Will The Real Barry Obama Please Stand Up?
Jul 18, 2016 2016 Election, Political, Terrorism
Just some thoughts on Obama and his response to police officers who have been murdered at the hands of terrorists from the terror group, Black Lives Matter.
Before I get to his words I would like to point out that Obama is either very stupid, blind, or deliberately ignorant of reality. Every time one of these things happens the murderer tells us why he did it (or tells us why he is going to do it) but Obama (or should we call him oblivious) says “we don’t really know the killer’s motivation.” It is going on now with the cop murders and it happens when there is a terror attack by ISIS or some other Islamic terrorist. They scream we hate America and we are doing this in the name of ISIS and Allah to avenge (fill in the blank) and Obama tells us we don’t know why they did it…
Hell, the guy could hire a plane to tow a banner saying why he did it, put it on all social media, give interviews with the media and send out cards in the mail and Obama would tell us we don’t know why he did it…
Of course, Obama is always ready to tell us why cops did what they did long before any facts are in. He might say they acted stupidly….
Now on to the response from Obama on the latest terror attack by BLM.
Obama said that we need to stop using inflammatory rhetoric:
We don’t need inflammatory rhetoric. We don’t need careless accusations thrown around to score political points or to advance an agenda. We need to temper our words and open our hearts … all of us.
This would be the same Obama who said this about how he would counter Republican attacks:
If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.
I am pretty sure that this remark would be considered inflammatory and designed to score political points…
But, but, but Obama is a great guy. Look at how he supported the Dallas police officers by referring to himself a lot and by telling us how cops can be better and that guns are the problem…
He even had some words about attacking police officers after the BLM terrorist murdered three in Baton Rouge:
Attacks on police are an attack on all of us and the rule of law that makes society possible.
Obama is the one who has blood on his hands. He has blamed the police for these issues and he has been one of the first to blame them when a black person is shot by police (most times the shooting is warranted). He is the one who fans the flames of racism and victimhood. He might tell people that attacks on police are an attack on all of us but he blames the police for this mess and says they need to admit they are the problem:
There are legitimate issues that have been raised, and there’s data and evidence to back up the concerns that are being expressed by these protesters.
And if police organizations and departments acknowledge that there’s a problem and there’s an issue, then that, too, is going to contribute to real solutions. And, as I said yesterday, that is what’s going to ultimately help make the job of being a cop a lot safer. It is in the interest of police officers that their communities trust them and that the kind of rancor and suspicion that exists right now is alleviated.
You cops got that? You have a problem and you have to admit it in order to be safe. This kind of talk gives the radical BLM terrorists their cues. They hear what Obama said and they don’t hear cops saying they have a problem so to them it means they can attack because Obama said cops can’t be safer until they fess up.
Obama has caused a lot of this strife. He has fanned the flames of racism and he has encouraged the violence that is taking place. He started an open season on law enforcement and his words still reflect his belief that they are the problem.
It is going to get a lot worse before it gets better.
Keep in mind though, the violence you see is caused by liberals who follow the ideology of Obama and his ilk. Any violence at the Republican convention will be caused by liberals, not the Republicans…
God help the US because we sure need it after eight years of Satan in the White House.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Note To Libs: Muskets Were Weapons Of War
Jun 20, 2016 Second Amendment, Terrorism, Tyranny
Every time there is a shooting in this country, that is every time some deranged liberal or Muslim terrorist shoots a bunch of people, there is always a cry to ban guns. The left wants to ban all firearms in this country regardless of what they say.
Make no mistake about that, they want to ban all firearms and all private ownership. They will do it incrementally but their end goal is a complete ban. If you listen to them you can hear them saying it. One only needs to hear them say we need what Australia has to know they want private ownership to end or be so difficult that no one has anything more powerful than a pea shooter.
The issue is not the gun, it is not the background checks, and it is not the availability of guns or the alleged ease with which a person can buy one (this ease all depends on where you live).
[tip]The firearm used was not an AR 15 though anti gun nuts keep calling it that and showing pictures of one when they appeal to the masses. They want control and nothing else.[/tip]
Removing all guns will not end gun violence and the liberal model of Australia shows us that crime will actually rise as all other categories of crime did in that nation. Background checks exist and every time a person who bought a gun legally uses it to harm others liberals scream we need expanded background checks. What do they actually hope to find that government (the entity conducting the checks) does not already have access to? The government has failed in doing background checks when it fails to discover the future motives of people.
Sound ridiculous? That is what government wants you to believe it can accomplish with “expanded” background checks. It wants you to believe that it can tell what a person will do in the future if only we could look a little deeper.
The reality is most of the gun crimes committed are done by people with illegally purchased firearms and legal gun owners account for a small fraction of the murders.
It is also important to note that the government conducted a background check on the Islamic terrorist who shot up the gay night club and said he could own a gun. They said nothing in his background kept him from buying the firearm. If that is true then we just have a case of a person who had not done anything wrong deciding to do so. That happens all the time in our country though the case of legal firearms owners doing so is rare.
