others need to listen to the UN and follow resolutions and they are more than happy to point out every time they think that Israel has violated a rule or resolution. The fact is, Muslims continually violate the UN resolutions and they are violating several right now with regard to the animals in Hezbollah who are rearming under the noses of UN observers and are preparing to again attack Israel.
Iran has decided that they do not have to listen to the UN and that the sanctions are invalid.
The Iranian government immediately rejected the resolution, vowing in a statement from Tehran to continue enriching uranium, a technology that can be used to produce nuclear fuel for civilian purposes or for a nuclear bomb. The government said it “has not delegated its destiny to the invalid decisions of the U.N. Security Council.” My Way
It is now time for Liberals to stand up and demand that Iran follow the UN’s directions just as they have done to President Bush. The Liberals need to insist that Iran do what they are told to and that they listen to everything that they have been told by the Security Council. The Liberals will not do that because they only expect any Republican President to follow UN directions and to ask for permission before undertaking anything. They do not expect that of any other country, especially a Muslim country and they do not expect it of Democratic Presidents. Anyone recall seeing them give Clinton a hard time for by-passing the UN on the way to Bosnia?
When the threat of Iran became clearer there were many on the left complaining that we would now attack that country. Many of the left wing blogs predicted that we would illegally invade Iran and that we needed to go to the UN and do things the right way. The UN is the left’s panacea and they were demanding that Bush use it with regard to Iran. Well, we used the UN and the UN imposed sanctions which were promptly rejected. It is time for the Liberals to tell Iran to shut up and listen. It is also time for the left to realize that the UN is a toothless organization and countries are free to disregard what they say. It is also time to realize that we did it their way and, so far, the result is not very good. If we end up in a war with Iran the left can keep its mouth shut because we did it their way.
For their own sake, the left needs to convince Iran to listen or the entire country will finally see (though many moonbats will not comprehend) that their way does not work.
Tags: Political
When America Goes After Its Warriors
Dec 22, 2006 Military, Political
The outcome can never be good when the United States goes after its warriors on charges that they murdered innocent civilians especially when there is no indication that the warriors deliberately intended to kill said civilians. Unfortunately, America is a little less safe today than it was yesterday because the military has filed charges against eight Marines in connection with the deaths of 24 Iraqi civilians after a Marine was killed by a roadside bomb.
It is not unheard of for the military to investigate and, if necessary, charge its members with crimes and as a society we expect that. When military members line up civilians and kill them we expect them to be held accountable. The stress of battle does not give any one the right to line people up and gun them down (though in WWII that is what our troops did to Nazis running concentration camps). However, we must take great care to distinguish between wanton criminal acts and acts that occur during the heat of battle. This is where the case gets particularly murky because the Marines claim that they were fighting and did not deliberately target non-combatants.
The events surrounding the battle in Haditha are unclear to everyone except those who were actually there. We can not know what exactly happened and we can not know why those people were shot but those who were there say that they were fighting the enemy and that they were following the rules of engagement. Our troops were following the law of land warfare that is expected of them and is not practiced by our enemy. It seems our enemy is only covered by the rules when they complain after being captured. In any event, there does not seem to be a concerted effort on the part of these Marines to just go along killing civilians. Yes, civilians died and that is tragic but the fact is it happens sometimes in the heat of battle.
Charging these Marines sets a very dangerous precedent that will come back to haunt us, though the ramifications will likely be welcomed by the cut and run Democrats. You see, we are putting our men and women in danger because they have the additional burden of worrying about whether they will be charged when they defend themselves. That split second could cost many lives and will ultimately lead many in our military to decide against furthering their careers. Who wants to work for an organization that does not defend workers who are legitimately doing their jobs? It will hurt recruiting efforts because many potential recruits will be wary of getting accused of murder for doing their jobs. The left will love this because they will claim that it is a sign people are disenchanted with the war and do not want to serve (except of course for poor people who can not get another job or people who do not get an education).
Our government is obsessed with showing that it is tough on anything the Iraqis do not like. They go out of their way to ensure that all accounts from locals are received and those people are given greater credibility than the words of our warriors and that is just wrong. The Muslim world is a backwards place where people settle disputes by killing each other or making deals (usually involving money) to restore dignity. The people involved in this are likely looking for a payout from our government to restore the dignity of the families who lost loved ones. There is also motive on the parts of some to portray our military in a bad light in order to push them out and increase American resentment toward the war effort. I wonder if these people realize what will happen to them if we leave too soon?
I support the war effort and our troops and I stand behind the Marines charged in this whole fiasco. I call on the leaders in this government to stop witch hunts and allow our warriors to do their jobs unencumbered with worries about legal issues. Those who commit obvious criminal acts should be pursued and prosecuted but these hazy situations should always err on the side of our troops and not on the side of a population of liars and snake oil salesmen. If these men are found guilty I will no longer encourage the young people who ask about the military to join. I can not, in good conscience, put them in these kinds of situations.
Additionally, our government needs to take its head out of its rectal cavity and start worrying about the enemy and the way it breaks the law every chance it gets. We need to do one of two things. We need to go balls to the walls and kill as many as possible and exact our will on them or we need to leave. I am not for cutting and running but if they screw our warriors then I am all for pulling back to the border and letting the tribes there kill each other every day until none of them are left. Then we can go in and annex the country and take its oil.
When America stops defending its warriors there will be no warriors left to defend America. Our country will only be the land of the free so long as it remains the home of the brave and with cowards in government chasing after our warriors our time for freedom will soon be over.
Wake up America.
Source:
Breitbart
Tags: Political