Al Sharpton Is Democrats’ House Negro
Nov 22, 2008 Political
The Reverend Al Sharpton, who does not appear to be a real reverend or a religious man, is the House Negro for the Democratic Party. I make this statement because it is evident, as I have reported many, many times, Sharpton is not interested in racial equality and he is not interested in ensuring that everyone is held to the same standards. He does not hold himself to the same standards depending upon the situation.
Sharpton will gladly protest anytime there is news or a report of a black person being wronged by a white person. Sharpton has been involved in a few of these protests even though the entire story was a lie. Sharpton has incited violence and people have been killed because of his big mouth. Sharpton hates Jews and he only tolerates the whites in the Democratic party who can help him with his race hustling business.
Now Sharpton has gotten his panties in a wad because al Qaeda referred to Barack Obama as a House Negro. Sharpton was on Bill O’Reilly’s show and he said that this was a derogatory, racist term and that he would say that NO MATTER who had made the comments. Al Sharpton is upset that our nation’s enemies would insult our president and call him a racist name. I never heard Sharpton defend Bush when the enemy called him names but that is a post for another time.
Yep, the race hustler in chief, Al Sharpton, is upset that a terrorist group called President Elect Hussein a racist name but Al seems to have forgotten that House Negro is exactly how he described Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell when asked how they (and other leaders like them) were viewed by the black community. This was back in 2007 and Al has had a lot on his plate in that time so he probably forgot.
He told O’Reilly that he would call it racist no matter who said it. Of course he was talking about who said it about Obama. Would he call himself racist for saying it about Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell?
Of course he won’t because they are Republicans (and Powell had not come back on the plantation yet). The race hustlers like Sharpton cover for the racists in their own party and they apply a double standard when it comes to Republicans. [begin sarcasm] God knows, no respectable black would ever be a hard working Republican when he can join the Democrats and be used for political gain [end sarcasm].
Guys like Sharpton are the House Negros for the Democratic party. “Yessur Massa Hussein. I’s be a good negro fo you and makes sho I’s only points out things dat heps ya.”
Sharpton has done as much to harm race relations in this country as the KKK (a Democratic organization).
The terrorists wanted Hussein because he is weak
And as a public service, here is a newsflash for the left. Al Qaeda is our enemy, and as such, we expect them to say bad things about our president. The reason this comes as a shock to morons like Sharpton is because al Qaeda and all the other terrorists supported Obama and wanted him to win. Idiots like Sharpton believed it was because Obama and the terrorists could sit down and engage in peaceful talks, hold hands, chant to Allah and end all world problems.
The reality is, they supported Obama because he was the weakest of the two nominees. The terrorists want to attack us and they want to destroy us. They are smart enough to know they cannot do it by confronting us head on so they are doing it from within. They also know that a weak president will be more tolerant of the process and be lulled into a false sense of security. By the time the terrorists spring the trap, it will be too late. With four million people expected in DC for the coronation of King Hussein, maybe that test Biden talked about will come earlier rather than later. Four million people is a tempting target…
Obama won’t have to worry about any of that as long as he has his House Negroes like Al Sharpton in place to display the double standard.
An interesting year this has been. We have Al Sharpton as the House Negro to Obama, Obama as the House Negro to al Qaeda, and Obama as the Magic Negro to half the country…
New definition of Racist
Racist—n.,adj. 1. Any person who performs any act, holds any belief or makes any statement that negatively reflects upon or adversely affects Barack Obama or his policies, positions, interests, conduct, associates, or holiness. 2. Any act, belief or statement that negatively reflects upon or adversely affects Barack Obama or his policies, positions, interests, conduct, associates, or holiness. Synonyms: conservative; Republican; red state; rural; churchgoer; gun owner. [NRO]
Others:
Gateway Pundit
Tags: al-qaeda, house negro, Obama, race hustler, sharpton, terrorists
Soldiers Can Solve Detainee Problem
Jun 13, 2008 Political, Terrorism
The more liberal members of the US Supreme Court did something extraordinary yesterday when they conferred Constitutional protection on people who are not covered under our Constitution. The Constitution of the US is a document that applies to citizens and those here legally. By saying that the detainees at Gitmo have the same Constitutional rights as others (especially for acts committed outside the US) the court has weakened our country. What next, will it be OK for them to be released and walk around the US keeping and bearing arms? Will they be allowed to vote? If we say that they are protected by the Constitution it has to mean the whole document, not just a part of it.
I don’t understand why this is an issue to begin with. Why don’t we call them Prisoners of War and call Gitmo a POW camp? We will release them when the war is over just as we have done in other wars. If some of them are suspected of crimes then we should put them on trial and be done with it. If all else fails, send them to another country and release them. I think there are a few places where they could go and be treated very badly.
Our soldiers can solve part of this problem by not taking prisoners, excuse me, detainees. Kill them in battle and there will be no problem with Gitmo and the Supreme Court. This is something that is easy to do. Refuse to allow surrender except under the most obvious conditions such as they lay down their arms and lie down with their hands behind their heads. Shooting them then would be murder. Killing them while they still look ready to fight is not.
In the event that these animals absolutely have to be captured then they should never be taken to a base where the SCOTUS would have any say. Hold them in POW camps in other countries. I am all in favor of handing them over to the Iraqi military and letting them deal with them. If the whiners think these animals have been treated badly at Gitmo they should wait and see how they are treated in other places by other countries.
We have already seen where some of these so called innocent people have been recaptured or killed on the battlefield. One can only pray that if they are released they do not make their way to the US and detonate a bomb killing untold numbers of innocent civilians.
Of course, the five justices who decided this will never have to worry about being affected. They live in relative safety and that is unfortunate (not that they are safe but that it skews their view of how others are affected).
I wonder how these people would have ruled if one of those planes had been heading for the Supreme Court building?
