Terrorists Speak While Patriots are Attacked
Sep 22, 2007 Uncategorized
Columbia University has decided that Iranian President Ahmadeinejad will be allowed to speak at the university and will have a question and answer session. Ahmadinejad will deliver a speech that is described as controversial. He will probably talk badly about President bush while telling the students how good Americans are but are being led by a bad man, as opposed to this guy who is determined to wipe Israel off the map. He will discuss his views on the Holocaust (he says it never happened) and he will certainly try to enlighten those students who decide to attend. The Dean of Columbia said that he would give Hitler a platform if he were alive and in New York. The only thing I want to know is if the students who attend Ahmadinejad’s speech will riot and chase him off the stage and if they do, will they be arrested (or tasered)?
You see, this very university invited the founder of the Minutemen in to speak and a bunch of students attacked him and he had to leave via a side door. The students then unfurled a banner that read No one is ever ILLEGAL in both Arabic and English. They then chanted yes we could in Spanish. The Republican club invited Minutemen founder Jim Gilchrist and they never really got the chance to hear him speak because Columbia students showed once again that speech is only free if it is what they want to hear. I would be interested to see how the Republican club handles Ahmadinejad. I would like to see them give him the same treatment and then dare the school to do anything about it since it set the precedent with Jim Gilchrist.
Ideally, the students would stay away from the speech and Ahmadinejad would talk to an empty room but since there are many liberal students with mush filled heads there will no doubt be a lot in attendance. I really would like to see this get out of hand in the very same fashion that it did when Gilchrist spoke. I want to see the Dean and his people explain the situation especially if they handle it differently than they did in the past.
Perhaps it is fitting that Ahmadinejad is speaking at Columbia. Ahmadinejad is from a country that does not allow free speech to its citizens but he loves to come here and exercise free speech to Americans and Columbia, much like Iran, does not allow free speech if the message does not agree with the liberal prattle that they teach.
What say young Republicans? How about tearing the place up a bit. Even attending and shouting down this jackass would be a good thing and it would be nice to see if Columbia uses the University of Florida method to quiet those in dissent.
Source:
Stop the ACLU
Sometimes unrelated trackbacks to: Stop the ACLU, Outside the Beltway, Right Pundits, Is It Just Me?, Rosemary’s Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, 123beta, Right Truth, Shadowscope, Nuke’s News & Views, Webloggin, Phastidio.net, The Amboy Times, Cao’s Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Conservative Cat, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The World According to Carl, The Pink Flamingo, CommonSenseAmerica, Right Voices, Church and State, Public Eye, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Tags: Commentary, Link Fest, Terrorism
Maybe We Should Riot for What We Want
Sep 9, 2007 Uncategorized
I have written a number of times about the plan of Islam to take over the world and how that plan includes causing so many problems for people so they will not make noise in the future. This will allow the Muslims to push forward while meeting little resistance. We have seen this time and again as the media and businesses avoid anything that might offend a Muslim so as to keep the Muslims from rioting and crying about how insensitive we are. They never take responsibility for their behavior because it is always the racists who hate Islam who are causing the problem. Imams acted like terrorists and caused a disturbance on an airplane and Ibrahim Hooper and the rest of the idiots at CAIR went nuts.
Just recently, the Washington Post refused to run two strips of the cartoon Opus because it had material that might be offensive to Muslims. The Washington Post does not hesitate to publish items that Christians find offensive. It seems that no business or media outlet ever considers the feelings of any group that does not worship a child molester prophet. Artists who are supported with our tax dollars routinely make “art” that is offensive to Christians. Calls to stop funding these artists lead to discussions of free speech and expression (it is not free if I am paying for it. I get a say if it is my money) yet these very people dismiss any idea of free speech if such speech could upset a Muslim. There was a recent photo or painting that depicted Osama bin Laden as Jesus. Did Christians riot over that?
Perhaps non Muslims need to start bringing violence to the table. It is obvious that the government and the media do not care how non Muslims feel and only worry about offending that one group of people. Imagine Christians rioting in a courthouse because of some ruling that removed a Cross or other Christian symbol? Maybe if a half a million or so tore down one of the New York museums with a Jesus in urine display and destroyed millions in old art they might listen.
