High Tech Lynching
Oct 31, 2011 Opinion
While the left screams about TEA Party members wanting blacks lynched (a baseless claim) the left is engaging in a high tech lynching of a black conservative. The story that Herman Cain was accused of sexual harassment and that an investigation turned up nothing has not stopped the left wing media (the Democrat wing) from lynching him. The baseless claims line up with the smear job The New York Times did in manufacturing (in 2008) the equally baseless claim that John McCain had an affair.
The left is very fast to jump on the lynch train when it comes to Herman Cain even though the allegations appear baseless. When it comes to their own they ignore the facts to provide protection.
Bill Clinton accused of rape and caught (and verified via DNA) having sex with an intern. He lied about it and the Democrats defended him during the impeachment he suffered for perjury. The left said it was a personal affair, a matter of sex between consenting adults. Nothing to see here so move along.
John Edwards is another example. He denied, denied, denied and then bam, the facts came out and not only did he have an affair while his poor wife was dying of cancer, he fathered a child. He was eventually shunned by his party but not until the evidence was so overwhelming (and sleazy) that there was no way to deny it.
Jesse Jackson, the paragon of virtue, fathered a child with someone that was not his wife. He is still regarded as a spokesperson for the disadvantaged minorities in this country (or those who have been told so often they are disadvantaged that they act like it).
We are all human beings and we all make mistakes. These men suffered their issues in public because of who they are. The untold numbers of people in the same situations are unknown to all except their family and friends because they do not live in the public’s eye.
The problem arises when allegations such as those against McCain and Herman Cain are manufactured and people do not give them the benefit of the doubt because of politics. Clinton and Edwards deny it so it must be false. Cain denies it and he is lying…
Wouldn’t it be better if the NYT did not make up the McCain story?
Wouldn’t it be better if Cain received the same consideration Clinton and Edwards did when the left kept telling us nothing was going on? It has not been shown that Cain did anything wrong. If it turns out that he did then fine, skewer him and send him on his way.
The idea that he needs to be ruined over baseless accusations is one of the things wrong in our political system.
It would have been nice though, if the MSM had spent as much time vetting Obama as it does looking to destroy Republicans.
Certainly there were a few things in Obama’s past that were liabilities. Of course they are not a problem when the MSM is burying legitimate stories.
Then again, the left only lynches blacks who have strayed away from the Democrat plantation.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: cain, Clinton, demoicrats, edwards, lies, McCain, msm, Obama, scandal, sex, vetting
NOW Finally Speaks Up
Oct 29, 2010 Political
The National Organization of Whores (NOW) is an interesting organization. Originally the National Organization of Women, it was supposed to be a group that fought for the rights of women. Unfortunately, the group only fights for liberal women. Let a liberal woman have some problem or get smeared and NOW is all over it. When the same happens to a conservative, well not so much.
I know the liberals will have an issue with my choice of words for NOW but I am using their criteria. When someone in Jerry Brown’s campaign called Meg Whitman a whore NOW ended up agreeing with the statement. NOW said that Whitman sold out to some group for its endorsement so that makes her a political whore.
Well, NOW only defends liberal women. It does the bidding of liberals, defends liberal men and ignores any affront to women when liberals are involved. In other words, the group has sold out to the liberals. By their reasoning with regard to Whitman, they are political whores.
Hope that clears it up for the limp wristed liberal men who will complain about the characterization. I only used NOW’s reasoning with regard to the issue. I used their own words against them.
The website Gawker has posted a story (a completely fabricated story) about Christine O’Donnell in which an anonymous person claims to have had a one night stand with the Senate candidate. The so called one night stand did not involve sex. It actually sounds like something one would read in the Penthouse Forum (to answer the obvious question; because I have read it).
In any event, when NOW was asked for its response a spokesperson said that NOW would pass on it. This was stated twice.
Some time later NOW issued a statement condemning Gawker for publishing a story that it claims is public sexual harassment. The response is not flattering, takes a shot at O’Donnell (using the term “slut-shaming”) and it makes quite clear that NOW endorsed O’Donnell’s opponent and that NOW is looking forward to her defeat.
I hardly call this supporting her. Of course, she is a conservative so this is the best she will get and the fact that anything was actually communicated is, in and of itself, quite astonishing.
The National Organization of Whores is a disgusting left wing liberal support group that will throw women overboard in order to defend liberal men.
