Hillary Clinton Has Always Been A Radical
Sep 22, 2014 Political
Saul Alinsky was an ends justifies the means person and his Rules for Radicals basically spelled that out. Hillary Clinton was a disciple of Alinsky and wrote her college thesis about him.
She had a close relationship with him, sought him out, communicated with him and he had strong feelings about Hillary so much so his secretary opened a letter from Hillary so she would not have to wait two weeks (Alinsky was away) for a response if there was an urgent matter.
Hillary downplayed her adoration of Alinsky and claims she did not agree with some of his tactics and ideas. In her book she claimed that those differences led to a parting of ways in 1969 just before she went to law school.
Letters that have been recently released show that Clinton did not part ways in 1969 (over differences or any other reason) and that she remained in touch with him up until his death in 1972.
The aforementioned letter was written by Hillary in 1971 and she expressed that she survived law school and was in California and hoped that she could meet up with Alinsky should he happen to visit the state. Her letter stated that she “would love to see [Alinsky]” and for him to let her know if there was any chance of the two getting together.
The words in the letter hardly paint a picture of a person who parted ways over differences. Instead they paint a picture of a person who was an admirer. Keeping in touch with glowing words is hardly evidence of a parting of ways.
Hillary Clinton is a radical and she will say or do whatever she has to in order to obtain and keep power. Hillary lives by Alinsky’s 12 rules and the only reason she did not win the Democratic nomination (and likely the presidency) is because Barack Obama was better at using the rules than Hillary was. Well, he was at least as good and he had darker pigmentation and spoke more eloquently than she did.
Make no mistake, all these left wing radicals follow these rules and they do so in order to take control of your life. While Alinsky might have discussed the haves and the have nots and the imbalance between them the one thing that is overlooked is the elitists. They are the ones who lord over the haves and the have nots and bring some kind of calm to the storm the radicals stir up.
Clinton and Obama are two of those elitist radicals and their goal is to pit us against each other and to lord over us.
Hillary was and still is a radical and while she whitewashed her radical past and adoration of Alinsky the recently released letters paint a much different picture, one that all the whitewash in the world cannot cover.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: adoration, Hillary Clinton, letters, lies, rules for radicals, saul alinsky
Obamacare Is NOT Failing
Nov 7, 2013 Obamacare
Wayne Allyn Root explains quite well how Obamacare is not failing because it was designed to destroy the economy and enslave more people to government.
Root points out that Obama is a disciple of Saul Alinsky and as he goes through the list of what is happening and how it is by design and he points out that the tipoff that all of this is by design is the left calling the patriots terrorists.
This is in the Alinsky book Rules for Radicals; Call the other guy a terrorist to hide YOUR intentions…
Excerpt:
The GOP needs to stop calling ObamaCare a “trainwreck.” That means it’s a mistake, or accident. That means it’s a gigantic flop, or failure. It’s NOT.
This is a brilliant, cynical, and purposeful attempt to damage the U.S. economy, kill jobs, and bring down capitalism.
It’s not a failure, it’s Obama’s grand success.
It’s not a “trainwreck,” ObamaCare is a suicide attack. He wants to hurt us, to bring us to our knees, to capitulate- so we agree under duress to accept big government.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: communism, dependence, obamacare, patriots, radicals, saul alinsky, terrorists
A Tale Of Two Slut Victims
Mar 6, 2012 Political
Sandra Fluke, the 30 year old activist masquerading as a student, was labeled a slut by Rush Limbaugh. She claimed (even said “as you know”) that birth control costs $3000 for three years and that women in school could not afford it. I have already done the math and she would have to have sex 28 times a day to use that much money worth of condoms and she could buy pills for 28 years with that much money, so she lied. I would say she was misinformed but she is an activist. If she told people what it really cost then they would laugh her out of the place. She needed to make it a great number to excuse the violation of the First Amendment.
Limbaugh simply pointed out that we have names for women who want to be paid for sex or who would have sex as many times as required to use $3000 in birth control (in three years).
The left has come unhinged and is calling for Limbaugh’s sponsors to pull their ads. Some of them have and the left is pushing for the rest of them to do so. The reason has nothing to do with the so called war on women. The left couldn’t care less about Fluke. The real issue is the desire to get Limbaugh off the air. The left has been working to drive him off the air for years and now it is all ginned up over a phony issue.
Phony? How dare you Big Dog? Well, it is phony. The left has plenty of figures who call women all kinds of names. They are called c*nts, bitches, sluts, bimbos, and who knows what else? Bill Maher, David Letterman, and Ed Schultz have all used such language toward women and have suffered no ill effects. At least one of Limbaugh’s sponsors (Carbonite) still runs ads on Schultz’s show. Of course, the guy running it is a supporter of the left. He donates to liberals and to organizations run by George Soros, the same Soros who wants Limbaugh off the air.
Have you heard about any boycotts? Have you heard anyone call for companies to remove ads from these shows? Have you heard the left get its collective pink panties in a bunch about any of this?
No and you won’t because the women who were attacked are conservatives. Like I said, they don’t care about women, just ideology.
Laura Ingram even tells us that while the gaggle at The View is apoplectic over the words Limbaugh used Barbara Walters laughed off the same word used against Ingram. Ha, ha. It would seem Schultz’s apology, which was accepted by Ingram, was good enough for the hens at The View but Limbaugh (who apologized) is not sincere and needs to go.
This is a war on conservative talk. Limbaugh is the big target and the left is employing Saul Alinsky’s tactics from Rules for Radicals in order to get him.
Perhaps it will work, perhaps not. But so far Limbaugh seems to be doing OK.
And Carbonite’s stock is down 8% as of this writing.
Further more, we should be focused on Obama’s record and the needs of the country.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: apology, birth control, lies, phony charges, Rush Limbaugh, sandra fluke, saul alinsky, sex, slut