When these things happen we get this outcry of people who want more gun control as if restricting those who follow the law will stop those who don’t. It is more convenient to blame a gun than it is to blame the liberal moron, or in this case the Islamic terrorist, who pulled the trigger. Liberals would rather moan about one guy with a gun and claim him as the problem rather than seeing the issue was the 150 people who did not have a gun. Even if half of the club goers were carry permit holders they were banned from having their firearms in the club. Evidently the Muslim terrorist did not follow that law either.
Look, the reality is bad people do bad things and we can’t predict when they will but we can’t infringe on the rights of the law abiding as some feel good measure to make liberal bed-wetters think they are doing good. We also can’t allow liberal (and sadly some alleged conservative) politicians to take away our rights. Doing so will allow them to control us instead of us controlling them.
When they take away your means to resist they will then do as they wish, just ask some old German and Jewish folks about that.
The problem is not the firearm, it is the person using it illegally (and to some extent politicians who refuse to allow law abiding people to carry firearms). We do not ban cars or alcohol because people drink and drive. We don’t say that some person might drink and drive so he can’t own a car or buy alcohol. We don’t do these things even though more people die in alcohol related accidents than are murdered with firearms. In these cases we hold the driver responsible for his actions.
Blaming firearms for the shooting at the night club is like blaming the planes for 9/11.
I am also tired of hearing liberals tell us we don’t need these assault weapons or these weapons of war.
[note]Alan Grayson, a moron politician and wife beater from Florida, claimed that these firearms could shoot 700 rounds a minute. A semi-automatic firearm’s rate of fire depends on how fast the shooter can squeeze the trigger. To shoot 700 rounds a minute the shooter would have to squeeze the trigger almost 12 times a second and that does not include the time to change magazines. Misinformed people are easy to control and government is doing the misinforming because it wants to control people. Though in this case it is likely Grayson, who is unintelligent, does not know.[/note]
First of all, there are no assault weapons. Assault is an action and people commit that action. They use many things to do so but whatever they use is not an assault item.
Second, all firearms can be weapons of war. In fact, the musket was a weapon of war and everyone had a musket. Obviously the Founders made no distinction and neither should we.
The important words are shall not be infringed. There is no qualifier, no sentence about weapons of war or only if you need or only if government says it is ok or anything else. The words are the right of the PEOPLE (all citizens) to keep and bear arms (to have and to carry) shall not be infringed.
Remember, the people telling you that you don’t need these firearms are surrounded and protected by people who have these firearms.
How many more Islamic terror attacks are we going to allow before Obama is held accountable?
The gun is not the problem. Anti-gun politicians, Muslim terrorists and bad people are the issue. But keep pushing for gun control and one day there will be pushback and you will not like it at all.
We will not comply.
MOLON LABE
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: firearms, gun control, islam, lies, Obama, Second Amendment, terror
Paris Foreshadows Our Future
Nov 14, 2015 Opinion, Religion of Peace, Terrorism
Yesterday Islamic terrorists conducted a coordinated attack across Paris leaving hundreds injured and at least 127 dead. Reports indicate that five terrorists caused the deaths of these folks. No society can sustain a ratio of 127:5 in a battle against and enemy.
It is no coincidence that France has opened its borders to huge numbers of Islamic refugees and it is no secret that France has allowed huge numbers of Muslims to move into its country. They invited the enemy in and now that enemy has bitten the hand that was offered in peace.
Barack Obama refused to call this attack Islamic terror and he is working hard to speed up the movement of refugees to the US. There is no doubt these refugees are full of Islamic terrorists who want to infiltrate our country (among others) and who want to raise hell and MURDER us. Any leader who witnessed what happened in France and pushes harder for these refugees is either woefully ignorant or complicit in the scheme. Barack Obama is not a stupid man so that leaves us with the stark reality that he is helping invaders arrive here.
Obama needs these kinds of things to happen here in order to put government in complete control of our lives. In France they now have what amounts to martial law and Obama is salivating at the opportunity to do the same thing here. He wants to control us and he wants us broken so he can “transform this nation” (his words, not mine). He needs this and it is all part of the Cloward-Piven strategy.
Look how quickly the French submitted after the attack. We are under curfew and the military is policing us. Stay in like good subjects and obey our betters.
We had a run through of this on a smaller scale when the two terrorists bombed the Boston Marathon. The area where the terrorists were running was closed and people were pulled from their homes as police searched their houses for the bad guys. No one was allowed out and businesses shut down while the police conducted building to building and house to house searches. Lord help any homeowner who refused entry to the police.
All of this for two terrorists who were free to run and could attack at will because, in part, of the gun laws in Massachusetts. Imagine how this would have played out in a place like Texas or Arizona…
The terrorists are getting better at what they do. Obama might call them the JV team and say they are contained but this is all a bunch of lies. They executed a coordinated attack in Paris and had such good operational security that no intelligence agency picked up chatter about the attacks. There are reports that our own Intelligence Agency had no warning. This secrecy allowed the terrorists to execute multiple attacks on multiple targets at the same time.
This is coming to America and Obama is rushing it along. We already have a number of Islamic terrorist training camps in this country and he is pushing to allow more terrorists to enter disguised as refugees.
