Funny How Obama’s Tune Changed
Apr 7, 2011 Political
Barack Obama took office as a wet behind the ears rookie with so little experience and so many words that calling him an empty suit was an insult to empty suits. He showed up with his bird chest pumped out ready to take on the world. He had majorities in both chambers of Congress and things were going to be his way. He thought so because he believed the hype about himself. It is a good thing (for him) that he did not try to walk on water.
Believing and doing are two different things.
After taking office Obama was challenged by a Republican on the contents of a package and Obama’s response as to why it would be a certain way; “I won.” To interpret that for you, Obama said it is my way or the highway.
After two years of driving us over the cliff and advancing toward Socialism the American public had enough of this upstart and his sock puppets in Congress and they sent him a very clear message. Obama and his Democrats lost a lot of seats in a historical midterm election that changed the balance of power. Now that Obama does not have majorities all over government, majorities that blamed its failures on Republicans, he has a slightly different tune. In a speech today he told the audience that Republicans cannot have it their way and that this is not how it works.
“At a time when you are struggling to pay your bills and meet your responsibilities, the least we can do to meet our responsibilities is produce a budget. That is not too much to ask for. That is what the American people expect of us, that’s what they deserve. You want everybody to act like adults, quit playing games and realize it is not my way or the highway,” President Obama said in Pennsylvania before he is set to hold a fundraiser tonight. Real Clear Politics
Perhaps an appropriate GOP response to Mr. Obama would be; “we won.”
You see, this is how Democrats work. When they are in charge then things have to go their way and they do not care about anyone or anything. The last Congress made that clear when it passed Obamacare, the unconstitutional law, over the wishes of the majority of Americans. They wanted it and they did not want to hear any other opinion. To them, it was their way or the highway. Democrats went against the will of the people while ignoring the jobs situation and suffering a net job loss over that period of time.
As soon as Democrats lose though, they want to talk about bipartisan compromise and working together. They start whining like a room full of Chuck Schumers about how the other side is not playing nice, blah, blah. They did not want to play nice when they had control and they said, on a number of occasions, we won and it is our way or the highway.
Now they have to eat humble pie and suck it up because, to be quite frank, we won and it is our way or the highway.
America is on a path to financial ruin which has been a long time coming but has been accelerated by a man who has spent more money in two years than all the presidents from Washington to Reagan combined!
[I stated this incorrectly. It should read:
In the first 19 months of the Obama administration, the federal debt held by the public increased by $2.5260 trillion, which is more than the cumulative total of the national debt held by the public that was amassed by all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan. CNS
I regret the error]
Now the adults are in charge because THEY WON and it is time for the Democrats to step aside and let them get down to the business of bringing fiscal sanity back to our country.
It is also important to remember, particularly as all the Democrats are out screaming about a government shut down and troops not getting paid, that the Democrats are entirely responsible for this. They had the majorities when the 2011 budget was due and they punted the ball. They refused to pass a budget because they were afraid to do anything prior to the election. If they had done their duty and passed a budget we would not be having this discussion right now and the Congress could be working on other important things.
To the victor goes the spoils and while Obama does not espouse that attitude now he certainly did back when he was still messianic.
Fortunately, he does not get to dictate how the game is played. It works how we want it to work because:
WE WON
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Murkowski and the Senate
Nov 5, 2010 Political
Now I realize that to many people the election in Alaska isn’t quite over. But, for all practical purposes, it is. Joe Miller is only showing up with 34% of the vote, while “write-ins” are 40%. Since the board of elections has already said they’re going for intent and that anything close will count (Lisa M, Mercowskii, etc.), unless 10% of the people wrote-in “Mickey Mouse,” she’s going to win. I will be curious to see how that pans out in DC.
You see, Lisa Murkowski lost her primary election in Alaska to Joe Miller. The Republicans in the state of Alaska voted for Joe Miller. The Republicans in Alaska did not vote for Lisa Murkowski. To win the general election, Murkowski turned to bribery — most of her support was from unions, native corporations, and state employees. These are all groups that will be paid back with cash from her votes. She made many liberal promises and ran on the idea that she will increase spending in Washington. In other words, she ran on the platform of the Democrat Party, and she was rejected by the Republican Party of Alaska.
However, Murkowski has repeatedly said that if elected, she will be a Republican, she will attempt to represent Alaskan Republicans, and she will caucus with Republicans. Why would she do this? One word: seniority. She is the ranking member of one committee and one sub-committee. The longer you remain, the more power you get. And she certainly wants more power. And, in all likelihood, she will remain (although strangely enough on the current Republican Senate Leadership page, she doesn’t show up at all). But should she?
In my humble opinion, I think the Republicans in the Senate should tell her, “Gee, I’m sorry, but you do not represent Republicans. You lost Republican support in your state. Sure, we’d like your support on our issues, but since you don’t represent the Republicans from Alaska, you’re not part of the Republicans in the Senate.” She should then appear as an independent on the rolls. I’m not holding my breath, but that would show that the Republicans in the Senate are principled and understand what just happened in this election. By taking her back, knowing her positions, and knowing she ran on the Democrat platform, the Republicans in the Senate will show that party affiliation doesn’t matter, principles don’t matter, just win and you’ll be on the team — and that there really is no difference between the two parties.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: alaska, miller, murkowski, sore loser