Source:
My Way News
Tags: bad ruling, liberal justices, supreme court, terrorists
Some Advice for Israel
Jun 10, 2008 General
Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit has been in captivity for two years after he was abducted by militants in Gaza. He recently sent a letter begging his country not to forget him and that he wanted to be home. He also indicated that his health was failing. There is no reason that this soldier should still be in captivity. His country started fighting to get him back but the UN complained about the disproportionate response. Sadly, our own country worked to get the fighting stopped. The people who took Shalit will not let him go unless they are afraid. Here is what Israel should do:
Send notification to the UN that they have one week to get the soldier released. He needs to be alive and relatively unharmed. If, at the end of the week, the UN has failed to get him released Israel will give his captors an additional 24 hours to send him home. Israel needs to make it clear to the UN and to the terrorists holding him that they plan to bomb his captors into oblivion if they fail to release him as outlined.
Israel needs to make absolutely certain that the UN and the captors as well as those harboring them know that the bombing campaign will not stop until the place is leveled and every living thing is killed. Then, if he is not released, Israel needs to make good on the threat and they need to continue bombing the place until the soldier is released or everyone is killed. It is that simple and the UN needs to understand that Israel will not bow to pressure because they gave that body its chance.
If other countries feel the need to get involved Israel needs to make clear its intent to use nuclear weapons against any country that jumps into the fray. Israel should be relentless and keep killing until they put fear in the hearts of everyone so that they will be left alone. It should also be made clear that any news organization that gets in the way will be considered the enemy and dealt with. Israel does not need more of al-Reuters passing around a baby that Israel did not kill as propaganda.
Gilad Shalit might end up dying in the attack but it is obvious that he is in poor health and that his captors do not care about him. They can, of course, avoid a massacre by releasing the soldier. After the demands are made the ball will be in the court of the UN and the captors. The deadline might seem short but they have had two years to solve this problem.
It is time to stop playing games with these terrorists and start injecting them with fear instead.
Source:
breitbart
Tags: bombing, captive, gilad shalit, Israel, terrorists, war
The real Barack Hussein Obama
May 13, 2008 Political
This is an interesting video that lists some major issues with Barry Obama. It goes into detail to explain what black liberation theology is, who Cone was and what he wrote and how Barry connects with all this. The video lays out a firm foundation that explains why Barry does not honor our flag and why his wife has not, until recently, been proud of America.
It is 13 minutes long but well worth the time.
Find it at Eyeblast.tv
Tags: black liberation, Obama, radical, terrorists, unpatriotic, wright
I Don’t Care What Offends CAIR
Feb 21, 2008 Political, Religion of Peace
There is a little bit of flack going on right now because the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has complained to the FBI about some comments made at a few blogs. The blogs in question were Little Green Footballs and Gateway Pundit and evidently a commenter left something that suggested blowing up a minaret being built in St. Louis. The comment was removed when it was discovered but CAIR complained to the FBI and asked that they investigate. Of course, the FBI takes every case of threatened violence seriously, unless those threats are against people who are not Muslims.
I personally do not give a damn if CAIR gets upset. Sure, making a comment about blowing up a structure is over the top but this is America and the person, no matter how deranged, has a right to speak his mind and Charles Johnson had the right to remove the comment. If a person wants to write those things he should do it at his own blog so that others are not affected by it. BTW, the terrible thing Gateway Pundit did was comment on how the call to prayer would go over great in St. Louis. Oh my God, call the FBI. I think it was over the top and I probably would have removed it as well because it could be perceived as a threat. If someone were to say that he wished all Muslims would get struck by lightning and disappear or that he hated all Muslims, or that it would be nice if Iran’s nukes detonated and killed all of them then that would be OK because these cannot be perceived as a threat.
CAIR would object anyway but who gives a damn about them? They are a terrorist organization that supports terrorists. Ibrahim Hooper is an idiot who uses intimidation to stifle opposition to him and his group. He is the SS for the Nazi terrorists who carry out evil deeds in the name of Mohammad, the child molesting prophet. Well screw CAIR. I just don’t give a damn about what bothers them. I don’t care if their poor feelings got hurt because someone does not like them. They are upset because someone said something that might be an indication of violence. Where are these sand fleas when Ahmadinejad calls Jews a bacteria and says that Israel should be wiped off the map?
I will give a damn about what CAIR thinks and says when I am done giving a damn about all the Muslims who make threats to the US, to Israel and to the rest of our allies. I am still a bit busy giving a damn about Muslims blowing up retarded women and killing children, sawing off people’s heads and rioting over cartoons. I am busy giving a damn about Muslims who hijacked planes and flew them into buildings killing 3000 of my countrymen. So as far as CAIR goes my give a damn is a bit overwhelmed to really care what bothers them.
Those low life, cry babies at CAIR should start worrying about why people have a bad impression of Muslims. It is not because the world is full of bigots (most of the bigots are the Muslims anyway) or that we all hate brown people. We have a bad impression because Muslims still act like they are in the stone ages. If they want to worship a child molester that is their business but all this blowing people up and rioting every time someone breaks wind makes a bad impression. Couple that with the realization that most major acts of terror committed in the last 20 years have been by Muslims and CAIR’s complaints ring hollow. They can be upset but screw them.
Start acting like human beings and maybe people will treat you like human beings. As for the FBI, perhaps they should get up off their sixes and investigate CAIR and its ties to terror. Perhaps the FBI should be working to get this group out of this country so we do not have to be subjected to harassment by our government in the name of a terrorist organization.
CAIR is no good and they should not be here. If they don’t like what I have to say, screw them because I just don’t give a damn.
Sources:
Gates of Vienna
Atlas Shrugs
Tags: CAIR, complaints, harassment, Muslims, terrorists