I think these methods are a bit archaic (which explains why those backwards Muslims use them) and represent a step in the wrong direction but our government and the media as well as many businesses have shown us that this is the only thing they respond to. We can show these folks the Constitution and they still remove our right to the free exercise or our religion. We are assaulted in court by judges who legislate from the bench and we are supposed to smile while it happens. All the while Muslims have foot baths built, prayer rooms designated, and old practices (like eating at our desks) removed because they find it offensive.
Well, I find Islam offensive and I believe that if this is the kind of action that is given credence then it will not be long until there is a physical clash of cultures in this country. Allah will not be able to help those worshipers of the child molester.
Source:
Federalist Patriot
Tags: Commentary, Terrorism
I Agree With CAIR
Aug 22, 2007 Uncategorized
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is upset with its designation as an unindicted co-conspirator and blames the Justice Department for the decrease in donations to the organization. CAIR wants to be removed from the list:
“The public naming of CAIR as an unindicted co-conspirator has impeded its ability to collect donations as possible donors either do not want to give to them because they think they are a ‘terrorist’ organization or are too scared to give to them because of the possible legal ramifications of donating money to a ‘terrorist’ organization,” CAIR said in an amicus curiae brief filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Washington Times
While I agree that their donations are down, I disagree with CAIR that this designation keeps people from giving because they think the organization is terrorist, I think people are not giving because they KNOW CAIR is a terrorist organization. CAIR is a front group for terrorists and people recognize this fact.
What I do agree with CAIR about is that they do not belong on the unindicted co-conspirator list. This is an unfair designation and one that CAIR does not deserve. CAIR should be on the indicted co-conspirator list and they should be removed from this country because of their support of terrorist groups. CAIR also uses economical terror by suing people who write bad things about them thereby using coercion to get people to stop. CAIR sues people for exercising the very right that CAIR exploits in its quest to impose Sharia Law on us.
I don’t care for CAIR and I wish our government would assign it the proper designation by indicting the organization and its officials. CAIR should be happy to be an unindicted co-conspirator because that is a great career builder.
Look what it did for Jack Murtha…
Tags: Terrorism
Ibrahim Hooper and CAIR want to Intimidate Americans
Jul 26, 2007 Uncategorized
The Council for American and Islamic Relations is an inappropriately named organization because the only thing this organization does is foster ill will toward Muslims by playing the victim and trying to intimidate Americans. Ibrahim Hooper, the Communications Director for this terrorist front group was on MSNBC defending the Imams who were removed from the airplane after they acted suspiciously. Hooper says that the only way that we will know if the people who made the complaints were being malicious is to take them to court to find out. Hooper completely defends this idea and cannot see the irony in the case. The only way to determine if the Imams were up to no good was to pull them off the plane and check them out. Maybe the Imams can be sued for filing a malicious lawsuit. Hooper is a piece of pig crap and should have bacon grease rubbed all over him and then be thrown in a pit with Michael Vick’s dogs. Better yet, he should be fed to a bunch of hungry hogs and have the whole thing filmed so we could show it during Ramadan. Now that is a You Tube that would be worth watching.
Here is the exchange:
Read the rest of this entry »
How to Handle Terror Threat Against US
Jul 14, 2007 Uncategorized
The US State Department has issued a warning that American buildings in Israel are being targeted by suicide bombers. The warning indicates that US citizens should leave and to exercise caution.
The American State Department has issued a warning Saturday to citizens and residents of the US living in Israel.
The warning was released after information was received that suicide bombings were planned against American institutes, restaurants and businesses in Israel that are connected to the US, especially in Jerusalem. Ynet
The US must have an idea of who is planning the attacks and what country they come from. Our government should warn that country that if any of our assets are bombed we will retaliate against that country with round the clock carpet bombing until nothing is left standing and then, if it is an oil producing country, we will enter and take the oil for our own use.
This will only be effective if we, as a country, have the stomach for such action. It is evident that the Democrats do not have the security of our nation at heart and that they lack the strength to be tough on sponsors of terror. Regardless, we should be willing to make the country that houses these terrorists pay and pay dearly for any terrorist act against us. These countries and the terrorists from them only understand force and by bombing them back to the stone age we will signal that we are done tippy toeing around and that we will use overwhelming power to obliterate these people.
It will only take one such response to get people’s attention and make them understand that we mean business. No other country will want to suffer that fate. As for the N and any idea of disproportional use of force, screw them.
Enough is enough. We need to show these terrorists and their sponsors what military might actually means.
Tags: Commentary, Terrorism