Don’t worry, he says, they will be properly vetted. The bombers in Boston were vetted by the government. Hell, in all the mass murders in our country where some leftist whack job shoots a bunch of people that person was vetted by our government. Edward Snowden and every traitor who sold classified information was vetted by our government.
How on earth does anyone think the government will be able to properly determine the status of the refugees?
The reality is our government can’t and that is what the terrorists are counting on. Obama knows this but he has to blow smoke up the behinds of Americans to make it seem all is well. He needs buy in so he can import the kind of terror that will finally allow him complete control.
The events in Paris foreshadowed what will happen here. I know folks say it could never happen here but it will and it will be huge. Imagine coordinated attacks not in one city but in dozens of American cities at the same time. DC, Boston, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Chicago, and countless others, particularly those with large populations, could all be hit at the same time causing mass chaos and confusion. Government would impose martial law and our freedom would be flushed down the drain.
And Obama is importing the means to do it.
France is vowing to go after those who did this and that is admirable but it is too little too late. That country imported the terrorists and now it is paying a heavy price. An adage about a horse and a barn door comes to mind.
Governments are reactive not proactive so there usually has to be some tragic event before anything is done. France is closing its borders and going after those who did this AFTER the fact. The US went after the terrorists AFTER 9-11 and we will pretend to do so after the next attack.
We need to be proactive and eliminate the threat NOW. Stop the refugees from coming in, deport those who are already here, build a wall on our border (and while we are at it deport the illegals).
The attacks are going to come. America is the prime target for these animals and our leaders are helping them. The youth of the nation is, by and large, more concerned with “free” stuff than safety and our so called leadership is hell bent on control. The rest of those who are still asleep are concerned with a myth about man-made climate change so they are too busy to see what lies ahead.
The III% needs to be prepared because a storm is coming.
You can pretty much bet on that…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Maybe If They Blow Up A Golf Course
Aug 28, 2014 Terrorism
There are rumblings that one of the Al Qaeda offshoot groups is planning to attack somewhere in the US. An Al Quada magazine has posted instructions on how to make a car bomb and suggests targets of casinos (particularly in Vegas), oil tankers and military colleges. ISIS has stated several times that it is coming here and that the streets will run with our blood.
I am sure that many in the government are paying attention to these threats. I wonder though, if Obama is paying attention.
He is protected around the clock and he lives in a bubble. The rest of us are open to the world and if you live in a place like Maryland you are a target for any bad guy because the governor and his minions have infringed on our Second Amendment right.
I don’t think Obama takes this stuff seriously. If he did Benghazi might never have happened. He is wrapped up in his own little world where he thinks he is well liked and looked at with respect. Hell, he probably has some sympathies for the causes of those who are out to harm us.
I imagine the only way these terrorists will get his attention is if they start blowing up golf courses.
Once that happens Obama will lose his mind. Thousands of citizens blown up would be no big deal to him but let the bad guys start destroying golf courses and all bets are off.
I can see Obama now standing on top of Golf Cart One with a bullhorn screaming; “I hear you, the putting greens hear you and pretty soon the terrorists who blew up this golf course will hear you.”
The problem is not so much that Obama is on the golf course as much as it is he has his head buried in the sand trap.
I guess if we are attacked he has his fallback position.
Its Bush’s fault…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: al-qaeda, golf course, Obama, terror
Mandela: Paying Respect To A Tyrant
Dec 11, 2013 Commentary, Terrorism
Nelson Mandela of South Africa died last week and leaders from around the world journeyed to that country to pay respect to the man. There were plenty of nice things said about him. Barack Obama took the time to pay respect and then tell us that we should follow Mandela’s example:
We, too, must act on behalf of justice. We, too, must act on behalf of peace. There are too many of us who happily embrace Madiba’s legacy of racial reconciliation, but passionately resist even modest reforms that would challenge chronic poverty and growing inequality. ~Obama speech
I guess we should follow this because everyone knows that South Africa has no poor people and that poverty has been eradicated there and we know that everyone is treated equally.
No, the reality is that nation is poor, is always involved in some kind of internal conflict and the only people who get rich are leaders like Mandela.
There is an excellent article Crisis Magazine that lays out the history of Mandela and his tyranny. It also discusses how he was not just some political prisoner. He was tried for crimes including terrorism and sent to prison. The article discusses the entire man and not just the saintly image presented by the media and those who praise him. Here is an excerpt:
Within South Africa, on direct orders from Winnie and Nelson Mandela, the ANC targeted not only whites, but also all black civil servants, teachers, lawyers, and businessmen—essentially anyone who imagined a post-Apartheid South Africa that differed from the one mandated by the Marxist ANC. Even simple black peasants who refused to carry out terror attacks were treated as enemies, and they were killed in large numbers. Thus, just as the terroristic FLN killed far more Algerians than did the French during the Algerian war for independence, the ANC was the leading cause of death, by far, for black South Africans throughout the period of Apartheid.
He was no saint for sure. He was a brutal murderer and he used violence to push his political agenda. He went to jail for that.
It is no surprise Barack Obama would love the guy. He is a lot like Obama’s buddy Bill Ayers…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: child murderer, nelson mandela, terror, tyranny