Bill Clinton got a pass for sexually harassing Monica Lewinsky and NOW ignored the credible allegations of rape levied against him. Remember, Gennifer Flowers was called a lot of names for suggesting that she and Clinton had an affair. Years later it was discovered that she was telling the truth. Yet, Clinton was defended by NOW.
Listen up folks in Delaware. Please elect Christine O’Donnell to the Senate just to slap these people in their faces. This is a hit job on O’Donnell and it is fabricated.
I expect more of this before election day. Pay no attention to this unless there is concrete proof. Democrats will lie, cheat, and steal in order to win.
We must bounce them out on Tuesday.
Sources:
TSG
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: christine o'donnell, lies, NOW, sex, whore
The Jackson Does Not Fall Far From The Tree
Sep 22, 2010 Political
Looks like Jesse Jackson Jr has a little woman trouble on his hands. The trouble would be that he has to many women which might not set to well with his wife. Seems ole Jr had a woman flown in to “meet” with him and the flights were paid for by an outside source. This means Jr might have taken a gift and not reported it.
Lost in all this are new allegations that Jr was involved in the pay for play scheme that involved the Senate seat once held by Barack Obama. Yep. looks like Jr is as corrupt as his daddy and just as smooth with the women.
Not to worry though. Jr knows he has disappointed some of his supporters but he plans to continue to work hard for them.
I think he will be working hard to keep his job which is his number one concern.
Then again, he did work hard for at least one supporter…
Source:
Chicago Sun Times
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: daddy's boy, illegal, jesse jackson, lies, sex
Harry Reid Sexes Up The Senate
May 6, 2010 Political
No one in his right mind thinks of sex and soon to be FORMER Senator Harry Reid but Reid introduced sex into the debate on Wall Street reform. The Democrats, who get more money from Wall Street than Republicans, want to impose restrictions on Wall Street to keep another meltdown from happening and to keep the taxpayer from paying for more bailouts. The bill will not do that but that will not stop the Democrats.
Yes, the people who put the rules that caused the meltdown in place are making more rules.
Of course the left likes to paint Republicans as being in the pockets of the Wall Street executives. Sure, there are some but Wall Street is deeper in the pockets of Democrats.
Harry Reid tried to paint the Republicans as being in bed with Wall Street:
Reid charged that Republicans are stalling action on a Wall Street reform bill because “they are having difficulty determining how they’re going to continue making love to Wall Street” by resisting banking regulation. The Hill
Well Harry, you can keep trying to paint Republicans as being in bed with Wall Street by claiming they are making love to that entity.
It might be true and it might not.
But it is absolutely true that your side will screw Wall Street.
And the American public along with it.
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: Democrats, Harry Reid, lies, Republicans, sex, wall street
Hillary Then And Now
Jan 22, 2010 Political
In 1998 when Bill Clinton’s sex scandal was the big news, news that broke because Matt Drudge posted it after it was quashed in the MSM, Hilary had an opinion about the Internet. Hillary said she did not know what she was in favor of but it sounded like she favored some kind of regulation.
…I don’t know what — that’s why I said I don’t know what I’m in favor of. And I don’t know enough to know what to be in favor of, because I think it’s one of those new issues we’ve got to address. We’ve got to see whether our existing laws protect people’s right of privacy, protect them against defamation. And if they can, how do you do that when you can press a button and you can’t take it back. So I think we have to tread carefully. Drudge Report
Hillary said that without some kind of gatekeeping function it was difficult to defend a reputation. It probably did not occur to her that Bill’s reputation was hurt when he had the affair and then lied about it. If he had been telling the truth then it would have been Drudge’s reputation that needed to be defended.
Thirteen years later and with news of China continuing to censor the Internet, Ms. Clinton still has an opinion though it is different than it was back then.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Thursday called for an unfettered worldwide Internet and urged global condemnation of those who conduct cyber attacks, as China sought to contain tension with the United States over the hacking and censorship of Google.
“A new information curtain is descending across much of the world,” she said, calling growing Internet curbs the modern equivalent of the Berlin Wall.
“We stand for a single Internet where all of humanity has equal access to knowledge and ideas,” said Clinton in a major address that cited China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt among countries that censored the Internet or harassed bloggers. Yahoo News
Well things have certainly changed with regard to her position on this.
Did it change because the scandal left Bill relatively unscathed and now China is the focus?
What do you think prompted her position reversal? I would be interested to read your opinions in the comment section.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: china, Clinton, Hillary, internet, monica, restrictions, scandal, sex